Citations

Institution: Mayo Clinic Clear

Showing 10 of 107930 citations.

USE OF GLEASON SCORE, PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, SEMINAL VESICLE AND MARGIN STATUS TO PREDICT BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
Blute, Michael L., Bergstralh, Erik J., Iocca, Angelo J., Scherer, Beth G., Zincke, Horst

Journal of Urology | August 25, 2004 | Volume: 165 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 119-125

10.1097/00005392-200101000-00030 | PMID 11125379 Get It

Solid Renal Tumors: An Analysis of Pathological Features Related to Tumor Size
Frank, Igor, Blute, Michael L., Cheville, John C. , Lohse, Christine M. , Weaver, Amy L. , Zincke, Horst

Journal of Urology | August 25, 2004 | Volume: 170 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 2217-2220

10.1097/01.ju.0000095475.12515.5e | PMID 14634382 Get It

Andropause: Symptom Management for Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Hormonal Ablation
Thompson, Carrie A. , Loprinzi, Charles L. , Shanafelt, Tait D.

The Oncologist | August 24, 2004 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 474-487

10.1634/theoncologist.8-5-474 | PMID 14530501 Get It

AbstractLearning ObjectivesAfter completing this course, the reader will be able to:Explain the side effects of hormonal ablation therapy for prostate cancer. Provide a list of potential non-hormonal therapies for treatment of vasomotor symptoms. Appreciate the impact of hormonal ablation therapy on bone mineral density.Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.comAndropause, or the age-related decline in serum testosterone, has become a popular topic in the medical literature over the past several years. Andropause includes a constellation of symptoms related to lack of androgens, including diminished libido, decreased generalized feeling of well-being, osteoporosis, and a host of other symptoms. The andropause syndrome is very prominent in men undergoing hormonal ablation therapy for prostate cancer. Most significant in this population are the side effects of hot flashes, anemia, gynecomastia, depression, cognitive decline, sarcopenia, a decreased overall quality of life, sexual dysfunction, and osteoporosis with subsequent bone fractures. The concept of andropause in prostate cancer patients is poorly represented in the literature. In this article, we review the current literature on the symptoms, signs, and possible therapies available to men who cannot take replacement testosterone.
Genetics and the Management of Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer
Mincey, Betty A.

The Oncologist | August 24, 2004 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 466-473

10.1634/theoncologist.8-5-466 | PMID 14530500 Get It

Abstract Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Identify appropriate candidates for consideration of genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Explain the importance of appropriate patient counseling prior to proceeding with genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2, including genetic counseling and education regarding interpretation and implications of test results. Discuss risk management options for BRCA mutation carriers and the available evidence regarding their effectiveness. Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com It is estimated that 5%–10% of all breast cancers in women are associated with hereditary susceptibility due to mutations in autosomal dominant genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, p53, pTEN, and STK11/LKB1. Another 15%–20% of female breast cancers occur in women with a family history but without an apparent autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, and are probably due to other genetic factors with environmental influence. Approximately 7%–10% of ovarian cancers occur in women with hereditary susceptibility, primarily secondary to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, with smaller contributions from mutations in mismatch repair genes associated with the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and other, as yet undiscovered, genes.
The Forgotten Myeloproliferative Disorder: Myeloid Metaplasia
Tefferi, Ayalew

The Oncologist | August 24, 2004 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 225-231

10.1634/theoncologist.8-3-225 | PMID 12773744 Get It

AbstractLearning ObjectivesAfter completing this course, the reader will be able to:Derive a conceptual understanding of the classification as well as the pathogenesis of chronic myeloproliferative disorders with emphasis on myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Recognize how myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia is diagnosed and know what the differential diagnosis constitutes. Be familiar with current therapeutic options in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia.Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.comMyelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia is a hematologic disorder currently classified with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia as a chronic myeloproliferative disease. The median age at diagnosis is 60 years, and more than 90% of patients are diagnosed after age 40 years. Clinical manifestations include massive splenomegaly, progressive anemia, profound constitutional symptoms, and extramedullary hematopoiesis. The diagnosis is confirmed by bone marrow examination after other causes of myelofibrosis are ruled out. Median survival is 5 years and causes of death include leukemic transformation. Prognosis is adversely affected by the presence of anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dl), leukopenia or leukocytosis (white blood cells >30,000/μl), circulating blasts, and hypercatabolic symptoms. Conventional treatment is palliative and does not improve survival. In this regard, androgen preparations, corticosteroids, and erythropoietin are useful for the treatment of disease-associated anemia. Symptomatic splenomegaly is best managed by cytoreductive therapy or surgical removal. Radiation therapy is most useful in the treatment of nonhepatosplenic extramedullary hematopoiesis. New treatment approaches include the use of thalidomide alone or in combination with prednisone and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: Recommendations for Management Based on Consensus Review and Recent Clinical Trials
Mincey, Betty A., Palmieri, Frances M., Perez, Edith A.

