Gelfand, Jeffrey M.

ObjectiveCo‐occurring anti‐tripartite motif‐containing protein 9 and 67 autoantibodies (TRIM9/67‐IgG) have been reported in only a very few cases of paraneoplastic cerebellar syndrome. The value of these biomarkers and the most sensitive methods of TRIM9/67‐IgG detection are not known.MethodsWe performed a retrospective, multicenter study to evaluate the cerebrospinal fluid and serum of candidate TRIM9/67‐IgG cases by tissue‐based immunofluorescence, peptide phage display immunoprecipitation sequencing, overexpression cell‐based assay (CBA), and immunoblot. Cases in which TRIM9/67‐IgG was detected by at least 2 assays were considered TRIM9/67‐IgG positive.ResultsAmong these cases (n = 13), CBA was the most sensitive (100%) and revealed that all cases had TRIM9 and TRIM67 autoantibodies. Of TRIM9/67‐IgG cases with available clinical history, a subacute cerebellar syndrome was the most common presentation (n = 7/10), followed by encephalitis (n = 3/10). Of these 10 patients, 70% had comorbid cancer (7/10), 85% of whom (n = 6/7) had confirmed metastatic disease. All evaluable cancer biopsies expressed TRIM9 protein (n = 5/5), whose expression was elevated in the cancerous regions of the tissue in 4 of 5 cases.InterpretationTRIM9/67‐IgG is a rare but likely high‐risk paraneoplastic biomarker for which CBA appears to be the most sensitive diagnostic assay. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:1086–1101

ImportanceProgressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy can occur in the context of systemic sarcoidosis (S-PML) in the absence of therapeutic immune suppression and can initially be mistaken for neurosarcoidosis or other complications of sarcoidosis. Earlier recognition of S-PML could lead to more effective treatment of the disease.ObjectiveTo describe characteristics of patients with S-PML.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsFor this case series, records from 8 academic medical centers in the United States were reviewed from 2004 to 2022. A systematic review of literature from 1955 to 2022 yielded data for additional patients. Included were patients with S-PML who were not receiving therapeutic immune suppression. The median follow-up time for patients who survived the acute range of illness was 19 months (range, 2-99). Data were analyzed in February 2023.ExposuresSarcoidosis without active therapeutic immune suppression.Main Outcomes and MeasuresClinical, laboratory, and radiographic features of patients with S-PML.ResultsTwenty-one patients with S-PML not receiving therapeutic immune suppression were included in this study, and data for 37 patients were collected from literature review. The median age of the 21 study patients was 56 years (range, 33-72), 4 patients (19%) were female, and 17 (81%) were male. The median age of the literature review patients was 49 years (range, 21-74); 12 of 34 patients (33%) with reported sex were female, and 22 (67%) were male. Nine of 21 study patients (43%) and 18 of 31 literature review patients (58%) had simultaneous presentation of systemic sarcoidosis and PML. Six of 14 study patients (43%) and 11 of 19 literature review patients (58%) had a CD4+ T-cell count greater than 200/μL. In 2 study patients, a systemic flare of sarcoidosis closely preceded S-PML development. Ten of 17 study patients (59%) and 21 of 35 literature review patients (60%) died during the acute phase of illness. No meaningful predictive differences were found between patients who survived S-PML and those who did not.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this case series, patients with sarcoidosis developed PML in the absence of therapeutic immune suppression, and peripheral blood proxies of immune function were often only mildly abnormal. Systemic sarcoidosis flares may rarely herald the onset of S-PML. Clinicians should consider PML in any patient with sarcoidosis and new white matter lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging.

ImportanceAutoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis can lead to harm.ObjectiveTo determine the diseases misdiagnosed as autoimmune encephalitis and potential reasons for misdiagnosis.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective multicenter study took place from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, at autoimmune encephalitis subspecialty outpatient clinics including Mayo Clinic (n = 44), University of Oxford (n = 18), University of Texas Southwestern (n = 18), University of California, San Francisco (n = 17), Washington University in St Louis (n = 6), and University of Utah (n = 4). Inclusion criteria were adults (age ≥18 years) with a prior autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis at a participating center or other medical facility and a subsequent alternative diagnosis at a participating center. A total of 393 patients were referred with an autoimmune encephalitis diagnosis, and of those, 286 patients with true autoimmune encephalitis were excluded.Main Outcomes and MeasuresData were collected on clinical features, investigations, fulfillment of autoimmune encephalitis criteria, alternative diagnoses, potential contributors to misdiagnosis, and immunotherapy adverse reactions.ResultsA total of 107 patients were misdiagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis, and 77 (72%) did not fulfill diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis. The median (IQR) age was 48 (35.5-60.5) years and 65 (61%) were female. Correct diagnoses included functional neurologic disorder (27 [25%]), neurodegenerative disease (22 [20.5%]), primary psychiatric disease (19 [18%]), cognitive deficits from comorbidities (11 [10%]), cerebral neoplasm (10 [9.5%]), and other (18 [17%]). Onset was acute/subacute in 56 (52%) or insidious (>3 months) in 51 (48%). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was suggestive of encephalitis in 19 of 104 patients (18%) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis occurred in 16 of 84 patients (19%). Thyroid peroxidase antibodies were elevated in 24 of 62 patients (39%). Positive neural autoantibodies were more frequent in serum than CSF (48 of 105 [46%] vs 7 of 91 [8%]) and included 1 or more of GAD65 (n = 14), voltage-gated potassium channel complex (LGI1 and CASPR2 negative) (n = 10), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor by cell-based assay only (n = 10; 6 negative in CSF), and other (n = 18). Adverse reactions from immunotherapies occurred in 17 of 84 patients (20%). Potential contributors to misdiagnosis included overinterpretation of positive serum antibodies (53 [50%]), misinterpretation of functional/psychiatric, or nonspecific cognitive dysfunction as encephalopathy (41 [38%]).Conclusions and RelevanceWhen evaluating for autoimmune encephalitis, a broad differential diagnosis should be considered and misdiagnosis occurs in many settings including at specialized centers. In this study, red flags suggesting alternative diagnoses included an insidious onset, positive nonspecific serum antibody, and failure to fulfill autoimmune encephalitis diagnostic criteria. Autoimmune encephalitis misdiagnosis leads to morbidity from unnecessary immunotherapies and delayed treatment of the correct diagnosis.

Expanding the US Food and Drug Administration–approved indications for immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer has resulted in therapeutic success and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Neurologic irAEs (irAE-Ns) have an incidence of 1%–12% and a high fatality rate relative to other irAEs. Lack of standardized disease definitions and accurate phenotyping leads to syndrome misclassification and impedes development of evidence-based treatments and translational research. The objective of this study was to develop consensus guidance for an approach to irAE-Ns including disease definitions and severity grading. A working group of four neurologists drafted irAE-N consensus guidance and definitions, which were reviewed by the multidisciplinary Neuro irAE Disease Definition Panel including oncologists and irAE experts. A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two meetings to discuss areas of controversy. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free text comments. Aggregated survey responses were incorporated into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND/University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions. 27 panelists from 15 academic medical centers voted on a total of 53 rating scales (6 general guidance, 24 central and 18 peripheral nervous system disease definition components, 3 severity criteria and 2 clinical trial adjudication statements); of these, 77% (41/53) received first round consensus. After revisions, all items received second round consensus. Consensus definitions were achieved for seven core disorders: irMeningitis, irEncephalitis, irDemyelinating disease, irVasculitis, irNeuropathy, irNeuromuscular junction disorders and irMyopathy. For each disorder, six descriptors of diagnostic components are used: disease subtype, diagnostic certainty, severity, autoantibody association, exacerbation of pre-existing disease or de novo presentation, and presence or absence of concurrent irAE(s). These disease definitions standardize irAE-N classification. Diagnostic certainty is not always directly linked to certainty to treat as an irAE-N (ie, one might treat events in the probable or possible category). Given consensus on accuracy and usability from a representative panel group, we anticipate that the definitions will be used broadly across clinical and research settings.