Murray, Melissa E.

AbstractBackgroundInter‐cellular communication within the gliovascular unit (GVU) is critical for cerebral blood flow regulation, maintenance of the blood‐brain‐barrier (BBB) properties, and brain energy metabolism. Although numerous cell biology studies demonstrate the role of the GVU for BBB breakdown in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the precise molecular changes contributing to its pathophysiology are unclear.MethodWe performed single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) of temporal cortex tissue in 24 AD and control brains to understand the transcriptional changes in the cells of GVU. We acquired the snRNAseq profile of 79,751 total brain cells that comprise 6,541 astrocytes and 2,210 vascular cells. The latter formed three distinct vascular clusters characterized as activated pericytes, endothelia and resting pericytes. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and their enriched pathways in these clusters and detected the most transcriptional changes within activated pericytes. Using our data and a knowledge‐based predictive algorithm, we discovered and prioritized molecular interactions between vascular and astrocyte clusters, the main cell types of the GVU of the BBB.ResultsVascular targets predicted to interact with astrocytic ligands have biological functions in signalling, angiogenesis, amyloid ß metabolism and cytoskeletal structure. Top astrocytic and vascular interacting molecules include both novel and known AD risk genes such as APOE, APP and ECE1. We validated gene expression changes using qPCR. We are in the process of evaluating these gene expression changes in antemortem blood from AD and control participants.ConclusionOur findings provide valuable information into the transcriptional changes in predicted vascular‐astrocytic partners at the GVU, highlighting insights into the molecular mechanisms of BBB breakdown in AD.

AbstractBackgroundWe recently discovered a novel tau binding partner, SERPINA5, to be upregulated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and co‐localize with corticolimbic tau distribution. As tau pathology is also observed in primary tauopathies, we hypothesized that SERPINA5 burden would mirror tau burden in these diseases. Thus, we sought to define the relationship between SERPINA5 and tau in primary tauopathies and compare this relationship to AD.MethodImmunohistochemistry was performed on the hippocampus or cingulate in 4 groups (n=6 per disease group): 1) AD, 2) 3R+4R primary age‐related tauopathy, 3) 4R tauopathies (progressive supranuclear palsy, corticobasal degeneration, argyrophilic grains disease), and 4) 3R tauopathy (Pick’s disease). Burden analyses for SERPINA5 and a phospho‐tau marker (AT8) were performed on digitized whole slide images.ResultVisual interpretation of SERPINA5 immunostaining identified both neuronal and glial inclusions that are commonly AT8‐positive in primary tauopathies. There were exceptions to this pattern such as SERPINA5‐positive Pick bodies being rarely observed. However, some pathologic structures, like ballooned neurons, were preferentially stained by SERPINA5. Quantitative analyses confirmed this observation with AT8 and SERPINA5 burden correlating in both the cingulate (R2=0.47, p<0.0001, Figure 1a) and hippocampus (R2=0.74, p<0.0001, Figure 1d). Nonparametric rank sum tests revealed majority of the primary tauopathies had less AT8 and SERPINA5 burden compared to AD in both the cingulate and hippocampus (Figure1b‐c, e‐f; Table 1).ConclusionSERPINA5 immunostaining patterns in primary tauopathies reflect tau immunostaining patterns. Our data suggests the SERPINA5‐tau interaction may not be specific for AD, which may implicate the role of SERPINA5 more broadly across tauopathies.

AbstractGlycogen synthase kinase‐3 α/β is involved in dysregulation of neuronal tau protein in Alzheimer's disease (AD). There is an unmet clinical need for a blood‐brain barrier (BBB) permeable positron emission tomography (PET) probe for imaging of GSK‐3α/β in the brain to understand the pathogenesis of AD. Herein, we synthesized two PET probes, [18F]F‐CNBI and [18F]F‐CNPIFE, and evaluated their BBB permeability and affinity towards GSK‐3α/β. [19F]F‐CNPIFE showed higher in‐vitro binding towards GSK‐3α/β (IC50=19.4±2.5 nM; n=3, for GSK‐3α, IC50=19.4±3.8 nM; n=3, for GSK‐3β) compared to [19F]F‐CNBI (IC50=107.6±26.0 nM; n=4, for GSK‐3α, IC50=105.3±18.2 nM; n=3, for GSK‐3β). [18F]F‐CNPIFE showed 9.5‐fold higher brain uptake than [18F]F‐CNBI, in normal FVB/NJ mice, which was increased by additional 1.5‐fold on co‐administration of [19F]F‐CNPIFE with respect to [18F]F‐CNBI. Overall, [18F]F‐CNPIFE is a promising PET probe for GSK‐3α/β imaging and warrants further evaluation in an AD mouse model.

