Citations

Abstract The Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGFβ)/SMAD signaling pathway can function as either a tumor suppressor or metastasis promoter during tumor progression. In normal epithelial cells and early stages of epithelial tumorigenesis TGFβ functions as a tumor suppressor to decrease cell proliferation or induce apoptosis. However, during malignant progression tumor cells no longer respond to the anti-proliferative effects of TGFβ, but instead undergo an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) whereby cells acquire a migratory and invasive phenotype which promotes tumor metastasis. Resolution of the dichotomy in TGFβ function and a further understanding of its tumor suppressor and metastasis promoting functions may uncover new strategies for the treatment of epithelial cancers. In previous studies we demonstrated an important role of the TGFβ-Inducible Early Gene-1 (TIEG1)/Krüppel-like Factor-10 (KLF10) as a central regulator of TGFβ/SMAD signaling and the anti-proliferative functions of TGFβ. In this study we examined the role of KLF10 in controlling the TGFβ-induced EMT in human lung adenocarcinoma cells. We show that depletion of KLF10 results in a more pronounced induction of EMT in human A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells as assessed by quantitative real-time PCR, changes in cellular morphology and immunofluorescence microscopy, and transcriptome-wide (RNA-seq) analyses. Moreover, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis shows that KLF10 directly binds to GC-rich sequences in the promoter region of the EMT-promoting transcription factor SLUG/SNAI2 to repress its transcription. Consistent with these findings, an analysis of KLF10 and SNAI2 expression in lung cancer revealed that while KLF10 levels are decreased in lung cancer vs. normal samples, SNAI2 levels are increased. Additional ChIP studies showed that KLF10 recruits HDAC1 to the SNAI2 promoter and is required for the removal of activating histone acetylation marks. These findings reveal a previously unknown function of KLF10 in suppressing TGFβ-induced EMT and represent a significant advancement in the understanding the molecular dichotomy of TGFβ function during tumor progression. Citation Format: Vivek Kumar Mishra, Vijayalakshmi Kari, Malayannan Subramaniam, Simon J. Baumgart, Sankari Nagarajan, Florian Wegwitz, Thomas C. Spelsberg, John R. Hawse, Steven A. Johnsen. Krüppel-like Transcription Factor-10 (KLF10) suppresses the TGFβ-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Chromatin and Epigenetics in Cancer; Sep 24-27, 2015; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A03.

Estrogen treatment causes renal phosphate (Pi) wasting and hypophosphatemia in rats and humans; however, the signaling mechanisms mediating this effect are still poorly understood. To determine the specific roles of estrogen receptor isoforms (ERα and ERβ) and the Klotho pathway in mediating these effects, we studied the effects of estrogen on renal Pi handling in female mice with null mutations of ERα or ERβ or Klotho and their wild type (WT) using balance studies in metabolic cages. Estrogen treatment of WT and ERβ knockout (KO) mice caused a significant reduction in food intake along with increased renal phosphate wasting. The latter resulted from a significant downregulation of NaPi-IIa and NaPi-IIc protein abundance. The mRNA expression levels of both transporters were unchanged in estrogen-treated mice. These effects on both food intake and renal Pi handling were absent in ERα KO mice. Estrogen treatment of Klotho KO mice or parathyroid hormone (PTH)-depleted thyroparathyroidectomized mice exhibited a significant downregulation of NaPi-IIa with no change in the abundance of NaPi-IIc. Estrogen treatment of a cell line (U20S) stably coexpressing both ERα and ERβ caused a significant downregulation of NaPi-IIa protein when transiently transfected with a plasmid containing full-length or open-reading frame (ORF) 3′-untranslated region (UTR) but not 5′-UTR ORF of mouse NaPi-IIa transcript. In conclusion, estrogen causes phosphaturia and hypophosphatemia in mice. These effects result from downregulation of NaPi-IIa and NaPi-IIc proteins in the proximal tubule through the activation of ERα. The downregulation of NaPi-IIa by estrogen involves 3′-UTR of its mRNA and is independent of Klotho/fibroblast growth factor 23 and PTH signaling pathways.

