Citations

Institution: Mayo Clinic Clear

Showing 10 of 108060 citations.

Prediction of Acute Kidney Injury Onset using Electrocardiograph and Demographic data through Reservoir Computer On-Chip
Gupta, Tushar , Damodaran, Vasundhara , Banerjee, Imon, Sanchez, Jose , Banerjee, Imon , Sanyal, Arindam

2025 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS) | January 14, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 433-437

10.1109/biocas67066.2025.00099 Get It

Sirolimus-Coated Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Coronary Artery Disease: A Grade Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Sajjad, Fatima , Khattak, Asad Iqbal , Farhan, Kanza, Arshad, Ayesha , Afridi, Abdullah, Shahid, Iqra, Imtiaz, Zeeshan , Naveed, Hammad, Alam, Umama , Henna, Fathimathul, Riaz, Zoya, Khattak, Fazia , Waqas, Saad Ahmed, Ahmed, Raheel, Farhan, Kanza , Afridi, Abdullah , Ali, Muhammad Abdullah , Shahid, Iqra , Henna, Fathimathul , Waqas, Saad Ahmad

Critical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 2 | Pages: e0415

10.1097/hpc.0000000000000415 | PMID 41533835 Get It

Despite advances in percutaneous coronary procedures, in-stent restenosis remains a significant challenge. Although sirolimus- and paclitaxel-coated balloons are promising alternatives, their comparative safety and efficacy remain uncertain. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched using relevant keywords from inception until August 2025. A total of 11 studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational cohort studies) were included, comprising 3633 participants overall. The primary outcomes assessed were target lesion revascularization and target lesion failure. Meanwhile, the Secondary outcomes included stent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, survival, binary restenosis, and angiographic endpoints (acute gain, diameter stenosis, in-segment late lumen loss, in-lesion late lumen loss, and in-segment minimal lumen diameter). Interstudy heterogeneity was assessed using I ² and X ² statistics ( I ²>50% = significant heterogeneity). Interstudy heterogeneity was low for most outcomes, including all primary clinical endpoints, with moderate heterogeneity observed only for select angiographic measures (notably in-segment late lumen loss and diameter stenosis). Statistical analysis was conducted using R software and RStudio (version 4.4.2), with a P value of < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. This meta-analysis examined studies that compared paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) versus standard balloon [sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB)] angioplasty. Regarding primary outcomes, there were no notable variations in target lesion failure [risk ratio (RR), 1.08, 95% CI, 0.90–1.29, P = 0.36] or target lesion revascularization (RR, 1.16, 95% CI, 0.98–1.37, P = 0.08). With all aggregated estimates being nonsignificant, secondary outcomes such as stent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, and survival were similar between groups. Angiographic endpoints revealed no discernible variations in late lumen loss (in-lesion and in-segment), acute gain, or diameter stenosis. Nonetheless, the SCB group’s minimal lumen diameter was significantly smaller than that of the PCB group (MD, −0.08 mm, 95% CI, −0.14 to −0.01, P = 0.02). In treating coronary in-stent restenosis, SCB and PCBs show similar overall safety and effectiveness; lesion-specific angiographic variations indicate that customized selection may improve patient outcomes.
Dual FAK and EPHA2 targeting by brigatinib tackles PARP inhibitor adaptive survival response in high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Duffield, Julie R. , Hou, Xiaonan, Wilson, Benjamin, Prasad, Anjali , McKeon-Makki, Iman K. , Huehls, Amelia M. , Wu, Xinyan, Correia, Cristina , Larson, Melissa C., Couch, Fergus J., Öberg, Ann, Kaufmann, S., Karnitz, Larry M., Weroha, S. John, Kanakkanthara, Arun , Kaufmann, Scott H. , Weroha, S. John , Couch, Fergus J. , Larson, Melissa C. , Wu, Xinyan , Couch, Fergus J. , Hou, Xiaonan , Wilson, Benjamin W, Wu, Xinyan , Larson, Melissa C , Oberg, Ann L , Kaufmann, Scott H , Weroha, S John , Correia, Cristina

Science Translational Medicine | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 832 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/scitranslmed.adt8706 | PMID 41533776 Get It

