Hálfdánarson, Þorvarður R.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Gland Tumors focus on the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, paragangliomas, and multiple endocrine neoplasia. NETs are generally subclassified by site of origin, stage, and histologic characteristics. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of NETs often involves collaboration between specialists in multiple disciplines, using specific biochemical, radiologic, and surgical methods. Specialists include pathologists, endocrinologists, radiologists (including nuclear medicine specialists), and medical, radiation, and surgical oncologists. These guidelines discuss the diagnosis and management of both sporadic and hereditary neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. This article is focused on the 2021 NCCN Guidelines principles of genetic risk assessment and counseling and recommendations for well-differentiated grade 3 NETs, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas, adrenal tumors, pheochromocytomas, and paragangliomas.

Abstract Background:Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare, chemo resistant and are associated with a poor prognosis. Preclinical and early clinical work had demonstrated interesting anti-tumor activity from targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway. We hypothesized that ponatinib, a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against FGFR, would be active in BTC patients with FGFR alterations.Methods:This was a multi-center, single institution pilot study of ponatinib in patients with advanced, refractory BTC with FGFR alterations. The primary end point was overall response rate, with secondary points of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) assessment. Results:Twelve patients were enrolled prior to early termination of the trial. Clinical benefit (defined as complete/partial response + stable disease) of 45.5% was observed. All observed toxicities were manageable and reversible. Toxicities were mild, with lymphopenia (75%), rash (63%) and fatigue (50%) being the most frequent. No significant detriment in global QoL was observed.Conclusions:Ponatinib as a single agent in FGFR altered BTC is tolerable with very modest clinical activity. This is the first report of prospective assessment of FGFR inhibition in BTC using ponatinib, and the first study to report its effect on HRQoL. Further development of ponatinib will involve correlative studies to better refine patient selection, focus on combinations with other molecular targeted agents, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy, and studies to better understand mechanisms of treatment resistance.

PURPOSECholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are a group of heterogeneous tumors arising from the biliary epithelia. Significant sequencing efforts have provided further insights into the molecular mechanisms of this disease including fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR) alterations, which occurs in approximately 15%-20% of intrahepatic CCAs. Herein, we describe the FGFR inhibitor (FGFRi)-associated treatment toxicity and cancer-specific outcomes from a multicenter single-institution cohort.METHODSThis is a retrospective study of patients with CCA and known FGFR alterations treated with FGFRi. We describe the toxicity and efficacy in patients treated at Mayo Clinic between January 2010 and December 2020.RESULTSOur group identified 61 patients with advanced or metastatic CCA, 19 males (31%) and 42 females (69%), harboring FGFR alterations who received FGFRi. The most common grade 1 or higher adverse events for all patients included fatigue (92%), AST elevations (78%), anemia (80%), decreased platelet count (63%), and hyperphosphatemia (74%). Median progression-free survival on FGFRi was 5.8 months for all patients (95% CI, 4.9 to 9.0). Females had significantly longer progression-free survival at 6.9 months (95% CI, 5.2 to 11.8) on FGFRi compared with males at 4.9 months (95% CI, 2.8 to not estimable; P = .038).CONCLUSIONFGFRi are well tolerated with clinical efficacy. With the recent approval of FGFRi by the US Food and Drug Administration and ongoing clinical trials for new FGFRi, understanding outcomes and toxicity associated with these medications is important for precision oncology.

Abstract Background and Objectives Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in patients with hereditary cancer syndromes are typically multifocal. In contrast, sporadic pNETs are usually unifocal and the incidence of multifocal sporadic pNETs is unknown. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of multifocality in sporadic pNETs and any associated effect on recurrence risk and survival. Methods Patients who underwent resection of pNETs at Mayo Clinic from 2000 to 2019 were identified and clinical data were obtained from medical records. Syndromic disease was defined as pNETs arising in the setting of a hereditary cancer syndrome. Statistical comparisons were made using χ 2 , Fisher's exact, and Kruskal–Wallis tests and survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results Six hundred and sixty‐one patients with sporadic pNETs and fifty‐nine with syndromic pNETs were identified. Multifocal disease was present in 4.8% of sporadic patients and 84.7% of syndromic patients ( p < .001). Within patients with sporadic pNETs, clinicopathologic features and recurrence‐free and overall survival were similar between patients with unifocal and multifocal disease. Conclusions Multifocal sporadic pNETs are rare and multifocality is not associated with worse survival or increased recurrence risk. Patients with multifocal sporadic pNETs can likely be safely managed with a combination of resection and observation as indicated for each tumor.

