Citations

PURPOSE Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare myeloid neoplasm characterized by clinical heterogeneity and is associated with poor outcomes. To date, limited molecular information has been incorporated into disease classification and risk stratification. We aimed to integrate genomic features into the clinical decision-making process for CMML. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 3013 patients with CMML (training set) and a prospective population of 516 patients (validation set). Using an innovative framework for multimodal data analysis, we developed molecular-based disease taxonomy and prognostication. RESULTS Unsupervised clustering identified nine entities with distinct genomic features and outcomes ( P < .001), including splicing machinery, transcription factors, signal transduction and tyrosine kinase pathways aberrations, and high-risk molecular signatures. Notably, 15% of patients showed molecular/clinical overlap with other myeloid neoplasms. We integrated molecular and clinical information to build the international CMML Prognostic Scoring System (iCPSS), incorporating mutations in nine genes together with hematologic parameters and cytogenetic abnormalities. The iCPSS identified five groups with distinct probability of overall and leukemia-free survival in both training and validation cohorts ( P < .001), outperforming existing prognostic models. Importantly, 55% of patients were reassigned to higher or lower risk groups by the iCPSS. Decision analysis demonstrated that iCPSS could refine the optimal timing of allogeneic transplantation at the individual level; compared with conventional prognostic tools, iCPSS-based decision modeling changed transplantation strategy in 31% of cases, resulting in a significant gain-in-life expectancy for eligible patient population ( P < .001). A federated learning platform was implemented to enable continuous, privacy-preserving model update across multiple centers. CONCLUSION Molecular information improves CMML classification and prognostication, supports more effective clinical decision making, and potentially refines the design of clinical trials.

Abstract Background The clinical use and interpretation of cardiac troponins (cTn) in pediatric patients is heterogeneous. Content This review is based on an appraisal and synthesis of the available literature and discussions between International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Committee on Clinical Application of Cardiac Biomarkers members and pediatricians, cardiologists, emergency department physicians, and laboratorians. It aims to summarize current knowledge and best practices related to cTn measurements in pediatric patients, including which percentile should be applicable as the upper reference limit, and the influence of age, sex, and physiology on circulating concentrations. Preanalytical and analytical precautions, and a consensus on optimal interpretation of the reported results are discussed. Summary Current studies report high cTn concentrations in healthy infants and newborns. The nadir is reached at 1–3 years at which time concentrations gradually increase, reaching adult levels through puberty. The incidence of myocardial injury is reported to be low and dependent on whether the 97.5th or 99th percentile is chosen as the upper reference limit. The main clinical indication for testing appears to be suspicion of myo/pericarditis or traumatic chest injury. On occasion, cTn is measured in cases of possible heart failure and/or myocardial ischemia. There is heterogeneity among the limited clinical studies published. Most of the data are retrospective, and the current suggestions for clinical practice are thus largely based on expert opinion. More research is needed regarding all aspects of cTn testing in children, and suggestions for future research are included at the end of this review.

Abstract Neuromodulation is approved for the treatment of drug‐resistant epilepsy. It has been increasingly utilized over the past two decades with the approval of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) in addition to vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)—particularly in patients who are not deemed to be good resective surgical candidates or in case of patient preference. In this seminar in epileptology article, we address learning objective 3.7 “Demonstrate knowledge of indications, limitations and risks for vagal nerve stimulation and other neuromodulation techniques” of the International League Against Epilepsy curriculum for epileptologists. We will review the indications for neuromodulation, device programming, surgical considerations for implantation, side effects, effects on sleep, and mood. This is complemented by case examples that provide perspective for trainees, along with an outlook on future directions for neuromodulation in epilepsy. This article aims to serve as a learning resource for trainees in neurology, clinical neurophysiology, and epileptology by providing guidance in how to navigate the landscape of neuromodulation in epilepsy.

Abstract Latin America is undergoing rapid population aging alongside a rising burden of dementia. While the region holds substantial potential for dementia risk reduction, challenges remain, such as delayed diagnoses, limited access to specialized care and biomarker testing, persistent stigma, and deep‐rooted structural inequities. To address these gaps and foster regionally informed solutions, the Alzheimer's Association convened the 2025 Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) Satellite Symposium in Lima, Peru, on May 14–15, in collaboration with the Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI) and the Atlantic Fellows for Equity in Brain Health. The meeting aimed to bring core elements of the global AAIC meeting to regional Latin American settings, recognizing that national and cultural contexts demand tailored approaches to dementia prevention, risk reduction, treatment and care all aimed at promoting brain health in the region. This manuscript synthesizes the symposium's key discussions, scientific advances, and opportunities for collaboration across the region.