Background: Dementia, vascular disease, and cancer increase with age, enabling complex comorbid interactions. Understanding vascular and cancer contributions to dementia risk and neuropathology in oldest-old may improve risk modification and outcomes. Objective: Investigate the contributions of vascular factors and cancer to dementia and neuropathology. Methods: Longitudinal clinicopathologic study of prospectively followed Mayo Clinic participants dying≥95 years-old who underwent autopsy. Participants were stratified by dementia status and compared according to demographics, vascular risk factors, cancer, and neuropathology. Results: Participants (n = 161; 83% female; 99% non-Hispanic whites)≥95 years (95–106 years-old) with/without dementia did not differ based on demographics. APOE ɛ2 frequency was higher in no dementia (20/72 [28%]) versus dementia (11/88 [12%]; p = 0.03), but APOE ɛ4 frequency did not differ. Coronary artery disease was more frequent in no dementia (31/72 [43%]) versus dementia (23/89 [26%]; p = 0.03) associated with 56% lower dementia odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.44 [confidence interval (CI) = 0.19–0.98]; p = 0.04) and fewer neuritic/diffuse plaques. Diabetes had an 8-fold increase in dementia odds (OR = 8.42 [CI = 1.39–163]; p = 0.02). Diabetes associated with higher cerebrovascular disease (Dickson score; p = 0.05). Cancer associated with 63% lower dementia odds (OR = 0.37 [CI = 0.17–0.78]; p < 0.01) and lower Braak stage (p = 0.01). Conclusion: Cancer exposure in the oldest-old was associated with lower odds of dementia and tangle pathology, whereas history of coronary artery disease was associated with lower odds of dementia and amyloid-β plaque pathology. History of diabetes mellitus was associated with increased odds of dementia and cerebrovascular disease pathology. Cancer-related mechanisms and vascular risk factor reduction strategies may alter dementia risk and neuropathology in oldest-old.

Abstract Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a tauopathy associated with repetitive mild head impacts characterized by perivascular hyperphosphorylated tau (p-tau) in neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and neurites in the depths of the neocortical sulci. In moderate to advanced CTE, NFTs accumulate in the hippocampus, potentially overlapping neuroanatomically with primary age-related tauopathy (PART), an age-related tauopathy characterized by Alzheimer disease-like tau pathology in the hippocampus devoid of amyloid plaques. We measured p-tau burden using positive-pixel counts on immunohistochemically stained and neuroanatomically segmented hippocampal tissue. Subjects with CTE had a higher total p-tau burden than PART subjects in all sectors (p = 0.005). Within groups, PART had significantly higher total p-tau burden in CA1/subiculum compared to CA3 (p = 0.02) and CA4 (p = 0.01) and total p-tau burden in CA2 trended higher than CA4 (p = 0.06). In CTE, total p-tau burden in CA1/subiculum was significantly higher than in the dentate gyrus; and CA2 also trended higher than dentate gyrus (p = 0.01, p = 0.06). When controlling for p-tau burden across the entire hippocampus, CA3 and CA4 had significantly higher p-tau burden in CTE than PART (p &lt; 0.0001). These data demonstrate differences in hippocampal p-tau burden and regional distribution in CTE compared to PART that might be helpful in differential diagnosis and reveal insights into disease pathogenesis.

Abstract Introduction Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers are increasingly more reliable in predicting neuropathology. To facilitate interpretation of phosphorylated tau sites as an early fluid biomarker, we sought to characterize which neurofibrillary tangle maturity levels (pretangle, intermediary 1, mature tangle, intermediary 2, and ghost tangle) are recognized. Methods We queried the Florida Autopsied Multi‐Ethnic (FLAME) cohort for cases ranging from Braak stages I through VI, excluding non‐AD neuropathologies and tauopathies. Thioflavin‐S staining was compared to immunohistochemical measures of phosphorylated threonine (pT) 181, pT205, pT217, and pT231 in two hippocampal subsectors across n = 24 cases. Results Each phosphorylated tau site immunohistochemically labeled early neurofibrillary tangle maturity levels compared to advanced levels recognized by thioflavin‐S. Hippocampal burden generally increased with each Braak stage. Discussion These results provide neurobiologic evidence that these phosphorylated tau fluid biomarker sites are present during early neurofibrillary tangle maturity levels and may explain why these fluid biomarker measures are observed before symptom onset. Highlights Immunohistochemical evaluation of four phosphorylated tau fluid biomarker sites. Earlier neurofibrillary tangle maturity levels recognized by phosphorylated tau in proline‐rich region. Advanced tangle pathology is elevated in the subiculum compared to the cornu ammonis 1 of the hippocampus. Novel semi‐quantitative frequency to calculate tangle maturity frequency.

