Yi, Cecilia Arana

Background TP53-mutant (mt) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are high-risk (HR) neoplasms, with high rates of AML progression and suboptimal response to hypomethylating agents (HMA). Given the lack of effective therapies for HR-MDS, azacitidine (AZA) was combined with venetoclax (VEN) in a phase Ib MDS study demonstrating safety and early efficacy (Garcia et al. ASH abstract 2023). We retrospectively sought to explore clinical outcomes comparing VEN + HMA, to HMA alone in TP53mt HR-MDS. Methods Among 221 TP53mt MDS pts treated at the Mayo Clinic between January 2007 and April 2024, we reviewed outcomes of pts who received HMA alone (n=98) or HMA+VEN combination (n=34) as their first-line chemotherapy regimen. MDS diagnosis was based on the 5th edition of WHO classification of hematolymphoid tumors (Khoury et al. Leukemia 2022). Responses were assessed according to the International Working Group 2006, MDS response criteria (Cheson et al Blood 2006). Results Baseline characteristics and response The median age (years [yrs]) was 65 (R,37-80) and 70 (range [R], 19-87) yrs in the HMA + VEN and HMA alone groups (gps) (p= 0.42), respectively. The median bone marrow (BM) blast % (9.5 [R, 0-18] vs 5 [R, 0-16], p= 0.01) and TP53 variant allele frequency (VAF) (42 [R, 6-96] vs 37 [R, 2-94], p= 0.03) were significantly higher in HMA + VEN compared to HMA gps, respectively. However, proportion of pts with biallelic (BA)/multihitTP53mt (85% vs 79%, p= 0.61) and complex cytogenetics (CG) (85% vs 81%, p= 0.85) were not different between HMA + VEN and HMA alone gps. The distribution of pts with frequently occurring myeloid co-mutations (ASXL1, TET2, DNMT3A, RAS, BCOR and splicing factor) were not significantly (NS) different between the two gps. IPSS-M scores were assessed in 108 (83%) pts; HR/very HR-MDS as per IPSS-M were NS different between HMA + VEN and HMA gps (100% vs 91%, p= 0.12). While the overall response rate (ORR) (76% vs 49%, p= 0.01) and marrow complete remission (mCR) rates (21% vs 7%, p= 0.05) were higher with HMA+VEN compared to HMA, CR rates were similar (17% vs 12%, p= 0.47). Higher proportion of pts were bridged to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) (41% vs 20%, p= 0.02), while AML progression rates (29% vs 31%, p= >0.99) were comparable between HMA + VEN and HMA gps, respectively. The non-relapse mortality (NRM) at day 60 (3% vs 3%, p=0.96) and day 90 (3% vs 4%, p=0.75) were comparable between HMA + VEN and HMA gps, respectively. RFS and OS The median follow-up from the time of initiation of HMA or HMA + VEN was 9.7 months (mo) (R, 0.3-90.6). The median RFS (8.47 vs 9.90 mo, p= 0.83) and OS (16.33 vs 14.20 mo, p= 0.66) from the time of initiation of therapy were comparable between the two gps. Similarly, among transplanted pts, there was no OS difference between HMA (21.7 mo) and HMA + VEN (18.43 mo) gps, respectively (p= 0.72). Comparable results for OS and RFS were obtained in both gps after censoring pts at the time of allo-HCT. Multivariable analysis for RFS and OS We conducted multivariable analysis (MVA) for RFS and OS using baseline variables that were significant/ trended towards significance (p<0.1), on univariate analysis (UVA) censored at the time of allo-HCT. Achieving ORR (HR; 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14-0.62, p= 0.001) retained significance for better RFS in MVA. Interestingly CR (HR; 1.74, 95% CI; 0.63-4.77, p= 0.28), BA TP53mt (HR; 1.27, 95% CI; 0.13-11.72, p= 0.83) and complex CG (HR; 1.52, 95% CI 0.16-14.03, p= 0.70) did not retain significance for RFS in MVA. In MVA for OS, achievement of ORR (HR; 0.56, 95% CI; 0.30-1.05, p=0.07) and CR (HR; 0.32, 95% CI; 0.09-1.11, p=0.071) trended towards favorable OS. BA TP53mt status (p= 0.42) and complex CG (p= 0.19) did not significantly impact OS in UVA. Conclusion We conclude that while HMA+VEN combination therapy in comparison to HMA monotherapy led to improved response rates, with higher percentage of pts being bridged to allo-HCT, this was not associated with reduced risk of AML transformation, or improved RFS/OS. We eagerly await results from the prospective randomized trial of VEN + AZA in treatment-naïve HR-MDS (VERONA).

