Citations

Introduction: Carotid revascularization is known to prevent stroke in patients with high-grade carotid stenosis, but whether carotid revascularization may slow the progression of hemispheric WMD in patients with carotid stenosis to prevent cognitive decline have not been well described. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal study involving patients age ≥40 years with carotid stenosis on ultrasound from 2011-2015 with serial brain MRI scans at least 1 year apart followed for radiographic and clinical outcomes to 2020. Severity of carotid stenosis was defined as moderate 50-69%, high-grade 70-99%, or occluded. Hemispheric WMD volume was quantified from axial T2 FLAIR images. Patients were stratified by revascularization status. Primary outcome was change in WMD volume per year ipsilateral or contralateral to the index carotid. Hemispheric differences in the annual rate of WMD progression (cc/yr) were compared between revascularized vs not revascularized using multivariable linear regression analysis adjusted for variables that differed between revascularization status. Results: Of the 150 patients, moderate stenosis was present in 37.3%, high-grade stenosis in 42.0%, and carotid occlusion in 20.7%. Mean age was 71±10 years, 36.7% were female. Seventy-three (48.7%) had carotid revascularization with a median follow-up of 5.1 years. Baseline WMD volume was 4.86cc ipsilateral and 4.39cc contralateral to the index carotid. Patients who underwent revascularization trended to have slower WMD progression in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the index carotid compared to those not revascularized (0.32cc/yr vs 0.63 cc/yr, p=0.340). The same trend was not observed in the contralateral hemisphere. In adjusted models, carotid revascularization was associated with a 0.33 cc per year decrease in WMD progression between hemispheres compared to those not revascularized (β= -0.33, p=0.070). Conclusions: In this study with a median follow-up of 5 years, we found that carotid revascularization resulted in a 50% reduction in the annual rate of WMD progression. Intervention trials should test whether carotid revascularization slows WMD progression in patients with cognitive impairment to prevent further cerebrovascular events and cognitive decline.

Introduction: Collateral circulation plays a crucial role in determining the extent of brain tissue ischemia and functional outcome in large vessel occlusive (LVO) stroke. Heart failure (HF) is known to cause cerebral hypoperfusion, yet the relationship between HF and robustness of collateral flow has not been well described. Here we hypothesized that HF is associated with poor collateral flow and functional outcome in patients presenting with LVO treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Methods: A single center retrospective study of patients presenting with LVO ischemic stroke who underwent MT between 2012-2020 was done. Single-phase CTA of head prior to MT was used to assess collateral status with poor status defined as ≤ 50% filling and good status as >50% filling. Classification of HF by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on echocardiogram was used where HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) had LVEF ≤40%, HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) had LVEF ≥50% with evidence of structural heart disease, and no HF was LVEF≥50% without structural heart disease. Functional outcome was modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days with scores of 0-2 representing good outcome and 3-6 representing poor outcome. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between HF and poor collaterals after adjusting for vascular risk factors. Results: We identified 235 patients, mean age was 69 ±15 years, median NIHSS was 18, and 45.5% had HF (HFrEF 12.8%, HFmrEF 4.7%, HFpEF 28.1%) while 54.5% had no HF. Poor collaterals were seen in 47.7%, and those with HF were likely to have poor collaterals compared to those without HF (56.1% vs 35.1%, P=.001). There was a dose-dependent relationship between severity of HF and poor collaterals: adjusted odds of poor collaterals were 1.63 and 2.45 in HFpEF and HFrEF, compared to those without HF (trend p=.018). Patients with poor collaterals were likely to have poor outcome at 3 months compared to those with good collaterals (75.0% vs 57.8%; p=.015). Conclusion: Patients with HFrEF were twice as likely to have poor collaterals. This study demonstrated a likely mechanism for poor outcomes seen in ischemic stroke with HF, future studies may explore whether optimization of HF may augment collaterals to improve outcomes.

