Citations

Abstract Complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy can be difficult to recognize when it presents in the setting of an apparent clinical trigger, such as pregnancy, severe hypertension, or kidney transplantation. These conditions can each cause endothelial injury directly but may also unmask complement dysregulation in susceptible individuals. In these situations, the critical question is not whether a trigger exists but whether it fully explains the syndrome and whether urgent complement blockade is warranted to prevent irreversible kidney injury. In this How I Treat article, we use 3 real-world cases to illustrate how we approach this decision in practice. We emphasize the bedside features that most influence our threshold to treat, including the pattern and severity of kidney injury, tempo of disease progression, and lack of improvement with supportive or trigger-directed care. We also address the interpretation of complement genetic findings, pregnancy- and transplant-specific risk stratification, and the individualization of treatment duration. Functional assays can support mechanistic assessment in selected cases but remain an adjunct to diagnosis and should not drive management decisions.

Solitary plasmacytomas (SPs) are rare localized tumors of clonal plasma cells, either in the bone (solitary bone plasmacytoma) or in soft tissue/extraosseous (extramedullary) with either no or with minimal bone marrow (BM) infiltration (<10% clonal plasma cells by immunohistochemistry) and no evidence of systemic involvement or myeloma defining events. Approximately 50% of SPs will progress to symptomatic myeloma within 5 years after initial definitive local radiotherapy. Increased availability of improved diagnostic and monitoring tools has increased the sensitivity of detection of additional lesions and marrow involvement and has implications for the follow-up strategy after treatment. Thus, the definitions and requirements for the diagnosis and follow-up of SPs are evolving. The diagnosis of SP requires the careful exclusion of multiple myeloma (MM) that would require systemic therapy, by using all the available methods to detect systemic disease (advanced imaging, sensitive BM assessment methods, blood and urine tests). Local radiotherapy remains the mainstay of therapy, and despite the availability of innovative drugs for MM, the clinical benefit of systemic therapy currently remains poorly defined. The International Myeloma Working Group provides here updated recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and response assessment of patients with SPs, incorporating recent data and advances in diagnostic tools.

PURPOSE Adherence to operative standards and thorough documentation of surgical technique are critical, particularly in multidisciplinary clinical trials. We sought to evaluate variability in the performance and documentation of oncologically relevant aspects of technical surgery among patients enrolled in Alliance A021501, a phase 2 National Clinical Trials Network randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS We reviewed the primary operative and pathology reports of all enrolled patients who underwent complete pancreatic resection. Operative techniques and pathologic end points with potential to influence recurrence and survival were evaluated. RESULTS Fifty-one of 126 study participants (40.5%) underwent complete pancreatectomy. The extent of lymphadenectomy was documented in 36 (70.6%) operative reports, and 5 (9.8%) reports outlined the specific lymph node stations removed. Periadventitial dissection of the superior mesenteric artery was described in 25 of 50 (50.0%) operative reports. Immediate histopathologic analysis of the hepatic duct and pancreatic parenchyma margins was documented in 29 of 50 (58.0%) and 32 of 49 (65.3%) reports, respectively, and presence or absence of residual disease following resection was documented in 9 of 51 (17.6%) reports. Specimen orientation was documented in 19 of 51 (37.3%) pathology reports, and 30 of 49 (61.2%) pathology reports stated the distance between the tumor and final SMA margin. CONCLUSION Even in this rigorously controlled, multicenter, randomized pancreatic cancer clinical trial, performance of key elements of technical surgery was inconsistent, and documentation was incomplete. Standardization of technique and documentation in clinical trials and within clinical practice should be addressed to improve quality assurance and trial interpretability.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate how speech signal compression algorithms affect the acoustic and perceptual characteristics of dysarthric speech. As telepractice becomes more common in speech-language pathology, particularly in the assessment of dysarthria, understanding the impact of telecommunication compression on speech fidelity is essential for clinical decision making. Method: Speech samples were collected from 15 individuals with dysarthria, recorded locally and simultaneously via Zoom (Version 6.2.11). The Opus codec was used to process the locally recorded speech samples under fullband, wideband, and narrowband compression conditions. Acoustic measures were derived for all samples. Twenty experienced speech-language pathologists (SLPs) rated vocal quality and nasality for sustained vowels and rated articulatory precision and orthographically transcribed sentences across each condition. Results: Narrowband compression was associated with significantly degraded voice quality measures (e.g., harmonic-to-noise ratio, shimmer) and reduced transcription accuracy. Despite these changes in acoustics and intelligibility, ratings of articulatory precision, nasality, and vocal quality remained stable across conditions, suggesting SLPs could adjust for compression artifacts when making perceptual judgments. Conclusions: Speech compression, particularly in low-bandwidth (i.e., narrow) condition, impacts acoustic fidelity and intelligibility, though expert listeners maintain reliable perceptual judgments. These findings underscore the need to consider compression effects in telepractice and highlight the importance of developing optimized protocols for remote dysarthria assessment.