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) are an important therapy for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). However, PARPi resistance frequently emerges, necessitating previously unrecognized approaches to improve HGSOC responses. Here, we showed that the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor brigatinib enhances PARPi activity in HGSOC cells by disrupting an adaptive survival mechanism orchestrated by Fos-related antigen 1 (FRA1) in response to PARPi. This effect of brigatinib occurred through an ALK-independent pathway, wherein brigatinib induced a dual blockade of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and EPH receptor A2 (EPHA2) tyrosine kinases, leading to the suppression of protein kinase B (Akt) and extracellular-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling accompanied by disruption of a phosphorylation event crucial for FRA1 protein stability. Moreover, in HGSOC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, brigatinib and PARPi combination therapy induced tumor regression and improved overall survival compared with PARPi alone, particularly in models with high FAK and EPHA2. These findings support dual targeting of FAK and EPHA2 as a strategy to achieve effective and durable PARPi responses and identify a promising biomarker-based combinatorial approach using brigatinib and PARPi for HGSOC, particularly the subset characterized by high FAK and EPHA2.
Evaluation of hybrid DIR performance using controlling structures and points of interest in MR‐guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer patients
Malkov, Victor , Mansour, Iymad , Li, Winnie , Dang, Jennifer , Sadeghi, Parisa, Navarro, Inmaculada, Padayachee, Jerusha , Winter, Jeff , Tadic, Tony , Kong, Vickie C. , Sadeghi, Parisa , Navarro, Inmaculada , Chung, Peter W M

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/acm2.70437 | PMID 41533320 Get It

Abstract Background MR‐guided adaptive radiotherapy (ART) allows for daily plan optimization based on patient‐specific anatomy. Accumulated doses, driven by deformable image registration (DIR), of daily fractions can provide cumulative dose metrics and insights into toxicity and tumor control. In prostate ART, inter‐ and intra‐factional deformations, particularly due to bladder and rectum, pose a challenge to accurate DIR generation. Purpose To quantify geometric and dosimetric accuracy of a proposed prostate MR‐to‐MR DIR approach to support MR‐guided ART dose accumulation. Methods We evaluated DIR accuracy in 25 patients treated with 30 Gy in five fractions on a 1.5 T MR‐linac using an adaptive workflow. For all patients, a reference MR was used for planning, with three images collected at each fraction: adapt MR for adaptive planning, verify MR for pretreatment position verification and beam‐on for capturing anatomy during radiation delivery. We assessed three DIR approaches: intensity‐based, intensity‐based with controlling structures (CS), and intensity‐based with controlling structures and points of interest (CS + P). DIRs were performed between the reference and fraction images and within fractions (adapt‐to‐verify and adapt‐to‐beam‐on). For the evaluation, we propagated CTV, bladder, and rectum contours using the DIRs and compared each to manually delineated contours using Dice similarity coefficient, mean distance to agreement, and dose–volume metrics. Results CS and CS + P improved geometric agreement between manual and propagated contours over intensity‐only DIR. For example, mean distance to agreement (DTA mean ) for reference‐to‐beam‐on intensity‐only DIR was 0.131 ± 0.009 cm (CTV), 0.46 ± 0.08 cm (bladder), and 0.154 ± 0.013 cm (rectum). For the CS, the DTA mean values were 0.018 ± 0.002, 0.388 ± 0.14, and 0.036 ± 0.013 cm. Finally, for CS + P, these values were 0.015 ± 0.001, 0.025 ± 0.004, and 0.021 ± 0.002 cm. Dosimetrically, comparing CS and CS + P for reference to beam‐on DIRs resulted in a change of CTV D98% from [−29 cGy, 19 cGy] to [−18 cGy, 26 cGy], bladder D5cc from [−51 cGy, 544 cGy] to [−79 cGy, 36 cGy], and rectum D1cc from [−106 cGy, 72 cGy] to [−52 cGy, 74 cGy]. Conclusion CS improved geometric and dosimetric accuracy over intensity‐only DIR, with CS + P providing further performance improvement, particularly for bladder. However, session image segmentation remains a challenge, which may be addressed with automated contouring.
Addressing Transplant Policy Shortcomings Utilizing a Relational Leadership Model
Beaman, Lindsay R. , Kim, Christopher H. , Diwan, Tayyab S., Diwan, Tayyab , Beaman, Lindsay , Diwan, Tayyab S.