Introduction: Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is a genetic, progressive microangiopathy caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene. Patients often present with migraine and progressive subcortical infarcts resulting in vascular cognitive impairment and death. Currently, there are no disease modifying treatments. Limiting future trials is the lack of an objective construct to classify and monitor severity of disease. The purpose of this study was to gain experience with a novel CADASIL severity grading system. Methods: Neurologists at 5 academic centers retrospectively reviewed charts of those with confirmed CADASIL. Demographic and clinical data were recorded. The CADASIL severity grades were then assigned: 0 (asymptomatic), 1 (migraine alone), 2 (stroke or mild cognitive impairment), 3 (gait impairment or early dementia) and 4 (bedbound) based on available data. Standard descriptive statistical analyses were used. Results: We identified 138 patients; overall mean age of 50.9±13.1 years, 42.8% were men. 15 (10.9%) were grade 0, 50 (36.2%) were grade 1, 41 (44.2%) were grade 2, 12 (8.7%) were grade 3, and none were grade 4. Those with less severe disease tended to be younger, more likely men, had a lower rate of hypertension and diabetes mellitus and were less frequently tobacco users, Table 1. Increasing number of vascular risk factors was associated with higher severity grading. Conclusion: Our study highlights the ability of this severity scale to separate those with CADASIL into an ordinal system. As known in the literature, more advanced phenotypes of CADASIL tend to have more vascular risk factors. Future trials may consider utilizing this ordinal construct to monitor disease progression, response to therapy, or as a screening tool.

Abstract This study aimed to investigate the influence of stroke lesions in predefined highly interconnected (rich‐club) brain regions on functional outcome post‐stroke, determine their spatial specificity and explore the effects of biological sex on their relevance. We analyzed MRI data recorded at index stroke and ~3‐months modified Rankin Scale (mRS) data from patients with acute ischemic stroke enrolled in the multisite MRI‐GENIE study. Spatially normalized structural stroke lesions were parcellated into 108 atlas‐defined bilateral (sub)cortical brain regions. Unfavorable outcome (mRS > 2) was modeled in a Bayesian logistic regression framework. Effects of individual brain regions were captured as two compound effects for (i) six bilateral rich club and (ii) all further non‐rich club regions. In spatial specificity analyses, we randomized the split into “rich club” and “non‐rich club” regions and compared the effect of the actual rich club regions to the distribution of effects from 1000 combinations of six random regions. In sex‐specific analyses, we introduced an additional hierarchical level in our model structure to compare male and female‐specific rich club effects. A total of 822 patients (age: 64.7[15.0], 39% women) were analyzed. Rich club regions had substantial relevance in explaining unfavorable functional outcome (mean of posterior distribution: 0.08, area under the curve: 0.8). In particular, the rich club‐combination had a higher relevance than 98.4% of random constellations. Rich club regions were substantially more important in explaining long‐term outcome in women than in men. All in all, lesions in rich club regions were associated with increased odds of unfavorable outcome. These effects were spatially specific and more pronounced in women.

Background: Over 9 million dual-eligible beneficiaries rely on both Medicare and Medicaid to obtain critical medical services. Medicaid serves as a safety net for low-income Medicare beneficiaries with limited assets; however, it is unknown whether dual-eligible patients have comparable outcomes for procedures to non-dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries. We compared outcomes by dual-eligible status for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Methods: We identified Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥65y who underwent CEA (ICD-9 38.12) from 2003-2010. Beneficiaries with ≥1m of Medicaid coverage were considered dual eligible. We fit mixed models with a random intercept for state and adjustment for demographics, comorbidities, and symptomatic status to assess the relationship between dual-eligible status and outcomes. Results: A total of 35,832 dual-eligible and 470,134 non-dual-eligible beneficiaries were hospitalized for CEA during the study period. The percentage of dual-eligible CEA patients decreased from 7.9% in 2003 to 6.7% in 2010. Dual eligibles were more likely to be younger, female, of nonwhite race, and living with comorbid conditions (e.g., heart failure, renal failure, diabetes) and symptomatic carotid disease. Dual eligibles had higher 30d composite outcomes including stroke (Table), but the associations with 1y stroke became nonsignificant from 2003-2010. Dual-eligible status was associated with higher 30d and 1y mortality after CEA throughout the study period. Conclusions: Dual-eligible Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries had worse short-term stroke and mortality outcomes than other beneficiaries, even after adjustment for comorbidities. Our results indicate a need to understand factors contributing to poorer outcomes. Challenges include the split accountability between the two programs and the diverse sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and generally poorer health of the patients.

