Citations

Objective The objective of the study was to determine risk factors for relapse of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV) after reinduction of remission with rituximab and discontinuation of maintenance therapy. Methods This is a post hoc analysis of the RITAZAREM clinical trial. Patients aged 15 years or older with AAV and a positive test for anti–proteinase‐3 or anti‐myeloperoxidase‐ANCA who achieved remission after reinduction with rituximab and glucocorticoids were randomized at month 4 to receive continued rituximab or azathioprine for a maintenance period up to 24 months, followed by observation until relapse or up to 48 months. Generalized estimating equations logistic regression identified baseline and time‐varying risk factors for relapse by the next visit for the two study phases: maintenance (months 4–24) and off‐treatment (months 24–48). Results Among 170 patients (median [interquartile range] age 59 [48–68] years, disease duration 5 [2–10] years), 99 relapses occurred (46 during maintenance). During maintenance, musculoskeletal involvement (odds ratio [OR]: 2.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–7.2; P = 0.03) and higher patient global assessment (OR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0–1.2; P = 0.04) were associated with relapse. During the off‐treatment phase, presence of CD19 + B cells (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.2–5.1; P = 0.01) and reappearance of ANCA (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.3–7.7; P = 0.01) were each associated with higher relapse risk. Multivariable analysis identified markers of inflammation (changes in platelets, white blood cells, and IgA) associated with relapse. Conclusion Risk factors for relapse in AAV vary by treatment phase. Monitoring markers of inflammation and immune reconstitution may identify patients at risk for relapse, particularly after treatment withdrawal.

Objective To compare the efficacy of abatacept to placebo for the treatment of relapsing, nonsevere granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). Methods In this multicenter trial, eligible patients with relapsing, nonsevere GPA were randomized to receive abatacept 125 mg subcutaneously once a week or placebo, both together with prednisone 30 mg/day (or equivalent), tapered and discontinued at week 12. Patients already taking methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, or leflunomide continued this medication at a stable dose. Patients achieving remission remained on their randomized assignment until relapse, early termination, or the common close date 12 months after enrollment of the last patient. Those who had a nonsevere relapse, had nonsevere worsening, or were not in remission by month 6 had the option to receive open‐label abatacept. The primary end point was the rate of treatment failure, defined as relapse, disease worsening, or failure to achieve a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Wegener's Granulomatosis (BVAS/WG) of 0 or 1 by six months. Results Sixty‐five patients were randomized; 34 received abatacept and 31 received placebo. No statistical difference in the treatment failure rate was found between those who received abatacept and those who received placebo ( P = 0.853). Treatment with abatacept did not demonstrate any statistical difference from placebo in key secondary end points, including time to full remission (BVAS/WG = 0), duration of glucocorticoid‐free remission, relapse severity, prevention of damage, and patient‐reported quality‐of‐life outcomes. There was no difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events between treatment arms, including infection. Conclusion In patients with relapsing, nonsevere GPA, abatacept did not reduce the risk of relapse, severe worsening, or failure to achieve remission.

Abstract Objectives To evaluate damage and clinical characteristics associated with damage in Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK). Methods Patients with TAK enrolled in a multicentre, prospective, observational study underwent standardized damage assessment every 6 months using the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) and the Large-Vessel Vasculitis Index of Damage (LVVID). Results The study included 236 patients with TAK: 92% female, 81% Caucasian; median (25th, 75th percentile) disease duration = 2.6 (0.12, 6.9) years. Eighty-four percent had follow-up: median (25th, 75th) duration 4.1 (1.9, 7.5) years. Items of damage were present in 89% on VDI, 87% on LVVID, in the peripheral vascular (76% VDI, 74% LVVID) and cardiac (40% VDI, 45% LVVID) systems. During follow-up, 42% patients had new damage, including major vessel stenosis/arterial occlusion (8%), limb claudication (6%), hypertension (7%), aortic aneurysm (4%) and bypass surgery (4%). Disease-specific damage accounted for >90% of new items. Older age, relapse and longer duration of follow-up were associated with new damage items; a higher proportion of patients without new damage were on MTX (P <0.05). Among 48 patients diagnosed with TAK within 180 days of enrolment, new damage occurred in 31% on VDI and 52% on LVVID. History of relapse was associated with new damage in the entire cohort while in patients with a recent diagnosis, older age at diagnosis was associated with new damage. Conclusion Damage is present in >80% of patients with TAK even with recent diagnosis and >40% of patients accrue new, mainly disease-specific damage. Therapies for TAK that better control disease activity and prevent damage should be prioritized.

