Gunter, Jeffrey L.

AbstractBackgroundSeveral programs are available for automatically “de‐facing” brain images. These are designed to prevent the potential use of face imagery to re‐identify research participants. Previous works have compared available software and mri_reface is frequently among the top methods. The “Minimally Invasive DeFacing of MRI images” (MiDeFace) program was more recently added to FreeSurfer, but minimal validation of MiDeFace has been published.MethodWe ran mri_reface 0.3.3 and MiDeFace 7.3.2 on two datasets: A) 207 participants with face photographs and 3D T1‐weighted and 3D T2‐weighted‐FLAIR MRI from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (all unimpaired, Siemens); and B) 300 participants from ADNI3 with 3D T1‐weighted MRI (50 unimpaired + 50 with clinical AD, from each of 3 vendors). For dataset A, we tested the rate at which Microsoft Azure face recognition matched each participant’s photographs with the correct MRI, comparing unmodified images, those from mri_reface, and those from MiDeFace. For dataset B, we compared measured regional brain volume and cortical thickness from original vs. de‐faced images with SPM12, FreeSurfer 7.4.1, and the FSL‐UK Biobank pipeline. For both datasets, images were visually rated to assess removal of the face and retention of brain tissue.ResultAutomated face recognition match rates were lower with mri_reface (17/207 8.2%) than with MiDeFace (24/207 11.6%), indicating stronger identity protection with mri_reface, but both were greatly reduced vs. unmodified images (203/207 98.1%). Example images with both programs are shown in Figure 1. From visual ratings (Table 1), rates of complete success (modification of the entire face while retaining the entire brain) were much higher with mri_reface, but the great majority of failures from MiDeFace were subtle and occurred in relatively less recognizable face regions. The effects of both programs on downstream imaging measurements (Figure 2) were small and very comparable, but MiDeFace was favored mildly for SPM12 and for FSL, while mri_reface was more favored for FreeSurfer.ConclusionAltogether, mri_reface more reliably removed the complete face, leading to smaller rates of potential re‐identification (8.2% vs 11.6%). Effects on downstream image measurements were small and comparable with both methods.

AbstractBackgroundThe Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) is a longitudinal, population‐based study of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA. MCSA is releasing de‐identified clinical and imaging data on GAAIN.org to benefit the research community.MethodWe included longitudinal clinical data from all participants of the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging 30‐90 years of age (average 70.0y) through the first 15 years of the study. Clinical data includes age, sex, self‐reported race/ethnicity, APoE4 allele status, cognitive impairment status (normal, MCI, dementia, or other), height, weight, blood pressure, multi‐domain neuropsychological scores, neuroimaging summary measurements, medications, cardiovascular risk factors, social activity, sleep, mood/anxiety, functional measures, and more. For our initial release of imaging data, we selected the first imaging timepoint acquired on 3T GE MRI scanners and amyloid (PiB) PET during the same visit, from all available imaging participants 50‐90 years of age (average 70.7y). Currently, we included 3D T1‐weighted (MPRAGE) MRI (1x1x1.2mm3), T2‐weighted FLAIR MRI (0.85x0.85x3.6mm3), diffusion MRI (2.7mm resolution with 41 directions at b=1000 and 5 b=0), and numeric cortical global SUVR and Centiloid values from PiB PET scans at 40‐60 minutes post‐injection. All images are released in DICOM format and thoroughly de‐identified using CTP while ensuring preservation of necessary fields for analyses. T1‐weighted and T2‐FLAIR MRI were also de‐faced (identifiable face imagery was removed and replaced with an average) using mri_reface version 0.3.3 to further protect participants’ privacy, and all de‐faced images were visually inspected by a trained data scientist for quality assurance.ResultThe first phase of our public data release includes clinical data from 5925 unique participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA), each ranging from 1‐12 visits at roughly 15‐month intervals, and three MRI sequences (T1‐w, T2‐w‐FLAIR, and diffusion) from 1802 unique participants. Demographic summaries are given in Table 1.ConclusionThis large, richly characterized, de‐identified clinical and imaging dataset is available to the research community at https://www.gaaindata.org/partner/MCSA, and it is suitable for a wide range of research uses. Additional data will be released over time, including de‐faced amyloid PET images.