The American Journal of Bioethics | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 101-103

10.1080/15265161.2025.2594430 | PMID 41533110 Get It

Agentic AI in Radiology: Evolution from Large Language Models to Future Clinical Integration
Khosravi, Bardia , Rouzrokh, Pouria, D’Antonoli, Tugba Akinci, Moassefi, Mana , Faghani, Shahriar, Mansuri, Aawez , Bressem, Keno K. , Tejani, Ali S. , Gichoya, Judy Wawira , Rouzrokh, Pouria , Khosravi, Bardia , Faghani, Shahriar , D’Antonoli, Tugba Akinci , Rouzrokh, Pouria , Akinci D'Antonoli, Tugba , Faghani, Shahriar , Bressem, Keno , Tejani, Ali , Gichoya, Judy W. , Moassefi, Mana

Radiology: Artificial Intelligence | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/ryai.250651 | PMID 41532836 Get It

Agentic artificial intelligence marks a shift from large language models to autonomous, goal-driven clinical assistants. The framework presented in this report outlines implementation in radiology workflows and addresses cybersecurity, bias, and accountability challenges.
Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk in early‐ and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease
Pentchev, Julian V., Jackson, Trever, Khan, Naazneen , Rosewood, Thea , Huang, Yen‐Ning, Nho, Kwangslk, Saykin, Andrew J., Eloyan, Ani, Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Riddle, Meghan, Salloway, Steven, Atri, Alireza, Honig, Lawrence S., Johnson, Erik C. B., Turner, Raymond Scott, Masdeu, Joseph C. , Foroud, Tatiana M., Clark, David, Hammers, Dustin B., Dage, Jeffrey L., Kirby, Kala, Ghetti, Bernardino, Newell, Kathy, Onyike, Chiadi U., Day, Gregory S., Graff‐Radford, Neill R., Murray, Melissa E., Jones, D. Richard, Jack, Clifford R., Vemuri, Prashanthi, Touroutoglou, Alexandra, Duara, Ranjan, Grant, Ian, Sha, Sharon, Wingo, Thomas S., Beckett, Laurel A., Rogalski, Emily J, Mendez, Mario F., Kramer, Joel, Joie, Renaud La, Grinberg, Lea T., Koeppe, Robert, Wolk, David A., Aisen, Paul, RAMAN, REMA , Toga, Arthur, Kukull, Walter A., Musiek, Erik, Womack, Kyle, Carrillo, Maria C., Rabinovici, Gil D., Dickerson, Bradford C., Apostolova, Liana G., Nudelman, Kelly N. H., Murray, Melissa E. , Carrillo, María C. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La , Day, Gregory S. , Day, Gregory S , Murray, Melissa E , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Huang, Yen‐Ning, Nho, Kwangsik T. , Saykin, Andrew J. , Eloyan, Ani , Taurone, Alexander, Riddle, Meghan , Salloway, Steve , Atri, Alireza , Honig, Lawrence S. , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Foroud, Tatiana , Clark, David, Hammers, Dustin B , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Ghetti, Bernardino , Newell, Kathy L. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Jones, David T. , Jack, Clifford R. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Duara, Ranjan , Sha, Sharon J. , Beckett, Laurel , Rogalskı, Emily , Mendez, Mario F. , Kramer, Joel, Blazhenets, Ganna , Grinberg, Lea T. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Wolk, David A. , Aisen, Paul , Toga, Arthur W. , Kukull, Walter A. , Musiek, Erik , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Apostolova, Liana G. , Nudelman, Kelly

