Citations

Background: Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a debilitating autoimmune disorder linked to thyroid dysfunction. There is limited knowledge of TED in Asian populations. This multicenter study characterizes the clinical features and treatment response of TED in a large Chinese cohort. Methods: A retrospective multicenter study included 4157 patients with TED from nine Chinese hospitals from February 2016 to July 2023. Disease severity and activity were evaluated according to the European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy standards. We examined associations of variables including sex, age, smoking status, I 131 treatment, consultation department, and geographical region with clinical outcomes. Logistic regression and nomogram models were developed to examine associations with sight-threatening TED and, in a subgroup analysis ( n = 126), patients’ responsiveness to intravenous glucocorticoid (IVGC) therapy. Results: We included 4157 patients with mean age and standard deviation (SD) 45.96 ± 16.44 years. Of these, 63.6% ( n = 2644) were females. Over half (55.6%, n = 2310) of participants were in the inactive phase, with a mean clinical activity score of 2.19 ± 1.61 (SD) for all patients. TED severity was categorized as mild (9.3%, n = 385), moderate-to-severe (82.5%, n = 3428), and sight-threatening (8.2%, n = 344). The average degree of exophthalmos was 20.04 ± 5.27 mm, and 48.8% ( n = 2029) of patients had diplopia. Patients treated with I 131 had higher disease activity (47.5%, n = 468, vs. 43.5%, n = 1379, p < 0.05). Coastal region patients exhibited more severe TED (sight-threatening cases: 10.1%, n = 195, vs. 7.2%, n = 147) and higher diplopia scores (1.00 ± 1.10 vs. 0.86 ± 1.09, p < 0.001) than inland counterparts. TED severity was also greater in patients treated in Ophthalmology departments (mild cases: 6.0%, n = 213; moderate-to-severe cases: 85.6%, n = 3055) compared with Endocrinology departments (mild cases: 29.3%, n = 172; moderate-to-severe cases: 63.5%, n = 373). Nomograms had an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.742 (confidence interval [CI] 0.716–0.768) for sight-threatening TED and 0.759 (CI 0.674–0.843) for IVGC therapy responsiveness. Conclusions: We characterized the clinical features and treatment response of TED in a large Chinese cohort. These findings offer valuable insights informing TED risk stratification in Asian patients and forming a foundation for future prospective studies.

10051 Background: CBL0137 is a novel agent that targets the FAcilitates Chromatin Transcription complex (FACT), a histone chaperone that regulates chromatin remodeling during transcription, replication, and DNA repair. CBL0137 has been shown to have anti-tumor activity in multiple preclinical models of pediatric cancer. We report the phase 1 trial of CBL0137 in children with relapsed or refractory solid tumors including central nervous system (CNS) tumors or lymphoma (NCT04870944). Methods: Patients (age 12 months to 21 years) with relapsed/refractory solid tumors, central nervous system tumors or lymphoma were eligible. In the dose escalation phase, a rolling-six design was used to evaluate CBL0137 administered intravenously (IV) once per week on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The starting dose was 400 mg/m 2 , with escalation to the adult phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 540 mg/m 2 . The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined based on cycle 1 dose limiting toxicity (DLT) using Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (v5). Pharmacokinetics (PK) and cytokine analyses were performed during cycle 1. Seven additional patients ( < 18 years old) were accrued to a PK expansion cohort at the RP2D. Results: Sixteen patients were enrolled; 14 were evaluable for DLT assessment (12 at 400mg/m 2 [6 in dose escalation and 6 in PK expansion] and 2 at 540mg/m 2 ). The median (range) age was 10 (4-20) years. Diagnoses included high grade glioma (n = 6), osteosarcoma (n = 5), ependymoma (n = 2), neuroblastoma, hepatoblastoma and Burkitt’s lymphoma (1 each). One of 12 evaluable patients treated at 400 mg/m 2 experienced a DLT: Grade 3 photosensitivity. At 540 mg/m 2 , the two evaluable patients both had fever and dose limiting Grade 3 hypotension. Non-dose limiting Grade 3-4 toxicities included anemia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, hypokalemia, anorexia, photosensitivity and fever. For both dose levels, a total of 12 patients were reported to have at least one episode of Grades 1-3 fever and/or Grade 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS). PK parameters (mean±SD) for CBL0137 (400 mg/m 2 ) were T max = 0.7 ± 0.5 h, C max = 1310 ± 417 ng/mL, and AUC 0-24h = 15300 ± 6790 h·ng/mL. Given the unexpected toxicities of fever, hypotension, and CRS, cytokine samples were collected in patients enrolled in the PK expansion cohort; all had Grade 1 CRS and significantly elevated levels of both IL-10 (adj p = 0.001) and IL-1RA (adj p < 0.001) at 24 hours vs pre-infusion. Conclusions: The RP2D and MTD of CBL0137 in children and adolescents with solid or CNS tumors is 400mg/m 2 IV weekly on Days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. CBL0137 leads to immune activation, with cytokine elevation and the possibility of CRS, an unexpected toxicity not previously reported in adults. A Phase 2 cohort in patients with Diffuse Midline Glioma is ongoing and includes further assessment of immune activation. Clinical trial information: NCT04870944 .

