Citations

ABSTRACT Background Penile length loss and erectile dysfunction (ED) are common post-prostatectomy. Recent results from a randomized, controlled study (RCT) of RestoreX penile traction therapy (RxPTT) demonstrated preserved erectile function and penile length improvements in men post-prostatectomy. Objective To report outcomes of the open label phase (6-9 month time point) of the previously noted RCT comparing efficacy of RxPTT to control in men post-prostatectomy. Methods A randomized, controlled trial (NCT03500419) has been completed of 82 men post-prostatectomy. Men were randomized 1-month post-prostatectomy to no therapy (control, n=27) or RxPTT (n=55) for 5 months. Participants then entered an open label phase for 3 months. Assessments included stretched penile length (corona), standardized (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]), and non-standardized questionnaires. Comparisons were performed of men who utilized traction at least 15 minutes daily for both phases to men who were originally control and continued with no treatment (as-treated analysis). Analyses were also performed of men who crossed over from control to >15 min daily (crossover to treatment) and those who were originally in the treatment group and continued with >15 min daily use during the open label phase (ongoing treatment). Results Of the 82 men enrolled (mean age 58.6), 55 had 6-month, and 42 had 9-month data available to review. Baseline characteristics (IIEF scores, penile length) were similar between cohorts. In the as-treated analysis (no treatment n=7, RxPTT x 8 months n=12, respectively), differences were as noted: IIEF-EFD (-8 vs -0.5, p=0.19), IIEF-OFD (-3 vs -2, p=0.86), IIEF-SD (-1 vs 0.5, p=0.09), IIEF-ISD (-3 vs -0.5, p=0.31), IIEF-OSD (-2 vs 0, p=0.29), penile length (-0.1 vs +1.8 cm, p<0.01), PDE5 use (86% vs 75%, p=0.57), intracavernosal injection use (86% vs 17%, p<0.01). Comparing men who did not use therapy at any time (n=7) to those who crossed over to RxPTT during the open label phase (n=8) demonstrated the following results: IIEF-EFD (-8 vs -6, p=0.49), IIEF-OFD (-3 vs -1, p=0.90), IIEF-SD (-1 vs 0, p=0.55), IIEF-ISD (-3 vs -1, p=0.45), IIEF-OSD (-2 vs -1, p=0.51), penile length (-0.1 vs +0.69 cm, p=0.39). Men who crossed over from RxPTT to no treatment (n=10) had relatively preserved improvements compared to those who continued with RxPTT during the open label phase (n=12) compared to baseline, respectively: IIEF-EFD (0 vs -0.5, p=0.95), IIEF-OFD (-3.5 vs -2, p=0.97), IIEF-SD (0 vs 0.5, p=0.18), IIEF-ISD (0 vs -0.5, p=0.87), IIEF-OSD (0 vs 0, p=0.66), penile length (+1.8 vs +1.8, p=0.99). Conclusions Although sample size and statistical power are limited, results from the open label phase confirm earlier findings of preserved sexual function and penile length in men treated with RxPTT compared to controls. Men who crossed over from controls to treatment experience benefits, although not as significant as those who were treated beginning at 1 month post-prostatectomy. Men who stopped therapy after 6 months demonstrated stable improvements from baseline, suggesting a preserved effect of RxPTT even after discontinuing use. If validated with external series, these findings would represent a significant advancement in the prevention of sexual dysfunction post-prostatectomy. Disclosure Work supported by industry: no.

