Britton, Jeffrey W.

Purpose: Neuroinvasive West Nile virus (WNV) is rare, occurring in less than 1% of those infected, and may manifest as meningitis, encephalitis, and/or acute flaccid paralysis. Patients may present initially with nonspecific symptoms including fevers. Although rare, neuroinvasive WNV is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The mainstay of treatment is supportive care. Electroencephalography (EEG) allows for identification of nonconvulsive status epilepticus and other epileptiform and nonepileptiform patterns suggestive of underlying cognitive dysfunction. Our aim was to describe specific EEG patterns observed in WNV neuroinvasive disease. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted. West Nile virus was confirmed with serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid markers. Patients with a history of abnormal EEG were excluded. Electroencephalography reports were classified into categories based on the presence of epileptiform activity, focal slowing, generalized periodic discharges with triphasic morphology, and frontally predominant generalized rhythmic delta activity. Results: In our cohort of 34 patients, 60% of focal EEG abnormalities were anterior-predominant, seen as epileptiform discharges, focal slowing, or frontally predominant generalized rhythmic delta activity. Nonepileptiform EEG patterns included nonspecific slowing and generalized periodic discharges with triphasic morphology. Two patients had electrographic seizures, one arising from the frontocentral head region. Conclusions: EEGs are important in the evaluation of WNV infection to rule out seizures or alternative causes of encephalopathy, and because of the risk of nonconvulsive seizures or status epilepticus in encephalitis. Although an anterior predominance of EEG abnormalities was seen in our cohort, this most likely is more correlative to encephalopathy than WNV itself. Although a specific correlative EEG pattern may not accompany all cases of WNV neuroinvasive disease, WNV should be considered as a possible etiology in patients presenting with an encephalitic or meningitic syndrome in the presence of abnormal EEG findings including encephalopathic patterns, particularly those with anterior predominant EEG changes.

SummaryObjectiveWe aimed to determine the frequency of probable obstructive sleep apnea (pOSA) in refractory epilepsy monitoring unit inpatients and clinical features associated with pOSA, including risk for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).MethodsWe prospectively recruited 49 consecutive adult patients admitted to the Mayo Clinic Epilepsy Monitoring Unit with focal, generalized, or unclassified epilepsy syndromes. pOSA was identified using oximetric oxyhemoglobin desaturation index (ODI) and the Sleep Apnea–Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (SA‐SDQ) and STOP‐BAG screening tools. Revised SUDEP Risk Inventory (rSUDEP‐7) scores were calculated, and epilepsy patients with and without pOSA were compared with Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests. Correlation and regression analyses were utilized to determine relationships between pOSA and rSUDEP‐7 scores.ResultsThirty‐five percent of patients had pOSA, with a mean ODI of 11.3 ± 5.1/h (range = 5.1‐22.8). Patients with pOSA were older and heavier, and more frequently had a focal epilepsy syndrome and longer epilepsy duration, with higher SA‐SDQ and STOP‐BAG scores (all P < 0.05). Median rSUDEP‐7 score was 3 ± 1.4 (range = 0‐6). Higher rSUDEP‐7 scores were positively correlated with higher ODI (P = 0.036). rSUDEP‐7 score ≥ 5 was associated with pOSA by ODI, SA‐SDQ, and STOP‐BAG questionnaire criteria (P < 0.05).SignificanceOur pilot study identified a high frequency of pOSA in refractory epilepsy monitoring patients, finding that pOSA patients were older and heavier, with higher screening symptoms for sleep apnea and more frequent focal seizures with a longer epilepsy duration. We also found a possible association between OSA and SUDEP risk. Identification and treatment of OSA in patients with epilepsy could conceivably provide a novel approach toward preventing the risk of SUDEP. Future studies with polysomnography are needed to confirm predictive features for OSA in epilepsy populations, and to determine whether OSA is associated with SUDEP risk.

