Citations

Abstract Abstract #76 Background: QOL and MH outcomes were integrated into the NSABP B-30 trial as secondary outcomes to the efficacy analyses which are being presented separately. Explicit secondary aims of the NSABP B-30 study were 1) to compare toxicities among the regimens, 2) to compare QOL, and 3) to examine differences in amenorrhea and its relationship to symptoms, QOL, and efficacy. Here we examine the secondary aims of the study as a companion to the efficacy results that are presented separately.
 Materials and Methods: 5351 pts with cT1-3, N0-1, M0 were enrolled from 3/1/99 to 3/31/2004. 2170 were enrolled on the QOL study, and 2449 were enrolled on the MH study and were randomized to one of three treatment groups: Group 1 [doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2 q 3 weeks (wks) x 4 followed by docetaxel (T) 100 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4; Group 2 [A 50 mg/m2 and T 75 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4]; Group 3 [A 50 mg/m2 T 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4]. All patients with ER-positive tumors received hormonal therapy after completing chemotherapy. Preliminary results from Group 1 have been reported previously (Swain, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2008).
 Results: The protocol specifies that 800 deaths are required for the definitive analysis of treatment, QOL, and MH outcomes, which are expected to occur by fall 2008. For this final report, results from a comparison of the three arms will be analyzed and presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 76.

Abstract Abstract #75 Background: The primary aims of this study were to determine 1) if a concurrent regimen of therapy containing cyclophosphamide compared to a sequential regimen containing cyclophosphamide would prolong disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and 2) if a regimen without cyclophosphamide was at least as efficacious as the two regimens containing cyclophosphamide. The secondary aims were to compare toxicities among the three regimens and to compare differences in amenorrhea in premenopausal women in each arm and its relationship to outcome.
 Materials and Methods: 5351 pts with cT1-3, N0-1, M0 were enrolled from 3/1/99 to 3/31/2004. 1783 pts were randomized to Group 1 [doxorubicin (A) 60 mg/m2 and C 600 mg/m2 q 3 weeks (wks) x 4 followed by docetaxel (T) 100 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4], 1784 pts to Group 2 [A 50 mg/m2 and T 75 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4], and 1784 to Group 3 [A 50 mg/m2 T 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/m2 q 3 wks x 4]. All patients with ER-positive tumors received hormonal therapy after completing chemotherapy. The protocol specifies that 800 deaths are required for the definitive analysis. This is expected to occur by Fall 2008.
 Results: Mean time on study is currently 79 months. At entry, 46% of pts were < 49 yrs; 54% were > 50 yrs. 82% were white, 10% black, 4% Hispanic. 66% had 1-3 positive nodes, 26% had 4-9, and 8% had 10+. 75% of pts were ER pos. 49% had lumpectomy, 51% mastectomy, and 24% local/regional radiotherapy. Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm. The presentation will include the first results of DFS, OS, and relevant toxicities from the trial. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 75.

