In Vivo
Efficacy of Tesevatinib in
EGFR
-Amplified Patient-Derived Xenograft Glioblastoma Models May Be Limited by Tissue Binding and Compensatory Signaling
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | March 30, 2021 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1009-1018
Abstract Tesevatinib is a potent oral brain penetrant EGFR inhibitor currently being evaluated for glioblastoma therapy. Tesevatinib distribution was assessed in wild-type (WT) and Mdr1a/b(-/-)Bcrp(-/-) triple knockout (TKO) FVB mice after dosing orally or via osmotic minipump; drug–tissue binding was assessed by rapid equilibrium dialysis. Two hours after tesevatinib dosing, brain concentrations in WT and TKO mice were 0.72 and 10.03 μg/g, respectively. Brain-to-plasma ratios (Kp) were 0.53 and 5.73, respectively. With intraperitoneal infusion, brain concentrations were 1.46 and 30.6 μg/g (Kp 1.16 and 25.10), respectively. The brain-to-plasma unbound drug concentration ratios were substantially lower (WT mice, 0.03–0.08; TKO mice, 0.40–1.75). Unbound drug concentrations in brains of WT mice were 0.78 to 1.59 ng/g. In vitro cytotoxicity and EGFR pathway signaling were evaluated using EGFR-amplified patient-derived glioblastoma xenograft models (GBM12, GBM6). In vivo pharmacodynamics and efficacy were assessed using athymic nude mice bearing either intracranial or flank tumors treated by oral gavage. Tesevatinib potently reduced cell viability [IC50 GBM12 = 11 nmol/L (5.5 ng/mL), GBM6 = 102 nmol/L] and suppressed EGFR signaling in vitro. However, tesevatinib efficacy compared with vehicle in intracranial (GBM12, median survival: 23 vs. 18 days, P = 0.003) and flank models (GBM12, median time to outcome: 41 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007; GBM6, 44 vs. 33 days, P = 0.007) was modest and associated with partial inhibition of EGFR signaling. Overall, tesevatinib efficacy in EGFR-amplified PDX GBM models is robust in vitro but relatively modest in vivo, despite a high brain-to-plasma ratio. This discrepancy may be explained by drug-tissue binding and compensatory signaling.
SCIDOT-14. ENHANCING BRAIN RETENTION OF A KIF11 INHIBITOR SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVES ITS EFFICACY IN A MOUSE MODEL OF GLIOBLASTOMA
Abstract Glioblastoma, the most common and lethal of brain tumors, is both highly invasive and proliferative. This allows tumor cells to infiltrate into regions of the brain with an intact blood brain barrier and be protected from effective therapeutics. Thus, an ideal glioblastoma therapy needs to target cellular components that drive both invasion and proliferation, with inhibitors that penetrate the blood brain barrier. The mitotic kinesin KIF11 meets these criteria and it can be targeted with ispinesib, a highly specific small molecule inhibitor. However, to be effective, ispinesib needs to cross the blood brain barrier and be retained within brain long enough to target glioblastoma cells when they are vulnerable, during mitosis.. We have examined the factors that affect distribution of ispinesib to both brain and glioblastoma. We find that delivery of ispinesib is limited by P-gp and Bcrp-mediated drug efflux at the blood brain barrier. Consequently, ispinesib levels are significantly lower in the infiltrative tumor margin relative to the tumor core, where the blood brain barrier is defective. We also show that elacridar—an inhibitor of the P-gp and Brcp efflux transporters—enhances delivery of ispinesib, and that co-administration of ispinesib with elacridar markedly slows tumor proliferation and prolongs survival in a mouse model of this disease. These results demonstrate the feasibility and efficacy of combining a potentially ideal therapeutic with a compound that enhances brain retention of this therapeutic, and provides support for utilizing this approach in clinical investigations of KIF11 inhibitors in GBM.
