Citations

Abstract Introduction Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS, mass fix) represents a sensitive and specific alternative to electrophoresis and immunofixation for quantifying monoclonal antibodies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Here we report real world data utilizing mass fix and compare its test characteristics to a gold standard of minimal residual disease (MRD) quantification utilizing next generation sequencing (NGS). Results All patients who had obtained mass fix and MRD testing by NGS as part of routine clinical care at Mayo Clinic Arizona were screened for this study. In total, 343 pairs of mass fix and NGS testing within 50 days of each other representing 269 unique patients with secretory multiple myeloma were included. Cases of IgD myeloma and those secreting only free light chains were excluded. The threshold of MRD negativity was set at <1x10-6(less than one malignant cell in one million) and was assessed utilizing the clonoSEQ NGS assay. The median age of our cohort is 67, it is 44% female, and primarily Caucasian (88%) with a median follow-up of 7.3 months from testing date. FISH testing was performed in 96% of patients and at least one high risk cytogenetic abnormality (t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p)) was found in 23% of patients. The t(11;14) translocation was found in 18%, +1q in 26%, and amp(1q) in 6% of evaluated patients. Notably, patients at all stages of treatment or disease status were included in our study. Induction treatment for newly diagnosed MM (NDMM, 133 patients) was mostly daratumumab-containing quadruplet (63%) or triplet drug regimens (36%). Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was performed in 79% of NDMM and 80% of relapsed refractory MM patients (RRMM, 138 patients). Of the RRMM patients, 94% were triple class exposed and 41% were penta-exposed. Overall agreement between NGS and mass fix results was 65% (Kappa statistic: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.22 – 0.41). Most discordant cases were instances of mass fix negativity and NGS positivity (n = 89, 26% of all testing pairs). Only 7% of cases (n= 30) represented mass fix positivity with NGS negativity. Mass fix was able to define therapeutic monoclonal antibody by its unique mass spectrometric profile in 38 of the total test pairs that otherwise would have been considered disease associated. Of the 30 patients testing mass fix positive and NGS negative, 25 (83%) represent post-treatment evaluations. Thus, ongoing mass fix positivity represents monoclonal protein washout kinetics. All of these cases are noted to have declining mass fix levels at last follow up and 40% had undetectable monoclonal protein. The discordant mass fix negative and NGS positive cases were evenly distributed across NDMM and RRMM representing 32% and 20% of test pairs in each group, respectively. Amongst these 89 total test pairs, the median abundance of malignant clone by NGS was 10 cells per million (range 0.06 to 297,895). This is in contrast to 136 concordantly positive test pairs where the median was 2960 cells per million (range 0.353 to 1,017,360). The median monoclonal protein identified (in those with a quantifiable M-spike) was 0.30 g/dL. Receiver operating characteristic curves using NGS as gold standard found the optimal mass fix threshold to be 0.010g/dL (specificity 95%, sensitivity 51%) for NDMM patients and 0.046g/dL (specificity 84%, sensitivity 55%) in RRMM patients. Conclusions Development of a MRD assay based on peripheral blood sampling could greatly improve the ease and speed of obtaining these assessments. Our experience highlights both the great potential and need to identify appropriate clinical contexts for optimal use of mass fix MRD assessment. A significant limitation of our data is that low level monoclonal proteins without a previous reference above a threshold of 20mg/dL are not reported as positive and may account for a significant fraction of discordant cases reported here. All clonoSEQ NGS samples are referenced to a positive control greatly increasing specificity. The currently reported dataset is biased against mass fix as not all test pairs reported are known to have a positive reference. Further delineation of these cases is forthcoming. Previous reports have also noted that mass fix test characteristics can improve with time from treatment which will be assessed with future follow-up.