Abstract Abstract #62 Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in younger women (25 to 49 years of age). Young women with breast cancer also have worse overall survival and increased risk of recurrence compared to older women with breast cancer. Innovative approaches to understanding risk factors and tissue characteristics for the younger population can improve understanding of breast cancer etiology and enhance risk-stratification for these women. This study was aimed at examining breast cancer risk factors among young women (<50 years) with BBD. Materials and Methods: Utilizing the Mayo Clinic Surgical and Pathology Indices, women ages 18 to 85 who had benign excisional breast biopsy between January 1, 1967 and December 31, 1991 were identified. The diagnosis of breast cancer served as the study endpoint and was determined using the Mayo medical record and questionnaire information from study participants. The breast pathologist, blinded to the initial diagnosis and clinical outcome, performed pathology review. BBD was classified as non-proliferative disease (NPD), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH). Age-related lobular involution (reduction in number and size of acini per lobule) was classified as none-0%, partial- 1 to74%, or complete- >75% involution. Relative risk (RR) was estimated by comparing the number of observed breast cancers with the number expected, based on breast cancer rates in the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. Results: Of the 9376 women in the Mayo BBD cohort, 4460 women were aged <50 years at BBD diagnosis and formed the study cohort. The mean age at BBD diagnosis was 39.4 (+ 8.3) years. With a median follow-up of 20 years, 326 breast cancer cases were identified. The histologic findings were NPD in 72% of women, PDWA in 26%, and AH in 2%. The relative risk of breast cancer for the overall cohort of young women with BBD was 1.5 (95% CI [1.4, 1.7]). The relative risk among those with AH was 6.9 (95% CI [4.6, 10.1), compared with a RR of 2.0 (95% CI [1.7, 2.4]) for PDWA, and RR of 1.2 (95% CI [1.0, 1.4]) for NPD. Risk was associated with extent of lobular involution (RR for no involution was 1.7 (95%CI [1.4, 2.1]); partial involution 1.4 (95%CI [1.2, 1.7]); complete involution 0.7 (95%CI [0.3, 1.4]). Family history was available for 83% of the cohort and RR was 2.2 (95% CI [1.7, 2.8]) for women with strong family history and was 1.3 (95% CI [1.1, 1.6]) for women with no family history. Discussion: Young women with BBD are at increased risk of breast cancer. Risk is high in women with atypical hyperplasia, and those with a family history of breast cancer. Lobular involution is associated with reduced breast cancer risk in this population, suggesting a role in modifying breast cancer risk. These findings suggest the need for further research in this population, along with tissue-based studies to examine the processes leading to breast cancer, and enable identification of those women at highest risk. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 62.

Abstract Abstract #6149 Background: Internal Review Boards and Data and Safety Monitoring Boards often require protocol-specified adverse event (AE) stopping rules for safety monitoring. However, availability of safety data for investigational agent(s) may be limited at the time of protocol development in the phase II setting. This meta-analysis was undertaken to quantify the variability of AE rates in North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II metastatic breast cancer (MBC) clinical trials and to investigate whether study factors are associated with AE rates for the development of AE stopping rules in future phase II clinical trials.
 Methods: All closed NCCTG phase II MBC clinical trials using CTC v2.0 or CTCAE v3.0 for AE monitoring were selected. Rates of G3/4 AEs (overall, hematologic [H], and non-hematologic [NH]) and of study discontinuation [SD] due to AEs were calculated for each trial. Associations between study factors [number of agents (single vs combination); line of therapy (first-line only vs other); and type of therapy (chemotherapy vs other)] and AE rates were assessed via Wilcoxon rank sum tests.
 Results: 15 trials met inclusion criteria. 7 used CTCAE v3.0; 6 investigated single agents; 5 investigated first-line therapy; and 11 investigated chemotherapy regimens. 694 pts were evaluable for AE analysis. The G3/4 AE rate across trials was 68% (16-98%) overall, 45% (0-96%) H, and 51% (16-78%) NH. The overall rate of SD due to AEs was 13% (0-40%). The overall rate of G3/4 AEs was significantly lower in single agents vs combination regimens (30% vs 86%, p=0.004). This association held for H (2% vs 66%, p<0.0001) and NH (27% vs 57%, p=0.03) Aes. The rate of SD due to AEs was also significantly lower in single agents vs combination regimens (0.5% vs 15%, p=0.04). The rate of G3/4 AEs was significantly higher in first-line only trials vs other trials (overall: 90% vs 47%, p=0.04; H: 73% vs 5%, p=0.02; NH: 66% vs 41%, p=0.08). The rate of SD due to AEs was also significantly higher in first-line only trials (18% vs 4%, p=0.008). The only significant association with chemotherapy vs other therapy was G3/4 H AE rates (51% vs 2%, p=0.02).
 Discussion: High variability in G3/4 AE rates overall and in H and NH AEs was noted in these 15 trials. There is also high variability in the rates of SD due to AEs. The data suggest that clinical trials with single agent regimens have lower AE rates than combination regimens and, surprisingly, trials of first-line therapy only have higher AE rates than other trials. This may be due to more aggressive therapy being tested in the first-line setting. Although data from previous trials with the investigational agent(s) should be used for developing AE stopping rules when available, this study suggests that study factors such as number of agents and line of therapy can be useful when previous data are limited. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6149.

