Citations

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that originates from the mesothelial surfaces of certain sites within the body. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and represents approximately 85% of mesotheliomas. The NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural provide recommendations for evaluation and treatment in patients with pleural mesothelioma. The NCCN Guidelines will continue to be updated annually based on available clinical evidence and panel consensus.

Abstract Background There is limited data on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and known pericardial effusions. Methods This international multi-center observational retrospective study included patients with advanced NSCLC with or without pericardial effusions receiving ICIs. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were graded per CTCAE v5.0. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards multivariable models assessed the association between survival outcomes and clinicopathologic variables, and an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) model compared outcomes between the two groups. Results A total of 1248 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICIs across 13 institutions were included. Of these, 85 patients (6.8%) had pre-existing pericardial effusions. Compared to controls, patients with pericardial effusions were younger (median age 63 vs 67 years, P = .007), diagnosed more frequently with PD-L1 positive tumors (96% vs 76%, P < .001), and had a higher median number of baseline metastatic sites (3 vs 1, P < .001). IrAEs were similar between both groups (42% vs 38%), and no cardiac irAEs occurred in patients with pericardial effusions. PFS (median 5.6 vs 4.6 months, P = .3) and OS (median 10.2 vs 14.7 months, P = .50) were not statistically different between patients with pericardial effusions and the controls, respectively. In both multivariable and IPTW models, pericardial effusions were not associated with PFS or OS. Conclusions Among patients with NSCLC and pre-existing pericardial effusions, ICIs demonstrate meaningful clinical benefit similar to those without effusions, with no new cardiac or severe toxicities.

Abstract Background Appendectomy has been proposed to influence ulcerative colitis (UC) outcomes, but its effect based on timing before or after diagnosis and long-term UC outcomes remains unclear. Materials and Methods Using TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network, we identified adults with UC (2010-2024) who underwent appendectomy before or after diagnosis. Two 1:1 propensity score-matched comparisons were performed: appendectomy-before-UC and appendectomy-after-UC versus controls. The primary outcome was a 5-year composite of oral/intravenous (IV) corticosteroid use or colectomy. Secondary outcomes included individual composite outcomes and advanced therapy initiation in biologic-naive patients. Subgroup analyses stratified by age and biologic exposure were also performed. Results After matching, appendectomy after UC diagnosis showed no association with the composite outcome (aHR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.83-1.16), oral steroids (aHR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.75-1.09), IV steroids (aHR 1.11, 95% CI, 0.87-1.43), colectomy (aHR 1.24, 95% CI, 0.77-1.99), or advanced therapy initiation (aHR 0.97, 95% CI, 0.63-1.48). Appendectomy before UC diagnosis also showed no difference in the composite outcome (aHR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.76-1.09), oral steroids (aHR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.72-1.08), colectomy (aHR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.60-1.63), or advanced therapy initiation (aHR 0.77, 95% CI, 0.53-1.13). However, IV steroid use was reduced (aHR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.51-0.90, P = .006). In subgroup analyses, advanced therapy initiation was lower in patients aged 18-40 years following appendectomy after UC diagnosis (aHR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33-0.96, P = .03). Conclusion Appendectomy was not associated with improved long-term UC outcomes of oral/IV steroid use, colectomy or initiation of advanced therapy regardless of timing.

