Odenike, Olatoyosi

Abstract Background: NS-018 is an oral, selective, small molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of orally administered NS-018 in patients with PMF, post-PV MF, or post-ET MF. METHODS: This multicenter, Phase 1/2, 3+3 dose-escalation study of NS-018 enrolled patients with IPSS intermediate-1, intermediate-2, or high risk PMF, post-PV MF, or post-ET MF. The study drug, NS-018, was given orally either daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in 28-day cycles. In Phase 1, changes in spleen size were assessed by manual palpation, quality of life with the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MF-SAF), and responses were assessed according to the IWG-MRT/ELN consensus criteria. Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) was evaluated by biopsy, according to WHO criteria. Changes in grade of BM fibrosis from baseline were categorized as improvement, stabilization, or worsening. The Phase 1 portion of the study has been completed and data are presented here. RESULTS: In this Phase 1 study, 48 patients were enrolled across 10 dosing cohorts (75-400 mg QD/100-400 mg BID). Characteristics: 37 PMF, 5 post-PV MF, 6 post-ET MF with a median age (range) 69.5 yrs (38-83); M/F:29/19; 35 JAK2V617F+, and 23 previously treated with a different JAK2 inhibitor. At 400 mg QD/BID, NS-018 dosing was associated with drug-related neurologic adverse events (AEs) including dizziness, peripheral neuropathy, headache, disturbance in attention, vertigo, dysesthesia, paresthesia, aphasia, and nervous system disorder (not otherwise specified). The 300 mg QD dose was better tolerated than 250 mg BID or 300 mg BID, with fewer neurologic AEs, and was selected as the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). For the 48 phase 1 patients, reductions in MF-SAF score were observed for all symptoms after 3 cycles, including for patients with prior JAK2 inhibitor treatment. In all dose cohorts, ≥ 50% patients achieved ≥ 50% score reduction from baseline in night sweats, pruritus and bone pain after 1 cycle. Moreover, ≥ 50% patients achieved ≥ 50% score reduction from baseline in abdominal pain and inactivity after 3 cycles. In patients who had received prior JAK2 inhibitor, ≥ 50% patients achieved ≥ 50% score reduction from baseline in filling up quickly, inactivity, night sweats and quality of life after 3 cycles. Among 36 patients with baseline splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm and treatment for ≥ 1 cycle, 20 (56%) showed ≥ 50% reduction in spleen size (confirmed for ≥ 8 weeks in 16 patients), including 9/19 (47%) patients with prior JAK2 treatment. According to IWG criteria, 14/36 (39%) patients showed splenic clinical improvement (CI) for ≥ 8 weeks, 4 had hemoglobin CI, and 1 had platelet CI. After 3 cycles of NS-018 treatment, 11/31 (37%) evaluable patients had a reduction in bone marrow fibrosis(BMF) by ≥ 1 grade. At any time during NS-018 treatment, 17/31 (55%) evaluable patients had a reduction in BMF by ≥ 1 grade. Overall, 23% (7/31) patients maintained improvement in BMF for ≥ 12 weeks. Reduction in BMF after 3 cycles was correlated with reduction in splenomegaly and hemoglobin responses. To date, 8 patients with prior JAK inhibitor treatment have been enrolled into the phase 2 portion of the trial. Updated Phase 2 data will presented at the meeting. CONCLUSIONS: The RP2D dose of NS-018 was 300 mg QD. This dose provided an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, and reduction in symptomatic splenomegaly. Phase 2 is ongoing and includes patients previously treated with other JAK2 inhibitors. Disclosures Talpaz: ARIAD: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Ritchie:Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Odenike:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Algeta Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Suneisis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI/Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Research Funding. Jamieson:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding. Stein:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 1508 Background: Tipifarnib is an orally bioavailable farnesyltransferase inhibitor with well-established antileukemic activity in a minority of unselected patients with AML. Seeking to identify patients most likely to have tipifarnib-responsive AML, we applied a PCR-based quantitative 2 gene expression signature ratio (RASGRP1:APTX), which had been tested and validated retrospectively as a predictor of response and survival in previous large studies of tipifarnib, as a molecular screening tool for selection of patients to this pilot trial. Objectives: 1) primary: to determine the complete response (CR +CRi) rate in AML patients prospectively selected for tipifarnib treatment on the basis of a 2-gene signature (RASGRP1:APTX ratio) in bone marrow aspirates. 