Citations

Background: Ketamine and esketamine ((es)ketamine) rapidly reduce depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation (SI) in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), but whether early SI improvement during the acute phase of the treatment predicts reduced suicide-associated emergency department (SAED) visits over the longer term remains unclear. Objectives: To examine whether early improvements in SI, measured using item 12 of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology – Self Reported (QIDS-SR), following (es)ketamine treatment are associated with SAED visits over 6 months Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Individuals with TRD who had available data on SI measured using the QIDS-SR during the acute phase, as well as data on SAED visits over 6 months, were included. Participants were classified based on changes in SI as resolved, partially improved, or unchanged/worsened using the QIDS-SR item 12 during acute treatment (up to six intravenous (IV) or eight intranasal (IN) treatments) and were followed for SAED visits. Results: Among 96 patients with SI data, 73 (76%) had baseline SI. Following acute-phase treatment, 36 (49%) achieved SI resolution, 14 (19%) partially improved, and 23 (32%) were unchanged/worsened. During the 6-month follow-up, 8 (11%) had post-acute SAED visits. While not statistically significant, patients with resolved SI had lower odds of post-acute ED visits (OR = 0.16, p = 0.12). Kaplan–Meier estimates of SAED visit-free survival across three SI change groups trended toward significance ( p = 0.066), suggesting lower cumulative healthcare (ED) utilization in more favorable change groups. Secondary analysis among 57 patients who received IV ketamine and had baseline SI showed that, after two infusions, 33 (47.2%) demonstrated a reduction in SI. Early SI improvement (⩾50% reduction in SI) was associated with a lower likelihood of any post-treatment SAED visit at 6 months after adjusting for pre-treatment SAED (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.02–0.98, p = 0.047), corresponding to numbers needed to treat of 4.3. Conclusion: Early SI changes may have prognostic implications, though larger studies are needed to confirm clinical significance.

Abstract The proliferation of advanced endoscopic resection techniques has provided a minimally invasive alternative to esophagectomy and revolutionized outcomes for patients with early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). This paradigm shift and the resulting research data on clinical and histologic determinants of treatment outcome have highlighted the heterogeneity of outcomes within EAC staged as T1 by invasion depth. Multidisciplinary cancer care teams are now routinely facing difficult decisions regarding the management of high-risk T1 EAC to balance the risk of long-term lymph node (LNM) or distant metastasis against the risks of surgical resection. In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the staging and risk stratification of T1 EAC, with particular attention to features that contribute to a higher risk of LNM and cancer mortality. We review recent clinical trial data on positioning the use of endoscopic resection (cap-assisted or submucosal dissection) versus surgical resection in high-risk T1 EAC patients and describe adjunctive techniques to further improve risk stratification and treatment. Finally, we explore emerging and future directions, such as artificial intelligence and advanced biomarker analysis to further aid decision-making and enhance patient outcomes.

PURPOSE Integrating external control data into clinical trial designs and analyses has the potential to accelerate drug development processes. We reanalyzed the three experimental arms of the Individual Screening Trial of Innovative Glioblastoma Therapy (INSIGhT), a randomized phase II platform trial in newly diagnosed O 6 -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase-unmethylated glioblastoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02977780 ). To evaluate the validity of using external data sets, we compared treatment effect estimates based on internal INSIGhT control data and matched external control data. METHODS The three experimental arms of INSIGhT (abemaciclib [n = 72], neratinib [n = 80], and CC-115 [n = 12]) did not improve survival compared with internal controls (standard chemoradiation [n = 70]). We derived external control patient-level data from multiple real-world and clinical trial data sets. We applied propensity score matching and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate treatment effects with external controls. Additionally, using this glioblastoma (GBM) data collection, we specified simulation scenarios to evaluate trial designs that integrate external controls. RESULTS After matching to external controls, no survival benefit was observed for patients receiving abemaciclib (hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.75 to 1.34]), neratinib (HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.70 to 1.24]), or CC-115 (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.41 to 1.88]). Simulations, together with the INSIGhT data and a collection of GBM data sets, allowed us to examine efficiencies and risks of clinical trial designs that leverage external control data. CONCLUSION The use of carefully matched external controls, to replace or augment the internal controls of INSIGhT, produced treatment effect estimates that were similar to previously published analyses. Single-arm trial designs and hybrid randomized designs incorporating propensity score–matched external control data evaluated treatment effects in the early-phase testing of experimental therapies in newly diagnosed GBM. The validity of this approach and risks of bias depended on the availability of comprehensive and accurate data on all potential confounders, in the absence of unmeasured confounding.

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB), a major global public health burden, is characterized by the presence of high circulating levels of non-infectious subviral particles (SVPs). These SVPs are mainly composed of small hepatitis B surface antigen (SHBs) and are associated with a dysfunctional HBV-specific immune response. Previous studies exploring the cellular mechanisms and molecular pathways by which SVPs are secreted from hepatocytes have utilized either non-hepatic cells or whole-genome HBV-integrated hepatoma cell lines in which SHBs can also be secreted as a component of the virion envelope. In this study, we provide a detailed examination of SHBs trafficking using biochemical approaches coupled with high-resolution confocal microscopy and live-cell imaging via a novel fluorophore-tagged SHBs probe in both HepG2 and primary human hepatocytes stably expressing SHBs. Our results provide evidence that SHBs utilize a modified ER-Golgi secretory pathway with transit from the ER to the multivesicular body and lysosomal/late endosomal compartments. Importantly, we identified the autophagy adapters ATG5 and LC3B, and the ER-phagy protein atlastin 3 (ATL3), central to mediating SHBs secretion. These findings suggest that SHBs is trafficked through a non-canonical path for secretion and provides new potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of CHB.

