Citations

Abstract Polygenic risk scores (PRSs), which quantify inherited susceptibility to complex traits and diseases, have emerged as valuable tools for risk stratification and precision medicine. Despite their promise, PRS developed on European cohorts often demonstrate substantially reduced predictive accuracy in non-European populations, due to differences in genetic architecture. The disproportionate representation of European ancestry cohorts in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) leads to inequitable deployment of PRS technologies across diverse populations. Here, we introduce PRANA (Polygenic Risk Adaptation via Neural-network Architecture), a deep learning framework that adapts an existing PRS developed on one population to other ancestries. Unlike methods that require large-scale GWAS in the target population, PRANA leverages pre-trained PRS models derived from European cohorts and adapts them using modestly sized cohorts from the target population. We evaluated PRANA on seven complex traits in South Asian, East Asian and Ashkenazi Jewish populations, as well as in selected smaller East Asian subpopulations where the scarcity of training data poses a particular challenge. PRANA mostly improved predictive performance of the baseline PRS models by 5%-20% in terms of effect size (β) and Nagelkerke’s R², and, in most cases, outperformed existing cross-ancestry multi-PRS approaches. These results highlight PRANA as a scalable and practical strategy to reduce disparities in genomic risk prediction and advance the equitable application of PRS in diverse populations.

TPS6138 Background: Patients with early-stage oral cavity cancer (OCC; T1-2N0M0; AJCC 8th edition) have a 20-30% risk of occult nodal metastases despite clinical and radiographic evaluations. Standard-of-care treatment for most patients includes elective neck dissection (END), which requires surgical removal of the regional cervical lymph nodes, even though 70-80% of these necks are disease-free. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN Bx), a less invasive procedure, could assess the first echelon lymph nodes as an alternative to END, potentially reducing morbidity and costs. A pivotal clinical trial comparing SLN Bx to END (NCT#04333537) is underway to inform efforts to establish optimal disease management for early-stage OCC. Methods: To assess the efficacy of SLN Bx in this population, we activated an international, multi-institutional, prospective phase II/III trial in July 2020, randomizing patients to two surgical arms: SLN Bx and END. A node-negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging biomarker study with centralized read was required before randomization. OCC patients with a positive PET/CT remained in a registry to compare imaging findings with final neck pathology. Given the current evidence on morbidity for SLN Bx versus END, the phase II was designed to determine whether the change in patient-reported neck and shoulder function and related quality of life (QOL) from baseline to 6 months after surgery, using the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), showed a signal of superiority of SLN Bx compared to END (minimum important difference ³ 7.5; one-sided a = 0.10; 90% power). As of December 2024, 261 patients had been randomized and 203 were analyzed for the “Go/No-Go” decision to move forward into phase III. The phase III portion is a non-inferiority (NI) trial with disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint (NI margin hazard ratio 1.34 based on a 5% absolute difference in 2-year DFS; one-sided a = 0.05; 80% power, and two interim looks). The change in NDII from baseline to 6 months after surgery is a hierarchical co-primary endpoint for phase III. Phase III opened in October 2025 upon receiving a “Go” signal from phase II. Target accrual for phase III is 686 node-negative PET/CT patients, including those randomized in phase II (425 additional patients). In addition to sites requiring radiotherapy and imaging credentialing, quality assurance will include central pathology review of all negative SLN Bx cases and surgeon credentialing through an education course with SLN Bx and END case review by the surgical co-chairs. A surgical quality assurance working group will review all trial SLN Bx and END procedures. As of 01/12/26, 351 patients have been screened, and 273 of the planned 686 have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT#04333537 .

Summary Cancer genome sequencing is essential for understanding tumor evolution and advancing precision medicine. 1 However, reference gaps and germline variants obscure detection of small and large somatic variants and methylation in repetitive regions. 1–3 It is common for tumor cells to gain or lose chromosome arms due to somatic structural changes that occur inside highly repetitive satellite DNA sequences in the centromeres. 4 To identify the full spectrum of somatic variants, including complex rearrangements, we construct and curate near-complete, haplotype-resolved assemblies of the most recent common ancestor of an early-passage broadly-consented hypodiploid pancreatic cancer cell line and matched normal tissues. The tumor assembly completely recapitulates all 35 tumor chromosomes observed with karyotyping, with multiple translocation-induced hybrid chromosomes. The hybrid chromosomes contain putative functional dicentric and fused centromeres, nested foldback inversions causing 14 breakpoints with a haplotype switch in a single event, and centromeric satellite tandem duplications up to 136 kbp. Direct comparison of tumor and normal assembly haplotypes uncovers >7,000 variants altering >1 Mbp of sequence in repetitive regions that have been hidden by reference gaps and germline variants. 44 % of somatic small variants change representation because they alter germline variants on GRCh38, impacting mutational signatures and kataegis/omikli clusters. Most somatic LINE insertions originate from two hypomethylated non-reference germline LINE insertions, highlighting their impact on insertion mutation burden. These assemblies demonstrate that centromeric, acrocentric, and telomeric regions conventionally excluded from analysis harbor extensive somatic and epigenetic changes. Resolving complete tumor genomes enables a deeper understanding of cancer structural plasticity and the endpoints of breakage-fusion-bridge cycles. These assembled, curated paired normal-tumor benchmarks will serve as a critical foundation for developing future algorithms to characterize the most intractable regions of cancer genomes.