Abstract Introduction: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), which is highly expressed in benign breast epithelium, is postulated to function as a tumor suppressor of breast cancer. Atypias of the breast increase the lifetime risk of breast cancer four-fold. However, little is known about ERβ expression in association with atypias or whether ERβ plays a role in mitigating breast cancer risk in high-risk individuals. We therefore undertook this study to examine the relationship of ERβ expression in atypias and adjacent normal lobules with the risk of subsequent breast cancer. Methods: We studied women in a well-characterized benign breast disease cohort with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) diagnosed from 1967 to 1991. Nuclear and cytoplasmic ERβ expression was assessed via immunohistochemistry in both the atypical hyperplasia epithelium (atypia) and background normal lobules for percent (scores 0-4 for <1%, 1-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, >75%, respectively) and intensity (scores 0-3 for negative, weak, intermediate, strong, respectively) using a highly specific ERβ monoclonal antibody (PPG5/10). For nuclear staining, an ERβ sum score (percent + intensity, range 0-7) was created and grouped as low (0-2), moderate (3-5) or high (6-7). Competing risks regression was used to assess the association of ERβ expression with future breast cancer risk while also accounting for the competing risk of death from other causes. Results: 171 women, median age 56, were studied (79 ADH and 92 ALH). Median follow-up was 15 years overall, and 36 women developed breast cancer at a median of 13 years after their atypia biopsy. ERβ expression was lower in the atypia versus normal lobules whether evaluated by nuclear percent stained, nuclear intensity or cytoplasmic intensity (all p < 0.001). For nuclear staining specifically, ERβ expression in the atypia was low in 44 (26%), moderate in 117 (68%) and high in only 10 (6%) based on the sum score. In contrast, ERβ was higher in the normal lobules with a majority showing high expression (n = 96, 56%), moderate expression in 74 (43%) and low expression in only 1 (0.6%). Lower ERβ nuclear expression in the atypia was associated with increased breast cancer risk, whether evaluated by percent staining, intensity or sum score; the same was true for ERβ nuclear expression in the background normal lobules. Low ERβ expression in the atypia (sum score 0-2) was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of subsequent breast cancer compared to atypia with moderate-high expression (sum score 3-7), HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.02-3.8, p = 0.04. Lower ERβ expression in the normal lobules was also associated with an increased risk of future breast cancer: HR = 2.5 (95% CI: 1.3-5.1, p = 0.009) for low-moderate versus high expression. Conclusions: Increased ERβ expression in normal and atypical lobules was associated with a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer in our high-risk patient cohort. These data suggest that in women with atypical hyperplasia, ERβ expression is protective against the future development of breast cancer. ERβ may serve as a useful biomarker to further stratify breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease. Citation Format: Tina J. Hieken, Jodi M. Carter, John R. Hawse, IV, Tanya L. Hoskin, Marlene Frost, Lynn C. Hartmann, Derek C. Radisky, Daniel W. Visscher, Vernon S. Pankratz, Amy C. Degnim. ERβ expression and breast cancer risk prediction for women with atypias. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Cancer Prevention Research; 2014 Sep 27-Oct 1; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Can Prev Res 2015;8(10 Suppl): Abstract nr A03.