SummaryDespite phenobarbital (PB) being a key component in status epilepticus (SE) treatment algorithms for decades, it has fallen out of favor compared to newer nonsedating medications due to potential for respiratory suppression and prolonged sedation. We retrospectively analyzed all nonintubated patients with refractory SE treated with parenteral PB. Forty patients were identified as having received PB in the neurologic intensive care unit at Mayo Clinic over a 7‐year period through our pharmacy dispensing database. Patients who received PB for maintenance therapy, those replenishing subtherapeutic levels, those who were already intubated, and those receiving PB for a non‐SE indication were excluded. Clinical data, prior treatments, therapeutic response, and outcome were reviewed. Eight patients were identified. Ages ranged from 24 to 77 years (median = 64 years); all had focal SE, and none was comatose. Seizure activity improved acutely following PB administration in seven and stopped in six. Dosages ranged from 5 to 19.8 mg/kg (median = 10.1 mg/kg); none required intubation, and one received supplemental oxygen. Patients received a median of four antiepileptic drugs prior to PB. Median interval between first drug and PB was 23.5 hours. Glasgow Coma Scale score did not change following PB administration. One patient required intervention for hypotension. Moderate‐dose parenteral PB was effective in attaining seizure control in a significant proportion of noncomatose refractory SE patients. None required ventilatory support. PB dosages below those in recent guidelines may be sufficient to stop SE without clinically significant cardiopulmonary complications.

SummaryObjectiveTo characterize seizure semiology and the utility of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in leucine‐rich glioma inactivated‐1 ( LGI1‐Ab) autoimmune epilepsy (AE).MethodsPatients with voltage‐gated potassium channel complex (VGKCc) titers higher than 0.02 nmol/L who were evaluated between May 2008 and June 2016 at the 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, or Minnesota) were identified. We then performed a retrospective review of those who were LGI1‐Ab positive and were treated for seizures.ResultsA total of 1,095 patients with VGKCc titers higher than 0.02 nmol/L were identified, in which 77 were LGI1 positive. Of these, 56 patients with seizures were included in the analysis. Mean age at symptom onset was 62.9 years; 66% (n = 37) were male. The most common seizure semiology was focal faciobrachial dystonic seizures with preserved awareness (FBDS) (n = 35, 63%), followed by focal with impaired awareness (FIA) (n = 29, 52%), generalized tonic–clonic (GTCs) (n = 28, 50%), and focal non‐motor seizures with preserved awareness (n = 28, 50%). The majority had more than one seizure type (n = 49, 88%; median = 2.5). Thirty‐eight patients (68%) became seizure free: 29 (76%) with immunotherapy, 3 (5%) with AEDs alone, 2 (3%) with AEDs before any immunotherapy, and 4 (7%) with AEDs after immunotherapy. Levetiracetam (n = 47, 84%) and valproic acid (n = 21, 38%) were the most commonly used AEDs, but neither were associated with seizure freedom. Sodium channel blocking (NCB) AEDs were associated with seizure freedom in 4 patients compared to none treated with non‐NCB AEDs. Regardless of class, AEDs prior to or apart from immunotherapy were associated with seizure freedom in only five patients (9%). In patients with FBDS, seizure freedom was more often associated with immunotherapy than AEDs (20/30 vs. 3/34, p = 0.001).SignificanceAlthough FBDS are the most characteristic seizure type seen in LGI1‐Ab AE, other seizure types including FIA and GTCs also occur. Immunotherapy was the treatment most frequently associated with seizure freedom in LGI1‐Ab AE. In general, AEDs seemed to confer a very low chance for seizure freedom, although AEDs with NCB‐blocking properties were associated with seizure freedom in a limited number. Levetiracetam in particular appears to be ineffective in this patient population.

Summary:The practice of stereo-EEG (SEEG) is expanding. Electrical stimulation mapping remains an important part of the surgical evaluation process in SEEG, as it is in subdural electrocorticography cases. Because the technique and electrodes used in SEEG and electrocorticography are distinct, the clinician needs to be aware of the important differences between these techniques when performing electrical stimulation mapping. In this review, the advantages, disadvantages, and potential safety concerns related to electrical stimulation mapping in SEEG are discussed. A case is presented illustrating the utility of SEEG cortical stimulation and safety concerns that need to be considered when performing these evaluations.