ABSTRACT Introduction Covid-19 has helped drive all forms of medicine away from traditional brick and mortar medical interactions. Given the availability of online services to obtain treatments for ED, we developed a website to facilitate patient education, triage and men's health appointment scheduling. Objective We sought to assess characteristics of men who utilized a novel website to treat their ED. Methods We report on 50 patients who ultimately booked and attended appointments (video or in person) for erectile dysfunction. Patients found our website through our institution's main informational ED pages or through youtube links from our men's health video playlist library. Patients create an institutional account and are then asked a series of MD created questions designed to streamline patient triage and complete the majority of chart documentation ahead of the appointment. Patients are then sent videos relevant to their condition and future appointment options. Results 2300 users investigated the ED portion of the website with 1.8% of patients ultimately following through with an appointment. 13% of patients who explored the ED portion of the site created a user account that allows a questionnaire to be taken. 90% of men who began the ED questionnaire completed with a mean time of 11 minutes. 52% of men offered an appointment based on their responses completed the patient scheduling form. 71% of traffic was on mobile devices with 29% on desktop/tablet. Site use by time of day is shown in figure 1. Mean age of patients was 53. 92% of patients had ED that occurred > 6 months. Mean SHIM score was 8.2 (IQR 4-12). 80% of participants had both desire and opportunity for sexual activity, 20% did not meet both criteria and thus SHIM scores were less valid for these men. Of the users 28% had never tried pde5s, 32% had partial success with pde5s, 24% could not tolerate or afford pde5s and 42% had unsatisfactory results with pde5s. PDE5 naïve patients were seen by an internal medicine MD specializing in men's health, 10 were seen by surgeons as they requested IPPs and the rest were seen by a combination of men's health APPS and urology attendings for second line treatments and penile doppler. Interestingly, 66% of men were interested in undergoing penile doppler to better understand the etiology of their ED. Hypertension (40%) and diabetes (22%) were the most common medical comorbidities. 36% of the cohort had a strong family history of cardiac disease. Conclusions Men with ED can be effectively triaged through a website application. Most men with pde5 refractory ED wish to pursue penile doppler. The majority of patients seen had watched educational video material ahead of time, facilitating a more sophisticated and streamlined patient interaction. Disclosure No

ABSTRACT Introduction The significant overlap of risk factors for erectile dysfunction and venous thromboembolism (VTE) may disproportionally increase the risk of VTE in men undergoing inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery. Owing to the absence of available literature, AUA and EAU perioperative VTE guidelines do not address VTE risk with IPP surgery and generally recommend against pharmacologic prophylaxis with outpatient surgery. The Caprini Score is a validated scoring system to estimate VTE risk in the perioperative period. Objective We sought to assess the risk of VTE by calculating Caprini Scores in men undergoing IPP surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed and calculated Caprini Scores for patients undergoing IPP surgery at our institution between July 2017 and June 2019. Results 215 patients undergoing IPP surgery were identified with a mean and median Caprini score of 5.96 (SD, 1.63) and 6 (IQR 5,7), respectively. 84% of the cohort was classified as high or highest risk for VTE (Figure 1). This is in part due to our cohort's mean age of 64, mean BMI of 31 and history of prostate cancer treatment as the cause of ED. Prior history of VTE (deep vein thrombosis(DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE)was identified in 17 (8%) patients with 5 (2%) have a history of both DVT and PE. Conclusions Men undergoing IPP surgery are high risk for VTE based on Caprini score assessment. VTE prophylaxis should be considered in men undergoing penile implant surgery. Before widespread application, long-term data is necessary to assess safety and efficacy of VTE prophylaxis in the IPP surgery population. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Senior author consultant for Coloplast

ABSTRACT Introduction Chronic pelvic and/or genital pain is a disabling condition and commonly associated with poor quality of life, impaired sexual function and decreased productivity. Objective To examine treatment outcomes among a cohort of patients diagnosed with refractory pelvic and/or genital pain enrolled in a 3-week interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP). Methods A series of with-in subjects ANOVAs (corrected for multiple comparisons) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of IPRP on self-report (pain severity, interference, depressive symptoms, quality of life) and observer-rated outcome (5 minute walk) among 15 treated patients receiving care at the Mayo Clinic IPRP between 2016-2018. Results Fifteen patients (5 male, 10 female) were identified. Mean age was 47.0 (range: 24-78) and primary diagnoses were pelvic pain (n=13) and penile pain (n=2). Significant within-subject effects were detected for all self-report outcomes and the 5-minute walk test (see table 1). Six patients were on opioid therapy (MME = 49mg), and all but one successfully tapered off opioids. In the remaining patient, daily MME decreased from 150 mg to 30 mg. Conclusions Intensive outpatient IPRP significantly improves quality of life for patients with treatment-refractory chronic pelvic and/or genital pain. These results support multi-disciplinary treatment paradigms for refractory urogenital pain. Disclosure No