AbstractBackgroundThe field of biological subtypes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has recently gained attention as a strong driver of precision medicine and future clinical trials. Neuropathology and neuroimaging studies have consistently identified four subtypes: hippocampal sparing AD, typical AD, limbic predominant AD, and minimal atrophy or minimal tau NFT AD. An important and still unresolved question is whether a truly hippocampal sparing subtype of AD can really exist, since it would challenge the widely accepted model of NFT spread. To address this question, we conducted a systematic review of the literature and performed original analyses on tau PET data.MethodOur systematic review included a search on EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases up to October 2020. Original analyses included implementation of several methods for AD subtyping on tau PET, and utilization of five complementary cut points to identify hippocampal sparing AD cases both in published studies and in data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).ResultIn the three reviewed neuropathologic studies, we did not find any individual case with tau NFT in the association cortex while completely sparing the hippocampus (i.e., truly hippocampal sparing cases). In the in vivo tau PET studies, more lenient cut points consistently identified AD patients with tau NFT in the association cortex while completely sparing the hippocampus.ConclusionOur current data suggests that the hippocampal sparing subtype of AD does exist ante‐mortem, at earlier stages of the disease, but more research is needed to understand its pathogenesis and progression during life. Based on the findings from both in vivo tau PET and neuropathologic studies, we suggest that there are two possible independent pathways of tau spread: (1) a canonical pathway with early involvement of entorhinal cortex with subsequent involvement of limbic regions before eventually affecting multimodal association cortices, and (2) a less common pathway that affects multimodal association cortices with limbic involvement observed at end stages of the disease. As emphasized in the Murray 2011 study, hippocampal sparing relative to greater cortical involvement defines the phenotype.

AbstractBackgroundSummarizing the multiplicity and heterogeneity of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) features into a single measure has been difficult in both pathology and imaging studies. The objective of this work was to evaluate the association between neuroimaging surrogates of CVD and two available neuropathologic CVD scales in those with both antemortem imaging CVD measures and post‐mortem CVD evaluation. We used (1) Strozyk scale (Strozyk et. al. NBA 2010) which is based on presence and number of three macroscopic lesions (large infarctions, lacunar infarctions, and leukoencephalopathy) and (2) Kalaria scale (Deramecourt et. al. Neurology 2012) which summarizes detailed evaluation of vessel wall modifications (arteriolosclerosis, amyloid angiopathy), perivascular spaces, myelin loss, microinfarctions, and large infarctions.MethodWe identified n=51 individuals in Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (mean age of 83.8 years, 37% female) with MRI scans within 5 years of death. We computed CVD measures from DTI (fractional anisotropy of the genu of the corpus callosum [FAGCC] and fractional anisotropy of cingulum adjoining the hippocampus [FACGH]), FLAIR (white matter hyperintensities [WMH] and total number of infarctions), and T2* GRE (total number of microbleeds). We also computed our recently developed imaging CVD composite score which summarizes the variability in all individual CVD imaging measures described above. We computed the Strozyk and Kalaria scales on postmortem tissue. We used weighted linear regression models with adjustments for MRI scan time to death to evaluate the associations between the antemortem neuroimaging measures and pathology scales in those who had scans within 3 years of death (N=31) and 5 years of death (N=51) (tables 1 and 2).ResultOf all the neuroimaging measures, DTI measures were the best predictors of the Strozyk and Kalaria Scales (p<0.05). In sensitivity analyses of data in Table 1, FAGCC explained 44% and FACGH predicted only 5.5% variability in white matter sub‐component of the Strozyk scale. The CVD composite score was a poor surrogate of the composite pathological scales.ConclusionMicrostructural white matter injury measurement using DTI may be a good surrogate of pathological CVD scales and possibly captures diffuse (and early) changes to white matter and secondary neurodegeneration due to lesions.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarkers can be broadly considered to inform upon regional or global changes occurring in‐vivo. Investigation of neuropathologic underpinnings of regional and global biomarker measures may require differing strategies to validate in the postmortem brain. The goal of this presentation will be to discuss potential neuropathologic strategies to validate AD biomarkers and consider how we may leverage our understanding of the biology to inform upon disease stages.MethodA neuropathologic overview of amyloid‐β composition, neurofibrillary tangle maturity, and glial activation will be provided in a didactic format with an emphasis on disease spectrum. The relevant AD biomarker literature with neuropathologic validation will be highlighted.ResultRegional AD biomarker measures can be visualized and quantified using positron emission tomography (PET). Neuropathologic validation is performed using PET‐to‐autopsy studies or via autoradiographic studies in the postmortem brain tissue. Global AD biomarker measures can be assessed using PET, or fluid biomarkers that include cerebrospinal fluid and blood. Interpretation of these global AD biomarker measures can be further examined in individuals followed to autopsy, which enables a direct comparison with global neuropathologic staging scales (e.g. Braak stage, Thal phase). Neuropathologic validation of global measures and disease stage may be especially useful in identifying contributors to biomarker variability owing to the presence of multiple comorbidities that are a common finding in the AD brain.ConclusionThe direct target of AD biomarkers (e.g. N‐terminal tau phosphorylation) may impact the sensitivity to early or advanced disease stages, both of which may be critical for disease monitoring depending upon the setting or study question. Quantitative digital pathology studies investigating regional, global, or disease stages measured by PET and fluid biomarkers provide an invaluable opportunity to inform upon the neuropathologic underpinnings of longitudinal biomarker changes.