Abstract Background and Significance Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other LBCLs account for 35–40% of non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases in North America, Europe, and East Asia. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard first-line treatment for DLBCL, achieving cure rates in approximately 60–70% of patients. However, 30–40% of patients will relapse or become refractory (R/R) to treatment, facing poor prognosis. Patients with high International Prognostic Index (IPI) scores (3–5) and those with IPI 1–2 who have bulky disease and/or very high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) are recognized as high-risk (HR) subsets with suboptimal outcomes (Maurer et al, ASH 2023, #4512). Novel combination strategies are an area of focus for improving efficacy in this population. GOLCA is a potential, first-in-class, oral CELMoD agent designed for the treatment of lymphoma, with preferential distribution to lymphoid organs and enhanced activity in lymphoma cell lines. GOLCA drives the closed, active conformation of cereblon to induce rapid and deep degradation of Ikaros and Aiolos, leading to direct cell killing (agnostic of cell of origin [COO]) and immunomodulatory activity. In the Phase 1b study CC-220-DLBCL-001, GOLCA in combination with R-CHOP demonstrated a predictable and manageable safety profile with high rates of durable responses, irrespective of COO, in previously untreated aggressive B-cell lymphomas (BCL), including promising activity in HR patients (Amzallag et al, ASH 2024, #579). The median relative dose intensity for GOLCA and CHO components was high (97–99%), indicating uncompromised delivery of curative standard-of-care treatment and combinability. GOLCA ± rituximab has also shown encouraging efficacy and safety in patients with R/R DLBCL (Bachy et al, ICML, #148). These findings support the further study of GOLCA + R-CHOP combination in the Phase 3 setting. Study Design and Methods GOLSEEK-1 (NCT06356129) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study evaluating GOLCA + R-CHOP versus placebo + R-CHOP in patients with previously untreated HR LBCL. Approximately 850 patients with previously untreated LBCL will be randomized 1:1 to either GOLCA + R-CHOP or placebo + R-CHOP. Eligible patients include those with histologically confirmed LBCL per WHO 2022 criteria—including DLBCL (not otherwise specified [NOS], ABC/GCB), high-grade BCL with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements or NOS, T-cell/histiocyte–rich LBCL, or Epstein Barr Virus-positive DLBCL. HR status is defined by IPI ≥3, or IPI 1–2 with HR features: LDH >1.3× upper limit of normal and/or bulky disease (≥7 cm lesion). All patients must have measurable disease as defined by Lugano criteria. Key exclusion criteria are other lymphoma subtypes such as primary mediastinal LBCL; primary cutaneous DLBCL-leg type, grade 3b follicular lymphoma (FL); transformed indolent lymphoma; anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive LBCL; primary effusion lymphoma; and Burkitt lymphoma and known or suspected central nervous system involvement. Randomization will be stratified by IPI score (HR 1–2 and 3 vs 4–5) and bulky disease status (≥7 cm vs <7 cm). After a screening period of ≤4 weeks, patients will receive either GOLCA (0.4 mg) or placebo orally once daily for 7 consecutive days in each of 6 cycles, combined with R-CHOP every 21 days. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator assessment per Lugano Response Criteria. Key secondary endpoints include PFS in non–high-grade BCL, event-free survival, independently assessed complete metabolic response, undetectable minimal residual disease by PhasED-Seq (defined as undetectable circulating tumor DNA levels at end of treatment), and overall survival. Patients will be followed up for up to approximately 67 months after beginning treatment. This study is currently recruiting at 309 sites in 36 countries , across the United States, Europe, Latin America, and East Asia. Acknowledgement BMS Artificial Intelligence was used to revise existing text with human author oversight.

Abstract Introduction: Idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease (iMCD) is a rare lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by systemic inflammation of unknown etiology. Clinically, iMCD is classified into idiopathic plasmacytic lymphadenopathy (IPL), thrombocytopenia, anasarca, fever, renal dysfunction/reticulin fibrosis, and organomegaly (TAFRO), and not otherwise specified (NOS) subtypes. Among these, TAFRO and a subset of NOS cases share overlapping clinicopathological features and often follow a fatal clinical course. However, the pathogenesis remains largely undefined. This study combines a comprehensive transcriptomic analysis with histological assessment, focusing on vascular proliferation to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of the TAFRO subtype. Methods: We conducted a pathological analysis of nine IPL, nine TAFRO, and eight NOS cases, and performed transcriptome analysis from frozen lymph node specimens from 12, two, and four IPL, TAFRO, and NOS cases, respectively. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and KEGG pathway analysis were performed to identify significant pathways in TAFRO and NOS, with IPL cases as controls. Results: Histologically, TAFRO and NOS exhibited a significantly higher degree of vascularization than IPL (IPL vs TAFRO: p < 0.001, IPL vs NOS: p = 0.002). In addition, “whirlpool vessels” in GCs were seen in most cases in TAFRO and NOS (TAFRO: 9/9, 100%, NOS: 6/8, 75%), but not in IPL (IPL vs TAFRO: p < 0.001, IPL vs NOS: p = 0.007). Immunostaining for Ets-related gene revealed that the number of endothelial cells of TAFRO and NOS was significantly larger than that in IPL (TAFRO vs IPL: p < 0.001, NOS vs IPL: p = 0.002). KEGG pathway analysis revealed the PI3K–Akt signaling pathway was significantly enriched in the TAFRO/NOS groups. Immunohistochemistry of phosphorylated Akt and phosphorylated p38, both upstream and downstream effectors of the PI3K–Akt signaling pathway, were positive in vascular endothelial cells of TAFRO and NOS. Discussion: TAFRO and NOS exhibit marked angiogenesis and are histologically distinct from IPL. Furthermore, this angiogenesis is thought to be driven by upregulation of the PI3K–Akt signaling pathway, which may also contribute to extravascular fluid leakage, potentially leading to pleural and ascitic effusion or systemic edema observed in the TAFRO subtype. Conclusion: The present results suggest the crucial role of PI3K–Akt signaling pathway in TAFRO pathogenesis from transcriptomic and histopathological findings. This mechanistic insight may help elucidate the distinct pathogenesis of iMCD subtypes.