Abstract Background: Mixed acinar neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC) of the pancreas is an extremely rare histopathologic subtype. MANEC is an amphicrine malignancy composed of at least 25% of acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (pNET). No standard systemic treatment is available for MANEC and current recommendations are derived from standard of care for PACC or pNET. Platinum based regimens have been approved for PACC while targeted agents (sunitinib and everolimus) are approved for pNET. This study aimed to investigate the antitumor effect and toxicities of both platinum based and targeted agents on a successfully first described patient derived xenograft (PDX) of metastatic MANEC of the pancreas. Methods: Several generations of PDX from a surgically resected metastatic MANEC of the pancreas was histologically validated. PDX-MANEC tumors were heterotopically implanted into NOD/SCID mice and randomized into 6 groups (4 mice each) as in table 1. The study continued for 3 weeks. Antitumor efficacy was determined based on change in the tumor volume. Toxicity was assessed change in mice weights. Results: Table 1 shows the changes in tumor volume and mouse weight in all study arms compared to controls end point. Only FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/cisplatin arms revealed overall decrease in tumor volume lower than starting volume in controls. All arms other than sunitinib, led to decrease in overall tumor volume compared to control tumor volumes over time. All treatment arms led to lower trending mouse weights (toxicities) except sunitinib, however only the everolimus arm had statistical significance. Conclusion: Both platinum-based regimens and everolimus revealed significant tumor control. No synergistic effect observed in sunitinib/everolimus. Preclinical studies are undergoing to investigate other effective and less toxic therapeutics for MANEC. Table 1.Delta in tumor volumes of PDX-MANEC-P after multiple platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapeutics from the standard of care for other pancreatic cancer subtypes including PACC and pNET.ControlFOLFIRINOXGemcitabine and CisplatinSunitinibEverolimusSunitinib and EverolimusDelta in tumor volume in mm3 at the study end (mean ± standard deviation)3225 ± 2054-609.3 ± 351.8-654.7 ± 92.561583 ± 950.3-178.1 ± 61.58-160.8 ± 86.55P value (column group vs. control)&lt;0.0010.0030.0950.0010.001Delta in mice weight in grams at the study end (mean ± standard deviation)0.84 ± 1.68-1.26 ± 0.84-8.5 ± 1.630.86 ± 1.22-2.2 ± 1.61-1.42 ± 1.27P value (column group vs. control)0.058&lt;0.0010.9810.0070.050 Citation Format: Amro M. Abdelrahman, Jennifer A. Yonkus, Roberto Alva-Ruiz, Jennifer L. Leiting, Nellie A. Campbell, Lewis R. Roberts, Michael L. Kendrick, David M. Nagorney, Sean P. Cleary, Travis E. Grotz, Gregory J. Gores, Jun Yin, Rondell P. Graham, Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson, Rory L. Smoot, Mark J. Truty. Preclinical efficacy of platinum based chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapeutics in the first successful described patient derived xenograft model of mixed acinar neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pancreas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 413.

