Citations

AbstractObjectivePrevious studies have suggested a high incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart transplant recipients. However, incidence trends of AF in heart transplant recipients remain unclear. The study's aims were (1) to investigate the pooled incidence/incidence trends of AF following heart transplantation and (2) to assess the mortality risk of heart transplant recipients with AF.MethodsA literature search for studies that reported the incidence of AF following heart transplantation was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Database from inception through March 2018. Pooled incidence and odds ratios (OR) with 95%CI were calculated using a random‐effects model.ResultsEighteen studies (2 cohorts from clinical trials and 16 cohort studies) with 5393 heart transplant recipients were enrolled. The pooled estimated incidence of AF in heart transplant was 10.1% (95%CI: 7.6%‐13.2%). Meta‐analysis based on the type of anastomotic technique demonstrated a pooled estimated incidence of AF following heart transplantation of 18.7% (95%CI: 10.3%‐31.5%) and 11.1% (95%CI: 6.5%‐18.4%) by biatrial and bicaval techniques, respectively. There was a significant association between AF following a heart transplant and increased mortality risk with a pooled OR of 2.86 (95%CI: 2.08‐3.93). Meta‐regression analyses showed no significant correlations between the year of study and incidence of AF (P = 0.47) or mortality risk of AF after heart transplantation (P = 0.99).ConclusionsThe overall estimated incidence of AF following heart transplantation is 10.1%. There is a significant association between AF and increased mortality after transplantation. Furthermore, incidence and mortality risk of AF following heart transplant does not seem to decrease over time.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the most common renal cell carcinoma subtype, and metastatic ccRCC is associated with 5-year survival rates of 10% to 20%. Genetically, ccRCC originates from sequential losses of multiple tumor suppressor genes. Remarkably, chromosome 3p loss occurs in more than 90% of sporadic ccRCCs. This results in concurrent one-copy loss of four tumor suppressor genes that are also mutated individually at high frequency in ccRCC (ie, VHL, 80%; PBRM1, 29% to 46%; BAP1, 6% to 19%; and SETD2, 8% to 30%). Pathogenically, 3p loss probably represents the first genetic event that occurs in sporadic ccRCC and the second genetic event in VHL-mutated hereditary ccRCC. VHL constitutes the substrate recognition module of the VCB-Cul2 E3 ligase that degrades HIF1/2α, whereas PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2 are epigenetic modulators that regulate gene transcription. Because 3p loss and VHL inactivation are nearly universal truncal events in ccRCC, the resulting HIF1/2 signaling overdrive and accompanied tumor hypervascularization probably underlie the therapeutic benefits observed with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, including sorafenib, sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, bevacizumab, cabozantinib, and lenvatinib. Furthermore, recent marked advances in ccRCC genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, molecular mechanisms, mouse models, prognostic and predictive biomarkers, and clinical trials have rendered invaluable translational insights concerning precision kidney cancer therapeutics. With an armamentarium encompassing 13 drugs that exploit seven unique therapeutic mechanisms (ie, cytokines, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, mTORC1, cMET/AXL, fibroblast growth factor receptor, programmed cell death-1 and programmed death-ligand 1, and cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte associated-4) to treat metastatic renal cell carcinoma, one of the imminent clinical questions concerning care of patients with metastatic ccRCC is how a personalized treatment strategy, through rationally combining and sequencing different therapeutic modalities, can be formulated to offer the best clinical outcome for individual patients. Here, we attempt to integrate recent discoveries of immediate translational impacts and discuss future translational challenges and opportunities.