Abstract Abstract #6147 Background: Phase II metastatic breast cancer (MBC) clinical trials evaluating efficacy of cancer treatments are often designed using a binary primary endpoint (i.e., each evaluable patient [pt] is classified as a “success” or “failure”). In the era of novel agents in cancer research, endpoints such as 6-month progression-free survival [PFS6] for measuring efficacy of cytostatic agents are more commonly being used. This meta-analysis was undertaken to compare two binary classifications of PFS6 and to compare these binary endpoints with other efficacy endpoints in the phase II setting.
 Material and Methods: All closed North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase II MBC clinical trials using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) with at least 1 year of follow-up since last pt accrued were selected. All eligible pts initiating treatment were included. Two binary classifications of PFS6 were computed for each trial. Success for PFS6-1 is defined as on study treatment 6 months from registration without documentation of disease progression. Success for PFS6-2 does not require a pt to be on study treatment at 6 months. Also computed for each trial are Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of PFS6 (PFS6-KM) and 1-year overall survival (OS1-KM). Trial-level endpoints were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using weighted (by trial sample sizes) Pearson correlations. Lastly, the concordance rate of PFS6-1 and PFS6-2 status with OS status at 1 year at the pt level was computed across all pts (pts censored for OS prior to one year were excluded [n=10]).
 Results: 11 trials met inclusion criteria. All trials required measurable disease and had a single arm. 485 evaluable pts were accrued (median 48 pts per trial [range 19-77]). Median PFS6-1 was 27% (range 10-44%) and median PFS6-2 was 34% (range 10-73%). The median trial-level difference between PFS6-1 and PFS6-2 was 5% (range 0-43%). The correlation between PFS6-1 and PFS6-2 was 0.81 (p<0.01). Among the endpoints, PFS6-2 and PFS6-KM had the highest correlation (>0.99, p<0.01) due to only 2 pts being censored for PFS prior to 6 months. Among the PFS endpoints, OS1-KM was most highly correlated with PFS6-1 (0.79, p<0.01) with the correlations with PFS6-2 and PFS6-KM not being statistically different from zero (both 0.59 with p>0.05). However, overall patient-level concordance between PFS6 status and OS status at 1 year was higher using PFS6-2 (68%) than PFS6-1 (59%).
 Discussion: Differences were observed between the two binary classifications of PFS6. PFS6 with (as compared to without) the requirement that a pt be on study treatment at 6 months appears to have higher correlation with OS at 1 year at the trial level but lower concordance with OS status at 1 year at the pt level. Selection of the historical control should take into consideration the definition of PFS6 being used. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6147.