PURPOSE: The benefit of routine pre-emptive screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections in patients with cancer before cancer-directed therapies is unclear. Herein, we characterize the outcomes of a cohort of patients with cancer who were diagnosed with COVID-19 by routine screening (RS) in comparison with those diagnosed on the basis of clinical suspicion or exposure history (nonroutine screening [NRS]). METHODS: A multisite prospective observational study was conducted at three major and five satellite campuses of the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center between March 18 and July 31, 2020. The primary outcome was COVID-19–related hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit admissions and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Five thousand four hundred fifty-two patients underwent RS in the outpatient setting only, and 44 (0.81%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. RS detected 19 additional patients from the scheduled inpatient admissions for surgical or interventional procedures or inpatient chemotherapy. One hundred sixty-one patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 on the basis of NRS. COVID-19–related hospitalization rate (17.5% v 26.7%; P = .14), intensive care unit admission (1.6% v 5.6%; P = .19), and mortality (4.8% v 3.7%; P = .72) were not significantly different between the RS and NRS groups. In the multivariable analysis, age ≥ 60 years (odds ratio, 4.4; P = .023) and an absolute lymphocyte count ≤ 1.4 × 109/L (odds ratio, 9.2; P = .002) were independent predictors of COVID-19–related hospital admission. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 positivity rate was low on the basis of RS. Comparing the hospital admission and mortality outcomes with the NRS cohort, there were no significant differences. The value of routine pre-emptive screening of asymptomatic patients with cancer for COVID-19 remains low.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to assess the impact of an interdisciplinary remote patient monitoring (RPM) program on clinical outcomes and acute care utilization in cancer patients with COVID-19. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis following a prospective observational study performed at Mayo Clinic Cancer Center. Adult patients receiving cancer-directed therapy or in recent remission on active surveillance with polymerase chain reaction–confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 18 and July 31, 2020, were included. RPM was composed of in-home technology to assess symptoms and physiologic data with centralized nursing and physician oversight. RESULTS: During the study timeframe, 224 patients with cancer were diagnosed with COVID-19. Of the 187 patients (83%) initially managed in the outpatient setting, those who did not receive RPM were significantly more likely to experience hospitalization than those receiving RPM. Following balancing of patient characteristics by inverse propensity score weighting, rates of hospitalization for RPM and non-RPM patients were 2.8% and 13%, respectively, implying that the use of RPM was associated with a 78% relative risk reduction in hospital admission rate (95% CI, 54 to 102; P = .002). Furthermore, when hospitalized, these patients experienced a shorter length of stay and fewer prolonged hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, and deaths, although these trends did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The use of RPM and a centralized virtual care team was associated with a reduction in hospital admission rate and lower overall acute care resource utilization among cancer patients with COVID-19.

11523 Background: Sarcoma pts often receive aggressive, highly immunosuppressive therapy and may be at high risk for severe COVID-19. Demographics, outcomes and risk factors for pts with sarcoma and COVID-19 are unknown. We aimed to describe the course of COVID-19 in sarcoma pts and to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes. Methods: The COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (NCT04354701) is an international registry of pts with cancer and COVID-19. Adult pts (≥18 years old) with a diagnosis of sarcoma and laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 were included from 50 participating institutions. Data including demographics, sarcoma diagnosis and treatment, and course of COVID-19 infection were analyzed. Primary outcome was the composite rate of hospitalization or death at 30 days from COVID-19 diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were 30 day all-cause mortality, rate of hospitalization, O2 need, and ICU admission. Descriptive statistics and univariate Fisher tests are reported. Results: From March 17, 2020 to February 6, 2021, N=204 pts were included. Median follow up was 42 days. Median age was 58 years (IQR 43-67). 97 (48%) were male. 30 (15%) had ECOG performance status ≥2. 104 (51%) received cancer treatment, including surgery or radiation, within 3 months of COVID-19 diagnosis. 153 (75%) had active cancer, of whom 34 (22%) had lung metastases. 100 (49%) pts met the composite primary endpoint; 96 (47%) were hospitalized and 18 (9%) died within 30 days from COVID-19 diagnosis. 64 (31%) required oxygen, and 16 (8%) required ICU admission. Primary endpoint rates were similar for pts who received cytotoxic chemotherapy (38/58, 66%) or targeted therapy (16/28, 57%). Pts with higher rates of the primary endpoint included patients ≥60 years old (59% vs 40%, OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.12-3.74, p=0.016), pts with ECOG PS ≥2 vs 0-1 (90% vs 41%, OR 12.2, 95% CI 3.44-66.8, p<0.001), pts receiving any systemic therapy within 3 months of COVID-19 diagnosis (62% vs 39%, OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.43-4.97, p=0.001), and pts with lung metastases (68% vs 42%, OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.19-6.79, p=0.013). Primary endpoint rates were similar across sarcoma subtypes (Table). Conclusions: This is the largest cohort study of pts with sarcoma and COVID-19 to date. Sarcoma pts have high rates of complications from COVID-19. Older patients, those with poor performance status, those recently receiving systemic cancer therapy, and those with lung metastases appear to have worse outcomes.[Table: see text]