Abstract In Vitro testing is widely used to evaluate the hemodynamic performance of transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs). However, many studies assess self-expanding valves using blood analogs matched in viscosity at room temperature, despite the temperature-dependent mechanical behavior of nitinol stent frames. This study investigates the independent and combined effects of temperature and viscosity on the in vitro performance assessment of a self-expanding TAV. Rheological characterization was performed to identify water-glycerin solutions with matched viscosities at room temperature and physiological temperature (37 °C). A patient-specific aortic model was cast in silicone. A self-expanding Medtronic Evolut R valve was deployed within the compliant model and evaluated using a pulse-duplicating left heart simulator under physiological flow and pressure conditions. The transvalvular pressure gradient and effective orifice area (EOA) were calculated. Rheometry identified two fluid conditions with comparable viscosities at room and body temperatures. Heating the blood analog to 37 °C resulted in significantly reduced transvalvular pressure gradient and increased EOA compared to the viscosity-matched room temperature condition (p &lt; 0.0001). At physiological body temperature, the higher viscosity fluid (42% glycerin) yielded further improvements in valve performance relative to the lower viscosity fluid (38% glycerin), with lower pressure drop and larger EOA (p &lt; 0.0001). These results demonstrate that temperature-dependent effects influence the hemodynamic performance of self-expanding nitinol TAVs beyond viscosity matching alone. Combined consideration of temperature and viscosity is therefore necessary to ensure physiologically relevant in vitro assessment of self-expanding TAVs.

Abstract Background Robotic left pancreatectomy (RLP) is increasingly adopted worldwide. Current guidelines suggest a learning curve of 21 cases, yet its impact on major morbidity and oncological quality remains uncertain. Methods A retrospective multicentre international study was undertaken across 10 centres in the UK, Spain, Germany, the USA, and Australia (2014–2025). Consecutive patients undergoing RLP were categorised into competency (first 21 cases per centre) or proficiency phase (&gt;21). The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥ IIIa), and secondary outcome was the R1-margin rate. Mixed-effects logistic regression and risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analyses were performed. Results 521 patients underwent RLP, including 200 (38.4%) in the competency phase and 321 (61.6%) in the proficiency phase. Median age was 63 years (IQR 54–73), and 56.4% were female. Rates of major morbidity were similar between phases (14.5% versus 14.0%, P = 0.981), as were R1 margin rates (21.6% versus 19.7%, P = 0.092). Independent predictors of major morbidity included male sex (OR 1.76, P = 0.037), preoperative pancreatitis (OR 2.23, P = 0.031), and multivisceral resection (OR 2.29, P = 0.034). Among patients with adenocarcinoma (n = 110), prolonged operative time (OR 1.39 per hour, P = 0.004) and nodal positivity (OR 2.62, P = 0.047) predicted R1 resection, while learning phase was not associated with margin status. RA-CUSUM demonstrated no excess morbidity over time in any centre. Conclusions In this first multicentre international analysis, the learning phase of RLP did not increase the risk of major morbidity or compromise oncological quality. These findings support the safe global adoption of RLP with appropriate training and case selection.

Abstract Background Minimally invasive left-sided pancreatectomy (MIS-LP) is increasingly adopted for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PNETs), yet its oncological safety compared with open surgery (O-LP) remains debated. Robust population-level evidence is required to guide practice. Methods Patients ≥65 years with grade 1–2 PNETs undergoing left pancreatectomy were identified from the SEER-Medicare database (2010–2019). Overall and cancer-specific survival outcomes were analysed using multilevel Cox regression after propensity-score matching (PSM). Landmark analysis from 6 months excluded early postoperative deaths. Results 772 patients were included: 257 (33%) MIS-LP and 515 (67%) O-LP. Median age was 71 years; 87% had grade 1 and 13% grade 2 tumours. Before matching, MIS-LP patients had lower comorbidity (median Charlson Index 2 versus 3, P = 0.011) and fewer with metastatic disease (2.0% versus 5.7%, P = 0.019). After PSM (MIS-LP n = 248; O-LP n = 441), 5-year overall survival was higher with MIS-LP (88.1% versus 84.5%, P = 0.03), while 5-year cancer-specific survival was similar (95.2% versus 93.5%, P = 0.11). O-LP was associated with increased risk of death (HR 1.75, 95% c.i. 1.05–2.91, P = 0.030), though not cancer-specific death (HR 1.97, 95% c.i. 0.86–4.54, P = 0.110). Notably, all 90-day mortalities (n = 15, 1.9%) occurred in the O-LP group. In landmark analysis beyond 6 months, surgical approach was no longer predictive of OS or CSS. Conclusions MIS-LP confers an early survival advantage, driven by reduced perioperative mortality, without compromising long-term oncological outcomes. As the largest population-based analysis in this setting, these findings support MIS-LP as the standard surgical approach for older patients with low- to intermediate-grade PNETs.