Background: Race-ethnic disparities in stroke care can contribute to inequality in stroke outcomes. We sought to determine the disparities in stroke performance metrics by race-ethnicity in a voluntary stroke registry of Florida and Puerto Rico Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-S) data. Methods: Sixty-three sites who had enrolled in the FL-PR Stroke Registry (54 FL; 9 PR) recorded 38,684 ischemic stroke cases from 2010 to 2013. Generalized linear regression models were used to evaluate race-ethnic differences in 7 pre-defined acute stroke performance measures and defect-free care (IV tPA treatment, in-hospital antithrombotic therapy, DVT prophylaxis, antithrombotic therapy at discharge, anticoagulation therapy, statin medication at discharge, and smoking cessation counseling), adjusting for age and region (FL vs. PR). Results: Of acute ischemic stroke cases, 63% were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 18% NH-Black (NHB), and 17% Hispanic. The mean age was 71±14 years. NHW were older (73±14), followed by Hispanics (70±14), and NHB (63±14); p<0.0001. Defect-free care was better among NHB (78%) and NHW (76%) than in Hispanics (68%), p<0.0001. Defect-free care improved over time and the race-ethnic disparity decreased (2010: NHW 61%, NHB 64%, Hispanic 46%, p<0.0001; 2013: 91%, 91%, 86%, p=0.47 respectively). NHW were most likely to receive IV tPA treatment (arrived by 2 hours and treated by 3 hours; 88%) and early antithrombotic treatment (96%). Hispanics were least likely to receive DVT prophylaxis (76%), anticoagulation (92%), statins (89%), and smoking cessation counseling (93%). Conclusions: Race-ethnic disparities in acute stroke care are evident yet decreasing, coinciding with improvements in quality of care over time in Florida and Puerto Rico hospitals participating in GWTG-S. Special stroke quality improvement programs to target areas where performance is less than expected and minimize race-ethnic disparities are necessary to improve stroke care for all Americans.

Background: Higher prevalence of stroke in women and sex-specific disparities in stroke care are reported. We sought to determine sex-specific differences in stroke performance metrics in a large quality improvement registry of Florida and Puerto Rico based on Get With The Guidelines-Stroke (GWTG-S). Methods: 38,684 (49% women) acute ischemic stroke patients were included from 63 sites (54 FL; 9 PR) from 2010 to 2013. Logistic regression was used to evaluate sex-specific differences in defect-free care (IV tPA therapy, in-hospital antithrombotic therapy, DVT prophylaxis, antithrombotic therapy at discharge, anticoagulation therapy, statin medication at discharge, smoking cessation counseling) adjusting for age and race-ethnicity. Results: As compared to men, women were older (73±15 vs. 69±14 years; p<0.0001), less likely Hispanic (17% vs. 18%; p=0.0001), with lower age- and race-ethnic-adjusted rates of hypertension (34% vs. 37%; p=0.0009) and smoking (13% vs. 21%; p<0.0001), but higher rates of atrial fibrillation (18% vs. 16%; p=0.02). Overall, 9% of patients received thrombolysis. Women were less likely to receive thrombolysis (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.99) and less likely to have door-to-needle time <1 hour (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97). Overall, defect-free care was 75% in women and 76% in men (lower early antithrombotic therapy [OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96], less antithrombotic at discharge [OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.99], less statin therapy at discharge [OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88] and less smoking cessation counseling [OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98]). Defect- free care improved over the study period; it was significantly lower in women vs. men in 2010 (58.2% vs. 60.7%, p=0.005), but similar in 2013 (90.2% vs 90.0%; p=0.64). Conclusions: Women eligible to receive IV tPA for acute ischemic stroke were less likely to be treated and received less defect-free care compared to men, but these measures improved over time. These findings suggest that the adoption of GWTG-S quality improvement program helps reduce sex disparities in quality of care for acute ischemic stroke patients.