Citations 15

Preface: promoting research in PLS: current knowledge and future challenges

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration | February 20, 2021 | Volume: 21 | Issue: sup1 | Pages: 1-2

10.1080/21678421.2020.1840795 | PMID 33602018

Effect of Ezogabine on Cortical and Spinal Motor Neuron Excitability in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

JAMA Neurology | November 23, 2020 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 186

10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.4300 | PMID 33226425

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Dose-Ranging Trial Of Reldesemtiv In Patients With ALS

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration | September 24, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 3-4 | Pages: 287-299

10.1080/21678421.2020.1822410 | PMID 32969758

Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) functional rating scale: PLS‐specific clinimetric scale

Muscle & Nerve | November 23, 2019 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 163-172

10.1002/mus.26765 | PMID 31758557

AbstractIntroductionOur research aim was to develop a novel clinimetric scale sensitive enough to detect disease progression in primary lateral sclerosis (PLS).MethodsA prototype of the PLS Functional Rating Scale (PLSFRS) was generated. Seventy‐seven participants with PLS were enrolled and evaluated at 21 sites that comprised the PLSFRS study group. Participants were assessed using the PLSFRS, Neuro‐Quality of Life (QoL), Schwab‐England Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and the Clinical Global Impression of Change scales. Participants completed telephone assessments at 12, 24, and 48 weeks after enrollment.ResultsThe PLSFRS demonstrated internal consistency as well as intrarater, interrater, telephone test‐retest reliability, and construct validity. Significant changes in disease progression were detected at 6 and 12 months; changes measured by the PLSFRS vs the ALSFRS‐R were significantly higher.DiscussionThe PLSFRS is a valid tool to assess the natural history of PLS in a shorter study period.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis–specific quality of life–short form (ALSSQOL‐SF): A brief, reliable, and valid version of the ALSSQOL‐R

Muscle & Nerve | July 20, 2018 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 646-654

10.1002/mus.26203 | PMID 30028537

ABSTRACT Introduction: The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)‐Specific Quality of Life instrument and its revised version (ALSSQOL and ALSSQOL‐R) have strong psychometric properties, and have demonstrated research and clinical utility. In this study we aimed to develop a short form (ALSSQOL‐SF) suitable for limited clinic time and patient stamina. Methods: The ALSSQOL‐SF was created using Item Response Theory and confirmatory factor analysis on 389 patients. A cross‐validation sample of 162 patients assessed convergent, divergent, and construct validity of the ALSSQOL‐SF compared with psychosocial and physical functioning measures. Results: The ALSSQOL‐SF consisted of 20 items. Compared with the ALSSQOL‐R, optimal precision was retained, and completion time was reduced from 15–25 minutes to 2–4 minutes. Psychometric properties for the ALSSQOL‐SF and its subscales were strong. Discussion: The ALSSQOL‐SF is a disease‐specific global QOL instrument that has a short administration time suitable for clinical use, and can provide clinically useful, valid information about persons with ALS. Muscle Nerve 58: 646–654, 2018