Abstract Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas represent a clinically heterogeneous group of malignancies characterized by rapid progression and varied molecular features. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and encompasses a biologically diverse group of diseases, now classified into 18 molecular subtypes (Alaggio et al. Leukemia, 2022). While first-line R-CHOP therapy cures approximately 60% of patients (Coiffier et al. N Engl J Med. 2002), those with relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease face poor outcomes. Although CAR T-cell therapies (e.g. axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel) have improved outcomes, access remains limited due to logistical and disease-related constraints (Locke et al. N Engl J Med. 2022). More recently, bispecific CD20xCD3 antibodies such as epcoritamab and glofitamab have shown clinical activity in the R/R setting after ≥2 prior lines, with complete response (CR) rates of ~40% (Dickinson et al. N Engl J Med. 2022; Thieblemont et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023). However, treatment sequencing and mechanisms of resistance to CD20-targeted therapies remain areas of active investigation. One emerging resistance mechanism to CD20 bispecific antibodies is the downregulation or loss of CD20 expression, which has been associated with treatment failure and disease progression (Bannard et al. Clin. Cancer Research, 2022). This highlights the need for novel strategies to overcome CD20 resistance. Dapolsertib (MEN1703) is a first-in-class dual PIM/FLT3 kinase inhibitor that targets key oncogenic and survival pathways in hematologic malignancies. PIM kinases (PIM1, PIM2, PIM3) regulate translation, metabolism, apoptosis, and immune modulation. Overexpression and mutations in PIM genes are associated with poor prognosis in DLBCL, particularly in the ABC subtype, and are known to cooperate with MYC and BCL6 (Szydłowski et al. Cancer Res. 2021). Simultaneous inhibition of all three PIMs downregulates MYC and induces marked cytotoxicity in preclinical models. In AML, dapolsertib has demonstrated preliminary clinical single-agent activity, with ~10% CR/CRi reported in the DIAMOND study (NCT03008187; Martinelli et al. Blood Neoplasia, in press). Dapolsertib has also shown strong antitumor activity in lymphoma models, both in vitro and in vivo (Bellon et al. Mol Cancer. 2023). Notably, dapolsertib demonstrated synergy with anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, providing a rationale for combination strategies (Szydłowski et al. Cancer Res. 2021). The rationale for combining dapolsertib with a CD20 bispecific antibody lies in its potential to modulate survival pathways, sensitize malignant B-cells to immunotherapy, and circumvent resistance mechanisms such as CD20 loss by inducing CD20 expression. JASPIS-01 (NCT06534437) is an ongoing, international multicenter, Phase 2 study evaluating dapolsertib as monotherapy or in combination with glofitamab in patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma after ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The trial consists of three parts: a safety run-in (Part 1), optional enrichment (Part 2), and a potential randomized comparison vs. glofitamab (Part 3). Part 1 will include 2 groups of patients. Group 1 comprises bispecific-naïve patients randomized to a prospective dose-optimization evaluation of the combination with dapolsertib. Patients receive either 125 mg on a 2 weeks on / 1 week off schedule or 150 mg on a 1 week on / 2 weeks off schedule for up to 12 cycles to investigate optimal therapeutic window. Group 2 comprises patients who exhausted therapeutic standard options and who will receive dapolsertib monotherapy at 125 mg on a 2 weeks on / 1 week off schedule until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The initial safety run-in (Parts 1 of both groups) informs dose selection for Part 2. Dose continuation in Part 2 will be guided by Data and Safety Monitoring Board safety assessments after ≥2 completed treatment cycles. The primary objectives are to assess safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-lymphoma activity. Key endpoints include incidence of adverse events, overall/complete response rates, and duration of response. As of July 11, 2025, Part 1 is enrolling in France, Poland, Spain and the UK with additional sites activation ongoing.

