Citations

The use of cannabis products to help with sleep and various other medical conditions by the public has increased significantly in recent years. Withdrawal from cannabinoids can lead to sleep disturbance. Here, we describe a patient who developed significant insomnia leading to worsening anxiety, mood, and suicidal ideation in the setting of medical cannabis withdrawal, prompting presentation to the Emergency Department and inpatient admission. There is a limited evidence base for the use of cannabis products for sleep. We provide a comprehensive review evaluating the literature on the use of cannabis products on sleep, including an overview of cannabis and related psychoactive compounds, the current state of the law as it pertains to the prescribing and use of these substances, and potential side effects and drug interactions. We specifically discuss the impact of cannabis products on normal sleep and circadian sleep-wake rhythms, insomnia, excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep apnea, parasomnias, and restless legs syndrome. We also describe the effects of cannabis withdrawal on sleep and how this increases relapse to cannabis use. Most of the studies are observational but the few published randomized controlled trials are reviewed. Our comprehensive review of the effects of cannabis products on normal sleep and sleep disorders, relevant to primary care providers and other clinicians evaluating and treating patients who use these types of products, shows that cannabis products have minimal to no effects on sleep disorders and may have deleterious effects in some individuals. Further research examining the differential impact of the various types of cannabinoids that are currently available on each of these sleep disorders is required.

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine best practice recommendation to review guidelines every 5 years is followed by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines Committee. The aim of this work was to provide an updated literature review and evidence-based recommendations on the topic of diagnosis and treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma (pGBM). OBJECTIVE: To review the literature published since the last guidelines on pGBM dated 2014, with literature search ending in June 2012. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for the period July 1, 2012, to March 31, 2019, using search terms and search strategies to identify pertinent abstracts. These were then screened using published exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify full-text review articles. Evidence tables were constructed using data derived from full-text reviews and recommendations made from the evidence derived. RESULTS: From the total 8786 abstracts identified by the search, 237 full-text articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this update. Two new level II recommendations derived from this work. For the diagnosis of patients with GBM, the use of diffusion-weighted images is recommended to be included in the magnetic resonance images with and without contrast used for surveillance to detect pGBM. For the treatment of patients with pGBM, repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended to improve overall survival. An additional 21 level III recommendations were provided. CONCLUSION: Recent published literature provides new recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of pGBM. The Central Nervous System Guidelines Committee will continue to pursue timely updates to further improve the care of patients with diagnosis. https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/guidelines-management-of-progressive-glioblastoma

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a nonatherosclerotic cause of myocardial infarction (MI) occurring most often in young women without cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. SCAD is associated with fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD), pregnant/postpartum state, and extreme mental stress or physical exertion. Migraine headaches have been reported common in SCAD and may increase CVD risk. The objective was to assess differences in presentation, clinical factors, and outcomes in SCAD patients with migraines (M-SCAD) compared to those without, and determine M-SCAD prevalence. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional observation study of patients with angiographically confirmed SCAD was conducted using the Mayo Clinic SCAD Registry. Participant-provided data and records were reviewed for migraine history, CVD risk factors, SCAD details, CVD and migraine therapies, and outcomes. Ordinal and nominal variables were compared using Pearson's chi squared test, and continuous variables were compared using Student's t-test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Among 586 patients with complete questionnaires, 236 had a history of migraines; the lifetime and 1-year prevalence of migraines were 40% and 27% respectively. Migraines are more common in SCAD survivors than a comparable population (40% vs 33%, p=0.0002). M-SCAD patients were more likely to be female (99.6% vs 94%, p=0.001), have SCAD at a younger age (45.3 yrs. vs 47.6 yrs., p=0.004), and report a history of aneurysms (7.6% vs 1.7%, p=0.0004), 46% of which occurred in head or neck vessels. There was a trend toward increased head and neck FMD in M-SCAD (32% vs 23%, p=0.095). Prevalence of depression (27% vs 17%, p=0.005), anxiety (32% vs 24%, p=0.038), recurrent angina (62% vs 44%, p=<0.001) and concern for recurrent SCAD (46% vs 37%, p=0.034) were higher in M-SCAD. Triptans were stopped in 39% of migraineurs at the time of MI. Conclusion: As compared to SCAD survivors without migraines, those with M-SCAD are younger, more often report a history of depression, anxiety, and aneurysms, and have more chest pain after SCAD. Further investigation into this association and development of safe, effective treatments of both headache and angina after SCAD is needed.