The Oncologist | August 24, 2004 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 246-250

10.1634/theoncologist.7-3-246 | PMID 12065798 Get It

Abstract Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Understand how evaluation of risk of relapse, results of clincial trials, risk/benefit ratio, and patient preference each contribute to the selection of appropriate adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Understand the important prognostic and predictive factors in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Understand the roles of local therapy, hormonal treatment, and chemotherapy in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Understand the recommendations of the 2000 NIH Consensus Development Conference: Advances in Breast Cancer. Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com Determining the optimal individual adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer patients is a challenging undertaking because it requires translating data from clinical trials that have involved thousands of patients into a highly individualized, risk-adjusted approach for the patient at hand. Choosing adjuvant therapy for women with breast cancer includes consideration of four issues: A) evaluation of risk of relapse; B) extrapolation of results from clinical trials; C) therapeutic ratio, and D) the patient's preferences following a thorough discussion with her physician. Data from recently completed phase III adjuvant trials and worldwide consensus conferences document the benefits of adjuvant therapy in improving disease-free survival and overall survival for patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer >1.0 cm in size. The benefits of hormonal therapy are clear, but limited to patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Anthracyclines lead to improved outcomes compared with nonanthracycline regimens. Taxanes appear to improve disease-free survival in patients with node-positive disease, although longer follow-up is required to assess their impact on overall survival. Some countries have reported a reduction in the mortality rate from breast cancer over the past several years. The improved survival rate is due, at least in part, to the use of adjuvant systemic therapy. Ongoing studies are evaluating targeted therapies, with the potential of remarkably improving patient outcome.
Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Therapy and Promising New Regimens
Okuno, Scott H. , Jett, James R.

The Oncologist | August 24, 2004 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 234-238

10.1634/theoncologist.7-3-234 | PMID 12065796 Get It

Abstract Learning Objectives After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Understand the treatment options for limited versus extensive small cell lung cancer. Understand the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation for small cell lung cancer. Understand second-line chemotherapy regiments for small cell lung cancer. Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at CME.TheOncologist.com In this review, we cover current therapy and promising new regimens and highlight areas where improvement is needed in the management of small cell lung cancer.
Update on the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma
Kyle, Robert A.

The Oncologist | August 24, 2004 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 119-124

10.1634/theoncologist.6-2-119 | PMID 11306723 Get It

Abstract The patient with multiple myeloma should be carefully evaluated from the standpoint of symptoms, physical findings, and laboratory data. If there are no symptoms or evidence of early or impending complications, the patient should not be treated. He or she should be followed and treatment delayed until progression of the disease occurs. If the patient is younger than 70 years, autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation should be considered. Hematopoietic stem cells should be collected before the patient is exposed to alkylating agents. If the patient is older than 70 years, chemotherapy is indicated. The two major shortcomings of autologous stem cell transplantation are: A) failure to eradicate myeloma, and B) contamination of autologous peripheral blood stem cells. Most physicians initially treat the patient with vincristine, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and dexamethasone (VAD) for three to four months and then collect the peripheral blood stem cells. One can then proceed with transplant or treat the patient with alkylating agents and delay the transplant until the patient progresses. In a prospective trial comparing autologous bone marrow transplantation with conventional chemotherapy, five-year overall survival favored the transplant group (52% versus 12%). In a randomized trial of 400 patients from France, there was no difference in event-free or overall survival between double and single autologous stem cell transplant when evaluated at two years. In a subsequent evaluation, patients with a low β2-microglobulin value at diagnosis appeared to have better results with a double transplant. There is no evidence that combinations of chemotherapeutic agents are more effective than melphalan and prednisone. Allogeneic transplantation is associated with a high mortality. Depletion of T-cells or a mini-allogeneic transplant may be beneficial in an effort to reduce mortality. Thalidomide produces objective response in approximately 30% of refractory patients. The use of intravenous bisphosphonates is recommended for patients with skeletal lesions. Hypercalcemia and renal failure must be treated promptly.
Robert A. Kyle: An Appreciation
Solberg, Lawrence A.

The Oncologist | August 24, 2004 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 118-118

10.1634/theoncologist.6-2-118 Get It

The Prednisone Dosage in the CHOP Chemotherapy Regimen for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas (NHL): Is There a Standard?
Moreno, Álvaro, Colón‐Otero, Gerardo , Solberg, Lawrence A.

The Oncologist | August 24, 2004 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 238-249

10.1634/theoncologist.5-3-238 | PMID 10884502 Get It

Abstract Purpose. Discrepancies in the quoted prednisone dosages in the regimens reported as the only standard CHOP regimen stimulated our interest in reviewing the medical literature regarding this issue and to assess whether practicing hematologists and oncologists in the U.S. are aware of the different dose schedules of prednisone in the published CHOP programs. Methods. Sixteen textbooks and chemotherapy reference books were reviewed. A MEDLINE search of English-language articles published between January 1970 and December 1998 was performed. An eight-point questionnaire was sent via e-mail with responses obtained from 421 hematology/oncology physicians in the U.S.. Results. Sixteen textbooks and chemotherapy reference books reviewed quoted only one prednisone dosage as part of the standard CHOP regimen; the prednisone dosages quoted as standard varied between publications. More than 4,000 eligible non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients have been treated with the CHOP chemotherapy as part of 43 different clinical trials reviewed. The dosages of prednisone and prednisolone used varied among six different levels. Thirty percent (127/421) of practicing U.S. physicians were not aware of the existence of more than one prednisone dose schedule as part of the CHOP regimen. The three most frequently used dosages are 100 mg/days 1-5 (67%), 100 mg/m2/days 1-5 (17%), and 60 mg/m2/days 1-5 (13%). Conclusions. Discrepancies in steroid dosages used as part of the reported standard CHOP regimens are common and not well recognized in the medical literature nor by practicing U.S. hematologists/oncologists. Based on this study, a prednisone dose of 100 mg/day for five days should be considered the standard dose.