Abstract Background: KMT2A-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia (KMT2Ar AML) is characterized by chromosomal translocation involving KMT2A gene at 11q23, resulting in fusion with variety of partner genes. It is usually associated with poor outcomes, high risk of relapses and suboptimal responses to conventional therapies. While NPM1-mutated (mt) AML is considered favorable risk, they are equally dismal in relapse refractory (RR) setting. Menin inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy, particularly in RR AML patients (pts) with KMT2Ar and NPM1-mt genotypes. While revumenib, a menin inhibitor approved for managing RR KMT2Ar acute leukemia, no menin inhibitor is currently approved for NPM1-mt AML. In this study, we evaluated clinical outcomes of adults with KMT2Ar AML and performed a comparative analysis of pts with RR KMT2Ar and NPM1-mt AML using data from the Mayo Clinic. Methods: After screening 102 AML pts with reported KMT2A abnormalities, we identified 33 adults with confirmed KMT2Ar diagnosed between 2012 and 2024 for retrospective analysis. Clinical and molecular/cytogenetics data, induction type (intensive chemotherapy [IC] vs non-intensive chemotherapy [NIC]), response, transplant use, and survival outcomes were reviewed. A separate analysis was performed comparing 20 RR KMT2Ar AML pts with 20 propensity score matched RR NPM1-mt AML pts from a pool of 125 NPM1-mt RR pts. Results: The median age was 50 years (yrs) (range [R], 19.0-75.0), and 60.6% were < 60 yrs. Most cases were de novo AML (64%), and the most frequent translocation was t(6;11)(q27;q23)/MLLT4 (27%), followed by t(10;11)(p12;q23)/MLLT10 (21%), t(9;11)(p21.3;q23.3)/MLLT3 (15%), and t(11;19)(q23;p13.1)/ELL (12%). Other KMT2A fusion partners were rare and collectively accounted for the remaining cases. The median follow-up was 57 months (mo) (R, 7.0-109.0). The overall response rate (ORR) was 91%, and composite complete remission (CRc, , including CR, CRi, and CRh) was 73%. The CRc rates were comparable between IC and NIC (80% vs 62%, p=0.24). CRc were not significantly different by disease type (de novo [71.4%] vs secondary [sAML] [75%], p= 0.82) or KMT2A fusion partner gene (60% for t[9;11]/MLLT3 vs. 57.1% for t[10;11]/MLLT10 vs 55.6% for t[6;11]/MLLT4, p=0.069). Seventeen (52%) pts received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The median overall survival (mOS ) for the entire cohort was 16 mo (R, 11.0-34.0). In subset analysis, IC compared to NIC was associated with significantly longer mOS (30 vs 11 mo, p=0.014). The mOS was also superior in pts <60 vs ≥60 yrs (32 vs 8 mo, p=0.005). Similarly, de novo cases had better mOS than sAML (22.0 vs 9.5 mo, p=0.052). Among KMT2Ar subtypes, t(6;11)/MLLT4 showed the longest mOS (54 mo [R, 30.0-not reached (NR)]), while t(9;11)/MLLT3 had the shortest (11.0 mo, [R 9-NR]), but differences were not statistically significant (p=0.32). The mOS was significantly longer among allo-HCT pts (30 vs 11 mo, p=0.005). Among 29 pts who experienced RR disease, the median relapse free survival (RFS) was 3 mo (R, 2.0-10.0). First salvage therapy yielded a CRc of 43.8% in 16 evaluable pts. When compared to a propensity matched cohort of 20 RR NPM1-mt AML pts, the CRc rates was 57.9% vs 50% in RR NPM1-mt and KMT2Ar AML (p= 0.68). The mRFS was not significantly different between RR KMT2Ar and NPM1-mt AML, (3 vs 4 mo, p=0.9). However, KMT2Ar pts had inferior mOS compared to NPM-mt AML (12 vs 65 mo, p=0.004). We further compared survival between NPM1-mt and KMT2Ar pts stratified by allo-HCT status. Among those who underwent allo-HCT, NPM1-mt pts had longer mOS (NR vs 22 mo, p=0.037). Among non-allo-HCT pts, mOS was numerically higher in NPM1-mt vs KMT2Ar (19 vs 8 mo, p=0.11). Conclusions: This single institusion cohort of adult AML with KMT2Ar underscores the biological and clinical heterogeneity of this high-risk group. IC was associated with a survival benefit, particularly among younger and fit patients. However, the outcomes following relapse remained poor, highlighting the urgent need for improved post-remission and salvage therapies. Comparative analysis with matched RR NPM1-mt AML pts revealed similarly dismal survival outcomes. Emerging data from single-arm studies of menin inhibitors in both frontline and RR settings among pts with NPM1-mt and KMT2Ar AML are encouraging and may represent a paradigm shift in treatment.