Background: Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS), a precursor of myeloid neoplasms (MN), is characterized by one or more persistent cytopenias, and acquired mutations in myeloid malignancy-associated genes. ZRSR2, located at Xp22.2, is one of the MN-associated genes and a member of the spliceosome family of genes. Aim: Describe the clinical characteristics, pattern of progression, and genetics of ZRSR2 mutation (ZRSR2m)-harboring CCUS patients. Methods: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed for 9320 patients between 2016-2023 at Mayo Clinic. After obtaining IRB approval, clinical characteristics and results of bone marrow morphology, cytogenetics, and molecular studies were abstracted. Overall Survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier, from the date of NGS until death or last follow-up. The ZRSR2m MN control cohort included 125 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), and MDS/MPN overlap. BlueSky Statistics V10.3.1 was used for statistical analysis. Results: ZRSR2m was detected in 39 CCUS patients, all of whom were males. Concurrent hematological neoplasms were identified in 8 patients (21%). Five (13%) had plasma cell proliferative disorders including 3 multiple myeloma, 1 MGUS, and 1 AL amyloidosis. There were also 2 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 1 with VEXAS syndrome. Prior chemotherapy, with or without radiotherapy, was given to 4 patients (10.3%), whereas 13 patients (33%) had received previous immunotherapy. Abnormal cytogenetics were detected in 11 patients (29%), with the most common abnormality being +8 (n=5, 13%). In 23 patients (59%), an absolute monocyte count of ≥0.5 x 10^9/L was documented which could be classified as clonal cytopenia with monocytosis of unknown significance (CCMUS). ZRSR2 median gender-corrected VAF among CCUS patients was 32% (range, 1-45). Isolated ZRSR2m was found in 6 patients (15%), and 1 (3%) had multiple ZRSR2m. The median number of co-mutations was 1 (range, 0-3). Sequential NGS, available in 13 patients, showed that 1 patient developed 3 ZRSR2 mutations and 2 ZRSR2 VUS. TET2 was the most common co-mutation (n=25, 64%). Additionally, TET2 was an isolated co-mutation in 18 patients (46%). ASXL1 co-mutation was the second most common (n=8, 20.5%), while other less common co-mutations were IDH1, IDH2, SRSF2, SF3B1, TP53, GATA2, and KDM6A. Pre-ZF1 was the most commonly mutated region in ZRSR2 mutations (n=23, 59%). With a median follow-up of 32 months, 9 (23%) of the ZRSR2m CCUS patients progressed to MNs, none progressed to AML. Five (55.6%) progressed to MDS, 4 were subclassified as low blast (LB) and 1 as increased blast-1 (IB1). Four (44.4%) progressed to MDS/MPN overlap syndrome, with 3 subclassified as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). None of the patients with isolated ZRSR2m progressed to MDS or CMML. None of the patients who received prior immunotherapy progressed to MDS. Thirty-six (92.3%) patients had high-risk CCUS (Malcovati et al, Blood 2017) while 3 had intermediate risk with no low-risk patients. None of the intermediate-risk patients progressed to MDS, while 5 patients of the high-risk (13.9%) progressed to MDS (p=1). Twelve (31%) patients died, and the median overall survival (mOS) was 56 months. Higher hemoglobin levels improved OS (HR=0.59, p=0.02), while higher adjusted ZRSR2 VAF worsened OS (HR=1.05, p=0.017). Patients with TET2 as isolated co-mutations showed better mOS than the rest of the cohort (not reached vs 41 months, p= 0.03). ZRSR2m CCUS patients showed a trend suggestive of better mOS than ZRSR2m with MNs including AML (56 vs 30 months, p=0.14), and with excluding AML (56 vs 39 months, p=0.24). On multivariate analysis, both Hgb (HR=0.61, p=0.03) and isolated TET2 co-mutation (HR=0.19, p=0.04) retained statistical significance. mOS was not affected by prior history of treatment, number of co-mutations, isolated ZRSR2, ASXL1 co-mutation, or MDS progression. Conclusion: ZRSR2m CCUS cohort was exclusively males. There was a significant number of patients with concurrent hematological malignancy or a history of prior chemo- and/or immuno-therapy (36%). Most patients had high-risk CCUS but showed a low rate of progression to MNs, especially in those with isolated ZRSR2. Additionally, patients with isolated TET2 co-mutation had better survival, indicating that TET2 confers a favorable prognosis among ZRSR2m CCUS patients.

