Hernandez, Loren P. Herrera

Background: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic has presented a serious challenge to nephrologists, since it can lead to severe kidney injury in the form of acute tubular necrosis, with many patients requiring renal replacement therapy. This is predominantly seen in people who develop severe respiratory manifestations like ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) from the viral infection, a cytokine storm or septic shock with unstable hemodynamics. It also presents with various glomerular injuries, mainly collapsing glomerulopathy in high-risk APOL1 (Apolipoprotein L1) genotype patients, thrombotic microangiopathy-related renal failure due to hyper coagulopathy and occasionally pauci-immune glomerulonephritis due to immune dysregulation. All the glomerular disorders that are caused by COVID-19 infection have been described under the designation COVAN (COVID-19-associated nephropathy). Proteinuria is a predominant presentation in glomerular disorders. Gross hematuria and AKI without any respiratory symptoms from COVID-19 infection have not been described so far in the literature. We are presenting one such rare case here. Methods: We have encountered a rare case of gross hematuria and severe acute renal failure. His serological work up was negative for all autoimmune etiologies that can cause Glomerulonephritis. He was found to have infection-related crescentic glomerulonephritis due to active COVID-19 infections discovered via kidney biopsy. He tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 but didn’t have any clinical respiratory symptoms. He has responded well to treatment with a steroid taper and antiviral medication (Remdesivir). This is a very rare renal manifestation of COVID-19 infection. Results: COVID-19 infection can result in crescentic glomerulonephritis. This can be diagnosed by kidney biopsy which shows extensive c3 deposits, tubuloreticular inclusion bodies along with crescentic lesions. This responds to treatment with steroids and Antiviral agents. Conclusions: Crescentic Glomerulonephritis should be considered as a possible etiology for severe acute kidney injury with hematuria in patients with active covid-19 infection without any respiratory symptoms. Kidney biopsy helps in diagnosing it and responds to treatment with steroids and antivirals.

Abstract Objectives Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic (VEXAS) syndrome is an autoinflammatory disease caused by somatic mutation of UBA1 and affects multiple organ systems. Involvement of the kidneys is not well characterized. We aimed to investigate the incidence, risk factors and histopathologic features of acute kidney injury (AKI) in VEXAS syndrome. Methods Patients with genetically confirmed UBA1 mutation consistent with VEXAS were included. Charts were manually reviewed. Cox regression analysis was used to identify variables associated with time-to-first AKI event. For patients with a kidney biopsy, histopathologic findings were reviewed. Results Eighty-one patients were included, all white men, with a mean age of 66.3 ± 8.6 years. Median (IQR) follow up was 3.5 (2.1–5.2) years during which 20 (25%) developed AKI and 22% died. AKI relapsed in 90% of cases for a median of 6 times during the follow up period. Cumulative incidence estimates (95% CI) for AKI at 1, 3 and 5 years were 6.2% (0.80–11.3%), 16.7% (7.5–25.0%) and 27.9% (14.9–38.9%), respectively. Age and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) were significantly associated with time-to-first AKI event. Six patients underwent a kidney biopsy. Findings included, plasma cell-rich interstitial nephritis (n = 3), neutrophilic-rich interstitial inflammation (n = 1), leukocytoclastic peritubular capillaritis (n = 1) and acute tubular injury (n = 1). AKI responded well to treatment with glucocorticoids but had relapse upon tapering. Conclusion AKI is an underrecognized feature of VEXAS occurring in 25% of patients in this cohort. Age at diagnosis and CRP were associated with time to first AKI event during follow up. Plasma cell-rich interstitial nephritis was the most common histopathologic finding.

Abstract Objectives There is a paucity of data on penile amyloidosis. We aimed to assess the frequency of different amyloid types in surgical specimens from the penis involved by amyloidosis and correlate relevant clinicopathologic parameters with proteomic findings. Methods Since 2008, our reference laboratory has performed liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for amyloid typing. The institutional pathology archive and reference laboratory database were queried to retrospectively identify all penile surgical pathology specimens with LC-MS/MS results between January 1, 2008, and November 23, 2022. Archived H&E-stained and Congo red–stained sections were re-reviewed. Results Twelve cases of penile amyloidosis were identified, which represented 0.35% (n = 3,456) of penile surgical specimens. AL-type amyloid was most frequent (n = 7), followed by keratin-type amyloid (n = 3) and ATTR (transthyretin)–type amyloid (n = 2). AL-type amyloid cases often showed diffuse dermal/lamina propria deposition, whereas all keratin-type amyloid cases were localized to the superficial dermis. Two cases with keratin-type amyloid had concomitant cutaneous findings (penile intraepithelial neoplasia and condyloma). Conclusions This series, the largest to date, demonstrates that penile amyloidosis has a heterogeneous proteomic landscape. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study describing ATTR (transthyretin)–type penile amyloid.

Context.— Progressive independence in medicine is critical to building confidence and decisiveness in trainees. However, this can be difficult to accomplish in the strict regulatory environment of pathology. Objective.— To pilot and adopt a process whereby surgical pathology fellows independently manage a subset of cases and release preliminary reports. Design.— Upon program approval, board-certified surgical pathology fellows were eligible for preliminary report sign-out at their discretion. Eligible cases were sent from outside institutions for confirmatory review. Preliminary reports were viewable in the electronic medical record. Safety measures were used to ensure timely release of final reports by attending pathologists. Results.— Fellows participating in the pilot (n = 4) released 59 preliminary reports out of 101 cases reviewed (58%), with 1 potentially significant discrepancy between preliminary and final report. Turnaround time was not affected. The process was endorsed by all participants and adopted as standard practice. During the first year, eligible fellows (n = 8) released 123 preliminary reports out of 1260 cases reviewed (9.8%). There were no major diagnostic discrepancies and no effects on turnaround time. The number of preliminary reports released by each fellow was variable (range, 2–48; median, 8), likely a reflection of both external factors (number of trainees on service, volume) and trainee-specific factors (confidence, efficiency). Conclusions.— Fellows showed good judgment when independently managing cases, with just 1 potentially significant discrepancy out of 182 cases (<1%). No patients were adversely impacted. Use of this process varied widely among fellows and may require closer monitoring and encouragement for fellows who are tentative about releasing preliminary reports.