Background: The timing of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) may critically impact clinical outcomes, yet the ideal surgical window remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between time-to-CABG and in-hospital outcomes among NSTEMI admissions undergoing CABG. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the US National Inpatient Sample database from 2017 to 2021 to evaluate the association between time-to-CABG and key in-hospital outcomes, including mortality, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, ischemic stroke, acute kidney injury, and blood transfusion rates, while assessing length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges exclusively among survivors. Adult admissions with principal diagnosis of NSTEMI who underwent CABG without prior interhospital transfer were grouped by the calendar day of CABG from admission (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and ≥7). Multivariate regression models were used to assess the outcomes across these eight groups. Results: Of 142,200 included admissions, same-day CABG (hospital day 0) was associated with the highest rates of in-hospital mortality, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, and ischemic stroke. The adjusted odds of mortality, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock were lower among admissions undergoing CABG between days 2 and 5. Likewise, the adjusted odds of ischemic stroke were lowest when CABG occurred on days 2 to 4. The odds of AKI increased when CABG was delayed beyond day 6, whereas blood transfusion rates showed no statistically significant association with time-to-CABG. Among survivors, LOS and hospital charges progressively increased with delayed CABGs. Conclusions: Among NSTEMI admissions undergoing CABG, CABG performed on hospital days 2 to 4 was associated with lower adjusted odds of several adverse in-hospital outcomes compared with same-day CABG. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and guide clinical decision-making.

aims: We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the SVEAT score in predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in comparison with the well-established HEART and TIMI scores. background: Acute chest pain (ACP) is a common symptom in emergency departments. Various risk stratification tools have been developed to assess patients presenting with ACP. The Simple Vascular Event Assessment Tool (SVEAT) is the most recent scoring system introduced, based on five variables: Symptoms of chest pain, history of Vascular disease, ECG, Age, and Troponin-I. objective: We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the SVEAT score in predicting 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in comparison with the well-established HEART and TIMI scores. method: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted across five databases until June 22, 2024. Four studies comprising 1,520 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The predictive accuracy of the SVEAT, HEART, and TIMI scores for 30-day MACE was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic, with values over 75% indicating significant heterogeneity. Indirect comparisons among the scores were performed using the Z-test. result: Pooled AUC for the SVEAT score was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.86-0.98), indicating superior predictive accuracy compared to the HEART (AUC: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81-0.92) and TIMI (AUC: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.69-0.96) scores. However, significant heterogeneity (I² = 90.6%) was observed across studies, potentially due to variations in patient demographics, clinical settings, and outcome definitions. Despite the higher AUC, indirect Z-test comparisons revealed no statistically significant differences between the scoring systems. conclusion: SVEAT score demonstrates potential as an accurate tool for predicting 30-day MACE in patients with ACP. other: N/A

Background: A summary of pharmacist-based practices and preferences regarding the prevention and management of high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) toxicity in patients with lymphoma does not exist. The objective of the study was to describe current practices surrounding management of HDMTX therapy. This was done through a self-administered, web-based, cross-sectional survey of hematology/oncology pharmacists to ascertain practices and individual attitudes about HDMTX therapy management. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics. Response comparisons were made using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical data, and Kruskal-Wallis test for variables on the Likert scale. A total of 175 pharmacists provided 116 eligible surveys [68 (59%) complete responses and 48 (41%) partial responses] for analysis. The Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance formula was the most preferred method (61%) to estimate kidney function and determine HDMTX dosing. Respondents would proceed with HDMTX therapy until the predicted risk of AKI, or AKI stage 2 or 3, exceeded 50% and 20%, respectively. Preferred treatment modifications for a high predicted AKI risk after HDMTX exposure included additional prehydration, HDMTX dose reduction, and increased kidney function monitoring, although levels and degrees of agreement varied. Respondents indicated that serum cystatin C-based GFR estimates lacked evidence, accuracy, and practicality in HDMTX therapy management. There was limited familiarity with cell cycle arrest biomarker use during HDMTX therapy. Glucarpidase was considered time-sensitive and highly effective; however, acquisition cost represented a barrier to use, and the optimal dose was felt to be unknown. In conclusion, there is significant heterogeneity in supportive practices and beliefs about the optimal management for patients with lymphoma receiving HDMTX therapy.