Abstract Estrogen receptor (ER) β is highly expressed in normal breast epithelium and a putative tumor suppressor. Atypical hyperplasia substantially increases breast cancer risk, but identification of biomarkers to further improve risk stratification is needed. We evaluated ERβ expression in breast tissues from women with atypical hyperplasia and association with subsequent breast cancer risk. ERβ expression was examined by immunohistochemistry in a well-characterized 171-women cohort with atypical hyperplasia diagnosed 1967–1991. Nuclear ERβ percent and intensity was scored in the atypia and adjacent normal lobules. An ERβ sum score (percent + intensity) was calculated and grouped as low, moderate, or high. Competing risks regression was used to assess associations of ERβ expression with breast cancer risk. After 15-year median follow-up, 36 women developed breast cancer. ERβ expression was lower in atypia lobules in than normal lobules, by percent staining and intensity (both P < 0.001). Higher ERβ expression in the atypia or normal lobules, evaluated by percent staining, intensity or sum score, decreased the risk of subsequent breast cancer by 2-fold (P = 0.04) and 2.5-fold (P = 0.006). High normal lobule ERβ expression conferred the strongest protective effect in premenopausal women: the 20-year cumulative incidence of breast cancer was 0% for women younger than 45 years with high versus 31% for low–moderate ERβ expression (P = 0.0008). High ERβ expression was associated with a significantly decreased risk of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia. These data suggest that ERβ may be a useful biomarker for risk stratification and a novel therapeutic target for breast cancer risk reduction. Cancer Prev Res; 8(11); 1084–92. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Background: While the biological functions and clinical importance of ERα are well understood in breast cancer, much less is known about its most closely related family member, ERβ, particularly in the setting of triple negative disease. Additionally, the ability to therapeutically target ERβ in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has not been fully explored. Methods: Expression of ERβ protein was determined using a well characterized and validated ERβ specific monoclonal antibody that only recognizes the full-length form of this receptor (PPG5/10) in a cohort of 71 TNBCs. To further define the biological functions of ERβ in TNBC, novel ERβ expressing triple negative cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) were developed and comprehensively characterized at the level of global gene expression profiling, modulation of important biological pathways, cellular proliferation and response to targeted therapies. Results: In TNBCs from 71 patients, nuclear and cytoplasmic ERβ was detected at moderate to high levels in 24% and 32% of cases respectively. This moderate to high expression of both nuclear and cytoplasmic ERβ was associated with higher levels of Ki67. Of the 17 tumors expressing ERβ, 13 (76%) were negative for androgen receptor expression. In the triple negative MDA-MB-231-ERβ and Hs578T-ERβ cell lines, expression of ERβ led to inhibition of proliferation in response to both estrogen and multiple ERβ specific agonists. Microarray analysis and RT-PCR profiling of these cells revealed that estrogen and ERβ agonists highly induced the expression of multiple cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors, while suppressing the expression of many interleukins. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ agonist treated MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells inhibited the proliferation rates and blocked TGFβ signaling in non-ERβ expressing TNBC cells, effects that were completely reversed following depletion of cystatins from the conditioned media. Conclusions: ERβ is expressed in a substantial proportion of TNBCs, and most do not express the androgen receptor. In TNBC, where targeted therapies are lacking, our data suggest that estrogen or ERβ specific agonists would be expected to elicit anti-tumor effects when ERβ is expressed. These tumor suppressive effects of ERβ appear to be mediated in part through the actions of cystatins, and their inhibition of TGFβ signaling, suggesting that this family of secreted proteins may represent novel biomarkers for monitoring ERβ specific drug responsiveness and/or patient outcomes. Citation Format: Jordan M Reese, Malayannan Subramaniam, Vera J Suman, Xianglin Wu, Vivian Negron, Anne Gingery, Kevin S Pitel, Sejal S Shah, Heather E Cunliffe, Ann E McCullough, Barbara A Pockaj, Thomas C Spelsberg, Matthew P Goetz, James N Ingle, John R Hawse. Therapeutic targeting of ERβ in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-06.

We have previously demonstrated that estrogen (E2) downregulates phosphate transporter NaPi-IIa and causes phosphaturia and hypophosphatemia in ovariectomized rats. In the present study, we examined whether E2directly targets NaPi-IIa in the proximal tubule (PT) and studied the respective roles of estrogen receptor isoforms (ERα and ERβ) in the downregulation of NaPi-IIa using both in vivo and an in vitro expression systems. We found that estrogen specifically downregulates NaPi-IIa but not NaPi-IIc or Pit2 in the kidney cortex. Proximal tubules incubated in a “shake” suspension with E2for 24 h exhibited a dose-dependent decrease in NaPi-IIa protein abundance. Results from OVX rats treated with specific agonists for either ERα [4,4′,4″;-(4-propyl-[1 H]-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl) trisphenol, PPT] or ERβ [4,4′,4″-(4-propyl-[1 H]-pyrazole-1,3,5-triyl) trisphenol, DPN] or both (PPT + DPN), indicated that only the latter caused a sharp downregulation of NaPi-IIa, along with significant phosphaturia and hypophosphatemia. Lastly, heterologous expression studies demonstrated that estrogen downregulated NaPi-IIa only in U20S cells expressing both ERα and ERβ, but not in cells expressing either receptor alone. In conclusion, these studies demonstrate that rat PT cells express both ERα and ERβ and that E2induces phosphaturia by directly and specifically targeting NaPi-IIa in the PT cells. This effect is mediated via a mechanism involving coactivation of both ERα and ERβ, which likely form a functional heterodimer complex in the rat kidney proximal tubule.