ABSTRACT Metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales are a global public health concern. Infections caused by these pathogens are often hard to treat, with few effective agents currently available. While aztreonam-avibactam only recently gained U.S. and European regulatory approval, laboratories have implemented laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) using existing aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam reagents. We sought to compare the performance of four phenotypic methods, up to three reagent manufacturers, and two media manufacturers. One hundred two MBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates were evaluated at two sites (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] and Johns Hopkins University [JHU] School of Medicine). The performance of four methods was evaluated: broth disk elution (BDE), disk stacking (DS), gradient diffusion strip stacking (SS), and a strip-to-disk proximity (strip-disk) method, which were compared to reference broth microdilution (rBMD) tested in parallel. Respective category agreement for CDC and JHU was 92.2% and 96.1% for BDE, 51%–76.5% and 31%–49% for DS, 71.6%–86.3% and 83.3%–86.3% for SS, and 82.4%–87.3% and 80%–89.2% for the strip-disk method. The SS essential agreement ranged from 46.1% to 62.7% for JHU and 54.9% to 92.2% for CDC. Interlaboratory reproducibility was 93.1% for rBMD, 92.2% for BDE, 47.1%–53.1% for DS, 76.5%–80% for SS, and 87.3%–88.9% for strip-disk. BDE was the only method that exceeded acceptable performance of >90% accuracy and reproducibility. DS had the lowest and most variable performance between sites and among the different disk manufacturers used. LDTs for combination testing can be highly variable, and further work is needed to improve standardization and harmonization to achieve accurate and reliable results for clinical purposes. IMPORTANCE Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales are classified as an urgent public health threat in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s 2019 Antibiotic Resistance Threats Report. Among the most concerning resistance mechanisms are carbapenemase enzymes encoded on mobile genetic elements, which can spread rapidly between bacteria. Of the various carbapenemases, metallo-beta-lactamases are particularly challenging, as they confer resistance to nearly all beta-lactams, and current treatment options remain limited. While aztreonam-avibactam has been U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for treating certain infections with limited or no alternative treatment options, no FDA-cleared susceptibility test is yet available. In this context, laboratory-developed methods, such as combination testing of aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam, play a critical role in guiding therapy. Our study evaluates several of the more common laboratory-developed tests compared to reference broth microdilution and found that broth disk elution was the most accurate; in contrast, other methods had variable performance, some demonstrating limited reliability and being prone to overcalling resistance.

ABSTRACT Background Long‐term outcome data for stiff person spectrum disorder (SPSD) remain limited and sustained response to treatment varies. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with probable or definite SPSD (Mayo Clinic criteria), evaluated at Mayo Clinic (12/1995‐07/2024) with ≥ 5 years of follow‐up after diagnosis. Primary outcome measures included the modified Rankin scale (mRS) and use of gait aids. Results Fifty‐four patients were included, 41 (76%) were female; median age at onset was 45 years (16–78). Most were antibody‐positive (51 [94%]), with high‐titer (serum, ≥ 20 nmol/L) GAD65‐IgG in 45 (83%). Nine patients had a stiff‐limb presentation (17%). The median interval from onset to diagnosis was 2 years (0–34), and median follow‐up was 9 years (5–26). Most patients (46 [85%]) received immune therapy; 37 (82%) reported improvement. All patients had significant impairment (mRS ≥ 2) at nadir, with 31 (57%) losing functional independence (mRS ≥ 3) and 40 (75%) requiring bilateral gait assistance. The median time from onset to nadir was 6 years (0–39). At last follow‐up, most (37 [69%]) were functionally independent (mRS ≤ 2), including 8 (15%) with minimal restrictions (mRS ≤ 1). Bilateral gait assistance was needed in 22 (41%). Among 40 patients with ≥ 10 years of follow‐up, 22 (56%) had an mRS ≤ 2 and 25 (63%) required a gait aid at last follow‐up. Poor outcome in this population was associated with bilateral gait assistance at nadir and older age ( p < 0.05). Conclusions Although over half of SPSD patients lose functional independence at disease nadir, many regain independence and achieve well‐controlled symptoms.

Background/Objectives: Hearing loss is frequently misunderstood by communication partners and healthcare providers of patients with hearing loss alike, leading to gaps in counseling, medical adherence, and empathy. Hearing loss simulation is a technique that can clarify patient experience by illustrating how hearing loss affects daily listening and speech discrimination. The current research explores the influences of a web-based hearing loss simulator on how hearing loss is understood by communication partners, audiologists, and medical providers/students. Methods: Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, 72 participants (communication partners, audiologists, and medical providers/residents) completed a guided trial with the hearing simulator, either one-on-one or in group settings, and subsequently completed a questionnaire regarding their experiences. The simulation trial included demonstrations of hearing loss and amplification across four listening environments: speech in quiet, in noise, at a distance, as well as listening to instrumental music. Results: Communication partners reported that they gained a better understanding of their partner’s hearing loss, with all expressing increased feelings of empathy towards their partner and individuals with hearing loss. When compared to audiologists, communication partners were significantly more surprised by the impact of hearing loss on speech understanding. Medical providers and students emphasized the value of the simulator as a counseling tool and highly recommended that other providers use the simulator with their patients. Conclusions: Simulating hearing loss can be beneficial for counseling purposes and medical training. These findings suggest that hearing loss simulation can enhance empathy and communication across clinical and educational contexts.