2) secondary: to assess safety, overall survival, and immunophenotypic expression of RASGRP1 on baseline bone marrow blasts for correlation with PCR-based detection. Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study. Key eligibility criteria included 1) patients with previously untreated AML, age ≥65 years and deemed unsuitable for or refusing traditional induction chemotherapy, and 2) RASGRP1: APTX ratio of ≥5.0 (measured in bone marrow aspirate) based upon qRT-PCR. Other inclusion criteria included: ECOG PS 0–2, adequate end-organ function, and WBC < 30,000/microliter. Treatment consisted of Tipifarnib 300 mg BID × 21 days, with 7 days off. Dose escalation to 600 mg BID following cycle 1 was permitted for patients who had stable disease (SD) after cycle 1. Patients who achieved CR/CRi or PR after 2 cycles were eligible to continue treatment for up to 6 cycles maximum. Results: A total of 62 patients were consented to the trial. Of these, 21 (34%) were eligible based upon the required 2-gene ratio. Assay results were reported within 72 hours for all patients. Median age was 75 years. Fourteen (67%) patients had adverse karyotype and 14 (67%) had secondary AML (including 7 patients who received prior therapy for MDS). Three patients were replaced during cycle 1, due to withdrawal of consent or early unrelated death, such that 18 patients were considered evaluable for response. Median RASGRP1:APTX was 14.8. Two patients (11%) achieved CR and 6 (33%) additional patients had both SD and achievement of ≥50% reduction in bone marrow blasts by completion of cycle 2. Two of these 6 patients also had ≥50% increase in peripheral blood neutrophils or platelets. All 8 patients with CR or SD received at least 2 cycles of therapy. There was no correlation between baseline RASGRP1:APTX ratio and response. Overall, tipifarnib was well tolerated. Early death (≤ 30 days) was observed in only 1 patient (5%). The most common therapy-related non-hematologic toxicities (mainly grade 1–2) included: anorexia (33%), nausea (33%), fatigue (28%), febrile neutropenia (23%) and diarrhea (23%). Due to the trial not meeting its primary endpoint of at least 3 CR/CRi after 2 cycles, accrual to the trial was suspended. Conclusion: Monotherapy with tipifarnib in preselected elderly patients with AML and a RASGRP1:APTX ratio of ≥5 was associated with significant antileukemic activity and good tolerance. Although the primary endpoints during the first stage of the trial were not met, this study demonstrated the ability to rapidly and efficiently execute a biomarker-driven trial in an aggressive malignancy. Given the observed antileukemic activity in this selected population, along with a favorable toxicity and bioavailability profile for chronic dosing, further study of tipifarnib with less rigid endpoints than CR/CRi is warranted. Updated survival and RASGRP1 protein expression data will also be presented. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Tipifarnib in AML. Knoblauch:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Karkera:Johnson & Johnson: Employment.

Abstract Background: Higher-risk MDS and CMML comprise a spectrum of disorders associated with cytopenias, high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and truncated survival. Initial treatment with a hypomethylating agent such as azacitidine (AZA) is considered standard of care. Whether addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (VOR), which acts synergistically with AZA to reactivate epigenetically silenced genes, or addition of lenalidomide (LEN), which impacts the bone marrow microenvironment, improves response rates compared to AZA monotherapy is unknown. Methods: This Phase II study (ClinTrials.gov # NCT01522976) randomized higher-risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Int-2 or High and/or bone marrow blasts >5%) and CMML patients (pts) with <20% blasts to receive AZA (75 mg/m2/d on d1-7 of a 28d cycle), AZA + LEN (10 mg/d on d1-21), or AZA + VOR (300 mg BID on d3-9). Eligibility criteria included: >18 years (yrs), no previous allogeneic transplant, no prior treatment with any of the study drugs, and adequate organ function; therapy-related (t)MDS was allowed. Pts continued treatment until disease progression, relapse, unacceptable toxicity, or lack of response. Dose reductions occurred for unresolved grade >3 adverse events (per NCI CTCAE) or delayed count recovery. The primary endpoint was improvement in overall response rate (ORR), by intention to treat and reviewed centrally, of one of the combination arms vs. AZA monotherapy per 2006 International Working Group MDS response criteria (complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + hematologic improvement (HI)). Relapse-free survival (RFS) was from time of response. The study had 81% power to detect a 20% improvement in ORR from 35% to 55%. Results: Of 282 pts enrolled from 3/12–6/14, 276 are included in analyses (6 ineligible pts excluded): 92 on the AZA arm, 93 on AZA+LEN, and 91 on AZA+VOR. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced across arms (Table). Pts received a median of 23 weeks of therapy: 25 of AZA; 24 of AZA+LEN; and 20 of AZA+VOR and were followed for a median of 9 months (range: 0-26). Numbers of pts with notable adverse events >grade 3 for AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR included febrile neutropenia (10:13:13); gastrointestinal disorders (4:11:23); infections (2:3:3); and rash (2:12:1). Responses were assessable in 260 pts (94%). ORR for the entire cohort was 33%: 19% CR, 1% PR, and 13% HI, with a median RFS of 7 months. ORR was similar across study arms: 36% for AZA, 37% for AZA+LEN (p=1.0 vs. AZA), and 22% for AZA+VOR (p=.07 vs. AZA). CR/PR/HI rates across arms were also similar: 23%/0%/13% for AZA; 18%/1%/17% for AZA+LEN (CR p=.47 vs. AZA); and 14%/1%/7% for AZA+VOR (CR p=.18 vs. AZA); rates of bone marrow exams to assess response were 76%, 67%, and 73%, respectively. HI-P/HI-E/HI-N rates were 21%/15%/5% for AZA, 26%/14%/15% for AZA+LEN, and 12%/8%/4% for AZA+VOR. HI-N rates were higher in AZA+LEN vs. AZA (p=.05) but otherwise were similar across arms. Median time to best response across arms was 15 weeks in AZA, 16 weeks in AZA+LEN, and 16 weeks in AZA+VOR. ORR did not vary significantly across arms in subgroup analyses for tMDS, baseline red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependence, and by IPSS risk group. ORR for CMML pts for AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR was 33%:53%(p=.15 vs. AZA):12%(p=.41 vs. AZA). Allogeneic transplantation rates were: 7 pts on AZA, 6 on AZA+LEN, and 9 on AZA+VOR. For AZA:AZA+LEN:AZA+VOR, median RFS was: 6:8:11 months (log-rank p=.3 for combination arms vs. AZA, Figure); and for pts on therapy >6 months, it was 7:7.5:13 months (log-rank p=.11 for AZA+VOR, .74 for AZA+LEN vs. AZA). Conclusions: In higher-risk MDS pts, ORR was similar for AZA monotherapy compared to AZA-containing combination arms, though some subgroups may have benefitted from combination therapy. Differences in types of response may have resulted from differential rates of follow-up bone marrow assessments. While a non-significant signal of a DFS advantage for combination therapy was observed, longer-term outcome data are being assessed. Table Table. Figure Figure. Disclosures Sekeres: Boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: lenalidomide, vorinostat for higher-risk MDS. List:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Gore:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Attar:Celgene: Consultancy. Erba:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Abstract Background: NS-018 is an oral, selective, small molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2).In the previously-reported Phase 1 portion, patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who received NS-018 achieved steady-state plasma levels above the IC50 for JAK2 at all doses (75mg QD - 400 mg BID). 300 mg QD was chosen as the recommended dose (RD) for Phase 2 portion of the study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, tolerability and efficacy of orally-administered NS-018 in patients with PMF, post-PV MF, or post-ET MF. METHODS: This multicenter, Phase 1/2, 3+3 dose-escalation study of NS-018 enrolled patients with IPSS intermediate-1, intermediate-2, or high risk PMF, post-PV MF, or post-ET MF. NS-018 was dosed orally daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in 28-day cycles. In Phase 1, changes in spleen size were assessed by manual palpation, quality of life with the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MF-SAF), and responses according to the IWG-MRT/ELN consensus criteria. Bone marrow fibrosis was evaluated by biopsy, according to standard practice at the sites. Changes from baseline in grade of BM fibrosis were categorized as improvement, stabilization, or worsening. The Phase 1 portion of the study is complete. In the ongoing Phase 2 portion, spleen size is being assessed by palpation and by centrally-read MRI, and quality of life evaluated by the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF). RESULTS: 48 patients were enrolled across 10 dosing cohorts (75-400 mg QD/100-400 mg BID) in Phase 1. Patient characteristics: 37 PMF, 5 post-PV MF, 6 post-ET MF; median age (range) 69.5 yrs (38-83); M/F:29/19; 35 JAK2V617F+, and 23 previously treated with a different