Abstract Background: In AI refractory MBC, TAM anti-tumor activity is limited (median PFS 4.5 months). In patients (pts) receiving TAM in the adjuvant and metastatic setting, breast cancer recurrence has been shown to differ based upon CYP2D6 genotype and Endx exposure. In collaboration with NCI, Z-Endx (NSC #750393) was synthesized and preclinical pharmacology studies demonstrated that oral Z- Endx resulted in > 20 fold Endx exposure compared to an equivalent dose of TAM and significantly greater anti-tumor activity than TAM in AI sensitive and resistant MCF7 xenografts. We conducted a phase I study of Z-Endx in women with ER+, AI refractory MBC to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and a dose associated with steady state concentrations (Css) of ≥ 2 uM, based on the IC50 of recently identified Endx substrates: PKC and PI3K. Methods: Pts were enrolled to an accelerated titration schedule (2 pts/dose level) until moderate toxicity or DLT, and then to a 3+3 design. Z-Endx was administered orally once daily (28 day cycle). Eye exams were performed at baseline, end of cycle 2, and after 6 cycles. PK was performed on days 1-2, 3, 7, 14, and 28, and prior to subsequent cycles. Results: 23 women with AI refractory MBC (median 56 yrs, range 41-83) received Z-Endx once daily encompassing 7 dose levels (Table 1). The median number of prior chemotherapies and hormonal therapies in the metastatic setting were 2 and 2, respectively. Dose escalation continues at 160 mg/day and the MTD has yet to be determined. Cmax and AUC increased in a dose-dependent manner. A 20 and 100 mg/day dose yields Css of 0.39 and 2.48 uM, respectively. Significant anti-tumor activity was observed including 1 pt (100 mg/day) with a PR lasting 225 days; 1 pt (80 mg/day) with a 30% reduction in tumor size (PFS 169 days) and 2 pts (60 and 80 mg/day) with stable disease for >270 days. No eye toxicity was observed. Conclusions: In women with AI refractory MBC, the MTD of Z-Endx HCl has not been determined but Endx Css concentrations of > 2 uM and substantial anti-tumor activity has been observed. Following completion of the 160 mg/day dose, expansion at 20 and 100 mg/day will commence to perform translational studies and further characterize Endx pk. A randomized phase II examining two different doses of Z-Endx is planned in AI refractory MBC. Supported in part by CA 133049, CA69912, CA15083, CA116201, and CA15083. Table 1Dose Level (mg/day)Number of Treatment CyclesModerate or Severe Toxicities ReportedTumor ResponseProgression-free Survival (days)28 day Z-Endx Css (uM) 20 (n = 2)2; 3Gr 2 hot flashes (1 pt)----60; 850.39 40 (n = 2)2; 6noneStable (1 pt)61; 1670.66 60 (n = 6)1; 2; 2; 5; 8; 14Gr 4 Triglycerides (1 pt);Gr 3 thromboembolic event (1 pt); Gr 2 hot flashes, anemia, and hypoalbuminemia (1 pt)Stable (3 pts)125+; 56; 57; 132; 232; 4331.01 80 (n = 3)4; 6; 10Gr 2 hot flashesStable (3 pts)113; 169; 2961.61 100 (n = 3)1; 2; 8Gr 2 nausea (1 pt); Gr 2 irritability (1 pt)PR (1 pt)30; 56; 2252.48 120 (n = 3)1; 2; 4Gr 2 hypersomnia, paresthesia, and peripheral sensory neuropathy (1 pt)—39; 54; 1082.18 * Bold face toxicities occurred during cycle 1 Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD3-4.