Abstract Abstract #6140 Background:
 Ixabepilone (ixa), the first in a new class of antineoplastic agents, showed clinical benefit in combination with capecitabine (C) in 2 large clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) pts whose tumors were resistant to (study 046, JCO, 2007) or pretreated with anthracycline (A) and taxanes (T) (study 048). In 048, ixa + C, compared to C alone, demonstrated significant increases in PFS (HR 0.79 [0.69-0.90]) and ORR (43% vs 29%). A trend toward increased OS was seen both in 048 (HR 0.90 [0.78-1.03]) and in 046 (HR 0.90 [0.77-1.05]), which did not reach statistical significance. Similar to taxanes, dose-limiting peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a side effect associated with ixa treatment. Here we present the incidence rates, management of ixa-induced PN from 3 registrational studies in pts with MBC and an analysis of resolution time. Also, data on potential risk factors for PN are presented.
 Methods:
 Incidence of PN is summarized from a 2000 pt program from 3 multi-center clinical trials. In this program, almost 1100 pts with MBC received ixa either as a monotherapy (40 mg/m2 IV over 3h Q3w, N=126) in a phase II study, or in combination with C (1000 mg/m2 PO BID x14d Q3w) in 2 large phase III studies (N = 369 and N = 595). PN was evaluated every 4 weeks after completion of treatment until toxicity was resolved. Resolution of PN was defined as the time from onset of worst grade to baseline or grade 1. A Cox regression analysis was also performed on a dataset of 945 pts with different tumor types across multiple studies, receiving ixa as a monotherapy or in combination with C, to identify the potential risk factors for grade 3/4 PN.
 Results:
 Incidence rates of grade 3/4 PN and resolution time observed in 1 phase III study (046) and the phase II (081) have been published before (081: JCO, 25; 3407). Here we present the data from the final confirmatory phase III study (048).
 
 PN was effectively managed with dose reduction. After dose reduction, symptoms improved or did not worsen in the majority of pts, and a median of 2-3 additional treatment cycles were delivered. Pts with diabetes were at a higher risk of grade 3/4 PN (HR: 1.67 [1.00-2.78], p-value = 0.049).
 Conclusions:
 Incidence of ixa-associated PN was similar to that observed in trials of other T based regiments. Ixa-induced PN has a predictable median time to resolution of 5-6 weeks over 3 large studies. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6140.

Abstract Abstract #6114 Introduction:
 Symptomatic patients (pts) with performance status (KPS) 70-80 with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have worse prognosis than pts with good performance status and are often excluded from clinical trials. Ixabepilone (ixa), the first in a new class of antineoplastic agents, showed clinical benefit in 2 large clinical trials in combination with capecitabine (C) in MBC pts with tumors resistant to (study 046; JCO; 2007) or pretreated with anthracycline (A) and taxane (T) (study 048). In 048, ixa + C, compared to C alone, showed significant increases in PFS (HR 0.79 [0.69-0.90] and ORR (43% vs 29%). A trend toward increased OS was seen in 048 (HR 0.90 [0.78-1.03]) and 046 (HR 0.90 [0.77-1.05]) which did not reach statistical significance. In 046 and 048 trials, a survival benefit was seen with ixa + C in a predefined analysis in a subset of symptomatic KPS 70-80 pts (HR: 0.75 [0.58-0.98], 0.76 [0.60-0.96], respectively). We present a predefined pooled analysis of clinical outcomes in symptomatic pts from both studies to better evaluate the treatment effect in this subset.
 Methods:
 1973 pts with MBC previously treated with an A and T were randomized in phase III trials 046 and 048 to receive ixa (40mg/m2 IV over 3h Q3w) + C (1000mg/m2 PO BID x14d Q3w) or C alone (1250mg/m2 PO BID x14d Q3w). 606 pts from the 2 studies were KPS 70-80. Study outcomes included ORR, PFS and OS.
 Results:
 ORR, PFS and OS favored ixa + C in this pt population.
 
 In asymptomatic pts (KPS 90-100), similar improvement was observed in PFS and ORR; no benefit in OS was seen. Incidence of key treatment related grade 3/4 AEs for ixa + C in this subset of pts was similar to the overall population.
 Conclusions:
 In the pooled analysis, ixa + C demonstrates a survival benefit (2.8 mo) for symptomatic pts (KPS 70-80) failing A and T, which was consistently seen in this pt population in the individual studies as well, indicating that symptomatic pts can benefit from management of their disease and achieve overall clinical benefit with ixa combination. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6114.