Background and Rationale: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clonal hematologic neoplasm characterized by abnormal accumulation of mast cells which can lead to symptoms related to mast cell degranulation and/or, in the case of advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM), organ dysfunction due to mast cell infiltration. AdvSM is a category of SM comprised of aggressive systemic mastocytosis (ASM), mast cell leukemia (MCL), and SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN). Among these, SM-AHN is the most common subtype, accounting for approximately 70% of AdvSM. A KIT D816V mutation found in up to 95% of SM cases is the primary oncogenic driver, making it a key therapeutic target. Avapritinib, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of D816V mutant KIT, has demonstrated high rates of rapid, deep, and durable responses in all AdvSM subtypes, including SM-AHN (Gotlib et al. Nature Medicine, 2021; DeAngelo et al., Nature Medicine, 2021). However, despite showing prolonged OS and low risk of progression of the SM component, some patients (20%) exhibit progression of the AHN component, including transformation to AML. In some patients, combination therapy with avapritinib and AHN-directed therapy may therefore be necessary for optimal control of SM-AHN. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) form the backbone of therapy for advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN); hematologic neoplasms most likely to co-occur with SM in patients (pts) with SM-AHN. To date, the combination of HMA and KIT inhibitors has not been clinically evaluated. In this study, we aim to assess the safety and tolerability of the combination of avapritinib and decitabine in patients with SM-AHN. Study design and Methods: The primary objective of the study is to establish the recommended dose (RP2D) of avapritinib in combination with decitabine based on dose-limiting toxicity, overall safety, and clinical activity data. A dose evaluation steering committee (DESC) comprised of participating investigators will review the totality of safety and efficacy data to determine RP2D. Secondary endpoints include SM overall response rate by the end of 6 cycles by the m-IWG consensus criteria and proposed ECNM-AIM criteria (Gotlib et al., J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 2022) and incidence/frequency of adverse events. Exploratory endpoints include patient reported outcomes, PFS, OS, and correlative biomarkers linked to mast cell disease or AHN. Pts with a diagnosis of SM-AHN by the WHO 2022 criteria will be eligible for inclusion. Pts must have any of the following myeloid AHN per WHO 2022 criteria: MDS, CMML, MDS/MPN with neutrophilia, MDS/MPN with SF3B1 mutation and thrombocytosis, or MDS/MPN-NOS. Patients with MDS must have intermediate, high- or very-high risk by IPSS-R. Patients with very-low or low-risk MDS by IPSS-R must be intolerant/refractory to ESA or have serum EPO > 200 U/L. A baseline platelet count of ≥ 75 x 109/L and ≥ 25 x 109/L will be required for inclusion in the dose-finding and the dose-expansion phases, respectively. Key exclusion criteria include a diagnosis of AML, history of intracranial hemorrhage, prior treatment with avapritinib or decitabine with documented progression in SM or AHN component, respectively, or treatment with alternative KIT inhibitor or azacitidine within 4 weeks of study treatment initiation. In the dose finding part of the study, a Bayesian adaptive design will be employed to assess different doses of avapritinib (50 to 200 mg PO daily) in combination with fixed doses of decitabine (oral decitabine/cedazuridine: 35/100 mg/day or intravenous decitabine: 20 mg/m2/day on days 1-5) in a 28-day treatment cycle. Close attention will be paid to treatment-emergent thrombocytopenia with protocol-driven treatment holds and dose modification strategies employed when platelet count drops below 50 x 109/L. After RP2D is determined, an additional 10 patients will be enrolled in the dose expansion phase. Patients with platelet count ≥ 25 x 109/L and < 75 x 109/L, will receive lead-in dosing with decitabine or decitabine/cedazuridine with the ability to add avapritinib if sufficient platelet thresholds are achieved. Planned correlative studies include serial single-cell multi-omics utilizing scDNA-seq and immunophenotyping to assess impact of combination treatment on a molecularly complex disease state. This study is currently open to accrual (NCT06327685).