Abstract Background: Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), unlike ERα, classically functions as a tumor suppressor in vitro. However, ERβ's biological functions in vivo and predictive/prognostic value in breast cancer are controversial. Methods: Expression of ERβ protein was determined using a well characterized and validated ERβ specific monoclonal antibody that only recognizes the full-length form of this receptor (PPG5/10) in the following 3 cohorts: 1) a cohort with all breast cancer subtypes (n = 182), 2) a prospective NCCTG adjuvant tamoxifen trial for postmenopausal women with ERα positive breast cancer with long-term follow-up (n = 198) and 3) a cohort of 80 triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs). To elucidate the biological functions of ERβ in breast cancer, novel ERβ expressing MCF7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines were developed and characterized using multiple techniques and were examined for responsiveness to various ERβ targeted therapies. Results: About one-third of all breast tumors, regardless of sub-type, were shown to express nuclear ERβ and this expression was independent of ERα or HER2. In the NCCTG 89-30-52 cohort, breast cancer recurrence rates were significantly associated with ERβ protein expression with 10 year recurrence rates of 25%, 15% and 4% for zero, low or high levels of ERβ expression respectively. Interestingly, in TNBCs, nuclear ERβ was expressed at intermediate or high levels in 24% of tumors. In the triple negative MDA-MB-231 cell line, expression of ERβ led to inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis in response to estrogen and multiple ERβ specific agonists. Conversely, these same treatments induced proliferation of ERβ-expressing MCF7 cells which endogenously express ERα. However, ERβ expression sensitized MCF7 cells to the anti-proliferative effects of anti-estrogens. Microarray analysis and RT-PCR profiling of MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells revealed that estrogen and ERβ agonists highly induced the expression of multiple cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which function as tumor suppressors, and potently inhibited canonical TGFβ signaling. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ agonist treated MDA-MB-231-ERβ cells suppressed the proliferation rates and inhibited TGFβ signaling in other TNBC cell lines, effects that were completely reversed following the depletion of cystatins from the conditioned media. Conclusions: These data demonstrate that ERβ is expressed in a substantial proportion of breast cancers and may have value as a predictive and/or prognostic biomarker. Therapeutic targeting of ERβ may have clinical benefit in multiple breast cancer sub-types; however, the specific drug of choice may vary based on ERα status. Specifically, we have demonstrated that ERβ expression in ERα+ MCF7 cells sensitizes them to the effectiveness of anti-estrogens, an observation that was confirmed in women enrolled in a prospective adjuvant tamoxifen trial. In TNBCs, where targeted therapies are lacking, our data suggest that targeting ERβ with either estrogen or ERβ specific agonists will elicit anti-tumor effects through the induction of cystatins and inhibition of TGFβ signaling resulting in tumor regression and improved patient outcomes. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P6-04-03.

Abstract Background: Endoxifen (Endx) is being developed as a drug for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer (BC). We previously demonstrated that Endx was superior to TAM in both a letrozole (L) sensitive and resistant MCF7/AC1 model. Tamoxifen (TAM) and its most commonly studied metabolite, 4-hydroxy TAM (4HT), are known to activate critical ER co-regulators such as SRC3, which are oncogenic, and contribute to acquired and de novo endocrine resistance. While both Endx and 4HT are more potent inhibitors of genomic ERα functions compared to TAM, the effects of Endx on non-genomic signaling have not been characterized and its efficacy as an anti-cancer agent compared to RAD001 in AI resistant BC is unknown. Methods: We evaluated the 1 hour in vitro effects of TAM, 4HT, Endx, and L, in terms of activation of multiple signaling cascades using an MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells and long term estrogen deprived (LTED) cells (MDA 361 and ZR75). Protein Docking studies (shape screening, pharmacophore modeling and ligand-protein docking) for oncogenic kinases, and their associated IC50's were determined for TAM and Endx. The in vivo activity of Endx (50 mg/kg, oral) was determined in MCF/AC1 L-resistant xenograft tumors and compared with L control (10 ug/day, sc), Exemestane (E) (250 ug/d, sc) and E+RAD001 (2.5 mg/kg/d, oral). Results: In MCF7/AC1 L-resistant cells, 1 hr treatment with either TAM (100 nM or 5 uM) or 4HT (100 nM or 5 uM) phosphorylated SRC3 (AIB1) and resulted in downstream activation (phosphorylation) of IGF1R, PDK1, AKT, and p70S6K. In contrast, Endx (100 nM and 5 uM) did not phosphorylate SRC3 nor any downstream kinases but resulted in a dose dependent decrease in AKT phosphorylation. Similar findings were observed in LTED cells MDA 361 and ZR75. Docking studies identified a significant decrease in the binding energy (>2 kcal/mol) of Endx compared to TAM for PKC and PI3K and subsequent kinase profiling demonstrated that Endx more potently inhibits PKCβ1 (IC50 357nM) and PI3KΔ (2.5uM) compared to TAM (IC50 4.8μM and 6.2μM respectively). Therefore, we evaluated the in vivo anti-tumor activity of Endx with E and E+RAD001 in MCF7 L-resistant xenograft tumors. After 9 weeks, the% change in tumor volume relative to baseline was significantly lower for both Endx (median -34%, p = 0.0002) and E+RAD001 (median +1.5%, p = 0.0002) as compared to L controls (median +301%). In contrast, E alone was non-significantly lower (median +172%, (p = 0.09). No significant differences were observed comparing Endx and E+RAD001 (p = 0.56). Conclusions: Endx inhibits PKCβ1 and PI3KΔ at concentrations that are pharmacologically relevant, and unlike TAM and 4HT, does not activate SRC3 nor induce oncogenic signaling pathways in AI resistant cells. Importantly, Endx elicits substantial anti-tumor effects in AI resistant models that are similar to the current standard of care of E+RAD001. These data suggest that Endx may be superior to TAM for the treatment of ER+ BC and may result in clinical benefit for patients with AI resistant disease. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-09-08.

Abstract Background: Commonly used endocrine therapies for breast cancer, such as aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women and tamoxifen in premenopausal women, have deleterious effects on bone mineral density. Therefore, the identification of novel cancer therapies which either maintain or improve bone mass are of clinical need. We and others have previously demonstrated that endoxifen is the most active tamoxifen metabolite responsible for eliciting the anti-cancer effects of this drug and that endoxifen concentrations are an important factor with regard to tamoxifen efficacy. These studies have led to the development of endoxifen as a novel anti-breast cancer drug for which phase I clinical trials are now underway. At present, there are no data regarding endoxifen's effects on bone. Methods: The effects of endoxifen on osteoblast gene expression profiles were compared to that of estrogen, tamoxifen, raloxifene and lasofoxifene by microarray and RT-PCR analyses in both estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and ERβ expressing cell lines. The in vivo effects of an anti-cancer dose of endoxifen (50mg/kg/day) on the skeleton were first analyzed in 3-month-old ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography, micro-Computed Tomography and histomorphometry. In a second set of studies, a pre-clinical rat model was used to determine the effects of endoxifen (10mg/kg/day) on the skeleton in both a pre- and post-menopausal setting. Results: Endoxifen treatment of ERα and ERβ expressing mouse osteoblast cells led to dramatically different gene expression profiles when compared to that of estrogen and other anti-estrogens. In ovariectomized mice, daily administration of endoxifen led to significant increases in bone mineral density and content throughout the skeleton relative to vehicle control treated animals. The numbers and activity of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts were also found to be significantly higher in endoxifen treated mice. In the pre-clinical model system, endoxifen treatment of 4 month-old ovariectomized Sprague-Dawley rats significantly protected against bone loss following estrogen depletion primarily due to suppression of osteoclast mediated bone resorption. Importantly, in sham operated rats (thus retaining ovarian function), endoxifen treatment enhanced bone volume and trabecular thickness and did not suppress osteoclast activity. Conclusions: These data are the first to examine the effects of the novel breast cancer therapy, endoxifen, on bone and reveal that the molecular mechanisms of action of this compound are substantially different than that of other SERMs. Endoxifen was shown to protect against bone loss following estrogen depletion in both mice and rats and interestingly, enhanced bone mass in ovary intact rats, an observation that is in stark contrast to the known effects of tamoxifen which induces bone loss in the “pre-menopausal” setting. These studies suggest that endoxifen may have superior bone-beneficial effects compared to tamoxifen, and if efficacy is confirmed in later phase trials, endoxifen may represent a better drug of choice for a sub-set of breast cancer patients. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P5-05-01.