ABSTRACT Introduction IPP revision after implant malfunction yields rare insight into patient preference and perception of penile implant variations in brand and size. Objective To assess patients’ perception of their penile implant after IPP revision. Methods Retrospective review of all patients undergoing revision surgery for purely mechanical malfunction (fluid leak) at our institution since 2017. Patients with greater than 6 months follow-up after revision were contacted to comment on changes in penile size and device preference. Patients were asked 1. “Did you notice any change in penile length or girth after your last surgery, explain, and 2. “Please describe your preference (if any) of implant and why”. We utilize the Coloplast Titan with “classic” (genesis) pump in most cases, with AMS Cx cylinders being used in cases with attenuated corpora (aneurysm). Results 21 patients were identified that met criteria with an average age of 70. 15/21 were successfully contacted. 9 Coloplast, 2 Mentor, and 12 AMS devices (Cx =7, LGX =4, Ultrex =1) were revised. Device brand used to replace the broken IPP was n= 19 for Coloplast and n=3 for AMS (Cx =2, Lgx =1). Mean and median time to revision was 9 years overall (2-26) and was similar between Coloplast and AMS. Fluid leak location showed no discernable pattern. Total average implant length increased 2.2 cm from 20.6 cm to 22.8 cm. 8/10 patients were reached that had had both AMS and Coloplast devices (all AMS initially). 12 patients stayed within the manufacturer. Despite change in implanted length, most patients did not discern a definitive change in penile length unless cylinders increased by > 3 cm (perhaps reflecting under-sizing of initial implant). All patients correctly described improvement or no change in penile girth when compared to actual cylinder sizes. Patients preferred Coloplast (6 – girth/erection quality/pump), AMS (1 pump/flaccidity) and undecided (1). Several patients felt consistently cycling the device after revision led to relative length improvement and ease of use. Conclusions Our small cohort of IPP revision patients for mechanical failure reveals that revision often requires longer cylinders but this is often imperceptible to the patient. Increased cylinder girth was a key factor in driving device preference. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Senior author consultant for Coloplast

ABSTRACT Introduction Patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) placement has been linked to preexisting curvature. Intraoperative findings such as curvature on artificial erection (AE) or asymmetric corporal measurements (ACM) are incompletely characterized in terms of impact on IPP outcome. Objective We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of AE and the significance of ACM during IPP surgery. Methods A single institution retrospective review of patients undergoing primary IPP placement between 7/2019-9/2020 was performed. Patient characteristics and intraoperative measurements were compared. Threshold for statistical significance was p≤0.05. Results A total of 130 patients underwent primary placement of penile prosthesis. Median age was 67 years (IQR 13). Comorbidities included prostatectomy in 33.8%, and known Peyronie's disease in 21.5%. Of the 27.7% (n=36) of patients who underwent intraoperative AE, 63.9% (n=23) had visible curvature. Of the patients with visible curvature, 70% (n=16) had a preoperative diagnosis of Peyronie's disease and 56.3% (n=9) underwent straightening procedures compared to 28.6% (n=2) of the 30% (n=7) with no known curvature. Incision and grafting was most frequently performed (6/11)- with a minority undergoing plication (2/11). Of the 72.3% (n=94) who did not undergo AE, only 2.1% (n=2) required additional measures for curvature correction. Median corporal measurement was 21 (IQR 2) bilaterally and median cylinder size 20 cm (IQR 4) bilaterally with 1cm rear tip extenders. Of the 18.5% (24/130) of patients with ACM, asymmetry was as follows: 20.8% (5/24) had less than 1 cm, 70.8% (17/24) had 1 to <2 cm, and 8.3% (2/24) had 2 cm or greater. Of these patients 87.5% (21/24) underwent placement of an asymmetric device, only 5% (1/21) of which had residual curvature less than 30 degrees. Despite ACMs, 12.5% (3/24) of patients had a symmetric device placed, one of which had residual curvature. Only 2 patients underwent straightening procedures including plication and incision/grafting. Conclusions Intraoperative AE is effective at revealing occult penile curvature at time of IPP placement, however most men with newly detected curvature do not require additional straightening measures. We also found that 1 in 5 patients undergoing IPP had ACM but this did not correspond to residual curvature following IPP or requirement for adjunct straightening. These findings may provide reassurance to urologists who do not routinely perform AE or those who encounter ACM during corporal dilation Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Boston Scientific, Coloplast