Background Pacritinib (PAC) is a relatively selective JAK2 vs. JAK1 inhibitor (JAKi) and is one of four FDA-approved JAKi for use in myelofibrosis (MF). PAC is indicated for MF patients with thrombocytopenia (Platelets <50 x 109/L). In a previously published controlled study of MF patients with platelet count <100 x 109/L (PERSIST-2), including JAKi-naïve and ruxolitinib-experienced, PAC therapy at the recommended dose of 200 mg BID was associated with a ≥35% spleen volume reduction rate of 22%; response rate was lower in ruxolitinib-experienced patients for both 200 mg BID (9.3%) and 100 mg BID (1.8%) dosing (JAMA Oncol 2018;4:652); a more recent post-hoc analysis suggested an additional benefit in anemia with 25-37% of transfusion-dependent patients achieving a ≥12-week transfusion-free period (Blood Adv 2023;7:5835). Herein, we describe our experience with the drug outside of a clinical trial setting. Methods Study patients were retrospectively recruited from Mayo Clinic (USA) databases, after approval from IRB. Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022;140:1200). Study inclusion criteria included documentation of PAC therapy outside of a clinical trial setting. Spleen response was adjudicated by the 2013 International Working Group-European LeukemiaNet (IWG-ELN) response criteria (Blood 2013;122:1395). Anemia response was rated by the revised 2024 IWG-ELN criteria (manuscript submitted; transfusion-free period x 12 weeks and/or 12-week average increase in hemoglobin ≥1.5 g/dL). Conventional statistical methods were employed. Results A total of 60 MF patients (median age 70 years; males 62%; primary MF 63%) received PAC upfront (N=19; 32%) or after failing treatment with another JAKi (N=41; 68%), including ruxolitinib (N=39; 65%): JAK2 60%, CALR 27%, MPL 10%. Reasons for discontinuation of previous JAKi treatment included drug intolerance (41%), relapse after initial response (33%), and suboptimal response (26%). Median interval between diagnosis and treatment with PAC was 4 years (range 0-22). At PAC treatment initiation, DIPSS-plus risk distribution was high in 48%, intermediate-2 47%, and intermediate-1 (5%). Transfusion-dependent anemia (TDA; ≥3 units during 12 weeks prior to enrollment) was present in 40% of patients, platelet count <50 x 109/L 25%, leukocyte count >11 x 109/L 40%, spleen size >15 cm 76%, constitutional symptoms 55%, complex/monosomal karyotype 27%, and mutations in SRSF2 11% or ASXL1 33%. PAC initial dose was 100 (N=41) or 200 (N=19) mg BID. Dose was increased in 44% of patients started at 100 mg BID and decreased in 55% of those started at 200 mg BID. Among 47 patients evaluable for anemia response, only one of 23 with non-TDA (2% overall and 4.3% at 200 mg BID dosing) and none of 24 with TDA responded. In evaluable patients, spleen response rate was 13% (95% CI 5.9-24.7) overall and higher in JAKi-naïve (29%; 95% CI 11.7-54.7) vs. JAKi-experienced (6%; 95% CI 1.6-19.1; p=0.04). Spleen response rate was higher in the absence of leukocytosis (21% vs. 0%; p=0.01) or complex/monosomal karyotype (17% vs. 0%; p=0.05) but similar between 100 and 200 mg BID initial dosing (p=0.9). At a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-27), PAC was discontinued in 80% of the patients: intolerance 58%, suboptimal response 54%, transition to allogeneic stem cell transplants (ASCT) 10%. Major side effects were more frequent with 200 vs. 100 mg BID dose and included diarrhea 43%, nausea/vomitting 17%, dyspnea 25%, peripheral edema 28%, allergic reaction 13%, grade 3/4 neutropenia 22%, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia 34%. Up to the time of this writing, 17 deaths (28%), 11 (18%) ASCT, and 3 (5%) leukemic transformations were documented. In multivariable analysis, post-PAC survival was adversely affected by TDA (HR 11.9; p<0.01), platelet count <50 x 109/L (HR 7.4; p<0.01), and SRSF2/ASXL1 mutations (HR 10.7; p<0.01), all independent of ASCT, which was independently associated with longer survival (HR 9.0; p<0.01). Conclusions: The observations from the current real-world study, regarding the moderate activity of PAC for reducing spleen size, are consistent with those of the aforementioned controlled clinical trial (PERSIST-2). However, despite recent suggestions of the drug's mechanistically unique erythropoietic activity, the anemia response rate seen in the current study was underwhelming.

Background and Significance: Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a rare heterogeneous disease characterized by the aberrant accumulation of neoplastic mast cells (MC). In about 95% of adult patients, SM is driven by a gain-of-function mutation (D816V) in exon 17 of KIT. Advanced SM (AdvSM) is a life-threatening form of SM and includes three subtypes: aggressive SM (ASM), SM with an associated hematologic neoplasm (SM-AHN), and mast cell leukemia (MCL). Despite improvement in disease control with approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), there is still unmet need for improved tolerability and efficacy in AdvSM treatments. Bezuclastinib, an oral and selective type 1 TKI that potently inhibits KIT D816V, is being studied in patients diagnosed with AdvSM in the Apex study (NCT04996875). Results from the Part 1 dose optimization portion of Apex were presented previously. Part 1 randomized 32 patients 1:1:1:1 to receive bezuclastinib at 50, 100, or 200 mg BID or 400 mg QD. Initial results from the Part 1 dose optimization portion of the Apex trial in patients with AdvSM demonstrated encouraging safety profile and signs of clinical activity, as well as deep reductions across biomarkers of MC burden including bone marrow MC burden, serum tryptase levels, and KIT D816V variant allele fraction (VAF). In addition, 94%, 93%, and 100% of patients demonstrated ≥50% reduction in serum tryptase, KIT D816V VAF, and bone marrow MC burden, respectively. Exposure achieved with 100 mg BID of bezuclastinib original formulation resulted in optimal efficacy and safety outcomes. 