Objective Identifying eligible patients for precision oncology clinical trials is challenging, particularly for rare molecular subpopulations. To address this challenge, A2 Biotherapeutics developed BASECAMP-1 ( NCT04981119 ), a non-interventional master screening study to identify patients eligible for interventional studies of logic-gated Tmod chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies. Eligible patients for these interventional trials have an advanced solid malignancy and are germline human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02 heterozygous, with tumour-associated HLA-A loss of heterozygosity (LOH). HLA-A LOH occurs in ~16% of advanced solid malignancies; therefore, an efficient screening strategy is required. This report describes BASECAMP-1; compares the efficiency of two screening methods; and discusses the broader advantages of BASECAMP-1 beyond efficient enrolment. Methods and analysis Patients are identified for BASECAMP-1 using two approaches. In the traditional approach, common for clinical trials, investigators consent and screen all patients who might be good candidates for cell therapy trials, with no prior knowledge of patient HLA-A type or LOH status. To further optimise our approach, we co-developed with Tempus AI (Tempus) the bioinformatic programme Aware, which identifies potentially eligible patients with tumour-associated HLA-A*02 LOH within a clinico-genomic database that includes linked genomic and transcriptomic sequencing and clinical data collected during routine care. Results Over 42 months of using a traditional approach to identify eligible patients, 1918 patients at 13 study sites were consented and screened for BASECAMP-1; of these, 30 patients with tumour-associated HLA-A*02 LOH were enrolled (~0.7 participants per month). Over the last 30 months of that same period, Tempus Aware screening was implemented and 55 patients with tumour-associated HLA-A*02 LOH were enrolled (~1.8 participants per month). The bioinformatic approach identified more patients than the traditional approach and used sequencing results produced as part of the standard clinical tumour sequencing workflow, reducing resource use and study staff burden. Additional advantages of using a screening study, such as BASECAMP-1, include manufacturing efficiencies and collection of a large dataset of molecular and clinical parameters that can be used to supplement trial analyses. Conclusions The BASECAMP-1 study demonstrates a clinico-genomic screening approach can more efficiently identify patients for precision oncology trials. Furthermore, precision oncology can be enhanced through collaborative data-sharing. Trial registration number NCT04981119 .

Importance Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens may be administered after pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma arising from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (A-IPMNs), although the evidence supporting their use is limited. Objective To evaluate the survival benefit associated with contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after resection in A-IPMNs between 2017 and 2023. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study was an international, multicenter study with 69 participating centers across Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients undergoing resection for A-IPMNs were included. Data were analyzed from May to August 2025. Intervention Contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, such as gemcitabine-capecitabine (GemCap); 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX), modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), and S-1. Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival (months). Results Among 1321 patients (median [IQR] age 70 [63 to 76] years; 713 males [54.0%] and 608 females [46.0%]), 781 patients (59.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, while in 181 patients (13.7%) it was omitted due to poor patient fitness. Of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, 568 patients (72.6%) received contemporary regimens, including GemCap (232 patients [29.7%]), FOLFIRINOX (176 patients [22.5%]), mFOLFIRINOX (71 patients [9.1%]), and S-1 (70 patients [9.0%]). The median (IQR) follow-up for the cohort was 64.2 (40.4 to 85.0) months, and the median overall survival was 73.8 months (95% CI, 66.4 to 81.9 months). After 90-day landmark analysis and exclusion of patients ineligible for chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 243:243 patients) was not associated with improved overall survival (median, 82.3 months; 95% CI, 78.2 months to not applicable [NA] vs not reached; 95% CI, 75.3 months to NA; P = .58). Contemporary regimens vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (propensity score–matched populations, 309:309 patients) was not associated with longer survival, and a mean survival benefit greater than 4.2 months over 5 years was excluded (difference in restricted mean survival, 1.26 months; 95%, −1.72 to 4.24 months). Treatment outcomes did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or disease characteristic (eg, N stage or carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level). Conclusions and Relevance In this study, contemporary adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival in A-IPMNs, and a randomized clinical trial is indicated.