Introduction: Current proposed Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2015 suggested replacing refined grains (e.g., white rice) with whole grains (e.g., brown rice) for improved health outcomes; however, the association between white rice consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) was not fully investigated. The purpose of this study was to explore the associations between rice consumption, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception through May 2015. Observational studies were included if the studies reported hazard ratios (HRs) or odd ratios (ORs) of the associations between rice consumption, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Data were extracted by one reviewer and then reviewed by two independent reviewers. Conflicts were resolved through consensus. Using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects models, we calculated pooled HRs and pooled ORs with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Subgroup analyses were performed to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The quality of the included studies and publication bias were assessed. Results: Out of 343 retrieved articles, we identified 6 cross-sectional and 9 prospective studies with a total of 575,852 individuals with 24,649 total CVD events and 4,409 metabolic syndrome cases. The highest category of white rice consumption (≥5 times/week) was associated with a 37% higher risk of metabolic syndrome (pooled OR, 1.37; 95% CI: 1.03-1.84; p<0.001; I 2 = 78.7%) but not a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (pooled HR, 1.01; 95% CI: 0.95-1.08; p=0.65; I 2 = 0%), compared to the lowest category (≤1 time/month). Conclusions: Higher white rice consumption has not been shown to increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases but may be associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome.

Introduction: Primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in select patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). The occurrence of device therapies after ICD implantation in contemporary clinical practice is not well described, especially in patient subgroups designated in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2005 Coverage with Evidence Development (CED). Methods: The Longitudinal Study of ICDs assessed rates and correlates of device therapies (overall and those requiring shock) up to 3 years post-implant among 2540 patients with LVSD receiving first-time primary prevention ICDs in 7 US health care systems from 2006-2009. Implant data from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD Registry were linked to electronic longitudinal health care system data and a novel centrally adjudicated repository of device therapies abstracted from medical records. Proportional hazard models evaluated associations with device therapies by appropriateness, adjusted for demographic and clinical factors. Results: Subjects were 26% women, 35% <65 years old, and 59% non-Hispanic white. Over a mean 26 months, 738 (29.1%) received at least 1 therapy (median 2). Estimated 3-year risk of any device therapy was 36% (24% appropriate, 12% inappropriate); for therapy requiring shock, corresponding values were 24%, 14%, 9%. The rate of appropriate therapy was higher in men than women (adjusted hazard ratio 1.84, 95% confidence interval 1.43-2.35). The rate of inappropriate therapy was higher for subjects <65 than for those >=65 years (1.40, 1.04-1.88), and lower among 2009 implants compared to 2006 (0.66, 0.46-0.95). Regarding the 3 CMS CED patient subgroups, neither ejection fraction nor heart failure symptom severity was associated with device therapy; for LVSD etiology, the rate of inappropriate therapy was nominally but not significantly higher among subjects with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy of < 9 months duration (1.38, 0.88-2.18). Conclusions: In a representative cohort of primary prevention ICD patients in usual care, rates of device therapies were somewhat lower than in landmark trials, differed by some patient characteristics, but did not differ meaningfully for CMS CED subgroups.

Introduction: Obesity is a growing global health problem associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The risk of obesity on incident new-onset heart failure is controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to explore the association between overweight, obesity and incident new-onset heart failure. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception through April 2015. Prospective cohort studies were included if the studies reported hazard ratios (HRs) of the association between overweight or obesity and new-onset heart failure (HF) relative to individuals with normal weight. Data were extracted by one reviewer followed by independent screening and extraction of study characteristics and outcome data by two other reviewers. Conflicts were resolved through consensus. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to pool the hazard ratio from the included studies. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: Out of 1,865 retrieved articles, we identified 10 relevant studies. Median follow-up was 12 years with a total of 82,167 individuals and 4,570 total HF events. Compared to normal body weight (body mass index (BMI) <25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) was associated with 27% higher risk of new-onset heart failure events (pooled HR, 1.27; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 1.15-1.41; p<0.001; I 2 = 0%) and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) was associated with a two-fold increased risk for new-onset heart failure events (pooled HR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.68-2.60; p<0.001; I 2 = 67.8%). Conclusions: Compared with normal-weight individuals, both overweight and obesity were independently associated with significantly higher incidence of heart failure. These results highlight the need for better understanding of mechanisms of obesity and heart failure.

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory lung disease with intermittent flares predominately mediated through memory T cells. Yet, the identity of long-term memory cells that mediate allergic recall responses is not well defined. In this report, using a mouse model of chronic allergen exposure followed by an allergen-free rest period, we characterized a subpopulation of CD4 + T cells that secreted IL-9 as an obligate effector cytokine. IL-9–secreting cells had a resident memory T cell phenotype, and blocking IL-9 during a recall challenge or deleting IL-9 from T cells significantly diminished airway inflammation and airway hyperreactivity. T cells secreted IL-9 in an allergen recall–specific manner, and secretion was amplified by IL-33. Using scRNA-seq and scATAC-seq, we defined the cellular identity of a distinct population of T cells with a proallergic cytokine pattern. Thus, in a recall model of allergic airway inflammation, IL-9 secretion from a multicytokine-producing CD4 + T cell population was required for an allergen recall response.