Abstract Purpose: Selinexor is a first-in-class, central nervous system (CNS)–penetrant, oral inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), the main nuclear exporter of many key tumor suppressors. We report a phase I trial of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent CNS and solid tumors (NCT02323880). Patients and Methods: A rolling six design was used to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and first dose pharmacokinetics of selinexor administered once (35–45 mg/m2) or twice (20–35 mg/m2) weekly during a 28-day cycle (part A). Ten additional patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) were treated at the MTD administered once weekly (part B). Results: In part A, 49 patients were enrolled. Continuous twice weekly dosing was limited by extended hematologic toxicity. The MTD on a twice weekly schedule for 3 weeks on/1 week off (twice weekly 3/1) was 20 mg/m2/dose. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) on this schedule included fatigue, acute reversible neurologic changes, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase increase. On a continuous once weekly schedule, the MTD was 35 mg/m2/dose; DLTs included seizure and thrombocytopenia. In part B (HGG expansion), there were no additional DLTs observed. Non-DLTs included lymphopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anorexia, fatigue, hypophosphatemia, nausea, and vomiting. There were no objective responses. The median number of cycles received was 1 (range, 1–9); eight of 59 patients (13.5%) received 5 to 9 cycles, five of whom had HGG. Conclusions: Selinexor-related toxicities were primarily hematologic and neurologic, requiring dose or dose-frequency reduction. The MTD and recommended initial phase II dose of selinexor in children and adolescents with recurrent solid and CNS tumors is 35 mg/m2/dose once weekly.

Introduction: Survival of children with relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) remains dismal, and successful treatment approaches are limited. Myeloid leukemias frequently have high telomerase expression, and neoplastic progenitor cells have relatively shorter telomeres compared to normal tissues due to the balance between frequent malignant cell division and compensatory increased telomerase activity. In one study, the 5-year overall survival (OS) in children with AML and lower telomerase activity was 88% compared to 43% for those with higher activity, suggesting potential prognostic and therapeutic importance of telomerase in this population (Verstovsek Cancer 2003). Imetelstat is a first-in-class telomerase inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2024 for the treatment of adult patients with low-to-intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) with transfusion-dependent anemia who are r/r/ineligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. . Imetelstat has also been shown to drive AML cells into ferroptosis (Bruedigam Nature Cancer 2024). The Children's Oncology Group (COG) previously conducted the ADVL1112 Phase 1 study of imetelstat monotherapy in children with r/r solid tumors or lymphomas (Thompson CCR 2013). Imetelstat was administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 268 mg/m2. Imetelstat was well-tolerated with no grade &gt;3 non-hematologic toxicities and one dose-limiting thrombocytopenia observed in a subject treated at the RP2D. In preclinical studies, imetelstat was active against leukemia stem cells in pediatric AML patient derived xenograft models (Barwe J Clin Med, 2022). Methods: PEPN2312 is an open-label, multi-center phase 1 study of imetelstat in combination with fludarabine/high dose cytarabine (FLA) for patients with AML in second or greater relapse, refractory to re-induction after first relapse, or r/r MDS or JMML (NCT06247787). The primary objective of this study is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or RP2D of imetelstat in combination with FLA in this patient population. Secondary objectives include toxicity assessment, pharmacokinetics, clinical response/minimal residual disease assessments per standard criteria, and OS. Exploratory analyses will be conducted to analyze telomerase activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, conduct pharmacodynamic studies, and evaluate any changes in cytogenetic and mutational abnormalities. Eligible patients must be between the ages of 1 to 18 at the time of study enrollment with Lansky/Karnofsky performance status of ≥50. Patients with leukemia must have platelet count &gt;25,000/µL and hemoglobin &gt;8 g/dL (transfusions allowed). Patients known to have a congenital bone marrow failure syndrome are excluded. This study will use the Rolling 6 design to estimate the MTD/RP2D. The starting dose of imetelstat (DL1) is 212 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours (80% of the single-agent RP2D) given on days 1 and 8 of a 28-day cycle in combination with FLA administered days 2-6. Premedication for infusion reactions with an antihistamine and corticosteroid are required prior to each dose of imetelstat. Patients may receive up to 2 cycles of therapy in the absence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity as graded by CTCAE version 5.0. Response assessment will be performed via morphology and central flow cytometry analysis for patients with AML and standard response criteria for patients with JMML or MDS (Niemeyer Haematologica 2015; Zeidan Blood 2023). One dose escalation to 268 mg/m2 (DL2) will be explored if DL1 is deemed safe. Intra-patient dose escalation is not permitted. Pharmacokinetic sampling will be performed during cycle 1. Once the MTD/RP2D is determined, further assessment of safety and preliminary activity of imetelstat and FLA chemotherapy will occur in an expansion cohort of up to 6 additional patients treated at the MTD/RP2D. PEPN2312 was activated in July 2024 and will enroll at 21 participating COG/PEP-CTN sites.

