Leiner, Tim

Abstract Aims Precapillary pulmonary hypertension (pPH) affects left ventricular (LV) function by ventricular interdependence. Since LV ejection fraction (EF) is commonly preserved, LV dysfunction should be assessed with more sensitive techniques. Left atrial (LA) strain and estimation of LV intraventricular pressure gradients (IVPG) may be valuable in detecting subtle changes in LV mechanics; however, the value of these techniques in pPH is unknown. Therefore, the aim of our study is to evaluate LA strain and LV-IVPGs from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) cines in pPH patients. Methods and results In this cross-sectional study, 31 pPH patients and 22 healthy volunteers underwent CMR imaging. Feature-tracking LA strain was measured on four- and two-chamber cines. LV-IVPGs (from apex–base) are computed from a formulation using the myocardial movement and velocity of the reconstructed 3D-LV (derived from long-axis cines using feature-tracking). Systolic function, both LV EF and systolic ejection IVPG, was preserved in pPH patients. Compared to healthy volunteers, diastolic function was impaired in pPH patients, depicted by (i) lower LA reservoir (36 ± 7% vs. 26 ± 9%, P < 0.001) and conduit strain (26 ± 6% vs. 15 ± 8%, P < 0.001) and (ii) impaired diastolic suction (−9.1 ± 3.0 vs. ‒6.4 ± 4.4, P = 0.02) and E-wave decelerative IVPG (8.9 ± 2.6 vs. 5.7 ± 3.1, P < 0.001). Additionally, 11 pPH patients (35%) showed reversal of IVPG at systolic–diastolic transition compared to none of the healthy volunteers (P = 0.002). Conclusions pPH impacts LV function by altering diastolic function, demonstrated by an impairment of LA phasic function and LV-IVPG analysis. These parameters could therefore potentially be used as early markers for LV functional decline in pPH patients.

The COVID‐19 pandemic highlighted the challenges delivering face‐to‐face patient care across healthcare systems. In particular the COVID‐19 pandemic challenged the imaging community to provide timely access to essential diagnostic imaging modalities while ensuring appropriate safeguards were in place for both patients and personnel. With increasing vaccine availability and greater prevalence of vaccination in communities worldwide we are finally emerging on the other side of the COVID‐19 pandemic. As we learned from our institutional and healthcare system responses to the pandemic, maintaining timely access to MR imaging is essential. Radiologists and other imaging providers partnered with their referring providers to ensure that timely access to advanced MR imaging was maintained. On behalf of the International Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) Safety Committee, this white paper is intended to serve as a guide for radiology departments, imaging centers, and other imaging specialists who perform MR imaging to refer to as we prepare for the next pandemic. Lessons learned including strategies to triage and prioritize MR imaging research during a pandemic are discussed.Level of Evidence5Technical EfficacyStage 5

There is increasing scrutiny from healthcare organizations towards the utility and associated costs of imaging. MRI has traditionally been used as a high‐end modality, and although shown extremely important for many types of clinical scenarios, it has been suggested as too expensive by some. This editorial will try and explain how value should be addressed and gives some insights and practical examples of how value of MRI can be increased. It requires a global effort to increase accessibility, value for money, and impact on patient management. We hope this editorial sheds some light and gives some indications of where the field may wish to address some of its research to proactively demonstrate the value of MRI.Level of Evidence: 5Technical Efficacy: Stage 5J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e14–e25.