Citations

Emerging evidence links veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) to right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, but the relative contribution of ECMO versus underlying disease progression remains unclear. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, propensity-matched study including 408 intubated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients who were admitted between January 2020 and October 2024 in a quaternary referral hospital network within the United States and underwent at least two transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) after intubation. Using 1:2 propensity score matching, we adjusted for baseline comorbidities, baseline hemoglobin, lactate, and worst PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio (P/F). Longitudinal echocardiographic changes were analyzed with a cumulative link mixed model (CLMM), evaluating RV size and function as ordinal outcomes. Within 408 patients (112 received ECMO support), propensity matching identified 55 ECMO and 110 non-ECMO patients with balanced baseline characteristics. Among 469 serial echocardiograms, RV size and function worsened more frequently in ECMO patients. In longitudinal modeling, ECMO use alone was not associated with RV dilation ( p = 0.23) or dysfunction ( p = 0.43). However, longer ECMO duration was associated with RV dilation (OR: 1.04 per day, p = 0.004) and dysfunction (odds ratio [OR]: 1.04 per day, p < 0.001). Higher ECMO circuit flow had a trend toward progressive RV dilation and dysfunction but did not reach statistical significance. These findings highlight the need for vigilant RV monitoring during ECMO support.

ABSTRACT Introduction Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life‐saving intervention for refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Despite advancements reducing complications, ECMO remains associated with acute kidney injury (AKI), often requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Studies report up to 45% of ECMO patients needing KRT, significantly increasing mortality. A prior meta‐analysis suggested a declining mortality trend in recent years. Methodology Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched (2000–2024) for randomized and observational studies on adult ECMO patients requiring KRT. Data extraction covered study characteristics, patient demographics, ECMO type, KRT timing, and clinical outcomes. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4.1 under a random‐effects model, with mortality as the primary outcome. Result A total of 24 studies (6347 patients) met the inclusion criteria, including 23 observational studies and one RCT. The mean age of ECMO + KRT patients was 51 years in observational studies and 61.2 years in the RCT, with cardiogenic shock as the most common ECMO indication. Meta‐analysis showed a significantly higher mortality in ECMO + KRT patients (RR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.63–2.12, p < 0.001), with infections and bleeding as key contributors. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant survival difference based on KRT timing, while Veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA‐ECMO) was associated with worse outcomes than Veno‐venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV‐ECMO). The RCT reported 61.9% mortality at 30 days in ECMO + KRT patients. Conclusion KRT during ECMO is associated with increased mortality, likely due to the severity of illness and complications like infections and bleeding. The optimal timing of KRT initiation remains unclear, and no significant survival benefit was found for early KRT. Further large‐scale RCTs are needed to optimize management strategies.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use during liver transplantation is a complex and evolving aspect of critical care. This retrospective analysis presents the largest North American case series to date, offering a detailed comparison of survival outcomes in liver transplant (LT) patients supported by ECMO. A total of 15 patients were supported with ECMO, eight were supported on venoarterial (VA) ECMO and the remaining seven on venovenous (VV) ECMO. The median duration of ECMO support was 10 days. Mean intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays were 34.8 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1–158) and 49.2 days (IQR: 1–121), respectively. Overall survival was 33.3%, comparable to published rates (20–30%). Survival was based on ECMO initiation timing: preoperative 33.3% (1/3); intraoperative 50% (3/6); postoperative, 16.6% (1/6). All the patients (five) discharged from hospital were alive at 1 year follow-up. Significant ECMO-related complications included acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) (40%, n = 6/15), neurological complications (40%, n = 6/15), and bleeding requiring transfusion (26.6%, n = 4/15). Literature review suggests better outcomes with intraoperative or postoperative ECMO. While ECMO use is increasing in LT, outcomes remain poor. Improved survival may depend on careful patient selection, optimal timing of initiation, and distinguishing reversible pathology from irreversible one.