Background: Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is a promising fusionless alternative for treating idiopathic scoliosis; however, limited data exist on the learning curve for this procedure. Previous studies are limited by single-center and short-term complication data. This multicenter study assesses the learning curve by evaluating improvements in operative characteristics over time and radiographic measurements up to 2 years postoperatively. Methods: As recorded from a multicenter registry, surgeons with ≥10 index AVBT procedures for patients with idiopathic scoliosis aged 16 years and below were included. Relationships between case number and multiple surgical variables were determined using Pearson correlation and linear regression testing. For identification of an inflection point, consecutive cases were plotted against operative time per level and fitted with a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curve. Independent samples t test and χ 2 test were used to compare outcomes between cases before and after the inflection point. Outcomes of interest included demographic, surgical, and radiographic information at the baseline, immediate postoperative, and 2-year timepointswhere available. Results: Eight surgeons and 325 index AVBT patients met the inclusion criteria. Inverse relationships were identified between case number and estimated blood loss, operative time, anesthesia time, and fluoroscopic time per level ( P < 0.005). The inflection point was identified at 15 cases. Operative time, anesthesia time, and fluoroscopy time per level were greater in the first 15 cases compared with those after ( P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in demographic variables, intraoperative complications, or length of stay between the early and late cases. Greater correction in the major coronal curve, minor coronal curve, and coronal balance occurred in the cases performed after the inflection point ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: AVBT is a safe alternative to posterior spinal fusion and demonstrates a predictable improvement in surgical performance over time. Large improvements can be expected during the first 15 AVBT cases performed with minimal differences in complications. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Introduction: Older age and multimorbidity observed in individuals with dementia may impact both the care they receive and their outcomes in the setting of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We conducted an analysis of ACS hospitalizations in the US to examine whether disparities exist between patients with and without dementia in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) use and ACS-related outcomes after accounting for age and comorbidities. Methods: We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2021 to identify adults hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ACS, including STEMI and NSTEMI. Propensity scores for dementia were calculated using 33 baseline characteristics, including age, sex, insurance, income, hospital characteristics, Charlson comorbidity index, and other relevant comorbidities. We performed 1:1 nearest-neighbor matching with a caliper of 0.2 standard deviations. After matching, we compare the following outcomes of people with and without dementia: receipt of PCI, mechanical complications of ACS, cardiogenic shock, mechanical circulatory support, inpatient mortality, length of stay, and hospitalization cost, and reported odds ratios or mean difference, 95% confidence interval, p-value. Survey weights were applied to ensure national representativeness. Results: Among 295,396 patients hospitalized with ACS, 7,143 had dementia. After matching, 7,142 patients with and without dementia were identified for analysis ( Figure 1 ). Covariate balance was achieved (all standardized mean differences <.1). Patients with dementia were 28% less likely to undergo PCI (0.72 [0.67–0.77], p<.001) and 78% more likely to develop cardiogenic shock (1.76 [1.58–1.95], p<.001), 82% more likely to require mechanical circulatory support (1.82 [1.61–2.05], p<.001), and 16% more likely to die during hospitalization (1.16 [1.04–1.30], p<.01) ( Figure 2 ). No significant difference was observed in mechanical complications of ACS (0.89 [0.33–2.33], p=.81). Patients with dementia had longer hospital stays (9.27 vs. 5.89 days; mean difference 3.38 [3.06-3.7] days, p<.001) and higher hospitalization costs ($182,649 vs. $130,233; mean difference $52,416 [$44,618- $60,215], p<.001). Conclusion: In this analysis of US hospitalizations for ACS, dementia was independently associated with lower PCI rates and worse ACS-related outcomes despite accounting for age and comorbidities. Further research is needed to understand and address these inequities in ACS management in patients with dementia.

PURPOSE Public reporting of health care outcomes can have unintended effects such as inappropriate risk aversion in patient selection. METHODS The center-specific survival analysis annually assigns all hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) centers in the United States a +1, −1, or 0 score for observed outcomes that are above, below, or within a center-specific predicted range of outcome. For each index year (2012-2016), centers receiving a −1 score after 0 scores in the preceding 2 years were compared with contemporaneous centers with as-predicted outcomes (0 score). Changes in the patient population characteristics in the 3 years before versus the 3 years after the index years were compared between the newly below-expected centers (NBCs) and the controls. A multivariate model adjusted for baseline patient population characteristics and center volume. RESULTS No differences in patient selection behavior were identified when comparing the NBCs with the controls across eight key patient population characteristics. For the statistically modeled (predicted) 1-year overall survival (OS), reflecting a holistic measure of centers' patient population risk, we observed no statistically significant difference in change (−0.23% [95% CI, −1.4 to 0.9]; P = .70). The observed OS increased in both NBCs and controls by 0.9% and 4.5%, respectively, without statistically significant difference in change. CONCLUSION Centers receiving a −1 score were not observed to deviate significantly from patient selection trends in the HCT field. These findings suggest that public reporting of HCT outcomes in the United States does not result in unintended bias against HCT for high-risk patients.