Citations 80

Anesthesia and organic aciduria: is the use of lactated Ringer's solution absolutely contraindicated?

Pediatric Anesthesia | May 5, 2015 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 807-817

10.1111/pan.12673 | PMID 25943188

SummaryBackgroundOrganic acidurias (OAs) are rare inborn errors of metabolism that can present with various neurologic manifestations, propensity for acute metabolic decompensation with anion‐gap metabolic acidosis, developmental delay, poor feeding, and failure to thrive.ObjectiveIn this case series, we outline the anesthetic management and perioperative outcomes of OA patients.MethodsWe reviewed demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and perioperative course of patients with four different OAs who underwent anesthetic care at our institution between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013.ResultsEleven patients with OA underwent 19 anesthetic procedures, of which 13 were <2 h in duration and seven were outpatient procedures. One patient with methylmalonic acidemia developed metabolic acidosis during a 10‐h procedure with substantial blood loss but lacked evidence that this acidosis could be attributed to his underlying metabolic disease. The patients who received hydration with lactated Ringer's solution and/or nitrous oxide anesthetic had a perioperative course free of metabolic complication. Two patients died within 30 days of surgery from causes likely to be unrelated to anesthetic exposure.ConclusionsOur patients with various forms of metabolically compensated OAs tolerated anesthetics for surgical procedures without metabolic decompensation, even when lactated Ringer's solution was used for hydration. Measures to prevent protein catabolism and intraoperative events that may precipitate metabolic acidosis, in addition to close monitoring of acid‐base status during more extensive procedures, must be part of perioperative treatment of these patients.
Primary osteolysis syndromes: beware of difficult airway

Pediatric Anesthesia | March 4, 2015 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 727-737

10.1111/pan.12643 | PMID 25736220

SummaryBackgroundPrimary osteolysis syndromes represent a number of rare conditions characterized by destruction and resorption of bone that is unrelated to neoplasia, infection, or trauma.AimTo characterize the periprocedural course of patients with primary osteolysis syndrome undergoing procedures that require anesthesia care.MethodsThe medical records database from our institution was searched from 1976 to 2013 to identify patients with primary osteolysis syndromes who received anesthesia care. We reviewed demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and perioperative course of patients with different forms of primary osteolysis. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify reports describing the anesthetic management of patients with these conditions.ResultsWe identified 11 patients with a primary osteolysis syndrome who received 111 anesthetics. The patients' ages at the time of surgery ranged from 3 to 62 years. Difficult airway management was a common finding. On preoperative examination, difficulty with endotracheal intubation was predicted in 8 of 11 patients. Three patients had preexisting tracheostomies. One patient required multiple awake fiberoptic intubations. Another two patients where successfully intubated early in life via direct laryngoscopy, but eventually required awake fiberoptic intubations as the disease process caused progressive distortion of airway structures. Intraoperative complications were absent. In the postoperative period, three patients required prolonged mechanical ventilation due to airway swelling, respiratory failure, and infection.ConclusionsAirway management may be challenging in patients with primary osteolysis syndromes. Because the osteolytic process advances with aging and craniofacial dysmorphism may progressively worsen, the airway should always be reassessed before surgery with an appropriate strategy for potentially difficult intubation. In all patients with primary osteolysis, a potential for pathologic fracture must be considered and careful intraoperative positioning is warranted.
Perioperative blood product administration and thromboembolic events in patients with treated polycythemia vera: a case‐control study

Transfusion | February 27, 2015 | Volume: 55 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1090-1097

10.1111/trf.13006 | PMID 25727411

BACKGROUNDPatients with polycythemia vera (PV) have historically been considered to be at high risk for perioperative hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications. However, no recent studies have compared these outcomes between treated PV patients and patients without PV undergoing similar procedures.STUDY DESIGN AND METHODSPatients with PV who underwent surgery with anesthesia from June 1, 2006, to May 31, 2011, were randomly matched (sex, age, type of surgical procedure, surgical year) at a ratio of 1:4 with control patients without PV. Conditional logistic regression analysis adjusting for surgical duration, preoperative hemoglobin, platelet count, and cardiovascular disease was used to assess the association between PV and blood product transfusions, thromboembolism, and other major cardiovascular and pulmonary complications.RESULTSFifty‐six PV patients who underwent 79 surgeries were matched with 312 controls. During hospitalization, 35 (44.3%) and 82 (25.9%) PV and control patients, respectively, were transfused with blood products. PV patients were at increased risk for transfusion intraoperatively (odds ratio [OR], 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79‐10.57; p = 0.001) and during hospitalization (OR, 4.35; 95% CI, 1.84‐10.31; p < 0.001). The likelihood of thromboembolic complications and/or other major complications did not differ between the two study groups (thromboembolic—OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.39‐6.02, p = 0.540; other major complications—OR 2.15, 95% CI 0.93‐4.96, p = 0.073).CONCLUSIONSMedically managed PV patients had an increased likelihood of receiving blood products perioperatively. Given the low number of observed thromboembolic events, we cannot make definitive conclusions regarding the association between PV and thromboembolism.
Hospitalization for partial nephrectomy was not associated with intrathecal opioid analgesia: Retrospective analysis

Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia | September 16, 2014 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 517-522

10.4103/1658-354x.140879 | PMID 25422611

Background: The aim of this retrospective study is to test the hypothesis that the use of spinal analgesia shortens the length of hospital stay after partial nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: We reviewed all patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for malignancy through flank incision between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2011. We excluded patients who underwent tumor thrombectomy, used sustained-release opioids, or had general anesthesia supplemented by epidural analgesia. Patients were grouped into “spinal” (intrathecal opioid injection for postoperative analgesia) versus “general anesthetic” group, and “early” discharge group (within 3 postoperative days) versus “late” group. Association between demographics, patient physical status, anesthetic techniques, and surgical complexity and hospital stay were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: Of 380 patients, 158 (41.6%) were discharged “early” and 151 (39.7%) were “spinal” cases. Both spinal and early discharge groups had better postoperative pain control and used less postoperative systemic opioids. Spinal analgesia was associated with early hospital discharge, odds ratio 1.52, (95% confidence interval 1.00-2.30), P = 0.05, but in adjusted analysis was no longer associated with early discharge, 1.16 (0.73-1.86), P = 0.52. Early discharge was associated with calendar year, with more recent years being associated with early discharge. Conclusion: Spinal analgesia combined with general anesthesia was associated with improved postoperative pain control during the 1 st postoperative day, but not with shorter hospital stay following partial nephrectomy. Therefore, unaccounted practice changes that occurred during more recent times affected hospital stay.
Perioperative allogeneic nonleukoreduced blood transfusion and prostate cancer outcomes after radical prostatectomy

Transfusion | March 24, 2014 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2175-2181

10.1111/trf.12595 | PMID 24660833

BackgroundAllogeneic blood transfusion induces immunosuppression, and concern has been raised that it may increase propensity for cancer recurrence; however, these effects have not been confirmed. We examined the association of perioperative transfusion of allogeneic blood long‐term oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer who underwent prostatectomy.Study Design and MethodsWe reviewed medical records of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1991 and 2005 and received allogeneic nonleukoreduced blood. Each transfused patient was matched to two controls who did not receive blood: matching included age, surgical year, prostate‐specific antigen level, pathologic tumor stages, pathologic Gleason scores, and anesthetic type. Primary outcome was systemic tumor progression, with secondary outcomes of prostate cancer death and all‐cause mortality. Stratified proportional hazards regression analysis was used to assess differences in outcomes between the transfused and nontransfused group.ResultsA total of 379 prostatectomy patients who were transfused and 758 nontransfused controls were followed for 9.4 and 10.2 years (median), respectively. In a multivariable analysis that took into account the matched study design and adjusted for positive surgical margins and adjuvant therapies, the use of allogeneic blood was not associated with systemic tumor progression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39‐1.99; p = 0.76), prostate cancer–specific death (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.44 to 6.48; p = 0.44), or all‐cause death (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.67; p = 0.27).ConclusionsWhen adjusted for clinicopathologic and procedural variables transfusion of allogeneic blood was not associated with systemic tumor progression and survival outcomes.
Severe Liver Injury while Using Umbilical Venous Catheter: Case Series and Literature Review

American Journal of Perinatology | March 4, 2014 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 965-974

10.1055/s-0034-1370346 | PMID 24590868

Anesthesia and Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy: review of 117 anesthetic exposures

Pediatric Anesthesia | August 6, 2013 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 855-864

10.1111/pan.12248 | PMID 23919455

Summary Background Duchenne muscular dystrophy ( DMD ) and Becker muscular dystrophy ( BMD ) are associated with life‐threatening perioperative complications, including rhabdomyolysis, hyperkalemia, and hyperthermia. Current recommendations contraindicate use of succinylcholine and volatile anesthetics; however, the latter recommendation remains controversial. Objective To review the perioperative outcomes of patients with DMD and BMD . Methods We reviewed records of patients with DMD or BMD who underwent anesthetic management at our institution from January 1990 through December 2011. Results We identified 47 patients ( DMD , 37; BMD , 10) who underwent 117 anesthetic exposures ( DMD , 101; BMD , 16). Volatile anesthetic agents were used 66 times ( DMD , 59; BMD , 7). One patient with undiagnosed BMD received succinylcholine and developed acute rhabdomyolysis and hyperkalemic cardiac arrest. All other major complications were attributed to the procedure (i.e., large bleeding), to preexisting comorbidities (i.e., respiratory failure, cardiac disease), or to both. Conclusions Use of succinylcholine in children with dystrophinopathy is contraindicated. These patients have significant comorbidities and are frequently undergoing extensive operations; complications related to these factors can develop, as evidenced by our series. These complications may occur with use of volatile and nonvolatile anesthetics. However, because most of our patients were older than 8 years at the time of surgery, our observation cannot be generalized to younger dystrophin‐deficient children.
Smoking and Pain