e13656 Background: Effective multidisciplinary cancer care is bottlenecked by the cognitive burden of synthesizing fragmented electronic health records across different specialties. Current AI tools often function as isolated chatbots rather than integrated workflow assistants. We developed and validated "OncoSphere AI," an Agentic AI multidisciplinary clinical workflow support tool designed to autonomously orchestrate the multidisciplinary review process by deconstructing complex cases into domain-specific insights. Methods: OncoSphere AI is a novel, multi-agent large language model–driven platform that simulates a multidisciplinary tumor board for cancer care. The architecture uses a parallel reasoning framework in which eight virtual specialty agents—Medical Oncology, Radiation Oncology, Surgical Oncology, Pathology, Radiology, Pharmacy, Clinical Research, and Nurse Navigation—independently analyze structured and unstructured patient data against specialty specific guidelines and contemporary peer-reviewed literature. System performance was assessed via built-in telemetry (task completion, latency, inter-agent agreement) and blinded review by eight expert oncologists using a structured survey to rate data extraction fidelity, guideline concordance, safety, and clinical utility compared with standard manual review. Results: The study cohort (n=20, median age 59.5 years; 55% female) had a median of 2.5 (range 0-7) prior lines of therapy and multiorgan metastatic disease (median: 2, range 1–4), including lung, breast, gastrointestinal (CRC, pancreatic, hepatobiliary), and genitourinary (prostate, renal) malignancies. OncoSphere AI demonstrated high workflow utility (mean rating: 4/5) and strong extraction fidelity, with more than 90% of biomarker extractions rated as a “perfect match” by expert reviewers. Operational efficiency gains were substantial with AI processing averaged 4.7 minutes per case versus 29.3 minutes for manual review, corresponding to an 84% reduction in time (p<0.001). System telemetry revealed adaptive compute behavior, with the platform autonomously allocating 1.73-fold more reasoning tokens to complex, refractory cases than to standard scenarios. Safety review identified only one critical contraindication issue in a heavily pretreated, multi-line setting. Conclusions: OncoSphere AI effectively automates the clinical “perception layer,” consistently transforming heterogeneous longitudinal data into decision-grade insights with high fidelity and marked time savings. By operating as a coordinated ensemble of domain-specialized AI agents rather than a single generic model, it offers a scalable approach to reduce physician cognitive burden and to standardize guideline-concordant care planning in diverse, heavily pretreated oncology populations.

8519 Background: Non-classical mutations (NCM) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represent a broad group of oncogenic mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), often associated with resistance to osimertinib (e.g., P-loop and αC-helix compressing [PACC] mutations). Patients (pts) with NCM have inferior clinical outcomes with a high incidence of CNS metastases (CNSm). Silevertinib (BDTX-1535) is a fourth-generation, covalent EGFR TKI with high CNS penetrance targeting both EGFR classical mutations and NCM. The antitumor activity and safety of silevertinib in pts with advanced NSCLC were evaluated in a Phase 2 trial (NCT05256290). Methods: Pts with advanced EGFR NCM NSCLC who received no prior systemic therapy were enrolled (Cohort 3) based on a local molecular test. Silevertinib 200 mg was administered orally once daily. The primary endpoint of objective response rate (ORR) was assessed using RECIST v1.1. CNS ORR was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology for Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) in pts with no prior CNS therapy. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results: From February 2024 to July 2025, 43 pts with 35 unique NCMs (including 25 pts with PACC mutations) were enrolled in Cohort 3: median age 70.0 years, 72% female, 74% white, and 42% never smoked cigarettes. As of November 3, 2025, median follow-up was 7.2 months. ORR by RECIST v1.1 is shown in the table. Sixteen pts (37%) had CNSm, including 7 pts (16%) with measurable CNS disease. RANO-BM CNS response was 86% (n=6/7). Complete clearance of EGFR VAF ctDNA was observed in 21/26 (81%) evaluable pts. Serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 5 pts (12%), and 4 pts (9%) discontinued treatment due to TRAEs. The most common TRAEs included rash (19%, grade 3), diarrhea (19%, grade 3), stomatitis (9%, grade 3), and paronychia (5%, grade 3). While 77% of pts had a dose reduction, 19/22 (86%) patients with a radiographic response maintained or deepened their response after dose reduction, including all patients with CNS response. Conclusions: Silevertinib demonstrated robust antitumor activity in treatment-naïve pts with a broad spectrum of NCM EGFR driver mutations with high intracranial activity in pts with brain metastases. The safety profile was consistent with the known AEs of the EGFR TKI class. Clinical trial information: NCT05256290 . Data as of November 3, 2025 N ORR n (%) 95% CI DCR n (%) 95% CI ITT Population * 43 26 (60) (44.4, 75.0) 39 (91) (77.9, 97.4) PACC mutations 25 14 (56) (34.9, 75.6) 22 (88) (68.8, 97.5) Compound mutations † 16 11 (69) (41.3, 89.0) 15 (94) (69.8, 99.8) *No pts with classical (E746_A750del or L858R) mutations were enrolled. † Presence of ≥ 2 NCMs. As of December 27, 2025, the 6-month PFS rate was 86% overall and 80% in pts with CNSm; available PFS and DOR data will be presented.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary disease management, surveillance, and subsequent treatment. The panel has updated the list of recommended targeted therapies based on recent FDA approvals and clinical data. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on treatment recommendations for advanced or metastatic NSCLC with actionable biomarkers.