Abstract Background: The coexistence of systemic mastocytosis (SM) and lymphoid neoplasms is rare and remains poorly defined. These cases are classified under SM with associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN) in the WHO framework, though the ICC distinguishes SM with associated myeloid neoplasm (SM-AMN) as a separate entity. Emerging evidence points to SM with associated lymphoid neoplasms (SM-ALN) as a biologically distinct and clinically indolent subgroup (Aperna F et al, 2025). We performed a multisite retrospective study to characterize the clinico-molecular features and outcomes of SM-ALN. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis across Mayo Clinic sites, reviewing records from January 1980 to December 2024 to identify patients with SM-ALN. IRB approval was obtained. Of 22 cases identified, 4 were excluded due to co-occurring myeloid neoplasms. The final cohort included 18 patients. Variables analysed included age, sex, SM subtype, KIT mutation, symptoms, treatment, and survival outcomes. Results: Eighteen patients were included (median age: 61.5 years; range: 38–80; 11 female). Most had indolent SM (ISM, n=16); two had aggressive SM (ASM). SM preceded the lymphoid neoplasm in 4 cases (22%), followed it in 6 (33%), and was concurrent in 8 (44%). Low-grade lymphomas (n=12, 67%) included follicular lymphoma (n=2), CLL (, n=2), marginal zone (n=1), lymphoplasmacytic (n=1), and mantle cell (n=1). High-grade lymphomas (n=6, 33%) included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, n=3), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=2), and T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n=1). SM-related symptoms were present in 16 of 18 patients (89%). The most common manifestations included dermatologic symptoms (rash/pruritus, 56%), systemic complaints (fatigue/weight loss, 39%), GI symptoms (17%), and anaphylaxis (6%). KIT D816V testing mutation was positive in 10 of 16 patients tested (63%). Tryptase was elevated (>20 ng/mL) in 15 of 18 (83%). NGS data was available for 9 patients: among the two ASM cases, both harbored SRSF2 mutation; one also had JAK2, DNMT3A, RUNX1, TET2, and TP53, while the other carried DNMT3A and IDH1. Mutations observed in ISM cases included CCND3, CXCR4, NOTCH2, SF3B1, MYD88 L265P, ASXL1, and TET2. SM management was divided into two categories: (1) Conservative approach, including observation alone in 4 patients (22%) and symptomatic therapies such as antihistamines or leukotriene inhibitors in 7 (39%); and (2) Cytoreductive treatments, comprising avapritinib in 5 patients (28%), cladribine in 1 (6%), and imatinib in 1 (6%). Management of lymphoid neoplasms included intensive regimens such as R-CHOP and hyper-CVAD for high-grade subtypes (e.g., DLBCL and T-ALL), while indolent forms (e.g., CLL and follicular lymphoma) were treated with bendamustine-rituximab or observation depending on disease burden. Overall, 13 patients (72%) received systemic therapy. At a median follow-up of 81 months (6.7 years), 17 of 18 patients (94%) were alive and progression-free. Median OS and PFS were not reached. The sole death occurred in a patient with ASM, while all ISM cases remained alive. ASM was associated with a higher (though nonsignificant) risk of death (OR 33.0; 95% CI, 0.89–1220.9; p = 0.111). Among patients with high-grade lymphomas (n=5), 80% were alive at follow-up, compared to 100% with indolent lymphomas (n=13). Discussion: Our findings support SM-ALN as a clinically indolent and biologically distinct subset within SM-AHN. Most patients had ISM and low-grade lymphoid neoplasms, with favorable outcomes regardless of lymphoma subtype or diagnostic sequence. High-risk mutations were confined to ASM cases, reinforcing underlying biologic differences. These findings align with prior Mayo Clinic data showing longer survival in SM-ALN compared to SM-AMN (median OS 8.1 vs 2.0 years; p<0.01). Treatment was primarily directed by the lymphoid malignancy, with limited need for cytoreduction in ISM. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations and optimize management strategies. Limitations include the study's retrospective, single-center design and limited racial diversity. Multi-institutional studies are warranted to validate these findings and guide optimal management. Conclusion: SM-ALN is a rare but distinct SM subtype characterized by indolent behavior, favorable treatment responses, and prolonged survival. Recognition of this subset is critical to avoid over-treatment and to guide risk-adapted management strategies.