ABSTRACT Introduction Women in healthcare are faced with unique challenges that may increase their risk of infertility including irregular work hours, occupational hazards due to radiation or chemicals, and advanced maternal age. Objective We sought to investigate live birth rates of female healthcare workers presenting with infertility compared to their non-healthcare counterparts. Methods After obtaining IRB approval, a retrospective review of all hospital employees (and their partners) presenting for a fertility evaluation between 2013-2019 was conducted. Patient age, BMI, history of previous live birth, occupation, use of assisted reproductive technology and female fertility factor were recorded. Couples with at least 12 months of follow up from initial presentation as well as a documented semen analysis were included in the study. Normal semen parameters were defined by the World Health Organization 2010 criteria. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of live birth. Results Of the 934 female partners identified, 445 were healthcare workers and 489 non-healthcare workers. Female age, female BMI, smoking status, and history of previous live birth were not statistically significant between groups. No differences in male partner age, male BMI, semen parameters and presence of male factor were noted. Live birth rate was greater in female health care workers compared to non-healthcare workers, 76.1 vs. 69.6%, respectively, p=0.042. Conclusions In this cohort of hospital employees, female healthcare workers had a higher live birth rate despite no differences in age, BMI, rate of female factor infertility, use of assisted reproductive technology, or male partner factors. While no differences in fertility were noted for female health care workers in this study, further research is needed to identify subgroups within the healthcare population that may be at greater risk for infertility. Disclosure No

ABSTRACT Introduction Erectile dysfunction (ED) stems from a variety of etiologies and often requires a multidisciplinary approach to optimize patient care. Objective We sought to assess attitudes and confidence regarding the treatment of erectile dysfunction across different provider types. Methods Anonymous, email-based survey of physicians and advanced practice providers in the disciplines of urology, internal medicine, and family medicine. Responses were recorded using a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistical analysis of survey response data was performed. Results With 76 providers on this ongoing survey including 31 internists, 24 family physicians, and 21 urologists, 88% of providers believed there to be good options for erectile dysfunction after failing pills. Figure 1 shows attitudes of the modalities of “good” options and confidence in the ability to counsel about these options. Regarding if most patients report willingness to consider surgical intervention for ED when counseled about it an equal portion of providers had positive, neutral, and negative feedback. Figure 2 lists other specific attitudes and opinions about penile prosthesis (IPP) implants. Moreover, 78% emphasized the necessity of a multidisciplinary team-based approach to ED patients. However, only 30% of the participants were in agreement with referrals to specialists in sexual health including urologists. Conclusions This survey indicates a knowledge gap and low comfort level in 2nd and 3rd line ED treatments. Focused education on penile implant outcomes appears particularly helpful. Disclosure No