Backround: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication following veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), leading to further complications from anticoagulation or stroke. The Artificial Intelligence AF Prediction Dashboard developed at Mayo Clinic generates two predictive outputs: (1) a continuous probability score and (2) a binary threshold-based signal to predict the likelihood of AF at an individual level after 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is obtained. Using both continuous risk (%) and binary (yes/no) likelihood, we present a novel method to understand AF risk after VV-ECMO cannulation based on pre-ECMO 12-lead ECG. Methods: We reviewed a total of 147 patients on ECMO between 2018 and 2024, from which 85 VV-ECMO patients with complete data were included. AI Dashboard outputs were quantified as binary (1/0) or percent likelihood for AF. R was utilized for statistical analysis. Results: 85 patients met our inclusion criteria from which AF after cannulation occurred in 31 (36%). 17 patients had a history of AF prior to VV-ECMO initiation. The mean age of our cohort was 49 years with a mean BMI of 29.3. Baseline AI Dashboard continuous assessment identified 39 patients (46%) compared to the binary assessment identifying 31 patients (36%). Logistic regression in the binary assessment demonstrated an odds ratio of 1.08 (95% CI 1.04 – 1.12) with a p value of <0.001. The binary AF Prediction yielded a 58% sensitivity, 76% specificity, 58% PPV, and 76% NPV, with an accuracy of 67%. The continuous AF Probability score achieved 72% balanced accuracy with sensitivity 74%, specificity 70%, PPV 59% and NPV 83%, indicating fair overall performance and suggesting good utility for ruling out AF in low-risk patients. Although both outputs provided moderate predictive accuracy, the continuous score reported before ECMO cannulation demonstrated stronger overall performance with fewer false negatives and higher rule-out value. Conclusions: We demonstrate the novel use of an AI predictive model in the VV-ECMO population for the prediction of AF risk with both continuous and binary risk cutoffs from baseline ECG. This data highlights the need for further development in ECMO-specific AI models to help mitigate risk after the onset of atrial arrhythmias. As AI-driven tools become increasingly integrated into care, their performance must be continuously validated and recalibrated for specific populations to ensure their safe and effective use.

Introduction: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPBT) and aortic cross-clamp time (AXCT) are independently associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, no universally accepted “optimal” duration exists, as these times are influenced by the complexity of cardiac surgery. ECMO is being increasingly used for cardiogenic shock in patients undergoing cardiotomy, but the impact of CPBT and AXCT on outcomes in this specific population remains unexplored. This study investigates how CPBT and AXCT influence outcomes in cardiotomy patients on ECMO support. Research Question: Do CPBT and AXCT influence mortality and complication rates in cardiotomy patients receiving ECMO support? Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review (Jan 2020–Dec 2024) across a multidisciplinary North American practice, identifying 623 patients who required ECMO. Of these, 236 (37.8%) received ECMO in the preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative period of cardiotomy. Patients were grouped by prolonged CPBT (>150 min) vs standard (≤150 min) and prolonged AXCT (>90 min) vs standard (≤90 min). We analyzed outcomes including 30-day mortality, ECMO characteristics, and postoperative complications. Results: Among the 236 patients, the average age was 60.8 years, BMI 37.43 kg/m 2 ; 63% were male, 85% White. Prolonged CPBT and AXCT were associated with higher BMI (p=0.02, 0.03), prior cardiac surgery (p<0.001, 0.006), and combined CABG+AVR procedures (p=0.01, 0.001). Patients with prolonged durations were more likely to require postoperative ECMO (p=0.001, 0.03). Complications such as mediastinal bleeding, AKI requiring CRRT, mediastinitis, bacteremia, and pneumonia, showed significant association with increased CPBT whereas prolonged AXCT was only linked with mediastinal bleeding. CPBT and AXCT durations did not significantly affect 30-day mortality, ICU/hospital stay, ECMO duration, or ventilation duration. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality included pre-/intraoperative IABP use (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.11–4.30, p=0.023), Impella use (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03–0.75, p=0.040), post-op intracranial bleeding (OR 5.46, 95% CI 1.43–23.9, p=0.016), and CRRT-requiring AKI (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.63–6.57, p<0.001). Conclusion: Prolonged CPBT and AXCT were significantly linked to higher rates of postoperative complications such as mediastinal bleeding, CRRT requiring AKI, mediastinitis, and pneumonia along with increased need for postoperative ECMO support, without significantly affecting mortality.