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71066 | PMID 41532810 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION The genetic basis of sporadic early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) remains largely unknown, prompting evaluation of late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) polygenic risk in EOAD. METHODS A LOAD polygenic score (PGS) was calculated in the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer's Disease Study (LEADS) and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study and tested for associations with AD risk, cognitive performance, and imaging and fluid biomarkers. RESULTS Though PGS was elevated in LOAD and EOAD, it was not a significant predictor of EOAD adjusting for APOE ε4 carrier status and was not associated with age of EOAD onset ( p = 0.106) or with cognitive performance ( p = 0.417). In LEADS, greater LOAD PGS was associated with differences in neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers, including elevated synaptosomal‐associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25) ( p = 2.3 × 10 −5 ). DISCUSSION While LOAD polygenic risk contributed minimally to EOAD onset and cognitive dysfunction, PGS association with fluid biomarkers in LEADS suggests a role for LOAD polygenic risk in EOAD pathophysiology. Highlights LOAD PGSs were elevated in both LOAD and EOAD compared to controls; however, LOAD PGS did not significantly predict EOAD risk, age at onset, or cognitive performance independent of APOE ε4 in the LEADS. Higher LOAD PGS was associated with lower amyloid PET Centiloids (less brain amyloid deposition) as well as lower CSF biomarker Aβ42 in LEADS (proxy marker suggesting higher brain amyloid deposition) in LEADS; these contradictory findings support the need for larger studies to further investigate whether LOAD PGS is associated with increased amyloid deposition in EOAD. Higher LOAD PGS was also associated with higher levels of CSF synaptosomal‐associated protein 25 (SNAP‐25), a key component of the SNARE complex, suggesting that LOAD genetic factors may contribute to dysregulation of synaptic transmission and/or pathological protein aggregation in EOAD.
Associated Risks to the Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (MARTA) Score: Development and External Validation
Diana, Francesco , Siddiqui, Adnan H., Tomasello, Alejandro , Hernández, David , Requena, Manuel, Lascuevas, Marta de Dios , Xu, Bin, Liao, Yujun, Raz, Eytan, Nossek, Erez , Stroh-Holly, Nico , Gmeiner, Matthias , Civelli, Vittorio , Arpaia, Francesco , Khattar, Nicolas, Nickele, Christopher M., Arthur, Adam S., Charbel, Fady T. , Vajkoczy, Peter, Sanchin, Amina, Jabbour, Pascal, Lanzino, Giuseppe, Raabe, Andreas, Velinov, N., Burkhardt, Jan Karl, Saei, Hamzah, Salcuni, Andrea , Manfrini, Elia , Romoli, Michele, Siddiqui, Adnan H. , Vajkoczy, Peter , Ransom, Ryan C, Romoli, Michele , Siddiqui, Adnan H , Jaikumar, Vinay , Baig, Ammad A. , Requena, Manuel , Arikán, Fuat , Liao, Yujun , Raz, Eytan , Chung, Charlotte , Hoffman, Haydn , Nickele, Christopher, Arthur, Adam Stephen , Jabbour, Pascal , Lanzino, Giuseppe , Ransom, Ryan C. , Raabe, Andreas , Petutschnigg, Thomas , Hassan, Ameer E , Saei, Hamzah, Eusebi, Paolo , Bonura, Adriano , Peschillo, Simone

Neurosurgery | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 99 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 603-614

10.1227/neu.0000000000003900 | PMID 41532751 Get It

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are increasingly detected and require careful management to prevent rupture. No externally validated score currently predicts procedural risk to guide treatment decisions. We developed and validated 2 predictive scores for complications after endovascular treatment (EVT) or neurosurgical treatment (NT) of UIA using routinely collected clinical and aneurysmal features. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including patients with UIA treated with EVT or NT across 15 neurovascular centers (2014-2024). Predictive models were built using multivariable logistic regression, with variables derived from Delphi consensus. The primary outcome was a composite safety end point: new neurological deficits, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) worsening (≥1 point or mRS 2-5 within 30 days), or procedural death. Internal validation used bootstrapping, and external validation was performed temporally and institutionally. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and calibration. Final scores, named Morbidity and Mortality Associated Risk in the Treatment of UIAs (MARTA)-EVT and MARTA-NT, were compared with existing models identified through systematic review. RESULTS: Among 2647 patients (1907 EVT and 740 NT), procedural complications occurred in 6.3% (EVT) and 12.8% (NT). Independent predictors included age, baseline mRS, aneurysm location, size, morphology, and procedural factors. MARTA-EVT (AUROC = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.57-0.78) and MARTA-NT (AUROC = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.54-0.77) showed moderate discrimination and good calibration. MARTA-EVT outperformed existing models; MARTA-NT performed similarly to SAFETEA. Predictive models are available open-source: https://martascoreapp.shinyapps.io/martascoreapp/. CONCLUSION: MARTA-EVT and MARTA-NT are validated tools for predicting procedural risks in UIA treatment and may support patient counseling and clinical decision making.
Validation of 13 102 International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes using a large language model-based system
Wang, Yichen , Song, Yilin , Siu, Rex K. , Nimma, Induja R., Savage, Thomas , Wang, Yiming, Li, Zhichen, Ramai, Daryl, Wang, J., Badurdeen, Dilhana, Tao, Cui, Kumbhari, Vivek , Huang, Yuting, Siu, Rex, Huang, Yuting , Wang, Yichen , Yan, Yan , Tao, Cui

