Walker, Keenan A.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are associated with cognitive decline, but their importance outside of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and the mechanisms of their impact on cognition are poorly understood. We evaluated the cross-sectional association between CMB patterns and cerebral Aβ (amyloid-β) deposition, by florbetapir positron emission tomography. METHODS: The longitudinal ARIC study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) recruited individuals from 4 US communities from 1987 to 1989. From 2012 to 2014, the ARIC-PET (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities - Positron Emission Tomography) ancillary recruited 322 nondemented ARIC participants who completed 3T brain magnetic resonance imaging with T2*GRE as part of ARIC visit 5 to undergo florbetapir positron emission tomography imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging images were read for CMBs and superficial siderosis; on positron emission tomography, global cortical standardized uptake value ratio >1.2 was considered a positive Aβ scan. Multivariable logistic regression models evaluated CMB characteristics in association with Aβ positivity. Effect modification by sex, race, APOE status, and cognition was evaluated. RESULTS: CMBs were present in 24% of ARIC-PET participants. No significant associations were found between CMBs and Aβ positivity, but a pattern of isolated lobar CMBs or superficial siderosis was associated with over 4-fold higher odds of elevated Aβ when compared with those with no CMBs (odds ratio, 4.72 [95% CI, 1.16–19.16]). A similar elevated risk was not observed in those with isolated subcortical or mixed subcortical and either lobar CMBs or superficial siderosis. Although no significant interactions were found, effect estimates for elevated Aβ were nonsignificantly lower ( P >0.10, odds ratio, 0.4–0.6) for a mixed CMB pattern, and odds ratios were nonsignificantly higher for lobar-only CMBs for 4 subgroups: women (versus men); Black participants (versus White participants), APOE ε4 noncarriers (versus carriers), and cognitively normal (versus mild cognitive impairment). CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based cohort of nondemented adults, lobar-only pattern of CMBs or superficial siderosis is most strongly associated with brain Aβ, with no elevated risk for a mixed CMB pattern. Further studies are needed to understand differences in CMB patterns and their meaning across subgroups.

AbstractIntroductionWe evaluated whether better cardiovascular health at midlife and improvement of cardiovascular health within midlife were associated with dementia risk.MethodsTwo longitudinal population‐based studies were used: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) (n = 11,460/visits at ages 54 and 60), and Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility (AGES)‐Reykjavik (n = 3907/visit at age 51). A cardiovascular health score (range 0–12/0–14, depending on diet availability) including six/seven items was calculated at each visit, with weight assigned to each item as poor (0), intermediate (1), or ideal (2). Cardiovascular health was defined as low (score 0–4/0–5), intermediate (5–7/6–9), or high (8–12/10–14). Incident dementia was ascertained through linkage to health records and with neuropsychological examinations.ResultsMidlife high compared to low cardiovascular health (hazard ratios [HRs]: for ARIC: 0.60 [95% confidence interval: 0.52, 0.69]); for AGES‐Reykjavik: 0.83 [0.66, 0.99] and improvement of cardiovascular health score within midlife (HR per one‐point increase: ARIC: 0.94 [0.92, 0.96]) were associated with lower dementia risk.DiscussionBetter cardiovascular health at midlife and improvement of cardiovascular health within midlife are associated with lower dementia risk.Highlights Cardiovascular health and dementia were studied in two large cohort studies. Better cardiovascular health at midlife relates to lower dementia risk. Improvement of cardiovascular health within midlife relates to lower dementia risk. Promotion of cardiovascular health at midlife can help to reduce dementia risk.

Objective Midlife vascular risk factors (MVRFs) are associated with incident dementia, as are amyloid β (Aβ) deposition and neurodegeneration. Whether vascular and Alzheimer disease‐associated factors contribute to dementia independently or interact synergistically to reduce cognition is poorly understood. Methods Participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities–Positron Emission Tomography study were followed from 1987–1989 (45–64 years old) through 2016–2017 (74–94 years old), with repeat cognitive assessment and dementia adjudication. In 2011–2013, dementia‐free participants underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (with white matter hyperintensity [WMH] and brain volume measurement) and florbetapir (Aβ) positron emission tomography. The relative contributions of vascular risk and injury (MVRFs, WMH volume), elevated Aβ standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR), and neurodegeneration (smaller temporoparietal brain regions) to incident dementia were evaluated with adjusted Cox models. Results In 298 individuals, 36 developed dementia (median follow‐up = 4.9 years). Midlife hypertension and Aβ each independently predicted dementia risk (hypertension: hazard ratio [HR] = 2.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16–5.67; Aβ SUVR [per standard deviation (SD)]: HR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.72–3.84), but did not interact significantly, whereas late life diabetes (HR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.18–5.28) and Aβ independently predicted dementia risk. WMHs (per SD: HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.03–2.20) and Aβ SUVR (HR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.83–3.47) independently contributed to incident dementia, but WMHs lost significance when MVRFs were included. Smaller temporoparietal brain regions were associated with incident dementia, independent of Aβ and MVRFs (HR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.18–4.01). Interpretation Midlife hypertension and late life Aβ are independently associated with dementia risk, without evidence for synergy on a multiplicative scale. Given the independent contributions of vascular and amyloid mechanisms, multiple pathways should be considered when evaluating interventions to reduce the burden of dementia. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:607–619