Abstract Abstract #6074 Objective: To analyze blood-serum biomarkers (HER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1) for prediction of response to treatment in conjunction with Study 96-32-55, a multicenter phase II trial assessing the efficacy and tolerability of two irinotecan schedules in anthracycline- or taxane-refractory MBC patients.
 Methods: MBC patients who experienced disease progression after one to three chemotherapy regimens, including at least one anthracycline- or taxane-based regimen, were randomly assigned to irinotecan in 6-week cycles comprising 100 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks, then a 2-week rest or 240 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. During this study the serum samples from each patient were collected at a possibility of three time points; prior to treatment, at the first occurrence of response, and at completion of or withdrawal from treatment. Response prediction was analyzed using predetermined elevated/non-elevated serum biomarker cutoffs. Percentage changes from baseline to first response and disease progression were analyzed.
 Results: In the weekly arm, the objective response (CR+PR) rate was 23% (95% CI, 13% to 37%), and in the every-3-weeks arm, the objective response rate was 14% (95% CI, 6% to 26%). Serum biomarker levels were determined for HER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1 prior to treatment for 91 patients. Of these 91 patients, 17 had serum measurements at first response, and 38 had serum measurements at their completion of study due to disease progression. Only 7 patients had serum-levels collected at all three event-points. The baseline levels of sHER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1 were not different among responders and non-responders (Fisher's Exact p=0.41, 0.26, 0.68, 0.75). sHER2 level increased by 20.6% from baseline to disease progression (p=0.01). TIMP-1 level was 15.2% lower than baseline at first response (p=0.03), 16.5% higher than baseline at disease progression (p=0.01), and for 7 patients with all three event-point measures, TIMP-1 was 21.8% lower than baseline at first response and was 22.3% higher than baseline at disease progression (p=0.02, 0.04).
 Conclusions: In this study, serum levels of HER2, EGFR, uPA, and TIMP-1 do not appear to be predictive of response. However, interpretation of the data is compromised due to limited availability of serum at all 3 points. Serum HER2 appears higher at disease progression than at baseline. Serum TIMP-1 appears to decrease from baseline to first response, and then appears to increase at disease progression. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6074.

Abstract Abstract #6037 Background: Tamoxifen (Tam) is biotransformed to the potent antiestrogen, endoxifen, by the CYP2D6 enzyme. We previously demonstrated that patients (pts) receiving adjuvant TAM with impaired CYP2D6 metabolism due to CYP2D6 (*4) and/or concurrent administration of a CYP2D6 inhibitor had a higher risk of recurrence. Other studies suggest CYP2C19*17 (Schroth JCO 2007) and SULT1A1*2 (Nowell JNCI 2002) may be associated with treatment outcome. With extended follow-up, we sought to evaluate the importance of comprehensive CYP2D6 genotyping as well as the potential association between CYP2C19*17 and SULT1A1 copy number with clinical outcome in pts randomized to TAM in NCCTG 89-30-52.
 Methods: Using DNA derived from paraffin embedded sections, CYP2D6 and SULT1A1 genotype were determined using quantitative multiplex PCR and CYP2C19 by sequencing. Pts administered the following CYP2D6 inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, cimetidine, amiodarone, doxepin, ticlopidine and haloperidol) were considered as intermediate (IM) or poor metabolizers (PM) based on the potency of CYP2D6 inhibition. CYP2D6 phenotype was defined as follows: extensive metabolizers (EM) were pts not administered an inhibitor who did not carry a null allele (*3, *4, *6) and who were not homozygous for an IM allele (*10, *17, *41). CYP2D6 IM were either heterozygous for a null allele or homozygous for an IM allele but not administered an inhibitor or CYP2D6 EM administered a weak inhibitor. PM were pts homozygous for a null allele, or any patient administered a potent inhibitor. The association between genotype or CYP2D6 phenotype and clinical outcome was determined using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox modeling was performed using traditional prognostic factors.
 Results: The median follow-up of living pts is now 14.5 years. Of 256 pts. randomized to TAM, genotype was determined for CYP2D6 (n=210), CYP2C19*17 (n=170), and SULT1A1 (n=169) with the following allele frequencies: CYP2D6 *3 (.02), *4(.20), *6 (.01), *10 (.03), *17 (.00), *41(.08), and CYP2C19*17 (.22). The frequency of SULT1A1 copy number alleles (CNA) was 1 (4%), 2 (67%), 3 (20%), and 4+ (9%). 14/227 patients (6%) were administered an inhibitor. A multivariate analysis accounting for nodal status and tumor size demonstrated that compared to CYP2D6 EM, CYP2D6 PM had significantly shorter time to recurrence (TTR) (HR 4.0, p=0.001) and DFS (HR 2.0, p=0.02) and CYP2D6 IM tended to have shorter TTR (HR 1.8, p=0.08) and DFS (HR 1.4, p=0.10). DFS did not differ by SULT1A1 copy number (p=0.62) or CYP2C19 *17 (p=0.47)
 Conclusion: Long term follow-up of pts in NCCTG 89-30-52 confirms the importance of CYP2D6 metabolism and further demonstrates the importance of comprehensive genotyping and phenotyping with CYP2D6 inhibitors. We could not identify an association between CYP2C19*17 or SULT1A1 copy number with recurrence but further evaluation is needed in larger cohorts. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 6037.