JAK2 inhibitor. The data cutoff for this analysis was June 30, 2016 (median follow-up time of 279.5 [range 5-1806] days from screening), at which time 10 patients remained on treatment. The median number of treatment cycles was 10 (1-65). Reasons for treatment discontinuation were disease progression (PD, n = 13), adverse events (AE, n = 8), physician consideration (n = 6), patient request (n = 4), and protocol non-compliance (n = 1). The 300 mg QD dose was selected as the phase 2 recommended dose (P2RD) in terms of tolerability and efficacy. For the 48 patients, reductions in MF-SAF score were observed for all symptoms after 3 cycles, including patients with priorJAK2 inhibitor treatment. Among 36 splenic-evaluable patients with baseline splenomegaly > 5 cm and treatment for > 1 cycle, 20 (56%) showed > 50% reduction in spleen size (confirmed for > 8 weeks in 16 patients), including 9/19 (47%) patients with prior JAK2 treatment. According to IWG criteria, 14/36 (39%) patients showed splenic clinical improvement for > 8 weeks, 4 with hemoglobin CI, and 1 with platelet CI. Twenty-nine patients with prior JAK inhibitor treatment have been enrolled into the phase 2 portion of the trial. Patient characteristics: 13 PMF, 12 post-PV MF, 4 post-ET MF; median age (range) 67 yrs (48-86). The reason for discontinuation of prior JAK2 inhibitor treatment: AEs (62%) and PD (38%). To date, the median number of treatment cycles is 6 (1-20). The majority of grade 3/4 AEs were hematologic and the most common hematologic toxicities were anemia (21%) and thrombocytopenia (17%). Non-hematologic AEs were mostly grade 1/2, and the other AEs shown in > 10% of patients was nausea (14%). Updated Phase 2 efficacy and safety data will be presented at the meeting. CONCLUSIONS: The RP2D dose of NS-018 was 300 mg QD. This dose provided a durable dosing schedule, an acceptable safety profile, splenic size reductions and clinical symptom improvement. Phase 2 is ongoing and includes patients previously treated with a different JAK2 inhibitor. Disclosures Talpaz: Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte Corporation: Other: Travel expense reimbursement, Research Funding; Ariad: Other: Expense reimbursement, travel accomodation expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: travel accomodation expenses, Research Funding. Ritchie:Pfizer: Honoraria; Arian: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria; Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Odenike:Suneisis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI/Baxter: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Geron: Research Funding; Spectrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Algeta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jamieson:GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding. Stein:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:CTI: Research Funding; Promedior: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Galena: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy.

Abstract Background: NS-018 is an oral, selective, small molecule inhibitor of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2). Pre-clinically NS-018 inhibited JAK2 kinase with an IC50 value in the subnanomolar range and demonstrated splenomegaly reduction at low doses in a JAK2V617F-bearing mouse model (Blood Cancer J 2011; 1: e29.). Methods: This multicenter, Phase 1/2, 3+3 dose-escalation study of NS-018 enrolled patients with IPSS intermediate-1, intermediate-2, or high risk PMF, postPV MF, or postET MF. Patients were ≥ 18 years, had ECOG PS ≤ 2 and required therapy but were not required to have splenomegaly in Phase 1. NS-018 was dosed orally daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) in 28-day cycles. Responses were assessed according to IWG consensus criteria, changes in spleen size by manual palpation and quality of life with the Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MF-SAF). The Phase 1 portion of the study completed enrollment and is presented here. Results: Patients: 42 patients were enrolled across 10 cohorts. Patient characteristics: 33 PMF, 5 postPV MF, 4 postET MF; median age (range) 69 yrs (43-83); M/F:28/14; 31 JAK2V617F+, and 17 previously treated with a different JAK inhibitor. Dosing and tolerability: Dose levels included 75, 125, 200, 300 and 400 mg QD and 100, 200, 250, 300 and 400 mg BID. Systemic exposures based on Cmax were approximately dose proportional across the tested range from 75 to 400 mg. The recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 300 mg BID, based on drug-related neurological adverse events (AEs) at 400 mg BID including dizziness (Grade 2 or 3), dysphagia (Grade 2) or hypoesthesia (Grade 1) in one patient each that led to dose