Citations

BACKGROUND: Pulsed field ablation is now widely used for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence remains common and postablation risk tools are limited. We assessed whether a validated sinus‑rhythm artificial intelligence— enabled ECG AF probability score, and its early postablation change, predicts recurrence after pulsed field ablation. METHODS: We studied consecutive patients undergoing index pulsed field ablation across 3 Mayo Clinic sites (February 2024–March 2025) with ≥1 sinus‑rhythm ECG within 180 days preprocedure. Baseline artificial intelligence—enabled ECG AF score (range 0–1) was the mean across baseline ECGs. Recovery indices (RI30/60/90), defined as mean postprocedure artificial intelligence—enabled ECG score within days 1–30/60/90 minus baseline, predicted post‑blanking recurrence using corresponding 30‑, 60‑, and 90‑day blanking windows. The primary outcome was time to first documented AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia episode >30 seconds, ascertained via clinic ECGs, ambulatory monitoring, and device interrogations. Cox regression adjusted for prespecified clinical and echocardiographic covariates assessed associations; Harrell C‑statistic quantified discrimination. RESULTS: Among 1052 patients (67±10 years; 33% women), median baseline score was 0.35; 320 (30%) recurred over 188 days. Higher baseline score independently predicted recurrence (hazard ratio per 0.1 increase, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.03–1.14]). Scores rose on day 0 after ablation, then declined over subsequent weeks, with persistently higher, less‑improving trajectories among patients who recurred (time×recurrence interaction P <0.001). Day 0 score was not independently associated with recurrence after adjustment. Attenuated early recovery (higher recovery index) was independently associated with recurrence, most robustly for RI-90 (hazard ratio per 0.1 increase, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07–1.24]), and improved discrimination beyond baseline and covariates (C‑statistic, 0.63–0.67; ΔC=0.04). Findings were consistent in a historical thermal ablation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline and early postablation dynamics of a sinus‑rhythm artificial intelligence—enabled ECG AF probability score are associated with pulsed field ablation recurrence and may aid multivariable risk stratification; prospective validation is warranted.

Abstract Objective To investigate the ability of artificial intelligence‐enabled electrocardiogram (AI‐ECG) atrial fibrillation (AF) prediction model output and delta age, defined as AI‐estimated age minus chronological age, to predict adverse vascular outcomes in patients with migraine. Background Migraine, especially migraine with aura, is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Using normal sinus rhythm ECG, our institution has developed AI‐ECG models that predict the probability of AF and estimate patients' age, and from that, delta age (estimated age minus actual age) has been shown to reflect cardiovascular health and physiologic aging. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included adult patients with migraine who had at least one digital, standard 12‐lead ECG from 2000 to 2020 at any Mayo Clinic site. The first normal sinus rhythm ECG was defined as the index ECG, and those with adverse vascular events or AF prior to, or within 3 days after, index ECG were excluded. AI‐ECG AF prediction model output and delta age were obtained from the index ECG. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of adverse vascular events that included acute myocardial infarction, acute ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and death. New‐onset AF was also recorded as a secondary outcome. Results A total of 29,928 patients were included. The mean age was 44.3 ± 14.5 years, and the median follow‐up time was 54 months. During the study period, 4662 (15.6%) patients had adverse vascular events, and 1384 (4.6%) patients developed new‐onset AF. A higher AF prediction model output was associated with a higher risk of adverse vascular outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]:1.15 [95% confidence interval: 1.12 to 1.18] for every 10% increase in prediction model output), as was a larger delta age (aHR:1.16 [1.12 to 1.21] for every 10‐year increase in delta age). Moreover, AI‐ECG AF prediction model outputs of ≥1% (aHR: 1.45 [1.36 to 1.54]) and delta age ≥−1 years (aHR: 1.09 [1.02 to 1.16]) were found to be the optimal cutoffs to dichotomize patients into high‐risk and low‐risk groups for adverse vascular events. Higher AI‐ECG AF prediction model output at baseline also predicted a higher likelihood of having new‐onset AF during the study period (aHR: 1.31 [1.26 to 1.37]), and the development of new‐onset AF was associated with a higher risk of adverse vascular events (aHR: 2.43 [2.17 to 2.73]). Conclusions For patients with migraine, a higher AI‐ECG AF prediction model output and delta age are predictive of adverse vascular outcomes. A higher AF prediction model output is also predictive of future AF development. Furthermore, we identified the cutoffs for both AI‐ECG models that can distinguish patients between high‐ and low‐risk groups. Our results showed that AI‐ECG models could inform clinical practice and identify patients with migraine at risk for future adverse vascular events.