Abstract Background Immune dysregulation, immunosuppressive therapy and active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increase susceptibility to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. We evaluated the risk of RSV infection in patients with active and nonactive IBD. Methods Using the TriNetX Analytics Network from October 2024 through March 2025, we identified adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with IBD. Patients were classified as having active IBD if they had recent IBD complications, IBD-related surgery, or elevated inflammatory markers (within preceding 6 months); those without recent complications,surgeries, or elevated inflammatory markers were classified as having nonactive IBD within the same period. Outcomes were assessed within 180 days after the index date and included RSV infection, bacterial pneumonia, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mechanical ventilation. Results Among 141 763 patients (47 883 patients with active IBD, 93 880 patients with nonactive IBD), 2879 patients with active IBD and 3583 with nonactive IBD received the RSV vaccination. After matching, each cohort included 46 308 patients. Active IBD was associated with higher odds of RSV infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.18-2.04), bacterial pneumonia (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.08-3.19), ICU admissions (aOR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.88-2.28), and mechanical ventilation (aOR, 2.41; 95% CI, 2.01-2.88). RSV risk remained higher among patients with active IBD both with and without systemic corticosteroid exposure. Among RSV-vaccinated patients, RSV infection rates were not significantly different between active and nonactive IBD (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.78-1.79). Conclusion Patients with active IBD had higher risk of RSV infection. Increased RSV risk was observed both among patients with active IBD with and without systemic corticosteroid exposure. Among RSV-vaccinated patients, RSV infection rates were not significantly different between active and nonactive IBD. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Importance Gastroparesis is a condition of delayed gastric emptying in the absence of gastric outlet obstruction. Based on a 2018 US administrative health insurance claims database study, prevalence of definite gastroparesis (with documented delayed gastric emptying) was 21.5 per 100 000 persons. Observations Gastroparesis, which is caused by reduced contractions of the distal stomach or abnormal pyloric relaxation, is more common among females than males (ratio, 2:1-4:1) and typically causes nausea, vomiting, early satiety, bloating, and abdominal pain or discomfort. In a large US epidemiological study involving 82.6 million patients, the most common causes of gastroparesis were type 2 diabetes (51.7%), postsurgical effects (15%), medication-induced (11.8%), idiopathic (11.3%), type 1 diabetes (5.7%), and other (4.5%). Other risk factors include neurological disorders (eg, Parkinson disease), hypothyroidism, amyloidosis, connective tissue disorders (eg, scleroderma), and viral infections (eg, norovirus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, SARS-CoV-2). The 2022 American College of Gastroenterology and the 2025 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guidelines define the criterion standard diagnostic test for gastroparesis as gastric emptying scintigraphy with more than 10% gastric retention at 4 hours in patients with symptoms of gastroparesis without mechanical obstruction based on upper endoscopy or abdominal imaging such as computed tomographic (CT) scan. The carbon 13 spirulina stable isotope breath test is also approved for diagnosing gastroparesis by the US Food and Drug Administration. Based on the percentage of gastric retention at 4 hours, gastroparesis is categorized in the 2022 AGA clinical practice update as mild (10%-15%), moderate (16%-35%), or severe (&amp;gt;35%). Treatment includes discontinuation of medications that delay gastric emptying such as opioids, cannabis, anticholinergics, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and for patients with diabetes, optimizing glycemic control. First-line therapies according to the AGA 2022 clinical practice update are a small particle diet (food that is blended or chopped into small pieces) that is low in fat and nondigestible fiber and antiemetics (eg, serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 [5-HT 3 ] receptor antagonists, histamine H 1 receptor antagonists) for mild gastroparesis; antiemetics and prokinetics (metoclopramide, erythromycin) for moderate gastroparesis, and liquid diet or jejunal enteral feeding for severe gastroparesis. Severe refractory gastroparesis may be treated with gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM), which involves endoscopic-guided incision of the pylorus sphincter muscle, or gastric electrical simulation, in which an implanted neurostimulator sends electrical pulses to the stomach muscle. Conclusions and Relevance Gastroparesis is a condition of delayed gastric emptying without gastric outlet obstruction that is diagnosed based on a gastric emptying study. First-line treatments include a small particle diet and antiemetics and prokinetics. Severe refractory gastroparesis may be treated with procedures such as G-POEM or gastric electrical simulation.

This JAMA Clinical Guidelines Synopsis summarizes the American College of Gastroenterology’s (ACG) 2025 clinical guideline update on management of ulcerative colitis in adults.