Abstract Gentically driven classical hematological disorders have variable prevelance in the general population, sickle cell disease (SCD) being the most common at 30 per 100,000 people, hemophilia (hem) 12 per 100,000 people for hemophilia A, 4 per 100,000 people for hemophilia B, and thalassemia (thal) at 18 per 100,000 people, with regional and racial-ethnic variation across US. There has been a dramatic change in the therapeutic landscape for these diseases in the past decade. Several new drugs and biological therapies including gene therapies have been approved for each of these disorders. Clinicians utilize different information sources to assimilate this rapid influx of knowledge into their practice; in the era of social media, the readership is not limited to original publications. As research visibility influences clinical adoption and patient awareness, it is vital to understand the modalities of engagement of gene therapy studies by clinicians and patients. An altmetric score is a simple and effective way of understanding engagement with research across platforms. It. measures digital attention received by research output, allowing us to gauge the social impact of an article. We sought to compare the impact and scientific dissemination of publications of gene therapy trials in these 3 diseases by capturing the number of traditional citations and Altmetric assessment score. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted for gene therapy trials in SCD, Hem and Thal between 2015 to 2025 and citations were captured using metrics from Google Scholar. The Altmetric assessment score for each article was determined using www.altmetric.com which includes any mention by news outlets, blogs, Twitter (X), Facebook, and Mendeley reader counts. Descriptive statistics are reported for the number of citations as well as the Altmetric assessment score in each of the disease categories. Median and range were reported due to the skewed distribution of the data. Comparison across groups for significance was done using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The number of qualifying studies for SCD (n=7) were lower than hem (n=21) and thal (n=12). Median PubMed citations were highest for SCD (147, range 4-436), followed by hem (26, range 0-828) and thal (42, range 0-801), though the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.4) Altmetric scores demonstrated differences that approached statistical significance with p=0.08: SCD had the highest median (422, range 4-770), driven by exceptional Twitter engagement, while hem and thal medians were 20 (range 0-2038) and 49 (range 0-825) respectively. Twitter/X was the leading social platforms for all diseases. Scholarly interest measured by Mendeley readers was also highest for SCD (median 195, range 11-542), with thal and hem medians at 50 (range 0-773) and 64 (range 8-646) respectively. Conclusion: We observed substantial variability in both academic and social media dissemination of practice-changing SCD, Hem and thal gene therapy studies, though not statistically significant likely due to the limited number of studies overall. Higher citation count and Altmetric score in SCD studies may reflect recent robust dissemination efforts by ASH and patient advocacy groups. Intentional promotion across academic and media platforms increases awareness, helping with early dissemination of updated information that could have significant impact on patient outcomes.

Abstract Background Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a very rare histiocytic/dendritic cell neoplasm driven by mutations in genes of the MAPK pathway, such as BRAFV600E. Its clinical presentation is highly heterogeneous, and data on its natural history and prognosis in large cohorts are limited. Here, we investigated the clinical features and outcomes of a very large international cohort of patients with ECD. Methods We included patients diagnosed with ECD between 1990 and 2024, followed at 13 referral centers in Europe and the Americas, who had available clinical and follow-up data (with a minimal follow-up duration of 6 months). We analyzed the clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes, and sought to identify predictors of survival. The study was conceived and conducted within the ECD Global Alliance network. Results A total of 1044 patients with ECD were included. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (IQR 46-66), and the male-to-female ratio was 2.2. The median age at the first ECD manifestation was 55 years (IQR 43-65). Bone pain (20%), kidney and urinary manifestations (18%), and diabetes insipidus (11%) were the most frequently reported initial features. The median number of involved sites was 4 (IQR 3-6), most frequently including the long bones (n=768, 74%), the retroperitoneum, (n=605, 58%), the periaortic space (n=449, 43%), the CNS (n=368, 35%), the facial/orbit area (n=347, 33%), and the heart (n=334, 32%). Among 955 tested patients, 572 (60%) harbored the BRAFV600E mutation, and 86 (9%) a MAP2K1 mutation. Clinical and/or pathology overlap with Langerhans cell histiocytosis and Rosai-Dorfman-Destombes disease was observed in 115 (11%) and 42 (4%) patients, respectively. Clonal hematopoiesis was identified in 217 of 556 tested patients (39%), and a history of second cancer was reported in 272 patients (26%), including both solid (14%) and hematologic (12%) neoplasms. First-line treatment mostly included interferon-alpha (n=342, 33%) and BRAFi/MEKi (n=314, 30%), while second- and third-line treatments mostly consisted of BRAFi/MEKi (55% and 63%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 51 months (IQR 20-89), 222 (21%) patients died; causes of death were related to ECD in almost half of the patients (n=101). A multivariate Cox regression model identified the following factors as significantly associated with increased mortality: older age (HR 1.058, 95%CI 1.033-1.083; p<0.001), pseudo-neurodegenerative lesions (HR 2.280, 95%CI 1.337-3.891; p=0.022), elevated CRP at diagnosis (HR 2.574, 95%CI 1.024-6.467; p=0.044), and second hematologic cancer (HR 2.639, 95%CI 1.602-4.348; p<0.001). Conclusions Despite advances in treatments over the last decade, ECD remains associated with substantial mortality. Age, neurodegenerative lesions, elevated CRP levels, and the presence of a second hematologic cancer are the main predictors of poor survival.