Introduction: Diastolic dysfunction is a hallmark of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, yet echocardiographic grading is challenging in patients with hypertrophic or amyloid cardiomyopathies due to variable structural and functional remodeling. Consequently, there is a need for additional diagnostic tools to identify patients at increased risk of diastolic dysfunction and enhanced filling pressure. Research Question: What is the accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) model to predict diastolic dysfunction in hypertrophic and amyloid cardiomyopathy? Methods: We included patients with diverse phenotypes of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and cardiac amyloidosis and validated Mayo Clinic's AI-enabled ECG model to grade diastolic function (normal: grade 0/1; abnormal: grade 2/3). Echocardiographic analysis of systolic (LVEF) and diastolic function was performed within 14 days of ECG recording. Diastolic function was graded based on E/e’ (>14), left atrial volume index (>34 mL/m2), pulmonary venous atrial reversal flow duration (≥30 ms), and peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity (>2.8 m/s). Filling pressure was considered increased if ≥3 parameters were abnormal, inconclusive if 2 were abnomal, and normal if ≥3 were normal. Echocardiograms with severe mitral regurgitation were excluded. Results: We identified and matched 840 ECGs from non-obstructive HCM patients (n=125, age 58±19y, 70% male), 145 ECGs from obstructive HCM patients (n=29, age 56±18y, 66% male), 225 ECGs from apical HCM patients (n=33, age 66±14y, 61% male), and 382 ECGs from cardiac amyloidosis patients (n=49, age 70±13y, 57% male). The AI-enabled ECG model predicted diastolic dysfunction with an accuracy of 65% (non-obstructive HCM), 67% (obstructive HCM), 65% (apical HCM), and 75% (cardiac amyloidosis), with sensitivities of 94% and 97% for obstructive HCM and cardiac amyloidosis, respectively, and high positive and negative predictive values for cardiac amyloidosis. Systolic dysfunction (LVEF≤40%) was more common in cardiac amyloidosis (29%) than in all HCM patients (5%). Conclusion: The AI-enabled ECG model demonstrates moderate accuracy but high sensitivity for detecting diastolic dysfunction and increased filling pressure, especially in obstructive HCM and cardiac amyloidosis. The AI-enabled ECG is a useful, widely scalable, and low cost tool to identify patients at increased risk for diastolic dysfunction.

Migraine with aura(MwA) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and adverse vascular outcomes compared to those with migraine without aura (MwoA). AI-ECG prediction models developed at our institution can evaluate the probability of atrial fibrillation (AF) and estimate a patient’s age based on a normal sinus rhythm (NSR) ECG. Delta age, AI-ECG estimated age minus chronological age, indicates endothelial dysfunction and is associated with cardiovascular mortality. We aim to assess how AI-ECG prediction model outputs, specifically the AF probability and delta age, are associated with adverse vascular outcomes in patients with migraine. Adult patients diagnosed with MwA and MwoA from 2000-2020 with at least one digital, standard 12-lead ECG were identified. The first ECG that showed NSR is used as the index ECG. Patients with any adverse vascular outcomes before the index ECG were excluded. Adverse vascular outcomes used as endpoints include acute ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, AF, and carotid artery dissection. A total of 31301 patients (13783 MwA, 17518 MwoA) were included in our analysis. The mean age at the time of the index ECG was 44.3 (14.5), and the average follow-up time was 71.6 (69.8) months. Based on the index ECG, the mean AF probability was significantly higher in MwA compared to MwoA (2.39 vs 2.06, p< 0.001), while the delta age was lower in MwA compared to MwoA (3.7 vs 4.2, p <.001). The prevalences of all vascular outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Multivariate Cox regression models showed that a higher AF prediction model output (every 10% increase), as well as a higher delta age (every 10-year increase), are associated with an increased risk of composite vascular outcomes (HR1.20, 95%CI 1.17-1.23, p<.001, and HR1.19, 95%CI 1.14-1.23, p < .001) [Table 2]. The Kaplan-Meier curve of adverse vascular outcome-free survival by AF prediction model output, using 1% as the cutoff (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.41, 1.57, p<.001), and by delta age, using 2-year as the cutoff (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08, 1.21, p <. 001) are presented in Figure 1. Having aura, older age, male, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, and tobacco use were also associated with a higher risk of adverse vascular outcomes. Our results demonstrated the potential of using AI-ECG AF prediction model output and delta age to identify migraine patients at risk for adverse vascular outcomes.