e17518 Background: Morbidity and mortality for patients with cervical cancer has improved significantly over the past few decades with modern multimodal therapy. However, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix (NCUC), which accounts for 1-2% of cervical cancers, remains a deadly subtype. In this study, we combine data from Mayo Clinic (MC) and the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (UIHC) to provide information on tumor characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Methods: The electronic medical record was reviewed for patients with NCUC from MC and UIHC. Data on diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes were collected through chart review. Primary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included median survival, survival at 1 year after surgery, and survival at 1 year by first line chemotherapy agent. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate median PFS, median survival, and OS. Fisher’s test analysis was used to calculate survival at 1 year after surgery and by first line chemotherapy agent. Results: There were 62 patients (MC: 26, UIHCC: 36) with NCUC stage I-IV (stage I: 29, stage II: 9, stage III: 7, stage IV: 14, unknown: 3). Median age of diagnosis was 47 years (range 21-77 years). By subtype, 47 were small cell (76%), 9 were large cell (15%), and 6 were unknown/undetermined (9%). The initial treatment modalities for each patient are outlined in the table. 28 patients had complete/partial response or stable disease from first line treatment, while 10 patients had disease progression. Of the patients who initially responded or had stable disease, 16 later progressed (57%) with a median time to progression of 15 months. Median follow up was 65.1 months with a median OS of 28.5 months. Median survival for those with stage I was 40.9 months, stage II: 54.6 months, stage III: 8.75 months, and stage IV: 11.7 months. There was a significant difference in overall survival at 1 year between those who received surgery and those who did not in stage I/II ( p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in overall survival at 1 year for those who received surgery in stage III/IV. There was no statistical difference in survival at 1 year for carboplatin or cisplatin in combination with etoposide as first line chemotherapy agent. Conclusions: NCUC is an aggressive malignancy that is usually progressive despite multimodal therapy. Our study demonstrated a median overall survival of 28.5 months and 5-year survival rate of 21%. Our study showed a survival benefit at 1 year for those who receive surgery with stage I/II NCUC. There was no significant survival benefit at 1 year between carboplatin or cisplatin in combination with etoposide as first line agent.[Table: see text]

e16205 Background: Data about neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) patients with SARS-CoV-2 are scanty and specific indications for clinical practice are missing. Our aim is to create an international registry about NENs patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 positivity to give a worldwide representation of the situation. Methods: This is an observational retrospective/prospective multicenter survey based on a direct email invitation. All types of NEN are eligible except SCLC and MiNEN. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria from March 1st, 2020 up to the end pf pandemic will be recruited. Electronic CRFs are filled out using the REDCap database. Local Institutional Review Board approval is required before data entry. Results: Eighty-one centers, 24 in and 57 outside Italy, representing 39 countries and 5 continents, were contacted. Fourteen centers did not respond and 15 declined the invitation. Among the remaining 52, 6 centers are currently recruiting and 8 are active but not recruiting yet. As of the current abstract submission deadline, 67 patients have been included, mostly GEP-NET (75%), non-functioning (86%), metastatic (85%) and on active treatment [47% somatostatin analogs (SSAs), 10% everolimus, 12% tirosin-kinase inhibitors (TKIs), 10% peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), 15% chemotherapy]. Median age at NEN diagnosis was 57 years whilst the median age at SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was 62 years. Almost all patients reported COVID-19-related symptoms, more commonly fever (67% of patients), cough (55%) and dyspnea (51%), in 28% of cases exertional and in 22% at rest. More than one third of patients (n, 24) had a pneumonia. The most common therapies for COVID-19 were antibiotics, steroids and hydroxychloroquine. Eleven patients (16%) needed oxygen therapy, three (4%) sub-intensive care and none intensive care. Fifty-six patients (84%) clinically recovered, six (9%) with sequelae, whereas five (7%) died. Among these latter 4 had a NET and 1 a NEC, and no patients have been receiving chemotherapy. With regard to the anti-tumor therapy no change occurred in 66% of patients, temporary interruption in 30%, and definitive discontinuation in 3%, 2% missing. Conclusions: Most of the NEN patients completely recovered from COVID-19, in many cases without any anti-tumor therapy adjustment. No clear correlations were observed with type, primary site and treatment of NEN. The recruitment is ongoing.