Abstract Introduction There are limited data on the impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) on the risk of recurrent pouchitis after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the TriNetX Research Network in adult patients with obesity and IPAA for UC with a history of pouchitis in whom a GLP-1RA was initiated compared to those patients in whom a GLP-1RA was not initiated. The primary outcome was the risk of recurrent pouchitis within 12 months. The secondary outcomes were mean number of antibiotic prescriptions, anti-diarrheal medication use, Crohns-like disease of pouch (CLDP), and pouch excision. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed. Results We identified 43 UC-IPAA patients with obesity and history of pouchitis (mean age 51.7 ± 14.7 years, mean body mass index [BMI] 34.4 ± 6 kg/m2, 60.4% female). After propensity score matching, the GLP-1RA cohort had a significantly decreased risk of recurrent pouchitis (26.3% vs 52.6%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12-0.84) compared to the control cohort. Mean antibiotic prescriptions were numerically lower in the GLP-1RA cohort (2 vs 4.4, P = .16). Anti-diarrheal medication use was lower in the GLP-1RA cohort (18.4% vs 47.3%; aOR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.67). There was no difference in the risk of CLDP. Zero patients required pouch excision in both cohorts. Conclusion Our study in a small cohort of patients with UC-IPAA and obesity with a history of pouchitis showed that GLP-1RA use was associated with decreased risk of recurrent pouchitis and anti-diarrheal medication use.

Abstract Background and Aims Seven new advanced therapies, belonging to three new classes, have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) since 2021. We examined trends in utilization of advanced therapies in the USA since 2021. Methods Using de-identified electronic health record data from 71 US health systems, we examined quarterly trends in utilization of different advanced therapies in patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease between 2021 and 2025, using interrupted time-series analysis utilizing Prais–Winsten regression. Results In 11 093 patients with ulcerative colitis treated with advanced therapies, we observed an increase in use of upadacitinib (12.1% in Q2/2025; P &lt; .001, compared with first quarter of prescription), interleukin-23p19 (IL23p19) antagonists (5.5%; P = .03), and ustekinumab (9.5%; P = .04), decline in use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (34.5%; P = .003), and stable use of vedolizumab (33.6%; P = .17) and sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor modulators (1.6%; P = .28). In 15 951 patients with Crohn’s disease treated with advanced therapies, we observed an increase in use of IL23p19 antagonists (15.0% in Q1/2025; P = .003) and upadacitinib (5.9%; P &lt; .001) and decline in use of TNF antagonists (50.2%; P = .001) and ustekinumab (13.5%; P &lt; .001). Conclusions Contemporary trends in advanced therapy utilization in patients with IBD suggest an increased utilization of upadacitinib and anti-interleukins, accompanied by a decline in use of TNF antagonists in the USA.

The NCCN Guidelines for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines, with a focus on systemic therapy options for the treatment of patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC and the corresponding molecular testing considerations.