Abstract Background: We previouslyreported that invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), the primary outcome, and distantdisease-free survival (DDFS), a secondary outcome, differed by menopausalstatus in a pre-specified analysis. Here,we report updates on IDFS and DDFS with additional follow-up, as well as distantrecurrence-free interval (DRFI) and post hoc analyses in premenopausal women.Methods: Eligibilitycriteria included women &gt; 18 years of age with HR+, HER2-BC and 1-3 +LN and no contraindications to taxane and/or anthracycline basedCT. DRFI was defined as time to distant recurrence or death from breast cancer.Analyses were intent-to-treat among eligible pts. We performed a post hocanalysis evaluating IDFS between treatment arms in premenopausal pts with pN1mi.In addition, we conducted a two-year landmarked IDFS analysis by ovarianfunction suppression (OFS) or not in the ET arm, as well as by regularmenstrual periods or not in both treatment arms.Results: Among the 4,984eligible pts, there were 553 IDFS events and median follow-up of 6.1 years.Postmenopausal women do not have any IDFS or DDFS benefit with CT; however, 5-yearabsolute benefits for IDFS and DDFS with CT for premenopausal pts were 5.9% and3.3%, respectively. In pre-menopausal pts, CT was associated with improved DRFIfor all RS values &lt; 25, with an absolute improvement of 2.3% for RS0-13 and of 2.8% for RS 14-25. Among premenopausal pts, 12.4% (n=206) had pNmi)disease. In a post hoc analysis, there was a trend for CT benefit for thosewith pNmi [hazard ratio (HR)=0.44, confidence interval (CI)=0.18-1.08]. Therewere only 22 IDFS events. Only 17.2% of premenopausal pts assigned to ETunderwent OFS in the first 24 months and in two-year landmarked analysis, therewas no IDFS difference in those who underwent OFS or not (HR=0.88,CI=0.47-1.63). In premenopausal women assigned to ET, 58.9% stopped havingperiods within the first 24 months, and have anumerically improved IDFS compared to those who continued regular periods (HR=1.48,CI: 0.92-2.40). Among premenopausal assigned to CT followed by ET, 80.8%stopped having periods within the first 24 months and have a numericallyimproved IDFS compared to those who continue to have regular periods (HR=1.56, CI:0.85-2.86).Discussion: In accordancewith the differential IDFS and DDFS benefit based upon menopausal status inS1007, premenopausal pts with 1-3+LN and RS &lt; 25 had a statisticallysignificant improvement in DRFI with the addition of CT. A small proportion of S1007premenopausal participants underwent OFS. The role of OFS as it relates to CTbenefit cannot be determined from this study. A future randomized trial should address the clinical question if OFScan replace CT in premenopausal pts with HR+/HER2-, node-positive breast cancer.Funding: Supported by National Cancer Institute grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819,U10CA180820, U10CA180821, U10CA180868, U10CA180863, and in part by Susan G.Komen for the Cure® Research Program, The Hope Foundation for Cancer Research,Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and Genomic Health, Inc. Citation Format: Kevin M Kalinsky, William E Barlow, Julie R Gralow, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Kathy S Albain, Daniel F Hayes, Nancy U Lin, Edith A Perez, Lori A Goldstein, Stephen KL Chia, Sukhbinder Dhesy-Thind, Priya Rastogi, Emilio Alba, Suzette Delaloge, Miguel Martin, Catherine M Kelly, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Miguel Gil-Gil, Claudia H Arce-Salinas, Etienne GC Brain, Eun Sook Lee, Jean-Yves Pierga, Begoña Bermejo, Manuel Ramos-Vasquez, Kyung Hae Jung, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Anne Schott, Steven Shak, Priyanka Sharma, Danika Lew, Jieling Miao, Debasish Tripathy, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel Hortobagyi. Updated results from a phase 3 randomized clinical trial in participants (pts) with 1-3 positive lymph nodes (LN), hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer (BC) with recurrence score (RS) ≤ 25 randomized to endocrine therapy (ET) +/- chemotherapy (CT): SWOG S1007 (RxPONDER) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-07.

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in women. Given accumulating evidence on sex- and gender-based differences in cardiovascular disease development and outcomes, the need for more effective approaches to screening for risk factors and phenotypes in women is ever urgent. Public health surveillance and health care delivery systems now continuously generate massive amounts of data that could be leveraged to enable both screening of cardiovascular risk and implementation of tailored preventive interventions across a woman’s life span. However, health care providers, clinical guidelines committees, and health policy experts are not yet sufficiently equipped to optimize the collection of data on women, use or interpret these data, or develop approaches to targeting interventions. Therefore, we provide a broad overview of the key opportunities for cardiovascular screening in women while highlighting the potential applications of artificial intelligence along with digital technologies and tools.