Background: We previously developed deep-learning algorithms that identify coronary artery disease (CAD) risk based on (i) coronary artery calcium (CAC), (ii) obstructive CAD by angiography, and (iii) left ventricular akinesis in ≥1 segment by echocardiogram, using a 12-lead electrocardiogram (CAD ECG-AI). We tested the hypothesis that those with increased probability of CAD by CAD ECG-AI algorithms will have an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events and would refine the AHA Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Events (PREVENT TM ) equations’ predictive capabilities. Methods: We assessed a group of consecutive patients who sought primary care in Olmsted County, MN, between 1997 and 2003. Passive follow-up was conducted using the Rochester Epidemiology Project's record linkage system. Patients included met the same criteria of the original PREVENT TM equations. The probability output of each CAD ECG-AI algorithm was used to predict ASCVD (fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke) and ASCVD-Plus [further including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and all-cause mortality]. Events were validated in duplicate. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, sex, and risk factors while modeling each CAD ECG-AI algorithm as an individual and additive predictor (see footnote). PREVENT TM risk categories stratified analysis to evaluate the effect of the CAD ECG-AI models on predicted ASCVD risk. Results: We included 21,193 patients, with mean ± SD age 51.6 ± 12.0, 54% women and 95% white. After 14.2±12.4 years follow-up, 1,351 (6.4%) developed ASCVD, and 2,808 (13.2%) had ASCVD-Plus. The risk of ASCVD and ASCVD-Plus increased with positivity for the CAD ECG-AI algorithms after adjustments for age, sex, and PREVENT TM equations factors, all p for trend <0.001 (data not shown). In additive analyses, the risk of ASCVD and ASCVD-Plus increased with increased CAD ECG-AI factors, all p for trend <0.001 ( Fig. A-B ). Furthermore, the CAD ECG-AI algorithm enhanced the predictive capabilities of PREVENT TM equations across most risk subgroups ( Fig. C-E ). Conclusions: The deep-learning CAD ECG-AI algorithms displayed an independent and additive association with long-term ASCVD and ASCVD-Plus events in the community and improved the PREVENT TM predicted ASCVD risk. The CAD ECG-AI algorithms could help identify individuals at risk in primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Background: Our team recently developed an Artificial Intelligence model that enables the identification of increased left ventricular filling pressures using a single-lead electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) with excellent performance (AUC 0.91). However, its ability to predict incident heart failure (HF) in the community is yet to be evaluated. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that the output from the AI-ECG will predict the long-term incidence of heart failure (HF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and would refine the HF predictive capabilities of the AHA Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTs (PREVENT TM ) Equations. Methods: Leveraging the resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) we analyzed data from patients who sought primary care in Olmsted County, MN, between 1997-2003 with passive follow-up until April 2024. We included those with a digital ECG at baseline and excluded those who were part of the original algorithm development or history of heart failure. The diagnosis of heart failure was ascertained by using ICD codes (ICD9-428,ICD10-I.50) and a word search for the terms related to heart failure. HFpEF was ascertained using the Ejection Fraction (EF) data closest to the heart failure diagnosis date, using EF more than 40% as the criterion. We tested the association between AI-ECG predicted probabilities and new-onset HF and HFpEF using Cox proportional hazard models. These models were also adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and were stratified to evaluate the effect of the AI-ECG output on PREVENT TM -predicted HF at 10 years. Results: We included 20,276 subjects, mean age 55±14.03, 52% women, 92% non-Hispanic white. After 18.2±8.5 years of follow-up, 4,008 (19.76%) were diagnosed with HF and 3,812 (18.8%) HFpEF. Risks of HF and HFpEF significantly increased in patients with increased left ventricular filling pressures by AI-ECG, independent of risk factors, all p for trend <0.001, see Fig A-B , respectively. AI-ECG enhanced the prediction capabilities of the PREVENT TM score across all risk groups, see Fig-C. Conclusions: AI-ECG-Derived increased left ventricular filling pressure is associated with new-onset HF and HFpEF in the community and was associated with incidental heart failure at any PREVENT TM risk category. Those results suggest a potential role of AI ECG in predicting heart failure.