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 947-956

10.1093/jamia/ocag008 | PMID 41670956 Get It

Abstract Objectives To comprehensively evaluate the validity of International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes for both prevalent diagnoses and less common diseases, and to assess the performance of a large language model (LLM)-based system in validating these codes. Materials and Methods This retrospective study analyzed hospital admissions from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. We developed a validated LLM-based system using GPT-4o, refined through iterative prompt engineering, to assess ICD-10-CM code validity. We measured the positive predictive value (PPV) of ICD-10-CM codes, PPV of principal and secondary diagnoses, and the performance of an LLM-based system in code validation. Results Among 865 079 assigned codes, the PPV was 84.6% (95% CI, 84.5%-84.6%). Principal diagnoses had a PPV of 93.9% (95% CI, 93.7%-94.1%), while secondary diagnoses had a PPV of 83.8% (95% CI, 83.7%-83.9%). The LLM system demonstrated high performance in validating ICD codes, achieving 93.6% accuracy, 95.4% sensitivity, and 85.2% specificity. Among correctly assigned secondary diagnoses, the majority (67.9%) represented historical or baseline conditions, while 32.1% reflected active conditions that deviated from baseline status; 22.3% of these emerged after hospital admission. PPV decreases with later diagnosis positions, with the largest decline occurring between principal and secondary diagnoses. Discussion and Conclusion In this large-scale evaluation, ICD-10-CM codes exhibited generally high accuracy, though variability existed by position and condition type. A validated LLM system performed comparably to physician review and offers a scalable means to improve coding accuracy. These findings support the potential for integrating LLM-based auditing into routine workflows to strengthen the quality of administrative and research data.
Outcomes of heart failure hospitalizations at urban teaching vs. Non-Teaching Hospitals: A Nationwide Propensity Score Matched Analysis in the United States
Jabbar, Ali Bin Abdul, Javed, Muhammad Abdullah , Hall, Alexander, Ismayl, Mahmoud, Aboeata, Ahmed, Abdul Jabbar, Ali Bin , Hall, A , Ismayl, Mahmoud , Goldsweig, Andrew M.

European Heart Journal Open | January 14, 2026 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ehjopen/oeag003 | PMID 41727909 Get It

Abstract Aims Heart failure (HF) continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, placing a significant burden on healthcare systems. Differences in the outcomes of HF hospitalizations for adults in teaching vs. non-teaching hospitals in urban settings are uncertain. We evaluated outcomes of HF hospitalizations in patients hospitalized in urban teaching vs. non-teaching hospitals in the United States. Methods and results HF hospitalizations were abstracted from the 2016 through 2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database and stratified into urban teaching vs. urban non-teaching hospital settings. Propensity-score matching was used to control for baseline differences between teaching and non-teaching hospital cohorts. Logistic regression and lognormal models were estimated to assess differences in inpatient mortality, length of stay (LOS), total costs, complications, and 30-day and 90-day all-cause readmissions. A total of 7 558 299 weighted HF hospitalizations were included in the analysis, of which 76.3% involved urban teaching hospitalizations. Compared to urban non-teaching, HF hospitalizations in urban teaching hospitals were associated with significantly higher odds of inpatient mortality (OR 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16–1.22), complications including cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, Intra-aortic balloon pump, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mechanical ventilation use as well as more extended hospital LOS, higher total costs, palliative care consultation and readmissions rates (all P &lt; 0.001). 30-day and 90-day all-cause readmission rates were also statistically higher in teaching hospitals, though the difference was clinically non-significant. Conclusion HF hospitalizations in urban teaching hospitals were associated with higher inpatient mortality, complication rates, resource utilization, and palliative care consult rates than urban non-teaching hospitals.