ABSTRACT Background Nab ‐sirolimus (ABI‐009, nab ‐rapamycin; Aadi Bioscience Inc. [Aadi]) is a human albumin‐bound form of sirolimus nanoparticles, a potent mTOR inhibitor. This phase I trial was conducted to define dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated or recommended phase II dose (MTD/RP2D), and pharmacokinetics of Nab ‐sirolimus in combination with temozolomide and irinotecan. Methods Using a rolling 6 design, Nab ‐sirolimus was administered intravenously (IV) on days (D) 1 and 8 of cycle (C) 1. In subsequent cycles, Nab ‐sirolimus was administered D1 and D8 in combination with temozolomide (125 mg/m 2 /dose, maximum 250 mg/dose) and irinotecan (90 mg/m 2 /dose) orally, daily on D1–5. Cycle duration was 21 days. Three dose levels (DL) of Nab ‐sirolimus were investigated (DL1: 35 mg/m 2 /dose, DL‐1: 20 mg/m 2 /dose, and DL‐2: 15 mg/m 2 /dose). The observation period for estimating the MTD/RP2D was defined by cycles 1 and 2. Results Thirty‐three patients were enrolled, 32 were eligible. Dose determination included 17 evaluable patients, median (range) age 12 (2–20) years and six additional patients were enrolled (four evaluable for toxicity) on a pharmacokinetic cohort. C1 or C2 DLTs were primarily thrombocytopenia including 2/5 patients at DL1, 2/6 patients at DL‐1, and 1/6 patients at DL‐2. One patient (DL1) with Ewing Sarcoma had a partial response and remained on study for 35 cycles. Rapamycin clearance was dose dependent. Irinotecan clearance and its active metabolite SN‐38 exposure were not affected by coadministration with Nab ‐sirolimus. Conclusion The MTD for Nab ‐sirolimus was 15 mg/m 2 /dose IV on D1 and D8 in combination with temozolomide 125 mg/m 2 /dose and oral irinotecan 90 mg/m 2 /dose daily for 5 days during 21D cycles. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02975882