OBJECTIVEEpilepsy surgery is effective for lesional epilepsy, but it can be associated with significant morbidity when seizures originate from eloquent cortex that is resected. Here, the objective was to describe chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation and evaluate its early surgical safety profile in adult patients with epilepsy originating from seizure foci in cortex that is not amenable to resection.METHODSAdult patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy underwent intracranial electroencephalography monitoring for evaluation of resection. Those with seizure foci in eloquent cortex were not candidates for resection and were offered a short therapeutic trial of continuous subthreshold cortical stimulation via intracranial monitoring electrodes. After a successful trial, electrodes were explanted and permanent stimulation hardware was implanted.RESULTSTen patients (6 males) who underwent chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation between 2014 and 2016 were included. Based on radiographic imaging, intracranial pathologies included cortical dysplasia (n = 3), encephalomalacia (n = 3), cortical tubers (n = 1), Rasmussen encephalitis (n = 1), and linear migrational anomaly (n = 1). The duration of intracranial monitoring ranged from 3 to 20 days. All patients experienced an uneventful postoperative course and were discharged home with a median length of stay of 10 days. No postoperative surgical complications developed (median follow-up length 7.7 months). Seizure severity and seizure frequency improved in all patients.CONCLUSIONSThe authors’ institutional experience with this small group shows that chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation can be safely and effectively performed in appropriately selected patients without postoperative complications. Future investigation will provide further insight to recently published results regarding mechanism and efficacy of this novel and promising intervention.

Objective To describe an expanded phenotypic spectrum and longitudinal outcome in 256 LGI1‐IgG–seropositive and/or CASPR2‐IgG–seropositive patients. Methods Patients were identified through service neural autoantibody evaluation. Ninety‐five had longitudinal follow‐up (7–456 months; median = 35). Results Among 3,910 patients tested, 196 were LGI1‐IgG positive, 51 were CASPR2‐IgG positive, and 9 were dual positive. Cerebrospinal fluid testing was less sensitive than serum testing, detecting only 24 of 38 (63%) LGI1‐IgG–positive and 5 of 6 (83%) CASPR2‐IgG–positive patients. LGI1‐IgG–positive specimens had higher voltage‐gated potassium channel–IgG immunoprecipitation values (0.33nmol/l, range = 0.02–5.14) than CASPR2‐IgG–positive specimens (0.10nmol/l, range = 0.00–0.45, p < 0.001). Of patients presenting with pain or peripheral nervous system (PNS) manifestations, 39% were LGI1‐IgG seropositive (7% had solely neuropathy or pain). Multivariate analysis identified age as the only significant predictor of central nervous system (CNS) versus PNS involvement (>50 years; odds ratio = 15, p < 0.001). Paroxysmal dizziness spells (PDS), a unique LGI1‐IgG accompaniment (14% of patients), frequently delayed the diagnosis. T2‐mesiotemporal hyperintensity was more common in LGI1‐IgG–positive (41%) than in CASPR2‐IgG–positive patients ( p = 0.033). T1‐bright basal ganglia were confined to LGI1‐IgG–positive patients with faciobrachial–dystonic seizures (9 of 39, 31%). Cancer was found in 44% of LGI1‐IgG/CASPR2‐IgG dual seropositive patients (one‐third thymoma). Response to initial immunotherapy was favorable in 97%; mean modified Rankin score was 3 (range = 1–5) at onset and 1.74 (range = 0–6) at last follow‐up, with 9% having severe refractory disability, 20% being asymptomatic, 28% receiving immunotherapy, and 58% receiving antiepileptic medication. Interpretation Older age is a strong predictor of CNS involvement in patients seropositive for CASPR2‐IgG or LGI1‐IgG. Pain, peripheral manifestations, and stereotypic paroxysmal dizziness spells are common with LGI1‐IgG. Response to initial immunotherapy is often favorable, but some patients remain severely disabled, requiring long‐term immunotherapy and/or antiepileptic medications. Ann Neurol 2017;82:79–92