OBJECTIVES: Prokinetics are recommended for the treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD) but systematic reviews give conflicting results on the efficacy of these agents. We have therefore conducted an updated systematic review to support the 2017 joint ACG/CAG dyspepsia guidelines. METHODS: Electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL, were searched until September 2017 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing either prokinetics and placebo or two types of prokinetics to improve FD symptoms. The primary outcome was absence or improvement of dyspeptic symptoms at the end of treatment. Double-blind eligibility assessment and data extraction was performed. Pooled risk ratios of symptoms persisting or adverse events occurring, and standardized mean difference of quality-of-life (QoL) scores with 95% CI, using a random effects model, were calculated. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: The search identified 1388 citations; 38 studies in 35 papers were included. Of these, 29 trials comparing prokinetics with placebo were found. There was a statistically significant effect of prokinetic treatment in reducing global symptoms of FD (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89; I 2 91%; NNT 7), regardless of FD subtype or ethnicity. When comparing two types of prokinetic, the most commonly used comparator was domperidone. There was no difference in reducing global symptoms (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.07). QoL was not improved with prokinetic treatment. The adverse events with individual prokinetics were not different from placebo, except for cisapride. The GRADE assessment rated the quality of the evidence in each outcome as very low. CONCLUSIONS: From the current evidence, prokinetics may be effective for the treatment in all subtypes of FD, with very low quality of evidence. There was no difference between prokinetics for dyspeptic symptom improvement. High-quality RCTs with large sample sizes of FD patients are needed to verify the efficacy of prokinetics.

11503 Background: Cancer Associated Macrophage-Like cells (CAMLs) are a recently described circulating stromal cell subtype commonly found in the peripheral blood of patients in all stages of solid malignancies and in a variety of cancer subtypes. However, while their biological association to cancer is being studied, their clinical utilization as it relates to cancer prognosis has not been evaluated. Methods: A two year prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the relationship of CAMLs and overall survival (OS) in 6 solid tumor types. The single blind multi-institutional study consisted of 269 stage I-IV patients; breast (n = 57), esophageal (n = 21), prostate (n = 43), pancreatic (n = 59), lung (n = 54), and renal cell (n = 35), in treatment (n = 134) and untreated baseline (n = 135). 7.5mL of whole blood was filtered by CellSieve microfiltration assay and CAMLs enumerated, as previously described. Patients were grouped by CAML number ( < 6 or ≥6) and by size ( < 49 or ≥50 µm) to evaluate hazard ratios (HR) by censored univariate & multivariate analysis. Results: CAMLs were identified in 93% of samples, averaging 8.2 CAMLs/7.5mL blood sample, and found in all 6 cancers at baseline and during treatment. Average CAML number was associated with disease stage and CAML positivity was 4.4 & 80% (Stage I), 4.7 & 93% (Stage II), 9.3 & 98% (Stage 3), 12.1 & 97% (Stage IV). Univariate analysis of patients (n = 269) stratified by ≥6 CAMLs had reduced OS (HR = 1.8, 95%CI 1.1-2.9, p = 0.03). Further, CAML size also had reduced OS in patients with ≥50 µm CAMLs (HR = 2.7, 95%CI 1.8-4.0, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Our data suggests that in solid malignancies, CAML number and size appear to clinically correlate with OS in early and late stage disease. Given these results relating CAMLs with OS, further analysis is warranted to determine if CAMLs can serve as a clinically-relevant blood-based marker.

5053 Background: Genomic aberrations associated with resistance/response to AA/P are not known. In a prospective study we assessed whole-exome/RNA-seq based aberrations in CRPC metastatic biopsies for identifying molecular markers associated with primary resistance and response duration. Methods: Sequencing of metastatic biopsies was performed for analyzing molecular aberrations that predict primary resistance (defined as progression at 12-weeks of therapy (non-responders) using PSA, RECIST, bone scan criteria per PCWG2). Gene network analysis was performed in genes mutated more frequently in non-responders and in genes differentially expressed between non-responders and responders using a “risk ratio” (RR) of ≥2. Cox regression models with multiple gene network pathways were used for determining association with time to treatment change (TTTC). Results: Of 92 enrolled pts 82 had complete whole-exome, RNA-seq & 12-week outcome data available for analysis. At 12-weeks 33/82 had progressed. Using a RR of ≥2, 113 genes were more frequently mutated in non-responders & 292 in responders. In non-responders, gene network analysis revealed frequent mutations in Wnt/β-catenin pathway genes; frequent deletion of negative regulators of Wnt pathway ( DKK4, SFRP2, LRP6). Gene expression analyses revealed significantly reduced expression levels of Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors and increased expression levels of cell cycle proliferation (CCP) genes in non-responders. Median study follow up was 32 months during which time 58/82 pts progressed and switched treatments. Median TTTC was 10.1 months (IQR:4.4-24.1). In multivariate analysis CCP scores of ≥50 predicted shorter TTTC (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.17-3.80; p = 0.01). Conclusions: In metastases Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation is associated with primary AA/P resistance and increased CCP with acquired drug resistance. These findings offer molecular based predictive biomarkers in CRPC stage treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT#01953640.