10015 Background: The Children’s Oncology Group developed and implemented a unified method of dosing anticancer drugs in infants and small children with a BSA < 0.6 m2. The dosing tables use BSA-based dose banding and account for deliverable doses/volumes of the drugs. We studied the PK of VCR (1.5 mg/m2 dose level) in infants and children to determine whether this new infant dosing method achieves uniform drug exposures across the pediatric age span. Methods: We designed a sampling strategy to limit the blood volume required by focusing on the elimination (β) phase of the VCR concentration-time curve, which accounts for > 80% of the total area-under the curve (AUC). Duplicate samples to detect contamination were drawn at 3 post-infusion time points (2, 6-8 and 18-24 hr) through a central venous catheter (CVC) after a 90 min flush. VCR concentrations were measured at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia using a validated high-pressure liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method with a lower limit of quantitation (LLQ) of 0.25 ng/mL. A one-compartment model was fit to the concentration-time data using population PK methods (Phoenix NLME). The AUCβ was derived from the dose and clearance for each patient. Patients were accrued in 4 age groups (≤6 mo, goal n = 20); > 6 mo to ≤12 mo, goal n = 10; > 12 mo to ≤36 mo, goal n = 10; and > 36 mo to ≤12 yr, goal n = 10) to focus on infants and ensure representation across the pediatric age range. Results: 52 eligible patients have been enrolled and 39 are evaluable for PK analysis, including 9 ≤6 mo, 8 > 6 mo and ≤12 mo, 12 > 12 mo and ≤36 mo, and 10 > 36 mo and ≤12 y,. The median (range) age is 13.5 mo (1.15-112 mo). VCR was quantifiable in all samples, and there was no evidence of contamination in the duplicate samples drawn through the CVC. The mean ± SD AUCβ in the 39 evaluable patients was 54.7 ± 19.8 ng⋅h/mL. As shown in the Table, the AUCβ is similar in patients with a BSA < 0.6 m2 dosed according to the BSA-banded infant dosing table and patients with a BSA ≥0.6 m2 dosed by multiplying their BSA times 1.5 mg/m2 (p = 0.53, Mann Whitney test). Conclusions: The VCR BSA-banded infant dosing table appears to provide uniform VCR exposure for infants and young children compared to conventional BSA-based dosing in older children. The study design and sampling strategy facilitated rapid accrual of a young population and generated more VCR PK data in infants within a year than has been published since the drug was approved in 1963. This study demonstrates the feasibility of systematically studying other anticancer drugs in infants and other special populations to ensure they are receiving safe and effective doses. VCR AUCβ by dosing method. Clinical trial information: NCT05359237 . [Table: see text]

AbstractPurposePepinemab, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody, targets the SEMA4D (CD100) antigen to inhibit binding to its high‐affinity receptors (plexin B1/PLXNB1, plexin B2/PLXNB2) and low‐affinity receptor (CD72). SEMA4D blockade leads to increased cytotoxic T‐cell infiltration, delayed tumor growth, and durable tumor rejection in murine tumor models. Pepinemab was well tolerated and improved T cell infiltration in clinical studies in adults with refractory tumors. SEMA4D was identified as a strong candidate proto‐oncogene in a model of osteosarcoma. Based on these preclinical and clinical data, we conducted a phase 1/2 study to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity, of pepinemab in pediatric patients with recurrent/refractory solid tumors, and activity in osteosarcoma.Experimental designPepinemab was administered intravenously on Days 1 and 15 of a 28‐day cycle at 20 mg/kg, the adult RP2D. Part A (phase 1) used a Rolling 6 design; Part B (phase 2) used a Simon 2‐stage design in patients with osteosarcoma. Pharmacokinetics and target saturation were evaluated in peripheral blood.ResultsPepinemab (20 mg/kg) was well tolerated and no dose‐limiting toxicities were observed during Part A. There were no objective responses. Two patients with osteosarcoma achieved disease control and prolonged stable disease. Pepinemab pharmacokinetics were similar to adults.ConclusionsPepinemab (20 mg/kg) is safe, well tolerated and resulted in adequate and sustained target saturation in pediatric patients. Encouraging disease control in two patients with osteosarcoma warrants further investigation with novel combination strategies to modulate the tumor microenvironment and antitumor immune response.Clinical trial registryThis trial is registered as NCT03320330 at Clinicaltrials.gov.DisclaimerThe content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

AbstractBackgroundRamucirumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds the extracellular domain of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR‐2) and prevents binding of VEGF ligands. Based on population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and correlation with efficacy in adults, a target steady state trough concentration (Css,min) ≥ 50 µg/mL was established.ProceduresThis phase 1 trial (ADVL1416) used a rolling six design and a PK primary endpoint to define the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ramucirumab in children with recurrent/refractory solid tumors. Two dose levels (DL) were planned (DL1: 8 mg/kg, DL2: 12 mg/kg administered intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks). Toxicity during the initial 6 weeks was used to assess maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Cycle 1 Day 42 trough (Cmin) ≥ 50 µg/mL was the target concentration for the PK endpoint. At the RP2D, cohorts for PK expansion and children with central nervous tumors were planned.ResultsTwenty‐nine patients were enrolled; 28 were eligible; median age [range] = 13.5 [1–21] years; 22 were evaluable for the PK endpoint. Dose‐limiting proteinuria occurred at both DLs; however, the MTD was not exceeded. At DL2 (12 mg/kg), the median Day 42 Cmin (n = 16) was 87.8 µg/mL; 15 of 16 patients achieved a Cmin ≥ 50 µg/mL.ConclusionRamucirumab was well tolerated in children and adolescents with solid tumors. The RP2D for ramucirumab was 12 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks. This trial demonstrates the feasibility of incorporating a primary PK endpoint to determine dose escalation and the RP2D in children. Studies of ramucirumab in children with selected solid tumors are ongoing.

AbstractBackgroundOutcomes for children with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) are poor, and new therapies are needed. Pevonedistat is an inhibitor of the NEDD‐8 activating enzyme, a key regulator of the ubiquitin proteasome system that is responsible for protein turnover, with protein degradation regulating cell growth and survival.ProcedureWe evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of pevonedistat (20 mg/m2 days 1, 3, 5) in combination with azacitidine, fludarabine, cytarabine (aza‐FLA) in children with R/R AML and MDS (NCT03813147). Twelve patients were enrolled, median age was 13 years (range 1–21). Median number of prior chemotherapeutic regimens was two (range one to five), and two (25%) patients had prior hematopoietic cell transplantation. Diagnoses were AML NOS (n = 10, 83%), acute monocytic leukemia (n = 1), and therapy‐related AML (n = 1).ResultsOverall, three of 12 (25%) patients experienced DLTs. The day 1 mean ± SD (n = 12) Cmax, VSS, T1/2, and CL were 223 ± 91 ng/mL, 104 ± 53.8 L/m2, 4.3 ± 1.2 hours, and 23.2 ± 6.9 L/h/m2, respectively. T1/2, VSS, and Cmax, but not CL, were significantly different between age groups. The overall response rate was 25%, with n = 3 patients achieving a complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi).ConclusionsPevonedistat 20 mg/m2 combined with Aza‐FLA was tolerable in children with R/R AML with similar toxicity profile to other intensive AML regimens. However, within the confines of a phase 1 study, we did not observe that the pevonedistat + Aza‐FLA combination demonstrated significant anti‐leukemic activity.

Abstract Background Cyclin D has been shown to play an essential role in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) initiation and progression, providing rationale for targeting the CDK4/6‐cyclin D complex that regulates cell cycle progression. Procedure The Children's Oncology Group AINV18P1 phase 1 trial evaluated the CDK4/6 inhibitor, palbociclib, in combination with standard four‐drug re‐induction chemotherapy in children and young adults with relapsed/refractory B‐ and T‐cell lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma. Palbociclib (50 mg/m 2 /dose) was administered orally once daily for 21 consecutive days, first as a single agent (Days 1–3) and subsequently combined with re‐induction chemotherapy. This two‐part study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), followed by an expansion pharmacokinetic cohort. Results Twelve heavily pretreated patients enrolled, all of whom were evaluable for toxicity. One dose‐limiting hematologic toxicity (DLT) occurred at the starting dose of 50 mg/m 2 /dose orally for 21 days. No additional DLTs were observed in the dose determination or pharmacokinetic expansion cohorts, and overall rates of grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were comparable to those observed with the chemotherapy platform alone. Five complete responses were observed, two among four patients with T‐ALL and three among seven patients with B‐ALL. Pharmacokinetic studies showed similar profiles with both liquid and capsule formulations of palbociclib. Conclusions Palbociclib in combination with re‐induction chemotherapy was well tolerated with a RP2D of 50 mg/m 2 /day for 21 days. Complete responses were observed among heavily pretreated patients.