Soroka, Jacek T.

Introduction Hospital readmissions in the US place a considerable burden on patients and their caregivers. Our study will investigate whether spiritual intervention during a patient’s hospital stay contributes to lower rates of readmissions 30 days after hospital discharge. Methods Two hundred patients receiving palliative care will be randomized into control (n = 100) and intervention groups (n = 100). The control group will receive a standard spiritual support visit, while the intervention group will receive a spiritual intervention consisting of active listening, compassionate presence, assessment of post-discharge resources, and a supportive phone call 5 to 7 days after discharge. The primary outcome will be hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge. Board-certified chaplains will be allowed to use their individual skillsets but within the standardized ACA spiritual care model. Training chaplains to assess patients in the same way will help with this discrepancy as the same form will be used. Discussion We hypothesize that patients who receive spiritual intervention with a supportive phone call will experience fewer hospital readmissions. Spiritual intervention will instill.confidence in those patients at risk of readmission by assuring them that the hospital staff remain concerned about their well-being even after discharge.

Background Approximately 20% of hospice patients in the US are discharged alive, often due to Medicare regulations. Such discharges are frequently perceived by caregivers as abandonment or expulsion, especially when they occur without follow-up or planning for care transition. Methods This study explored caregiver experiences with live hospice discharge through 2 narrative interviews and institutional data from a Midwest medical center (January 2020 through December 2022). Caregiver stories were analyzed thematically to identify emotional and logistical challenges. Retrospective patient data were also reviewed to provide descriptive statistics on patient volume. Results Of 1556 hospice patients discharged, 107 (6.9%) were discharged alive, with a mean length of stay of 205 days—substantially longer than that for the general hospice population. Most patients were women who were diagnosed with cerebrovascular or neurologic conditions and discharged from skilled-care facilities. One of the caregivers described discharge as distressing and poorly coordinated; the other reported a positive experience shaped by prior knowledge and financial resources. Both emphasized the importance of clear communication, care planning (eg, to avoid loss of durable medical equipment), and interdisciplinary support. The caregiver’s financial stability likely influenced discharge decisions and preparedness. Conclusions Live hospice discharge can cause emotional and practical disruption, especially when not accompanied by a care transition plan or access to durable medical equipment. This study highlights the need for team-based communication, sensitivity in language, and continued support. Engaging all members of the interdisciplinary team and ensuring access to essential resources may improve caregiver confidence and continuity of care.

Objectives: Little is known about the experiences of caregivers who provide care to persons with terminal delirium (TD) in home settings. This scarcity of information is suggestive that further research is needed about care for hospice patients with delirium in the home and community. Aim: To elicit views, feelings, and end-of-life care experiences of primary caregivers assisting dying persons with TD in hospice at home. Design: Qualitative, exploratory, cross-sectional study design was chosen. In-depth semistructured interviews explored caregiver experiences in caring for persons with TD. Qualitative thematic framework analysis was used. Participants: Fifteen bereaved adult primary caregivers who received services from a hospice care program affiliated with a large nonprofit health system in the US Midwest. Results: Caregiver experiences were broad and reflected 4 major themes: symptomology, coping, effective and noneffective interventions, and support. The most distressing factors for caregivers were behaviors and symptomology of TD. They did not know what to say, how to respond, and how best to behave with someone who had delirium. Many caregivers had the impression that medication does not lessen delirium symptoms and that nonpharmacologic interventions are effective and beneficial only when they were important and meaningful to patients before delirium onset. Conclusions: This study added new knowledge from direct and personal perspectives of caregivers providing end-of-life care to patients at home. Understanding developed about provision of care to someone with TD in home hospice. Improved comprehension of caregiver experiences can help professional hospice and palliative care staff better prepare caregivers for when patients have TD.

Objectives: Although the experiences of family members who care for relatives at the end of life have been researched extensively, little is known about the needs and experiences of families caring for hospice patients with pacemakers. Aim: To better understand the experiences of family caregivers of a terminally ill patient who received hospice care at home and chose deactivation of a pacemaker. Design: The exploratory, cross-sectional design involved semistructured, in-depth interviews. A narrative analysis focusing on form and content was chosen to analyze the data. Participants: Five bereaved caregivers from the Midwestern United States who provided care and participated in the deactivation of their family member’s pacemaker. Results: Four storylines that described, gave meaning to, and contextualized the caregivers’ experiences were identified: “I am done. I am not doing it anymore”; “Whatever you decide, I’ll support you”; “It is really difficult to watch, but you want to be there”; and “I will not have part of this.” Caregivers struggled with lack of support, understanding, and acceptance from medical providers when their family member decided to have her pacemaker deactivated, and they believed that the hospice model of care was appropriate to support and help them in that process. Conclusions: This research aids in understanding the ramifications of family-provided end-of-life care to a patient whose pacemaker has been deactivated. This can help to increase hospice clinicians’ knowledge regarding caregivers’ experiences facing deactivation of a pacemaker, before and after the patient’s death.

Abstract Background: Research shows that religion and spirituality are important when persons cope with serious and life-threatening illness. Patients who receive good spiritual care report greater quality of life and better coping, and such support is strongly associated with greater well-being, hope, optimism, and reduction of despair at end of life. Despite these benefits, evidence shows that many patients and caregivers (P/C) refuse spiritual care when a hospice team offers it, possibly resulting in unnecessary suffering. Objective: To better understand what contributes to spiritual support acceptance in hospice care. Design: Quasi-experimental quantitative study. Setting/Subjects: 200 patients admitted to hospice. Measurements: Participants were divided equally into intervention and control arms. Control participants received standard information about the availability of chaplain support and an offer for referral to chaplain services. Intervention participants received educational intervention that explained hospice chaplain services and the evidence-based benefits of spiritual support. The association of chaplain acceptance was measured with treatment group, patient age, disease, church affiliation and support, sex, bereavement risk, and place of residence. Results: Among intervention participants, 64 (64%) accepted spiritual support versus 52 (52%) of control participants. The intervention arm's acceptance rate was higher than the control arm after adjustment for other variables. The variables associated with acceptance were age, primary diagnosis, and place of residence. Conclusions: This research suggests that educational intervention that explains spiritual care in hospice and its benefits contributes importantly to greater acceptance and allows P/C to gain the benefits of spiritual support during end-of-life care.

Objectives: Although the experiences of family caregivers have received attention, little research has specifically explored caregivers’ confidence. Evidence shows that caregivers of hospice patients do not feel confident or prepared to care for relatives or friends who die at home. Aim: We aimed to elicit the views, feelings, and experiences of primary caregivers who provide unpaid care to dying family members in the home setting to better understand what contributes to their confidence during end-of-life care. Design: The exploratory, cross-sectional design involved semistructured, in-depth interviews. A narrative analysis that focused on form and content was chosen to analyze the data. Participants: Sixteen bereaved caregivers (14 individuals and 1 brother/sister dyad) from the midwestern United States who received support from 1 hospice participated in the study. Results: Four storylines running longitudinally through the interviews were identified as shaping, giving meaning to, and contextualizing caregivers’ confidence: values/relationships, stories of terminal illness, needs, and support. Caregivers’ confidence is shaped by the terminal illness of the person for whom they care and caregivers’ values and relationships. It is also influenced by their needs and the sources and strength of support they receive. Conclusions: This research developed understanding about family provision of end-of-life care at home. Better comprehension of caregivers’ experiences can help professional hospice and palliative care staff to understand what aids caregivers to be more confident.