150 mg QD of an optimized formulation is expected to deliver bezuclastinib exposures consistent with the 100 mg BID of the original formulation. Part 2 is further evaluating the efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib in patients with AdvSM at the selected Part 2 dose of 150mg QD of the optimized formulation. Study Design and Methods: Apex is a multicenter, Phase 2 open-label study of bezuclastinib in patients with AdvSM as defined per the WHO criteria. Enrollment includes previously treated and treatment-naïve patients. Part 2 is enrolling approximately 65 patients including up to 15 patients without measurable mIWG C-findings. The Part 2 expansion portion of the Apex study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bezuclastinib in patients with AdvSM, including ASM, SM-AHN, or MCL. Key eligibility criteria include measurable disease (centrally adjudicated) according to modified IWG-MRT-ECNM criteria and clinically acceptable laboratory values including platelet count ≥50,000/µL. The primary efficacy endpoint of Part 2 is overall response rate (ORR = complete response [CR] + complete remission with partial hematologic recovery [CRh] + partial response [PR] + clinical improvement [CI]) per mIWG-MRT-ECNM criteria according to mIWG-MRT-ECNM response criteria and will be confirmed by a Central Response Review Committee. Secondary endpoints include further characterization of safety and tolerability, pure pathologic response, biomarker response (including changes in bone marrow MC burden, serum tryptase level, and KIT D816V mutational burden), duration of response, time to response, progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Apex Part 2 is actively enrolling. Study sites are enrolling in North America, Asia-Pacific, and Europe. In addition, a high-risk SM-AHN sub-study assessing the safety and feasibility of the combination of bezuclastinib 150 mg QD and azacitidine may enroll up to 20 patients who are currently receiving or indicated for azacitidine and have biopsy-proven SM with an associated high- or very high-risk myeloid neoplasm. Patients with SM-AHN from Part 1 or Part 2 who have demonstrated AHN progression may enroll in an additional rollover cohort to receive bezuclastinib with concomitant azacitidine or hydroxyurea.

Background: SETBP1 gene, located on 18q12.3, is a major oncogene in myeloid neoplasms. GATA2 gene, located on 3q21, is one of the six GATA transcription factors regulating gene expression via two conserved zinc finger domains (ZF). Previous data suggested that in patients with germline GATA2 mutation (m), acquisition of a somatic SETBP1 mutation (m) was associated with leukemic transformation among patients with excess blast MDS and CMML. Aim: To study the characteristics of patients with somatic SETBP1-GATA2 mutated myeloid neoplasms. Methods: This study is a retrospective study at Mayo Clinic. After obtaining IRB approval, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who had myeloid NGS panel results between 2016-2023. All data were recorded at time of first NGS. Cohort 1 was defined as patients with SETBP1m and GATA2m, cohort 2; patients with SETBP1m and GATA2wt, and cohort 3; patients with SETBP1wt and GATA2m. Germline work-up was not performed in the majority of GATA2 cases. We stratified risk based on the European LeukemiaNet 2022 guidelines for AML, IPSS-M for MDS and MDS/MPN, and CPSS-M for CMML. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of NGS to date of last follow-up based on Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression analysis. For statistical analysis, we used BlueSky Statistics V10.3.1. Results: General characteristics: 114 patients had SETBP1m (median VAF= 39%), and 63 patients had GATA2m (median VAF= 35%). Nine patients had co-occurring SETBP1m/GATA2m mutations (cohort 1). 4/9 patients in cohort 1 had MDS/MPN (44.4%), while only 13/105 in cohort 2 (12.4%) had MDS/MPN (P=0.02). AML was seen in 2 patients in cohort 1 (22.2%) compared to18 in cohort 2 (17.1%) (p=0.6). The median WBC count was 22.9 x 109 cells/L among cohort 1 compared to 9 x 109 cells/L among cohort 2 cases (p=0.09). BM blasts were higher in cohort 3 (7%) compared to cohort 1 (5%) and cohort 2 (3%) (p=0.09), while peripheral blasts tended to be lower in cohort 2 (1%) in comparison to cohort 1 (6%) and cohort 3 (4%) (p=0.48). Genetic characteristics: In cohort 1,7 GATA2m clustered in zinc finger 2 (ZF2) (77.8%), while the other two mutations were outside the ZF domains (22.2%). This was higher than the ZF2 mutated cases in cohort 3 (46.3%, p=0.1). Abnormal cytogenetics were seen in 66.7% of cohort 1 patients and 45% of cohort 2 (p= 0.3). Two cases with trisomy 8 were seen among patients in cohort 1 (22.2%), compared to only 4.9% in cohort 2 (p=0.09). Two incidences of isochromosome 17q [i(17q)] were seen in cohort 1 (22.2%), versus 5 cases in cohort 2 (4.8%) and 1 case in cohort 3 (1.9%) (p= 0.068). Co-mutations: The median number of co-mutationswas 3 in both cohort 1 and cohort 2 (p= 0.6). In cohort 1, ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutations were the most common (7/9, 77.8%) followed by NRAS (22.2%) and TET2 (22.2%). 