AbstractBackgroundPhysical frailty is associated with increased risk for dementia and other neurologic sequelae. However, the neurobiological changes underlying frailty and frailty risk remain unknown. We examined the association of cerebral white matter structure with current and future frailty.MethodsAtherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Neurocognitive Study participants who underwent 3T brain MRI were included. Frailty status was classified according to the Fried criteria. Cerebral white matter integrity was defined using white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume and microstructure, measured using diffusion tensor imaging fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). Multivariable linear regression was used to relate baseline frailty to white matter structure; multivariable logistic regression was used to relate baseline white matter to frailty risk among participants nonfrail at baseline.ResultsIn the cross-sectional analysis (N = 1 754; mean age: 76 years), frailty was associated with greater WMH volume, lower FA, and greater MD. These associations remained consistent after excluding participants with a history of stroke or dementia. Among participants nonfrail at baseline who completed follow-up frailty assessment (N = 1 379; 6.6-year follow-up period), each standard deviation increase in WMH volume was associated with 1.46 higher odds of frailty at follow-up. Composite FA and MD measures were not associated with future frailty; however, secondary analyses found several significant white matter tract-specific associations with frailty risk.ConclusionThe current study demonstrates a robust association of WMH volume with current and future frailty. Although measures of white matter microstructure were altered in frail individuals, these measures were not generally associated with progression from nonfrail to frail status.

AbstractBackgroundDementia disproportionately impacts people of color in the U.S.. Whether these disparities are due to differences in vascular risk factors, cognitive reserve, or AD pathophysiology remains unclear.MethodBlack and White participants from four U.S. communities were recruited into the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study at ages 45‐64. Vascular risk factors were evaluated in midlife and at multiple visits over 30+ years, as were markers of cognitive reserve, with expert classification of dementia. In participants with brain MRI, brain volumes were evaluated in association with dementia. In nondemented participants in the ARIC‐PET ancillary study, florbetapir PET scans were used to quantify brain cortical amyloid; differences in levels by race, vascular risk factors, and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) were evaluated.ResultIn 15744 ARIC participants, dementia was more common in Black vs White participants. Although midlife vascular risk factors were related to dementia, the impact of these risk factors on dementia risk and cortical volumes didn’t differ by race. Lower education was nonsignificantly more strongly associated with dementia in Blacks vs Whites, and an APOE e4 allele was more strongly associated with dementia in Whites. In ARIC‐PET (N=322), vascular risk factors from midlife were associated with PET amyloid, without similar associations for late‐life risk factors; these associations did not significantly differ by race. WMH volume was more strongly associated (cross‐sectionally) with PET amyloid in Blacks vs Whites, but differences were not statistically significantly different. Finally, Blacks had an over two‐fold increased odds of elevated florbetapir PET vs Whites, independent of vascular risk factors, demographics, WMH volume, cognitive status, and APOE genotype.ConclusionConsideration of racial disparities in dementia should consider vascular risk, cognitive reserve, and social determinants of health, across the life course. Vascular risk factors do not appear to differentially impact dementia risk or brain amyloid in Blacks vs Whites, but the greater prevalence of these risk factors in Blacks must be considered. Although the A/T/N framework may clarify underlying biology contributing to Alzheimer’s disease, inclusion of these additional factors is needed to understand and reduce racial disparities in dementia rates.

AbstractAimWe investigate if periodontal disease is prospectively associated with cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative markers of dementia and Alzheimer's pathology.Materials and MethodsN = 1306 participants (Visit 5 mean age = 76.5 [standard deviation = 5.4] years) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study with completed dental exams at Visit 4 underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging scans at Visit 5 while N = 248 underwent positron emission tomography scans. Participants were classified as edentulous or, among the dentate, by the modified Periodontal Profile Class. Brain volumes were regressed on periodontal status in linear regressions. Cerebrovascular measures and β‐amyloid positivity were regressed on periodontal status in logistic regressions.ResultsPeriodontal disease was not associated with brain volumes, microhaemorrhages, or elevated β‐amyloid. Compared with periodontally healthy individuals, odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for all‐type infarcts were 0.37 [0.20, 0.65] for severe tooth loss and 0.56 [0.31, 0.99] for edentulous participants.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, periodontal disease was not associated with altered brain volumes, microhaemorrhages, or β‐amyloid positivity. Tooth loss was associated with lower odds of cerebral infarcts.