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for nearly 20% of all hematologic cancers in the US and remains a substantial clinical burden, with patients (pts) requiring multiple lines of therapy (LOT). While advances such as BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy have improved outcomes, challenges persist, including disease relapse, treatment toxicities (CRS, ICANS, and non-ICANS neurotoxicities), and access. AZD0120 (formerly GC012F) is a first-in-class autologous BCMA/CD19 dual-targeting CAR T-cell therapy using the FasTCAR rapid manufacturing platform that preserves the naive and central memory T-cell phenotypes with marked in vivo proliferative capacity. Phase 1 investigator-initiated trials in China demonstrated deep, durable responses and a favorable safety profile following single-infusion AZD0120 in newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) (Du J, et al. EHA 2024 and ASCO 2023). Here, we report for the first time preliminary phase 1b results from DURGA-1, an ongoing phase 1b/2 clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of AZD0120 in pts with RRMM. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, US-based, multicenter study (NCT05850234) evaluated the safety/tolerability of 2 dose levels (DL) of AZD0120 in pts with RRMM along with preliminary efficacy. Eligible ptswere aged ≥18 y with RRMM (3+ prior LOT [pLOT] including a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, and anti-CD38 antibody), ECOG PS 0–1, and documented evidence of progressive disease. Exposure to BCMA-directed therapy ≥6 mo with best response of PR or better was permitted. Pts underwent lymphodepletion followed by a single infusion of AZD0120. Pts in DL1 received 1x105 cells/kg; DL2 received 3x105 cells/kg. Dose escalation and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) were determined by a safety review committee. Phase 1b primary objectives included safety/tolerability and RP2D determination; secondary objectives included efficacy, cellular kinetics (CK), and pharmacodynamics. Results: As of data cutoff (DCO) on 18 July 2025, a total of 25 pts received infusion of AZD0120 (n=12 DL1; n=13 DL2). The median age was 64 y (range 44–78), median pLOT was 4 (range 3–7), 72% were triple-class refractory, 20% had prior BCMA CAR T-cell therapy, 4% had prior teclistamab, 28% had high-risk cytogenetic features [del(13q), del(17p13), t(4;14), t(14;16), amp(1q)], and 8% had extramedullary plasmacytomas. The median time from apheresis to release was 14 d (range 10–30). Median time from apheresis to infusion was 28 d (range 19–44) with 5 pts receiving bridging therapy. Median follow-up was 1.4 mo (range 0–19.3). No dose-limiting toxicities were reported for either dose. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs, any grade) were CRS (64%), neutrophil count decreased (56%), and anemia (32%). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were neutrophil count decreased (52%), lymphocyte count decreased (32%), and white blood cell count decreased (32%). CRS was reported in 75% of pts at DL1 (all grade 1) and 54% at DL2 (46% grade 1; 8% grade 2), with no cases of grade ≥3 CRS. Median time to CRS onset (DL1/DL2) was 9 d (range 2–11), with a median duration of 2 d (range 1–4); 12 pts (48%) received tocilizumab for CRS management and 12% received dexamethasone. No cases of ICANS, related non-ICANS neurotoxicity, IEC-colitis, or secondary primary malignancies have been reported. There have been no deaths. For efficacy-evaluable patients (n=15), ORR was 100% (33% sCR, 47% VGPR, 20% PR). CR rates in evaluable pts were 30% in DL1 (n=10) and 40% in DL2 (n=5); median time to response was 0.9 mo for both DLs (range 0.9–1.9 DL1; 0.6–1.8 DL2). All MRD-evaluable pts (n=5 DL1; n=3 DL2; DCO 01 July 2025) were MRD-negative by NGS at a sensitivity of 10-5. Three pts in DL1 with ≥12 mo follow-up maintained MRD negativity. Consistent with robust in vivo expansion, CK analysis from 16 evaluable pts (DCO 12 June 2025) demonstrated a median Tmax of 13 d post-infusion with a median Cmax of 85,266 copies/mg gDNA. Median persistence was 42 d (range 13–273). Updated clinical data with additional follow-up will be presented. Conclusion: Preliminary phase 1b results demonstrated AZD0120 was well tolerated, with a low incidence of serious AEs, no grade ≥3 CRS, and no ICANS. FasTCAR-manufactured AZD0120 had expectedin vivo expansion, which may have resulted in the predictable CRS profile. A single infusion of AZD0120 achieved early, deep responses with 100% MRD negativity from 4L+ triple-class‒exposed pts with RRMM.