Abstract Rationale Diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) is a life-threatening manifestation of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). The PEXIVAS (Plasma Exchange and Glucocorticoids in Severe Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody–Associated Vasculitis) (NCT00987389) trial was the largest in AAV and the first to enroll participants with DAH requiring mechanical ventilation. Objectives Evaluate characteristics, treatment effects, and outcomes for patients with AAV with and without DAH. Methods PEXIVAS randomized 704 participants to plasma exchange (PLEX) or no-PLEX and reduced or standard-dose glucocorticoids (GC). DAH status was defined at enrollment as no-DAH, nonsevere, or severe (room air oxygen saturation of ≤ 85% as measured by pulse oximetry, or use of mechanical ventilation). Measurements and Main Results At enrollment, 191 (27.1%) participants had DAH (61 severe, including 29 ventilated) and were younger, more frequently relapsing, PR3 (proteinase 3)-ANCA positive, and had lower serum creatinine but were more frequently dialyzed than participants without DAH (n = 513; 72.9%). Among those with DAH, 8/95 (8.4%) receiving PLEX died within 1 year versus 15/96 (15.6%) with no-PLEX (hazard ratio, 0.52; confidence interval [CI], 0.21–1.24), whereas 13/96 (13.5%) receiving reduced GC died versus 10/95 (10.5%) with standard GC (hazard ratio, 1.33; CI, 0.57–3.13). When ventilated, ventilator-free days were similar with PLEX versus no-PLEX (medians, 25; interquartile range [IQR], 22–26 vs. 22–27) and fewer with reduced GC (median, 23; IQR, 20–25) versus standard GC (median, 26; IQR, 25–28). Treatment effects on mortality did not vary by presence or severity of DAH. Overall, 23/191 (12.0%) with DAH died within 1 year versus 34/513 (6.6%) without DAH. End-stage kidney disease and serious infections did not differ by DAH status or treatments. Conclusions Patients with AAV and DAH differ from those without DAH in multiple ways. Further data are required to confirm or refute a benefit of PLEX or GC dosing on mortality. Original clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00987389).

ObjectiveTo develop evidence‐based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient‐important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate‐to‐severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA).MethodsWe developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations.ResultsThe panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality.ConclusionThis guideline provides evidence‐based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate‐to‐severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient‐important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

ObjectiveTo develop evidence‐based consensus recommendations for the optimal timing of hip and knee arthroplasty to improve patient‐important outcomes including, but not limited to, pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year for patients with symptomatic and radiographic moderate‐to‐severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis of the hip or knee who have previously attempted nonoperative therapy, and for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective, and who have chosen to undergo elective hip or knee arthroplasty (collectively referred to as TJA).MethodsWe developed 13 clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, outcomes (PICO) questions. After a systematic literature review, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low), and evidence tables were created. A Voting Panel, including 13 physicians and patients, discussed the PICO questions until consensus was achieved on the direction (for/against) and strength (strong/conditional) of the recommendations.ResultsThe panel conditionally recommended against delaying TJA to pursue additional nonoperative treatment including physical therapy, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, ambulatory aids, and intraarticular injections. It conditionally recommended delaying TJA for nicotine reduction or cessation. The panel conditionally recommended delay for better glycemic control for patients who have diabetes mellitus, although no specific measure or level was identified. There was consensus that obesity by itself was not a reason for delay, but that weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and the increase in operative risk should be discussed. The panel conditionally recommended against delay in patients who have severe deformity or bone loss, or in patients who have a neuropathic joint. Evidence for all recommendations was graded as low or very low quality.ConclusionThis guideline provides evidence‐based recommendations regarding the optimal timing of TJA in patients who have symptomatic and radiographic moderate‐to‐severe osteoarthritis or advanced symptomatic osteonecrosis with secondary arthritis for whom nonoperative therapy was ineffective to improve patient‐important outcomes, including pain, function, infection, hospitalization, and death at 1 year. We acknowledge that the evidence is of low quality primarily due to indirectness and hope future research will allow for further refinement of the recommendations.