77.8% of cohort 1 patients had SRSF2 co-mutation, compared to 44.8% in cohort 2 (p=0.08), and 27.8% in cohort 3 (p= 0.006). No isolated SETBP1m/GATA2m cases were found. Survival: Patients in cohort 1 had a numerically higher median OS compared to those in cohort 2 (19.4 vs 15.4 months, p= 0.3). When comparing with the cohort 3, patients in cohort 1 tended to have better outcomes (median OS= 19.4 vs 13.8 months, p=0.8). Among cohort 1, SRSF2 co-mutation was associated with worse survival outcomes compared to patients with SRSF2wt (median OS= 5.3 vs 19.4 months, p= 0.02); this association was not found in cohort 2 (12.5 vs 18.4 months, p= 0.3) and cohort 3 (13.2 vs 17.1 months, p= 0.4). Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation was associated with favorable survival outcomes in all cohorts (cohort 1: 22.6 vs 7.8 months, p= 0.1; cohort 2: 20.9 vs 12.5 months, p= 0.04; cohort 3: 25.6 vs 13.1 months, p= 0.03). Conclusion: SETBP1m/GATA2m myeloid neoplasms included a significantly higher proportion of MDS/MPN overlap cases in comparison with the SETBP1m/GATA2wt group. The SETBP1m/GATA2m group had a higher proportion of ZF2 GATA2m and SRSF2 co-mutation compared to patients with SETBP1wt/GATA2m. Survival of SETBP1m/GATA2m patients was not worse compared to SETBP1wt/GATA2m or SETBP1m/GATA2wt.

Background Blast or accelerated phase myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN-BP/AP) carries a dismal prognosis, with 3-year survival estimates of <5% (BCJ 2023;108). Patients with MPN-BP/AP were excluded from venetoclax (Ven) plus hypomethylating agent (HMA) clinical trials for acute myeloid leukemia (NEJM 2020;383:617). In the current retrospective study, we examined response patterns and long-term survival of newly-diagnosed MPN-BP/AP patients who received treatment with Ven+HMA, outside of clinical trials. Methods Newly-diagnosed patients with MPN-BP/AP treated with Ven+HMA at the Mayo Clinic, between March 2019 and May 2024, were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022;140:1200). Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed by conventional karyotype and next-generation sequencing, respectively. All patients received at least one cycle of Ven+HMA (azacitidine 75 mg/m2 days 1-7 or decitabine 20 mg/m2 days 1-5). Response was assessed according to the 2022 European Leukemia Net criteria (Blood 2022;140:1345). Standard statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro (Version 17.1.0). Results Patient characteristics 70 patients (median age 73 years, 59% males, 48% splenomegaly >14 cm, 4% isolated myeloid sarcoma) with newly-diagnosed MPN-BP (n=58) or AP (n=12) received Ven+HMA with (n=13) or without (n=57) concomitant JAK2 inhibitor. Driver mutation distribution was 69% JAK2, 21% CALR, 6% MPL, and 4% triple negative. Mutations involved ASXL1 (31%), TP53 (28%), TET2 (28%), RUNX1 (25%), SRSF2 (18%), IDH2 (12%), U2AF1 (11%), DNMT3A (9%), IDH1 (7%), and K/NRAS (7%). Karyotype was abnormal in 50 (76%) of 66 informative cases, of which 28 (56%) were complex (CK). Median TP53 mutation variant allele frequency (VAF) was 30% (8-96%) and all evaluable cases displayed CK (n=18). Response and Survival Complete remission (CR; 21%) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi; 19%) was documented in 28 (40%) patients with residual MPN in 18 (64%) patients. Median response duration was 5.5 months (1-60 months). After a median follow up of 7 months (1-62 months), 48 (69%) deaths, 13 relapses (46%), and 15 (21%) allogeneic stem cell transplants (ASCT; 12 in CR/CRi) were recorded. Median overall survival (OS) was 9 months and was superior with ASCT (median 22 vs. 8 months; p=0.01). In univariate analysis, transplant-censored survival was superior with CR/CRi (12 vs. 5 months; p<0.01) and IDH1 mutation (33 vs. 8 months; p=0.04) and inferior with CK (7 vs. 10 months; p=0.05), TP53 mutation (5 vs. 10 months; p<0.01), post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis (post-PV MF) (3 vs. 9 months; p=0.01), and splenomegaly >14 cm (5 vs. 16 months; p<0.01). Multivariable analysis confirmed the negative survival impact of not achieving CR/CRi (HR 3.8; p<0.01) and presence of TP53 mutation (HR 4.0; p<0.01); median survival (1/3-year survival rate) was 3 months (10%/0%) in TP53 mutated patients not achieving CR/CRi (n=11) vs. 27 months (65%/28%) in TP53 unmutated cases achieving CR/CRi (n=19) (p < 0.01). Median survival in patients with TP53 mutations or CK who achieved CR/CRi (n=7; 7 months) was inferior to that in treatment responders without TP53 mutations or CK (n=18; 23 months; p=0.01). CR/CRi rates in the presence vs. absence of TP53 mutations were 42% vs. 39% (p=0.80) and of CK (25% vs. 50% (p=0.04). Importantly, responses in the presence of TP53 mutations or CK were too short-lived to allow successful bridging to ASCT (median 2 vs. 9 months; p<0.01). Additional predictors of inferior treatment response included splenomegaly >14 cm (24% vs. 53%; p=0.01), and post-PV MF (0% vs. 46%; p<0.01) while SRSF2 (67% vs. 34%; p=0.04) and IDH2 mutations (75% vs. 35%; p=0.03) were associated with favorable response. In multivariable analysis, CK (p=0.04) and splenomegaly >14 cm (p=0.01) remained independent predictors of inferior response. The use of concomitant JAK2 inhibitor therapy did not impact treatment response (CR/CRi 46% vs. 39%; p=0.62) or survival (median 9 vs. 8 months; p=0.71). Conclusions TP53 mutations and CK undermine the value of Ven+HMA, with or without concomitant JAK2 inhibitor, in enabling successful bridging of newly-diagnosed MPN-BP/AP to ASCT. An alternative treatment approach is advised, in the particular scenario, while the observed 3-year survival rate of 28%, in treatment responders without TP53 mutations, is encouraging.

