Citations

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy, yet their benefits remain limited to a subset of patients, underscoring the need for more reliable biomarkers and novel therapeutic strategies. The gut microbiome has emerged as a critical modulator of systemic immunity and a promising determinant of ICI response. Evidence links specific microbial features, taxa, and bioactive metabolites to enhanced antitumor immunity, whereas disruptions, such as antibiotic exposure, are associated with poorer outcomes. Advances in sequencing and multi-omics technologies have provided more profound insights into microbiome-immune crosstalk, though methodological heterogeneity continues to challenge reproducibility. Translational studies demonstrate that microbiome-based intervention, including fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), biotics supplementation, and engineered microbial strains, can enhance ICI efficacy or mitigate immune-related toxicities. Despite encouraging early clinical signals, broader implementation requires methodological rigor, standardized protocols, and innovative trial designs that account for host and environmental factors. For clinicians, the most immediate strategies involve prudent antibiotic stewardship and patient enrollment in microbiome-focused clinical trials. Overall, the gut microbiome is a promising biomarker and a therapeutic target, representing a new frontier for personalizing immunotherapy and improving patient outcomes in oncology.

Background: Depression affects approximately 5.7% of adults worldwide, and around one-third of these individuals develop treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Intravenous (IV) ketamine and esketamine (administered IV or intranasally (IN)) are novel treatment options for TRD; however, only IN esketamine currently holds FDA approval. Objectives: Compare the acute effectiveness of IV ketamine with esketamine (IV or IN) in adults with TRD. Design: Mantel–Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis of head-to-head studies. Response and remission at study end point were co-primary outcomes, expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses explored the impact of diagnosis, study type, and publication format; heterogeneity was quantified with I 2 . Data sources and methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, APA Psycinfo, and Scopus were searched from inception through 19 March 2025. Eligible studies enrolled adults with unipolar or bipolar depression directly comparing IV ketamine with esketamine and reporting response or remission. Results: Screening 1089 records identified eight studies ( n = 978). Seven observational studies ( n = 915) comparing IV ketamine with IN esketamine were included in the meta-analysis, while one randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing IV formulations was summarized qualitatively. Pooled response from six studies gave OR = 1.26 (95% CI, 0.92–1.71; p = 0.15) and remission from seven studies gave OR = 1.31 (95% CI, 0.93–1.86; p = 0.12), both nonsignificantly favoring IV ketamine with negligible heterogeneity ( I 2 = 0%). Sensitivity analyses excluding bipolar depression or abstract-only reports yielded similar effect estimates, reinforcing the robustness of the findings. Evidence across three studies for faster onset with IV ketamine ranged from significant in one study to modest trends in two. Conclusion: Based on the currently available comparative evidence, which is almost entirely observational, IV ketamine and IN esketamine show comparable acute response and remission rates, though IV ketamine may act faster. Large head-to-head RCTs are needed to confirm these findings. Trial registration: The study protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://osf.io/5jzev .

Abstract Objective To evaluate 2-year cost to insured patients treated with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. Methods Using the 2017 to 2023 Merative™ claims database, we identified adult patients with severe obesity and T2D who were treated with a RYGB or GLP-1 RAs. Patients with RYGB had no treatment with GLP-1 RAs, and those who received GLP-1 RA therapy with tirzepatide or semaglutide for ≥ 2 years had no metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) procedures. The study cohorts were matched on demographics including obesity, associated medical problems, and baseline direct or out-of-pocket (OOP) costs to patients in the year prior to treatment initiation. Direct costs included those from outpatient services, inpatient admissions, and outpatient prescription filled that were paid directly by patients. We compared this cost up to two years after treatment initiation using paired t-tests. Results 1012 matched RYGB and GLP-1 RA patients were analyzed, including 35% male. At 1-year after treatment initiation, healthcare costs paid directly by patients were similar for the RYGB ($2,301) and GLP-1 RA ($2,179) (delta = $122, p = 0.15) cohorts. From one to two years after index treatment date, OOP costs were significantly lower in the RYGB treatment group ($1,277 vs. $2,104, p < 0.01). Two years after treatment initiation, RYGB patients spent $704 less in OOP costs than similar patients treated with GLP-1 RA medications (p < 0.01). Conclusions Direct OOP healthcare costs were lower for RYGB compared to GLP-1 RA use patients 2-years after treatment initiation.