Abstract Abstract #57 Background: ABCSG 8 is the only prospective trial examining the value of switching patients (pts) to an aromatase inhibitor after tamoxifen (Tam) in which randomization occurred prior to therapy. This trial demonstrated that 2 years (yrs) of Tam followed by 3 yrs of anastrozole (TAM to A) was superior to 5 yrs of Tam (Jakesz SABC 2005). Tam is metabolically activated by CYP2D6 to endoxifen and pts with impaired CYP2D6 metabolism have a higher risk of recurrence (Goetz JCO 2005). The HOXB13/IL17BR (H/I) index (Ma Cancer Cell 2004) is associated with Tam resistance while a 5-gene molecular grade index (MGI) distinguishes outcome in grade II tumors. H/I and MGI are complementary prognostic factors that define low (low MGI), intermediate (low H/I, high MGI) and high risk groups (high H/I and MGI) (Ma Clin Cancer Res 2008). We sought to validate these biomarkers in ABCSG Trial 8, and hypothesized that they may predict the benefit of sequencing TAM to A versus Tam alone.
 Methods: From 1996-2004, ABCSG 8 randomized 3,901 pts with ER positive breast cancer. The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Assuming 40% of pts had reduced CYP2D6 metabolism, we designed a nested case control study in which 110 Tam treated cases matched to 2 controls would yield 80% power to detect a relative risk of 2.3 for pts with reduced CYP2D6 metabolism. Additionally, we sought to perform an exploratory analysis of the benefit of switching from Tam to A in pts with impaired vs non-impaired CYP2D6 metabolism. DNA and RNA derived from paraffin embedded sections were used to genotype for CYP2D6 and to obtain H/I and MGI RT-PCR profiles.
 Findings: Thus far, CYP2D6 genotyping is complete in 345 pts corresponding to 53 cases/106 controls (Tam) and 62 cases/124 controls (Tam to A). DNA and RNA yields were excellent with a CYP2D6 genotype call rate of >95%. CYP2D6 allele frequencies were as expected: *3 (.01), *4, (.23), *6 (.01), *10 (.02), *17 (.00), and *41 (.10). 44% of pts had reduced CYP2D6 metabolism (at least one CYP2D6 null allele or intermediate metabolizer) and 8% were CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. For H/I and MGI, 340 pts were profiled with 64%, 20% and 16% in the low, intermediate, and high risk groups, respectively. Tissue sectioning/genotyping for additional cases/controls is ongoing.
 Discussion: This is the first retrospective analysis of a large Tam versus Tam to A trial to evaluate the association between 1) CYP2D6, HOXB13/IL17BR, and MGI with TAM treatment outcome and 2) the predictive benefit of these biomarkers in pts randomized to switch from Tam to AI versus Tam alone. Final results will be presented at the meeting. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 57.