ABSTRACT Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on global health. During uncertain times, priorities amongst patients shifted as many faced health concerns, economic uncertainty, and isolation. Access to general medical care during 2020 was challenging for many Americans who spent the year in quarantine. Without access to care, we hypothesize that patients were less likely to search for treatment options for a non-emergent condition like erectile dysfunction. Objective Herein, we aim to report on Google search trends observed in the pre COVID and post COVID era. Methods Google Trends was analyzed using search terms related to erectile dysfunction between June 2018 and June 2021. The search volume index (SVI), a relative measure of search volume on Google, was obtained for the following terms: erectile dysfunction, viagra, trimix, penile pump, and penile implant. Student t test was used to compare changes in mean SVI for each month compared to the same month one year prior. Results Compared to one year prior, the search for erectile dysfunction remained relatively stable over time with the exception of three months (9% decline Mar 2020, 38% increase Jan 2021, 8% increase Jun 2021). When compared to the preceding year, searches for Viagra declined during 9/37 (24%) months analyzed including Mar-Jun 2020, which coincided with the early part of the COVID-19 pandemic (p<0.05 for all). The only statistically significant increase occurred Oct 2020, a 16% change compared to Oct 2019 (p<0.05). In contrast, search for trimix did not change significantly over time except for an increase of 62% Mar 2021 and 60% Apr 2021 (p<0.05 for all). Search for the term penile pump did not change over time except for a 16 and 10% decline early during the pandemic, Feb and Mar 2020, respectively (p<0.05 for all). Lastly, search for penile implant declined 37% Mar 2020 and 32% Apr 2020 compared to 2019, and increased by 67% May 2021 compared to May 2020 (p<0.05 for all). Conclusions COVID-19 represented a major global health crisis, raising concerns and uncertainties for many. Erectile dysfunction remained a constant source of online interest. Despite limited access to medical care for elective conditions, only a few isolated increases in Google SVI were noted, most of which occurred during 2021 compared to 2020. This may be a reflection of the general public's lack of familiarity with treatments other than phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. Disclosure No

ABSTRACT Introduction Introduction:: Chronic scrotal content pain (CSCP) is generally defined by persistent and bothersome pain present for > 3-months. This symptom complex leads to frustration for patients and providers alike, as the underlying etiology varies and in many instances is unknown. Scrotal pain may arise from outside the scrotal contents, as is seen with musculoskeletal conditions involving the hips, lower back, and pelvic musculature. Identifying those patients who have signs or symptoms of a musculoskeletal etiology earlier in their clinical course will allow for a more streamlined treatment pathway and minimize the need for unnecessary referrals. Objective To review historical and examination findings in patients presenting to a tertiary care center for evaluation of chronic testicular pain. Methods We reviewed our clinical experience with referrals for surgical intervention for “chronic testicular pain” at a tertiary care medical center between July 2019 and October 2020. Prior to scheduling an appointment, patients are queried via a list of questions to gather additional information in order to determine whether specialist consultation is indicated. Pertinent information was collected including historical patient data, physical examination findings, laboratory and imaging results, and treatment as recommended by the assessing physician. In addition, we gathered data on the number of prior consults and interventions performed by outside clinicians. The data was summarized to present a cross-sectional representation of patients presenting for CSCP. Results In total, 126 patients were seen for a primary chief complaint of CSCP. Mean patient age was 45 years [standard deviation (SD) 15]. 31 (24%), 55 (44%), and 40 (32%) were self-referred or referred by their primary care provider or a urologist, respectively. 88 patients (70%) had seen at least one prior urologist. 22/126 (17%) reported bilateral testicular pain. 29 patients (24%) had undergone a prior unsuccessful surgical intervention for their pain. On examination, reproducible testicular tenderness was present in only 57 patients (45%), despite 109 patients (87%) stating testicular pain as their primary chief complaint. Digital rectal examination of the pelvic floor musculature was positive for tenderness in 31/126 patients (25%), suggesting a possible pelvic floor contribution. After thorough assessment, musculoskeletal etiologies were suspected to underlie CSCP in 49 patients (39%), prompting additional evaluation and/or referrals. This included 35 patients (28%) who were specifically referred to a pelvic floor physical therapy specialist. Surgery was recommended in 68/126 patients (54%), including microdenervation of the spermatic cord in 22% (after successful diagnostic spermatic cord block), and epididymectomy in 13%. Conclusions CSCP presents with a wide array of concurrent symptoms. The history and physical examination must include assessments for concurrent abdominal, back, hip, and other genital/pelvic pain that may lend towards an alternative non-urologic treatment pathway. Disclosure No