Wang, Xiao‐Jing

INTRODUCTION: Increasing rates of obesity have led to increased numbers of bariatric surgeries performed world-wide. However, some patients do not achieve significant weight loss or develop weight regain following these procedures. Other than estimating the size of the gastric remnant at endoscopy or transaxial imaging, there are limited approaches to quantitate the function of the post-surgical stomach in order to evaluate the disparate weight patterns, or to develop strategy for future treatments, e.g., pharmacotherapy or endoscopic intervention. We hypothesize that altered gastric function in the pre- and post-surgical periods may offer an explanation. Studies performed thus far are difficult to interpret due to heterogeneity in approaches to diagnostic evaluation. The aims of this project were: to assess the feasibility of a new protocol for simultaneous evaluation of gastric accommodation and gastric emptying in the post-bariatric state; and to report normative values in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Methods: We utilized single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and gamma scintigraphy to concurrently study postprandial gastric accommodation responses and gastric emptying rates of a limited size meal designed for subsequent use in post-bariatric patients. The standard meal consisted of 1 egg and 1 extra egg yolk scrambled with 111 Indium-activated charcoal (∼130kcal, 9.5g fat) and 120mL 2% milk (130kcal, 4.4g fat). Gastric accommodation was measured using 99m Technetium-SPECT. SPECT imaging was obtained concomitant with gastric emptying of the 111 In-labeled meal. Anterior and posterior scans of the abdomen were obtained for estimating gastric emptying parameters every 15 minute until 90 minutes, and then in 30-minute intervals until 240 minutes or complete emptying. RESULTS: Data on 28/30 healthy volunteers (35.7% men; 67% Caucasian) with completed studies to date are shown in the Table 1 (data presented as mean ± standard deviation). Gastric emptying proportion at 1, 2, and 4 hours, T 1/2 , and gastric volumes including accommodation are graphically depicted in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Discussion: This study has demonstrated feasibility of simultaneous measurement of gastric emptying and accommodation and provides normal values; this sets the stage for future baseline and post-operative scans on patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Over-the-scope clips (OTSC) are used for closure of fistulas, leaks, and acute perforations, and for GI bleeding. Adverse events include perforation, migration, and ulceration. Little is know about the natural history of OTSCs and no data addressing the longevity of clips is available. We present an interim analysis of our center’s experience with OTSC focusing on natural history. METHODS: OTSCs used from 1/1/2011 to 1/1/2019 were compiled and retrospective chart review undertaken. Primary endpoint was clip retention time (time when the clip was placed to time the clip was last seen or was physically removed). Secondary endpoints were rate of complications and factors that influence clip retention time and clinical success. Cox proportional hazards were used to evaluate variables impacting clip retention. Univariate regression was used to assess potential risk factors for adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 358 OTSC were placed in 299 patients (55.8% male, n = 184) with mean age 64 + 15.3 years. Procedures and indications presented in Table 1. Clip placement was clinically successful in 81% of cases (N = 265). Median time to clip loss as assessed by Kaplan-Meier curve was 267 days (95% CI 196-406) (Figure 1). Adverse events occurred in 34 clip placements (10.7%) and included bleeding (n = 8, 24.2%), perforation (n = 5, 15.2%), ulceration (n = 3, 9.1%), migration (n = 15, 45.5%), and infection (n = 1, 3.0%). Univariate analysis (Table 2) revealed that age, gender, type of clip used (there are 3 types of OTSC), and performing endoscopist did not impact clip retention rate. A size 14 clip had marginally higher rates of retention compared to others. Clips placed in the rectum or esophagus were lost earlier compared to those in the small/large intestine and stomach. Clips placed for fistulas and those associated with adverse event were associated with earlier clip loss. In evaluation of clinical success, clips placed for fistulas had a relative risk of clinical failure of 2.08 (95% CI 1.29-3.36) compared to all other indications. CONCLUSION: OTSCs are retained for a median of 8.9 months with clip location and indication for placement being key factors in time to clip loss. Clips used for fistula closure were more likely to be lost compared to those placed for other indications, less likely to be clinically successful, and more likely to cause a complication. These data help guide decision-making when considering OTSC use across clinical indications.