reduction or drug discontinuation. Study drug-related serious AEs (SAEs) included non-cardiac chest pain (Grade 2, 200 and 300 mg BID), lower GI hemorrhage (Grade 3, 300mg BID), paresthesia (Grade 3, 300mg BID), increased lipase (Grade 2, 300mg BID), and dizziness (Grade 3, 400 mg BID) in one patient each. For the 300 mg BID cohort (n=11), the most frequent drug-related AEs across all grades were nausea (Grade 1, 18%), decreased platelet count (≤ Grade 2, 18%), and dizziness (≤ Grade 2, 27%); Grade 3 related AEs included anemia, lower GI bleed, leukopenia, neutropenia or paresthesia (1 patient each, 9%); and no Grade 4 AEs. Overall, 22 patients (52%) discontinued treatment due to AEs (n=7), progressive disease (PD) (n=7), or MD/patient decision (n=8). The AEs leading to discontinuation included thrombocytopenia (Grade 4), transient ischemic attack (Grade 2), muscle contraction involuntary (Grade 2), light headedness (Grade 1), insomnia (Grade 1), hemolytic anemia (Grade 3), dizziness (Grade 2), dysphagia (Grade 2), and hypoesthesia (Grade 1). Nine patients had a hemoglobin decrease ≥ 2 g/dL and 8 patients a platelet decrease ≥ 50%. Responses: Of 33 evaluable patients with baseline splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm and treatment for ≥ 1 cycle, 16 (48%) patients showed ≥ 50% reduction in spleen size (confirmed for ≥ 8 weeks in 11 patients). In addition, 11 patients showed splenic clinical improvement (CI, for ≥ 8 weeks), 3 patients hemoglobin CI, and 2 patients platelet CI. Median (range) time to splenic response and duration of response: 1.5 cycle (1-12) and 4.5 cycles (1-29). Splenic reductions ≥50% are shown in the Table for the specified patient groups. Changes in MF-SAF and PK and PD results will be presented. Table Splenic reduction(in evaluable patients) All doses 16/33 (48%) 300mg BID 3/6 (50%) 300mg QD 4/7 (57%) Prior different JAK inhibitor treated 8/16 (50%) Conclusions: The dose of NS-018 determined to be the RP2D in Phase 1 was 300 mg BID. This dose provided a durable dosing schedule with an acceptable safety profile, and was associated with splenic size reduction and clinical improvements. The Phase 2 portion of the study is ongoing and includes only patients previously treated with a different JAK inhibitor. Disclosures Verstovsek: NS Pharma, Inc: Research Funding. Talpaz:Ariad, BMS, Sanofi, Pfizer, Incyte: Research Funding. Ritchie:Celgene, Incyte: Speakers Bureau. Odenike:Suneisis Pharmaceuticals, Incyte, Sanofi-Aventis, Algeta Pharmaceuticals, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jamieson:Roche, Johnson&Johnson, CTI: Research Funding. Stein:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi Oncology: Honoraria. Tomonori:NS Pharma, Inc.: Employment. Mesa:Incyte, CTI, NS Pharma, Inc., Gilead, Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Pracinostat, a potent oral pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor with modest single-agent activity in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), has shown synergistic antitumor activity when combined with azacitidine. This single-group, multicenter phase 2 study assessed the safety and efficacy of pracinostat combined with azacitidine in patients who were at least 65 years old with newly diagnosed AML and who were ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy. Patients received pracinostat 60 mg/d, 3 d/wk, for 3 consecutive weeks, plus azacitidine 75 mg/m2 daily for 7 days in a 28-day cycle. Primary endpoints were complete remission (CR), CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), and morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS) rates of the combination. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of the regimen. Fifty patients (33 de novo, 12 secondary, and 5 therapy-related AML) were enrolled. Twenty-six patients (52%) achieved the primary endpoint of CR (42%), CRi (4%), and MLFS (6%). Median OS and PFS were 19.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10-26.5 months) and 12.6 months (95% CI, 10-17.7 months), respectively, with a 1-year OS rate of 62%. Forty-three patients (86%) experienced at least 1 grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event with the combination, with infections (52%), thrombocytopenia (46%), and febrile neutropenia (44%) reported as the most common toxicities. The 30- and 60-day all-cause mortality rates were 2% and 10%, respectively. DNA sequencing revealed somatic mutations at baseline, and clearance rates correlated with response to treatment. Pracinostat plus azacitidine is a well-tolerated and active regimen in the frontline treatment of older patients with AML unfit for intensive therapy. A larger controlled trial is ongoing. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01912274.