Anesthesiology | September 24, 2010 | Volume: 113 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 977-992

10.1097/aln.0b013e3181ebdaf9 | PMID 20864835

Cigarette smoke, which serves as a nicotine delivery vehicle in humans, produces profound changes in physiology. Experimental studies suggest that nicotine has analgesic properties. However, epidemiologic evidence shows that smoking is a risk factor for chronic pain. The complex relationship between smoking and pain not only is of scientific interest, but also has clinical relevance in the practice of anesthesiology and pain medicine. This review will examine current knowledge regarding how acute and chronic exposure to nicotine and cigarette smoke affects acute and chronic painful conditions. It will cover the relevant pharmacology of nicotine and other ligands at the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor as related to pain, explore the association of cigarette smoking with chronic painful conditions and potential mechanisms to explain this association, and examine clinical implications for the care of smokers with pain.
Performance Improvement System and Postoperative Corneal Injuries

Anesthesiology | July 16, 2009 | Volume: 111 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 320-326

10.1097/aln.0b013e3181ae63f0 | PMID 19602956

Background The authors' department conducted a performance improvement initiative aimed to reduce the rate of perioperative corneal injuries. This study reports the effects of the initiative and examines the risk factors for corneal injury. Method The rate of corneal injuries during nonophthalmologic procedures under anesthesia was compared between the two time periods: preinitiative baseline (August 1, 2005-December 31, 2005) and initiative period (January 1, 2006-April 30, 2007). To examine the risk factors for corneal injury, a nested case-control study with a 2:1 matched-set design was separately performed and included cases between January 1, 2006 and July 31, 2008. Results During the baseline period, the corneal injury rate was 1.51 per 1,000, and it decreased to 0.79 per 1,000 during the performance initiative (P = 0.008). Independent risk factors were longer anesthetics (odds ratio = 1.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-1.3 per 30 min), lower American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (odds ratio 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8 for American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 3-4 vs. 1-2), and student nurse anesthetist as a primary anesthesia provider (odds ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.0). Conclusion Corneal injury rate in our institution was significantly reduced and remains at low levels long after initiation of perioperative eye care improvement initiative. The higher rate of corneal injuries among student nurse anesthetists highlights the importance of standardizing education and supervision among all anesthesia providers. We believe that our model of performance improvement initiative can be used to improve other perioperative outcomes.
Anesthesia and Patients with Congenital Hyposensitivity to Pain

Anesthesiology | July 25, 2006 | Volume: 105 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 338-345

10.1097/00000542-200608000-00017 | PMID 16871068

Background Congenital hyposensitivity to pain or hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy represents a variety of disorders characterized by decreased perception of nociception, loss of other modalities of sensation, and variable expression of autonomic dysfunction. Sensory loss, especially that of pain, is associated with self-mutilations that may require frequent operations. Little is known about the safety of anesthesia for these patients. Methods The authors performed a computerized search of the Mayo Clinic medical records database between January 1996 and November 2005 for patients with congenital hyposensitivity to pain and related disorders who underwent general anesthesia. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, anesthetic techniques and agents, use of opioids, and perioperative complications. In addition, the authors conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to summarize the current knowledge regarding anesthesia for patients with congenital hyposensitivity to pain, and compared it with the patients with hyposensitivity to pain identified at the Mayo Clinic. Results The authors identified seven patients with hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy II, IV, or V and undefined variants of congenital pain hyposensitivity who generated 17 anesthesia records: 12 for orthopedic operations, 3 for sural nerve biopsies, and 2 for ophthalmologic procedures. In all patients, standard doses of volatile agents were used during anesthesia. Small amounts of opioids were used during the course of eight operations. Most patients experienced mild hypothermia (lowest temperature 34.7 degrees C), and none experienced hyperthermia. All patients were hemodynamically stable during otherwise uneventful anesthesia. During recovery from anesthesia, opioids were given to only one patient, a single dose of 1 mg morphine. Even after major orthopedic operations, the patient did not require additional analgesia. Conclusions The patients with profound congenital hyposensitivity to pain underwent anesthesia without any adverse events. The authors found that despite reduced pain perception, the requirements for volatile anesthetics were within the expected range for population with normal pain perception, but they did not require opioids postoperatively. Intraoperative mild hypothermia was easily managed by adjustment of environmental temperature.