ObjectiveThis study examined the relationship between age at diagnosis and disease characteristics and damage in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)–associated vasculitis (AAV).MethodsAnalysis of a prospective longitudinal cohort of patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic GPA (EGPA) in the Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium (2013–2021). Disease cohorts were divided by age at diagnosis (years): children (<18), young adults (18–40), middle‐aged adults (41–65), and older adults (>65). Data included demographics, ANCA type, clinical characteristics, Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI) scores, ANCA Vasculitis Index of Damage (AVID) scores, and novel disease‐specific and non‐disease‐specific damage scores built from VDI and AVID items.ResultsAnalysis included data from 1020 patients with GPA/MPA and 357 with EGPA. Female predominance in GPA/MPA decreased with age at diagnosis. AAV in childhood was more often GPA and proteinase 3‐ANCA positive. Children with GPA/MPA experienced more subglottic stenosis and alveolar hemorrhage; children and young adults with EGPA experienced more alveolar hemorrhage, need for intubation, and gastrointestinal involvement. Older adults (GPA/MPA) had more neurologic manifestations. After adjusting for disease duration, medications, tobacco, and ANCA, all damage scores increased with age at diagnosis for GPA/MPA (P < 0.001) except the disease‐specific damage score, which did not differ (P = 0.44). For EGPA, VDI scores increased with age at diagnosis (P < 0.009), whereas all other scores were not significantly different.ConclusionAge at diagnosis is associated with clinical characteristics in AAV. Although VDI and AVID scores increase with age at diagnosis, this is driven by non‐disease‐specific damage items.image

AbstractObjectiveVitamin D might participate in the pathogenesis of several immune-mediated diseases, but few related data are available for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). In this study, we analysed the association between vitamin D status and disease in patients with AAV.MethodsSerum levels of 25(OH)D2/3 were measured in 125 randomly selected patients with AAV [granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n = 50), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (n = 50) or microscopic polyangiitis (n = 25)] enrolled in the Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium Longitudinal Studies at the time of enrolment and a subsequent relapse visit. Sufficient, insufficient and deficient vitamin D status were defined as 25(OH)D3 levels &gt;30, 20–30 and ˂20 ng/ml, respectively.ResultsSeventy of 125 patients (56%) were female, with a mean age of 51.5 (16) years at diagnosis; 84 (67%) were ANCA positive. Mean 25(OH)D was 37.6 (16) ng/ml, with vitamin D deficiency in 13 (10.4%) and insufficiency in 26 (20.8%). In univariate analysis, lower vitamin D status was associated with male sex (P = 0.027) and disease activity (P = 0.047). In univariate and multivariate analyses, deficient vitamin D status was associated with disease activity (P = 0.015). Mean 25(OH)D status in the 21 patients with a subsequent relapse did not differ between baseline and relapse visit [37.8 (16) vs 38.0 (10) ng/ml, respectively; P = 0.92].ConclusionMost patients with AAV have sufficient 25(OH)D levels, although those with lower vitamin D status were more likely to be male and to have active disease. Whether optimization of vitamin D status alters disease manifestations or activity in AAV remains to be determined.Trial RegistrationVasculitis Clinical Research Consortium (VCRC) Longitudinal Study (LS), NCT00315380, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00315380

Abstract Objectives ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a group of multisystem diseases that can have several ocular manifestations. There are published data on ocular manifestations of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), but few for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). There is little information concerning chronicity, complications, and association with other cranial manifestations of AAV. Methods This study retrospectively analysed longitudinal multicentre cohorts of individuals with AAV followed between 2006 and 2022. Data included diagnosis, demographics, cranial manifestations of disease, presence of manifestations at onset of disease and/or follow-up, and ocular complications of disease. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed associations across disease manifestations. Results Data from 1441 patients were analysed, including 395 with EGPA, 876 with GPA, and 170 with MPA. Ocular manifestations were seen within 23.1% of patients: 39 (9.9%) with EGPA, 287 (32.7%) with GPA, and 12 (7.1%) with MPA at any time in the disease course. There were more ocular manifestations at onset (n = 224) than during follow-up (n = 120). The most common disease-related manifestations were conjunctivitis/episcleritis and scleritis. In multivariable analysis, dacryocystitis, lacrimal duct obstruction, and retro-orbital disease were associated with sinonasal manifestations of GPA; ocular manifestations were associated with hearing loss in MPA. The most common ocular complications and/or damage seen were cataracts (n = 168) and visual impairment (n = 195). Conclusion Ocular manifestations occur in all forms of AAV, especially in GPA. Clinicians should be mindful of the wide spectrum of ocular disease in AAV, caused by active vasculitis, disease-associated damage, and toxicities of therapy.