ABSTRACT Background Given the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' coverage of screening CT colonography (CTC) beginning in January 2025, we evaluated the cost‐effectiveness of CTC for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by race (Black and White) and gender, considering real‐world screening adherence. Methods A microsimulation model compared CRC screening strategies in average‐risk adults by race and gender, incorporating 2010–2019 U.S. data on disease progression and real‐world screening adherence for colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Five strategies were compared: (1) status quo (choice between colonoscopy and FIT); (2) CTC every 5 years; (3) colonoscopy every 10 years; (4) annual FIT; and (5) multitarget stool DNA test every 3 years, plus no screening. Lifetime costs, quality‐adjusted life years gained (QALYG), and incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios were projected. A willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100,000/QALYG was used. Results Under the status quo, Black adults showed higher CRC cases and greater utilization for FIT over colonoscopy than White adults. Compared to the status quo, the CTC strategy yielded more QALYG and fewer CRC cases among Black adults, but fewer QALYG and more CRC cases among White adults. Both status quo and CTC strategies outperformed other strategies across races. The CTC strategy was the dominant strategy for Black adults. For White adults, the status quo was cost‐effective with incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios of $34,998–$73,428/QALYG, while the CTC strategy was cost saving compared to no screening. Conclusions CTC could be cost‐effective for CRC screening in Black adults under real‐world screening adherence, supporting Medicare coverage to address specific population needs and structural barriers to screening.

Objective: To characterize patient outcomes after primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the management of sporadic facial nerve schwannoma. Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Six tertiary referral centers across the United States and United Kingdom. Patients: Adults undergoing SRS from 2000 through 2023 for sporadic facial nerve schwannoma along any segment of the facial nerve were included. Patients with NF2-related schwannomatosis were excluded. Intervention: Stereotactic radiosurgery. Main outcome measure: Long-term tumor control. Results: Among 60 patients meeting inclusion, the median age at SRS was 52 years (IQR: 41 to 64) with a median tumor size of 19.5 mm (IQR: 14.7 to 22.8). Tumors commonly involved the internal auditory canal (73%), cisternal (49%), geniculate/labyrinthine (47%), and tympanic segments (22%). Two patients experienced SRS failure and underwent salvage treatment; salvage-free survival rates (95% CI; number still at risk) at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years after SRS were 100% (100 to 100; 55), 100% (100 to 100; 36), 100% (100 to 100; 18), and 87% (72 to 100; 9), respectively. Among 31 (52%) patients with House-Brackmann (HB) grade I facial function at presentation, only 6 demonstrated worse facial function at a median of 3.2 years (IQR: 1.7 to 6.6) after SRS. Of 18 patients with serviceable hearing (AAO-HNS class A/B) at SRS, 13 maintained serviceable hearing at a median of 1.0 years (IQR: 0.5 to 4.9) of post-SRS audiometric follow-up. Conclusions: Durable tumor control after primary SRS for sporadic facial nerve schwannoma is achieved in most patients. Among those with HB grade I facial function at presentation, treatment with SRS harbors limited additional risk of facial paresis beyond observation alone.

Pulmonary fibrosis is a devastating and progressive disease marked by replacement of gas-exchanging tissue with collagen-rich scar. The mechanical environment is profoundly altered in pulmonary fibrosis and contributes to disease progression via feedback relationships between cells, the extracellular matrix, and the evolving mechanical environment. Targeting these mechanobiological feedback loops has emerged as a promising approach to interrupt disease progression, though with challenges in how to intervene selectively, safely, and effectively. We posit that further delineation of cell–matrix mechanobiological interactions will be pivotal to promoting fibrosis resolution and should guide efforts to discover and implement new approaches that can preserve or even restore lung function. To set the stage for these advances, we first review the mechanobiology of the healthy lung and the feedback loops that promote fibrosis progression. We then lay out the challenges and opportunities for targeting the fibrotic matrix as an essential element for protecting or restoring lung function.

Abstract Background Computational phenotyping from electronic health records (EHRs) is essential for clinical research, decision support, and quality/population health assessment, but the proliferation of algorithms for the same conditions makes it difficult to identify which algorithm is most appropriate for reuse. Objective To develop a framework for assessing phenotyping algorithm fitness for purpose and reuse. Fitness for Purpose Phenotyping algorithms are fit for purpose when they identify the intended population with performance characteristics appropriate for the intended application. Fitness for Reuse Phenotyping algorithms are fit for reuse when the algorithm is implementable and generalizable—that is, it identifies the same intended population with similar performance characteristics when applied to a new setting. Conclusions The PhenoFit framework provides a structured approach to evaluate and adapt phenotyping algorithms for new contexts increasing efficiency and consistency of identifying patient populations from EHRs.