Background: Age-related clonal hematopoiesis (ARCH) is a precursor state to blood cancers and is associated with epigenetic age acceleration (EpiAgeAccel) (Aging Cell, 2021). While ARCH in combination with AgeAccel has the highest risk for all cause mortality and cardiovascular disease, not much is known about context-relevant clonal hematopoiesis (CRCH) - CH occurring in the context of prior chemo/radiation, bone marrow failure and germline predisposition syndromes. CRCH has a unique mutational signature enriched in genes in DNA damage response and repair (TP53 and PPM1D). To answer this question, we assessed EpiAge in a prospective cohort of patients with both ARCH and CRCH. Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited for CH and EpiAge assessment from the Mayo Clinic CH clinic between 2022 and 2024. Demographic and clinical data including chronologic age, BMI, sex, blood counts, and medical history were recorded at the time of enrollment. CH status was determined using error corrected sequencing on peripheral blood (PB) DNA. All somatic variants with a variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥0.5% were considered as CH. For EpiAge analysis PB DNA was analyzed using the Illumina MethylationEPIC array. The resulting beta values were used to obtain epigenetic age estimates using Horvath's clock (Genome Biol., 2013), Hannum's Clock (Mol Cell., 2013), PhenoAge (Aging, 2018), DunedinPACE (eLife, 2022), and predicted telomere length (Aging, 2019). Results: 106 (62%) of 170 patients assessed were found to have CH, with the most frequent mutations being TET2 (19%), PPM1D (17%), DNMT3A (16%), ASXL1 (9%), and TP53 (6%); median VAF 9.5%. Except for a higher median chronologic age (68 vs 60 years, p<0.001) in the CH group, baseline characteristics including BMI, comorbidities, baseline blood counts, sex and tobacco use history were similar between the two groups. The CH group demonstrated significant EpiAgeAccel by all three clocks: Horvath (p=0.001), Hannum (p<0.001), and PhenoAge (p<0.001); with an increase in biological age of 4.9 years (95% CI 2-7.7) by Horvath clock, 4.8 years (95% CI 2.2-7.5) by Hannum clock, and 7 years (95% CI 2.9-10.5) by PhenoAge, after adjusting for chronologic age, sex, smoking status, and cancer history. CH was also associated with increased DunedinPACE of aging by 0.13 biological year per chronologic year (bioyear/chronoyear) (95% CI 0.06-0.2, p<0.001), and shortened telomere lengths by 0.24kb (95% CI 0.11-0.35, p<0.001) after adjusting for chronologic age and excluding patients with telomere biology disorders. CH patients were then further classified into ARCH-63 (59%) and CRCH-43 (41%). While the median chronological age (69 vs 67 years) was similar between the 2 groups, CRCH patients had lower Hgb [10.9g/dL vs. 13g/dL (p=0.0001)] , lower platelet [146x109/L vs. 192x109/L (p=0.0132)] and lower WBC [4.4x109/L vs. 5.2x109/L (p=0.0345)]. The median BMI, comorbidities, and tobacco use history were similar between the 2 groups. The 3 most common ARCH mutations were TET2 (20%), DNMT3A (19%), and ASXL1 (14%), while, PPM1D (27%), TET2 (18%), and DNMT3A (14%) were frequent in CRCH. There was no significant difference found in median EpiAge via Horvath (68 vs 67.5years p=0.2826), Hannum (65 vs 66 years p=0.9333), or PhenoAge (55 vs 56 years p=0.618) between ARCH and CRCH. However, DunedinPACE of aging was higher in CRCH (1.27 vs 1.18 bioyear/chronoyear p=0.0148) and median telomere length was shorter in CRCH (6.35 vs 6.49kb p=0.0247), in comparison to ARCH. Multivariable regression analysis was completed for both ARCH and CRCH compared to non-CH, adjusting for chronologic age, smoking status, and male sex. While both ARCH and CRCH demonstrated EpiAgeAccel via Horvath(5.8years p=0.0001, 3.4 years p=0.051), Hannum(5years p=0.001, 4.5 years p=0.007), and PhenoAge (6.7years p=0.002, 7.6 years p=0.002) clocks, CRCH more than doubled DunedinPACE (0.2 bioyear/chronoyear, p<0.001) of aging compared to ARCH (0.08 bioyear/chronoyear, p=0.026). CRCH also demonstrated double the decrease in telomere length (0.34kb, p<0.001) compared to ARCH (0.17kb, p=0.015). Conclusion: Our prospective CH cohort study validates the association between CH and EpiAgeAccel using several different methylation clocks and for the first time, highlights increased pace of aging and shorter telomere lengths in CRCH versus ARCH. Correlations with cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes are ongoing.