INTRODUCTION: Double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is an important tool for evaluation of obscure GI bleeding but is a limited resource given time and expertise required. Patient selection is important to help optimize diagnostic yield and subsequent successful management of small bowel bleeding. To maximize the efficiency of DBE performed, our endoscopy group established a screening protocol (Figure) prior to approval of any procedure. We developed a quality improvement project to assess the efficacy of this screening protocol and to evaluate which components of screening were most predictive for procedural success. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent anterograde or retrograde double balloon enteroscopy for suspected GI bleeding from January 2016 to December 2017. Our screening protocol was implemented on February 1 st , 2017. Data was obtained on patient demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory evaluation, and prior investigation for bleeding evaluation. Endoscopy outcomes were separated into procedural success, defined as lesion identified, and clinical success, defined as resolution of bleeding. Success rates were compared pre and post intervention. Regression analysis was performed to evaluate which components best predicted a successful procedure. RESULTS: We reviewed 114 DBE procedures in 89 patients, 53.5% male (n = 61) with a mean age of 62.8 + 13.3 years. Of these, 86% (n = 98) were performed prior to initiation of the screening protocol. Overall, there was no significant difference in procedural success pre and post intervention as defined by presence of recurrent bleeding, persistent anemia, or transfusion need (Table 1). On univariate analysis of clinical success, defined as lack of recurrent bleeding, gender, anticoagulation use, and presence of lesion on CE were significant (Table 2). Identification and intervention on a lesion during the balloon endoscopy did not impact future anemia, bleeding, or transfusion requirements. CONCLUSION: The patient screening protocol was successful in decreasing the number of procedures performed but did not improve our lesion detection rate on endoscopy and did not improve clinical outcomes as measured by rebleeding. Patients on anticoagulation and those who had prior lesions identified on capsule endoscopy had higher odds of rebleeding, indicating clinical failure. This data may help modify patient selection to maximize success of DBE procedures in the future.

INTRODUCTION: Loey Dietz syndrome (LDS) is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by a mutation in TGFBR1 - or TGFBR2. LDS is characterized by distinctive facies, tortuous arteries and aortic aneurysms predisposition to eosinophilic allergic disorders including eosinophilic esophagitis and gastritis, and other systemic findings including inflammatory bowel disease. Patients with vascular Ehlers Danlos Syndrome (vEDS) have deficiency in type III collagen and have similar vascular laxity and concomitant GI manifestations. This connective tissue vulnerability contributes to increased post-operative wound dehiscence and development of hernias. Our aim was to summarize abdominal wall and GI tract manifestations in these two rare vascular disorders at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Data were collected via Advanced Cohort Explorer (ACE) application at Mayo Clinic. A chart review was undertaken on patients with a confirmed diagnosis of vEDS or LDS seen at Mayo Clinic in Rochester from 1994 to 2018. Diagnoses were confirmed by genetic testing and/or clinical review through the specialized medical genetics clinic. Information was extracted on vascular complications of disease, prevalence of abdominal hernias, and gastrointestinal symptoms. The study was reviewed and exempted by the Mayo Clinic IRB. RESULTS: We identified and reviewed records of 50 vEDS and 13 LDS patients; data are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. Patients were similar in age at diagnosis and gender distribution. Hernias were present in similar proportions of patients with vEDS and LDS, although ventral hernias were more frequent and the hernias were more likely to be post-operative in vEDS than in LDS. LDS patients had more aneurysms (58% vEDS vs. 76.9% LDS, P = 0.02) with higher proportion requiring arterial repair (32.7% vEDS vs. 69.2% LDS, P = 0.03). Co-morbidities more prevalent in LDS than vEDS were autonomic dysfunction, psychopathology and allergy. We did not note increase in symptoms suggestive of eosinophilic esophagitis/gastritis in the LDS patients. GI symptoms were prevalent in both disorders and largely similar, except for diarrhea and constipation which were both significantly more prevalent in LDS patients. CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION: While vEDS and LDS are both connective tissue disorders with propensity for GI symptoms, abdominal hernias and aneurysm formation, the risk of arterial rupture and co-morbidity of autonomic dysfunction, psychopathology and allergy are greater in LDS than vEDS.