Abstract Introduction: Axatilimab is an anti–colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) monoclonal antibody that targets monocytes and macrophages, key mediators of inflammation and fibrosis in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). Axatilimab is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg (up to a maximum dose of 35 mg) every 2 weeks (Q2W) for patients with cGVHD after ≥2 prior lines of therapy, based on results from the pivotal phase 2 AGAVE-201 clinical trial (NCT04710576). Patients treated with the 0.3 mg/kg Q2W dose in the AGAVE-201 study were able to transition to 0.6 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W) dosing based on the investigator's discretion and per study protocol criteria. Aims: To describe the safety and feasibility of transition from axatilimab 0.3 mg/kg Q2W to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W dosing using data from AGAVE-201. Methods: Patients treated with axatilimab 0.3 mg/kg Q2W in AGAVE-201 who had their Cycle 7 assessment and achieved a partial or complete response (PR/CR) per National Institutes of Health criteria that was sustained for ≥20 weeks or had not progressed were able to change their dosing schedule to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W (without dose capping) per the study protocol and investigator discretion. Safety and treatment duration were assessed in this post hoc analysis; patients who received additional systemic therapies were excluded. The data cutoff was March 30, 2025. Results: In the first 6 treatment cycles, 59 of the 80 patients (73.8%) randomized to axatilimab 0.3 mg/kg Q2W had a response to treatment (primary endpoint). Of these 59 patients, 19 (32.2%) transitioned to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W dosing. Among these 19 patients, demographics (median [range] age, 50.0 [20–73] y; male, 63.2%) and baseline clinical characteristics (median [range] number of organs involved at baseline, 3.0 [2–8]; severe disease, 73.7%; prior use of ibrutinib, ruxolitinib, or belumosudil, 89.5%) were comparable to the full cohort initially randomized to 0.3 mg/kg Q2W. Overall response rate in the first 6 treatment cycles among the 19 patients who switched to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W was 94.7% (95% CI, 74.0%–99.9%; CR, 5.3%; PR, 89.5%); 1 patient had stable disease and thus was eligible to switch, per investigator discretion. Patients were on treatment for a median (range) of 20.9 (2–32) months after switching doses; 16 of 19 patients (84.2%) maintained the 0.6 mg/kg Q4W dose after dose switching. The safety profile for axatilimab was generally similar before and after the dosing change. After switching to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W, 10 patients (52.6%) had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); pneumonia was the only grade ≥3 TEAE reported in >1 patient (n=2). TEAEs led to treatment interruptions in 4 patients (21.1%) and discontinuations in 3 patients (15.8%) after switching. The most common TEAEs after switching to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W were fatigue (n=5 [26.3%]), upper respiratory tract infection (n=5 [26.3%]), and headache (n=4 [21.1%]); 1 patient (5.3%) had an infusion-related reaction (n=1 [rash]). Incidences of on-target TEAEs were generally similar before and after the switch, including elevations in alanine aminotransferase (n=3 before switching and n=1 after) and amylase (n=0 and n=1).Conclusion: Transition to 0.6 mg/kg Q4W (without dose capping) is feasible and well tolerated in patients treated with axatilimab 0.3 mg/kg Q2W on the AGAVE-201 study. The Q4W dosing strategy at the 0.6 mg/kg dose identified no new safety signals. Patients had a prolonged duration of therapy, with a median of 20.9 months (1.7 y), and 84% of patients continued treatment, suggesting ongoing clinical benefit. These data provide evidence of the safety and feasibility of a 0.6 mg/kg Q4W dosing strategy in alignment with the AGAVE-201 protocol.