AbstractIntroductionMotoric cognitive risk (MCR), a clinical syndrome characterized by slow gait speed and subjective cognitive complaints, has been associated with dementia risk. The neuropathological features underlying MCR remain poorly understood.MethodsThe Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) community‐based cohort study classified participants using standardized criteria as MCR+/– and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)+/– at study baseline (2011–2013). We examined the 5‐year dementia risk and baseline brain structural/molecular abnormalities associated with MCR+ and MCI+ status.ResultsOf 5023 nondemented participants included, 204 were MCR+ and 1030 were MCI+. Both MCR+ and MCI+ participants demonstrated increased dementia risk. The pattern of structural brain abnormalities associated with MCR+ differed from that of MCI+. Whereas MCI+ was associated with comparatively smaller volumes in brain regions vulnerable to Alzheimer's disease pathology, MCR+ status was associated with smaller volumes in frontoparietal regions and greater white matter abnormalities.DiscussionMCR may represent a predementia syndrome characterized by prominent white matter abnormalities and frontoparietal atrophy.

Background White matter abnormalities are a common feature of aging and Alzheimer disease, and tend to be more severe among Black individuals. However, the extent to which white matter abnormalities relate to amyloid deposition, a marker of Alzheimer pathology, remains unclear. This cross‐sectional study examined the association of white matter abnormalities with cortical amyloid in a community sample of older adults without dementia and examined the moderating effect of race. Methods and Results Participants from the ARIC‐PET (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities‐Positron Emission Tomography) study underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging, which quantified white matter hyperintensity volume and microstructural integrity using diffusion tensor imaging. Participants received florbetapir positron emission tomography imaging to measure brain amyloid. Associations between measures of white matter structure and elevated amyloid status were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Among 322 participants (43% Black), each SD increase in white matter hyperintensity volume was associated with a greater odds of elevated amyloid (odds ratio [OR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03–1.83) after adjusting for demographic and cardiovascular risk factors. In race‐stratified analyses, a greater white matter hyperintensity volume was more strongly associated with elevated amyloid among Black participants (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.15–3.50), compared with White participants (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.89–1.89). However, the race interaction was not statistically significant ( P interaction=0.09). We found no association between white matter microstructure and elevated amyloid. Conclusions The results suggest a modest positive relationship between white matter hyperintensity and elevated amyloid in older adults without dementia. Although the results indicate that this association is nonsignificantly stronger among Black participants, these findings will need to be confirmed or refuted using larger multiracial cohorts.

Background: Midlife vascular risk factors (MVRF) are associated with incident dementia. Similarly, amyloid β(Aβ) and neurodegeneration (e.g.brain volumes), as parts of the Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) ATN framework, are associated with cognition. Whether vascular and AD-associated factors contribute to dementia independently or interact synergistically to reduce cognitive ability is not well understood. Methods: Recruited from 3 U.S. communities, ARIC-PET participants were followed from 1987-89 (45-64 yo) through 2016-17 (74-94 yo). Cognition was evaluated in 2011-13 (ages 69-88), and twice more, every 2-3 years. In 2011-13, nondemented ARIC-PET participants had a brain MRI, with measurement of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and brain volumes, with florbetapir (Aβ) PET scans in 2012-14; global cortical standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was log-transformed and standardized. Dementia was classified by expert review, as well as phone and medical record surveillance. The relative contributions of vascular risk (MVRF, WMH volume) and AD pathology (elevated Aβ SUVR, smaller AD signature region volumes) to incident dementia were evaluated with Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: In 298 individuals, 36 developed dementia. In models with key MVRF, demographics, and Aβ SUVR, hypertension and Aβ each independently predicted dementia risk (per SD of Aβ SUVR: HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.72-3.84; hypertension: HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.16-5.67), but didn’t interact on dementia risk. WMH (per SD: HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.03-2.20) and Aβ SUVR (per SD: HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.83-3.47) each contributed to incident dementia but WMH lost significance when MVRF were added to the model. Smaller AD signature regions were associated with incident dementia, independent of Aβ SUVR, and remained significant after adjustment for MVRF (HR per SD 2.18, 95% CI 1.18-4.01). Conclusions: Midlife hypertension and late-life Aβ independently contribute to dementia risk, but don’t synergize on a multiplicative scale. Neurodegeneration (e.g.smaller AD signature region volume) is also associated with incident dementia, independent of Aβ and MVRF. Multiple pathways leading to dementia should be considered when evaluating risk factors and interventions to reduce the burden of dementia.