e15567 Background: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) prognosis is poor and there is a need to identify patients that benefit most from neoadjuvant therapy. To examine the association of various biomarkers with clinical outcomes in neoadjuvant treatment of EAC, we retrospectively evaluated the biomarker expression (TS, ERCC1, TOPO1, PD-L1, PD-1) in patient matched formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples. Methods: Immunohistochemistry of TS (TS106/4H4B1) , ERCC1 (Ab. 8F1), TOPO1 (1D6), PD-L1 (both 22c3 and SP142), PD-1 (NAT105), and chromogenic in-situ hybridization (CISH) of Her2 were performed on FFPE samples from 35 patients across 2 institutions at time of EAC diagnosis and after treatment when available. Retrospective clinical data and survival (5/2006-1/2016) was analyzed with a mean follow up of 110 months (range 22-306). Results: Overexpression (pre/post-treatment) of TS (60%/54%), ERCC1 (69%/16%), TOPO1 (74%/50%), PD-1 (54%/63%), PD-L1 (SP142) (2.9%/4%), PD-L1 (22c3) (0%/4%) and amplification of Her2 (18%/23%) were observed. Pretreatment observed PD-L1 levels were lower in our study (3%) when compared to other studies in EAC specimens (35%). Immunohistochemistry and changes observed after chemoradiation are reviewed in Table. No markers had significant correlation with prognosis however TS negative expression showed a non-significant (p=0.15) trend towards improved survival. Conclusions: Analyzing biomarkers in our neoadjuvant EAC cohort demonstrated a lower than expected PD-L1 positivity. In the largest cohort, to our knowledge, of patient matched FFPE tumor samples, we did not observe a statistically significant association between TS, ERCC1, TOPO1, PD-L1, or PD-1 with improved clinical outcomes. [Table: see text]

e15563 Background: Expression of thymidylate synthase (TS), a target of fluoropyrimidine-based (5-FU) chemotherapy, has prognostic value in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Its value as a biomarker in treatment of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is unknown. With widespread adoption of CROSS trial protocol for treatment of EAC, 5-FU is frequently omitted from regimens. We retrospectively analyzed the association between TS protein expression and clinical outcomes in EAC. Methods: TS expression levels were measured by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens from 35 primary EAC patients from 2 institutions (range 5/2006-1/2016); at time of diagnosis and surgical resection (33 neoadjuvant chemoradiation and 2 surgery alone). TS expression higher than 1+, 5% was read as positive. Mean follow up was 1323 days (range 263-3677). TS expression correlated with treatment response and survival in patients treated with and without 5-FU therapy (log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier method). Results: In the cohort of 35 patients, 21 patients (60%) had pretreatment positive TS expression. Overall survival (OS) for TS negative patients was 1216 days versus 974 days for TS positive (p = 0.15). In the 23 patients treated with 5-FU, TS-negative patients had a trend towards longer overall survival compared to TS-positive patients, mean OS (1272 days versus 743 days, p = 0.08). In the group of 12 patients not treated with 5-FU, 2 patients showed negative TS staining. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation was performed in 33/35 patients. Downstaging was observed in 69% (9/13) of patients with negative pre-treatment TS levels versus 55% (11/20) in pre-treatment TS positive patients (p = 0.48). In 23 patients treated with 5FU, 9/12 (75%) were downstaged in the TS-negative cohort versus 6/11 (45%) in the TS-positive cohort (p = 0.21). In the 5FU treatment group, complete response was seen in 2 patients with negative TS staining. Conclusions: Low TS expression in EAC patients trended towards improved survival and tumor downstaging, particularly in patients treated with neoadjuvant 5-FU and platinum based therapy. Prospective data and greater patient numbers may be necessary to demonstrate statistical significance.