Background: Renal dysfunction is a known prognostic factor in advanced heart failure and among patients receiving temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). However, the predictive value of post-Impella creatinine in determining healthcare resource utilization in patients bridged to transplant with Impella 5.5 remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between post-Impella creatinine and key hospitalization metrics in this population. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who received Impella 5.5 as a bridge-to-transplant between January 2020 and January 2025. Serum creatinine was collected 72 hours after Impella placement. The primary outcome was device-to-discharge time. Secondary outcomes included transplant-to-discharge time, post-transplant ICU length of stay (LOS), and total LOS (admission-discharge). Univariate and multivariable linear regressions were used to examine the association between post-Impella creatinine and each outcome, adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and LVEF. Results: 133 patients were supported with the Impella 5.5 as BTT and were included (median age 58 years (51–65), 82.7% were male, and 71.4% presented with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. The median BMI was 27.7 (24.3–32.3), LVEF 17% (15–22), and post-Impella creatinine 1.32 mg/dL (0.96–1.71). The median device-to-discharge time was 45 days (29-64), transplant-to-discharge time was 14 days (12–19), ICU LOS post-transplant was 6 days (4–8), and total LOS was 58 days (42–76). Higher post-Impella creatinine was significantly associated with longer device-to-discharge time (β = 6.67, p = 0.004), longer transplant-to-discharge duration (β = 3.42 p = 0.003), longer ICU LOS (β = 2.19, p = 0.007), and longer total LOS (β = 7.24, p = 0.002) on univariate analysis. Post-impella creatinine remained significantly associated with device-to-discharge time in the multivariate model after adjusting for confounders (β = 6.33, p = 0.006). Importantly, this suggests that patients with lower post-Impella creatinine levels may experience shorter hospitalizations and faster recovery trajectories following transplant. Conclusions: Post-Impella creatinine is a significant predictor of prolonged hospitalization in patients supported with Impella 5.5 as a bridge to transplant. These findings emphasize the prognostic importance of early renal function assessment and may guide risk stratification and resource planning in advanced heart failure care.

Background: Progressive heart failure cardiogenic shock (HFCS) often requires escalation to temporary or durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to transplant (BTT). Following the 2018 UNOS allocation changes, our center revised its BTT strategy to optimize support and shorten wait times. At our institution, the Impella 5.5 with SmartAssist via the axillary approach was selectively used for patients who remained refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy, failed single-inotrope therapy, and were not considered suitable durable LVAD candidates by our multidisciplinary heart team. We compared transplant-related outcomes of BTT patients supported with Impella 5.5 versus durable LVAD. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of all heart and heart/kidney transplant candidates at Mayo Clinic Florida from October 2018 to February 2021. INTERMACS profile, baseline characteristics, and perioperative data were collected at the time of device implantation and throughout the transplant hospitalization. Results: A total of 87 heart and 4 heart–kidney transplants were completed. Forty-five patients (49%) required MCS as BTT: 27 (60%) with a durable LVAD and 18 (40%) with an Impella 5.5. All eighteen patients with Impella 5.5 as BTT (100%) were transplanted compared to nineteen patients with durable LVAD (70%), p = 0.001. The median time from listing to transplant was substantially shorter with Impella (32 vs. 696 days, p < 0.001), and this difference persisted across INTERMACS profiles. UNOS status at transplant was more urgent for Impella than LVAD (p < 0.001). Transplant surgery following Impella support required shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (181 vs. 219 min, p < 0.001) and resulted in lower postoperative vasoactive-inotropic requirements (7.9 vs. 13, p = 0.003). No patients in the Impella group died or were delisted while awaiting transplant, whereas 5 LVAD patients (26%) died or were removed due to LVAD complications (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that the use of the Impella 5.5 as BTT was associated with significantly shorter waitlist time, higher transplantation rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and lower postoperative vasoactive support compared with durable LVAD as BTT. These benefits were achieved despite a higher severity of illness at transplantation in the Impella cohort.