Abstract 4858: CNS delivery of VX-970: A selective ATR inhibitor for radiosensitization in GBM
Cancer Research | August 7, 2019 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: 4858-4858
Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive and infiltrative primary brain tumor with a median survival of 14.6 months following the current treatment strategy of radiation and chemotherapy. Therefore, there is a need to develop strategies to enhance the efficacy of chemo-radiation treatments for GBM. DNA damage response signaling pathways play a critical role in DNA repair and cell survival following radiation therapy and the inhibition of these pathways could augment the cytotoxicity associated with radiation providing a radiosensitizing effect. Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-Related Protein (ATR) is a key regulator of the DNA damage response network and VX-970 is the first potent and selective inhibitor of ATR to enter clinical trials. Preliminary in vitro studies from our lab to determine a dose dependent effect of VX-970 in combination with a radiation dose of 5 Gy on the cell survival indicated that administration of radiation led to an enhancement in the cell death with an increasing dose of VX-970 in the U251 human GBM cell line. We evaluated the BBB penetration of VX-970 and studied the role of efflux transporters on the brain exposure of VX-970 in preparation for efficacy studies in PDX models of GBM. Brain distribution studies were performed in wild-type and Mdr1a/b-/- Bcrp1-/- (triple knockout) FVB mice (n=4) following intravenous administration of 20 mg/kg VX-970. Plasma and brain samples were collected at 7 time points post dosing and were analyzed using LC-MS. The brain-to-plasma (B/P) ratio in transporter (Pgp and Bcrp) knockout mice was 17.5 as opposed to 0.8 in transporter intact wild-type mice. This 22-fold increase in the B/P ratio in the triple knockout mice indicates that Pgp and/or Bcrp play a significant role in the efflux of VX-970 from the brain thereby limiting its brain penetration. Oral administration of VX-970 at a dose of 20mg/kg in transporter intact wild-type mice indicated an oral bioavailability of 38%. Steady state brain distribution studies were also performed in wild-type and triple knockout FVB mice following intraperitoneal implantation of the Alzet osmotic pumps to release VX-970 at a rate of 10ul/hr for 48 hours. We observed that the B/P ratio in transporter (Pgp and Bcrp) knockout mice was 12.6 as opposed to 0.12 in transporter intact wild-type mice We are in the process of conducting additional studies in Pgp and Bcrp single knockout mice to determine a more precise status of the role of efflux transporters in the brain delivery of VX-970. The free fraction of VX-970 was found to be 6.1% in plasma indicating that it has a relatively high unbound fraction as compared to other chemotherapeutics for brain delivery. We are in the process of determining free fraction in the brain and relating the concentration of free drug to a dose range associated with effective radiosensitization through efficacy studies in the PDX models of GBM. This PK-PD relationship will help guide future clinical trials. Citation Format: Surabhi Talele, Afroz Mohammad, Minjee Kim, Danielle Burgenske, Ann C. Mladek Tuma, Jann N. Sarkaria, William F. Elmquist. CNS delivery of VX-970: A selective ATR inhibitor for radiosensitization in GBM [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4858.
Abstract Background: Bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of firefly luciferase expressing cells is widely used for analysis of growth, metastasis and drug response in tumor xenografts. D-luciferin, a commonly used luciferase substrate, has limited brain distribution that may undermine BLI for intracranial xenografts. The synthetic luciferin cyclic alkylamino-luciferin (CycLuc1) is a purported brain penetrant luciferase substrate not yet tested in intracranial xenografts. We compared BLI with CycLuc1 and D-luciferin in a glioblastoma (GBM) xenograft model. Methods: GBM6 cells were lentivirally transduced to express LUC2=tdTomato fusion protein. In vivo BLI were performed in orthotopic and heterotopic xenografts established in athymic nude mice. Concentrations of D-luciferin and CycLuc1 were measured by LC-MS/MS. Results: In a dose-response analysis, CycLuc1 at 5 mg/kg provided robust and reproducible imaging; however, an increased photon flux was observed with 10 mg/kg, while escalation to 15 or 20 mg/kg provided marginal additional gains in photon flux. In comparison of CycLuc1 (5 or 25 mg/kg) and D-luciferin (30 or 150 mg/kg, respectively) with serial, crossover BLI at both dose levels, CycLuc1 resulted in less variability and significantly higher photon flux as compared to D-luciferin in GBM6 intracranial xenografts (15 days after implantation). On average BLI with 25 mg/kg CycLuc1 resulted in ~8 fold greater photon flux from these early-stage xenografts as compared to 150 mg/kg D-luciferin (2.9±0.6x106 vs. 3.3±2.8x105 p/sec/cm2, p<0.001). Interestingly, bioluminescence emission with CycLuc1 and D-luciferin was comparable in xenografts imaged 28 days after implantation. In samples harvested after last imaging session, there was no significant difference in substrate distribution in intracranial tumors (tumor to plasma ratios for CycLuc1 and D-luciferin were 0.012 ± 0.020 and 0.012 ± 0.015, respectively; p=0.89). These results suggest that intracranial tumors at early stage may comprise relatively intact blood-brain barrier, which is disrupted at later stage. Consistent with notion that suboptimal delivery may interfere with D-luciferin mediated BLI in intracranial xenografts, photon flux in heterotopic tumors with D-luciferin or CycLuc1 was comparable (4.9±4.6x108 vs. 1.3±0.8x108 p/sec/cm2, p=0.10). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that CycLuc1 may be a superior BLI substrate as compared to D-luciferin for monitoring tumor growth of intracranial GBM xenografts. Citation Format: Shiv K. Gupta, Minjee Kim, Bianca-Maria Marin, Lihong He, Katelyn Swanson, Tuma Tuma, Brett L. Carlson, Mark A. Schroeder, William F. Elmquist, Jann N. Sarkaria. Synthetic luciferin, CycLuc1, improves bioluminescence imaging for intracranial glioblastoma xenografts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4112.