Introduction Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients can lead to impaired tolerance to immunosuppressive therapy, increased risk for complications, and potentially compromise graft and patient outcomes. The impact of mutational profile in CH on risk for hematological transformation and patient/graft outcomes for kidney transplant (KT) recipients is largely unknown. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of CH and progression of CH in KT, evaluate the impact of CH on allograft function, assess patient outcomes and determine Clonal Hematopoietic Risk Score status. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the CH profile of patients 18+ years of age who received a kidney transplant at Mayo Clinic Enterprise between 01/01/1994-12-31/2022 and underwent bone marrow biopsy with aspirate pre- and/or post-transplant. Bone marrow biopsies were primarily performed post-transplant in the workup for cytopenias. Transplant database was used to collect our variables of interest including post-transplant malignancy and outcomes. CH was ascertained through next-generation sequencing (NGS) on bone marrow samples. A 47-gene panel was utilized in our study. CH was defined by presence of somatic mutation with a variant allele frequency of > 2.0%. CH in absence of cytopenias was classified as CHIP while CH in individuals with one or more cytopenias was classified as clonal cytopenias of undetermined significant (CCUS). The Clonal Hematopoiesis Risk Score (CHRS) was utilized for CHIP and CCUS risk stratification We excluded the patients who had a prior hematologic malignancy. Results 305 kidney transplant recipients met our study criteria. The median time to follow up, defined as time from transplant until first bone marrow biopsy with evidence of CH, was 46.1 months. The frequency of CH in kidney recipients was 27/305 (9.0%), of these 14/27 (52%) patients were found to have CCUS and 10/27 (37%) were found to have evidence of post-transplant myeloid malignancy. Of these cases, 5/10 (50%) developed acute myeloid leukemia while 5/10 (50%) developed myelodysplastic syndrome. Both CCUS and myeloid neoplasms were more common in female patients, accounting for 8/14 (57%) and 7/13 (54%) of each cohort, respectively. Amongst CCUS, the most frequent mutations were seen in ASXL1, DNMT3A and TET2. More than half of patients with CH, 14/27 (52%), exhibited mutations in 2 or more genes. Meanwhile, in cases of myeloid malignancy, the commonly mutated genes were ASXL1 and TP53, seen in 3/10 and 3/10 cases, respectively. The CCUS risk status was intermediate, with median score of 11.8 (range 9.5-14). One CCUS patient transformed to myelodysplastic syndrome. The time to progression from CCUS to myelodysplastic syndrome was 14.3 months and their respective CHRS status was determined to be high-risk. Infectious complications, including viral and opportunistic infections, were seen in 12/27 (44%) recipients with CH, with CMV viremia being the most common, followed by BK viremia. In this cohort, post-transplant cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolic events occurred in 2/27 (7.0%) and 7/27 (26%) patients, respectively. Allograft failure was seen in 17/27 (63%) recipients at a median of 93.4 months post-transplant. After a median of 122 months, there were 14/27 (52%) deaths at a median duration of 93.4 months post-transplant. Causes of mortality included myeloid malignancy, infection, cardiovascular complications, end-stage renal disease or were unknown. Conclusions Renal transplant recipients carry mutations in epigenetic regulators resulting in adverse outcomes. Similar to the general population, DNMT3A, TET2 and ASXL1 mutations were the most common mutations in post-transplant CCUS. Infections, cardiovascular events, and allograft failure were frequent. Prospective studies in a larger cohort are needed to evaluate the impact of CCUS in survival and myeloid malignancy transformation risk.