AbstractBackgroundPhase four of the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI4) began in 2023. This time‐period corresponded to MRI vendors introducing product sequences with compressed sensing (CS), cross‐vendor adoption of arterial spin‐labelling (ASL) and multi‐band slice excitation, and hardware improvements (head‐coils, increased gradient amplitudes). These advances enabled the acquisition of new imaging measures and reduced scan times. The ADNI4 MRI protocol aims to maintain longitudinal consistency across two decades of data acquisition, while adopting new technologies. Here we describe the design and justification behind the ADNI4 protocol and list the target imaging biomarkers.MethodsThe ADNI4 MRI protocol includes 9 MRI sequences; i) T1‐weighted (T1w) MP‐RAGE, ii) a compressed sensing T1w MP‐RAGE, iii) 3D T2w FLAIR, iv) structural isotropic 3D T2w v) T2*‐weighted susceptibility imaging vi) multi‐post labelling delay (PLD) 3D ASL, vii) 2D multi‐band‐multiple‐shell diffusion (dMRI), viii) 2D multi‐band EPI BOLD ix) high resolution, limited field of view, imaging centered on the hippocampus. Table 1 gives a detailed summary of the key protocol parameters and lists some of the imaging biomarkers that can be obtained from each series.ResultsStructural imaging was kept consistent across imaging sites. Variations in vendor specific sequences, software upgrades, and hardware performance capabilities, resulted in variations in advanced imaging strategies. Table 2 highlights the advanced sequences introduced in ADNI4, which will gradually be implemented as the required upgrades and licenses are obtained at each site. The main advanced sequences that are new in ADNI4 from ADNI 3 are i) CS for T1w images, ii) pseudo‐continuous‐ASL (pCASL) being implemented on all 3 vendors (GE, Siemens, Philips), iii) multi‐PLD ASL, which allows for the generation of quantitative maps of cerebral blood‐flow (CBF) and arterial transit times (ATTs), iv) and isotropic 1mm3 resolution for 3D FLAIR. When ADNI4 began, product sequences that utilized artificial intelligence were not widely available and could not be adequately tested before the rollout of ADNI4.ConclusionsThe ADNI4 database will continue to help the neuroimaging community, not only extract valuable imaging biomarkers, but provide the data necessary to test the impact of advanced imaging strategies on diagnostic accuracy and disease sensitivity.

ABSTRACT Background and Purpose In idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow is typically evaluated with a cardiac‐gated two‐dimensional (2D) phase‐contrast (PC) MRI through the cerebral aqueduct. This approach is limited by the evaluation of a single location and does not account for respiration effects on flow. In this study, we quantified the cardiac and respiratory contributions to CSF movement at multiple intracranial locations using a real‐time 2D PC‐MRI and evaluated the diagnostic value of CSF dynamics biomarkers in classifying iNPH patients. Methods This study included 37 participants: 16 iNPH, 10 Alzheimer's disease (AD), and 11 cognitively unimpaired (CU) controls. Anatomical and real‐time (non‐gated) PC images were acquired in a 3T Philips scanner. CSF flow was assessed at the foramen magnum, fourth ventricle, Sylvian fissure, lateral ventricle, and cerebral aqueduct. We calculated three CSF dynamics biomarkers: mean velocity amplitude, cardiac signal power, and respiratory signal power. Biomarkers from each location were evaluated for classifying iNPH versus AD and CU using support vector machine (SVM). A p ‐value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant. Results The velocity amplitude and cardiac signal power were significantly reduced in iNPH compared to CU ( p < 0.005) and AD ( p < 0.05) at the lateral ventricle. The SVM model using biomarkers from the lateral ventricle performed significantly better at classifying iNPH than the other locations in terms of accuracy ( p < 0.005) and diagnostic odds ratio ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Evaluation of CSF movement beyond the cerebral aqueduct may aid in identifying patients with and understanding the pathophysiology of iNPH.

Abstract The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Core has been operating since Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative's (ADNI) inception, providing 20 years of data including reliable, multi‐platform standardized protocols, carefully curated image data, and quantitative measures provided by expert investigators. The overarching purposes of the MRI Core include: (1) optimizing and standardizing MRI acquisition methods, which have been adopted by many multicenter studies and trials worldwide and (2) providing curated images and numeric summary values from relevant MRI sequences/contrasts to the scientific community. Over time, ADNI MRI has become increasingly complex. To remain technically current, the ADNI MRI protocol has changed substantially over the past two decades. The ADNI 4 protocol contains nine different imaging types (e.g., three dimensional [3D] T1‐weighted and fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR]). Our view is that the ADNI MRI data are a greatly underutilized resource. The purpose of this paper is to educate the scientific community on ADNI MRI methods and content to promote greater awareness, accessibility, and use. Highlights The MRI Core provides multi‐platform standardized protocols, carefully curated image data, and quantitative analysis by expert groups. The ADNI MRI protocol has undergone major changes over the past two decades to remain technically current. As of April 25, 2024, the following numbers of image series are available: 17,141 3D T1w; 6877 FLAIR; 3140 T2/PD; 6623 GRE; 3237 dMRI; 2846 ASL; 2968 TF‐fMRI; and 2861 HighResHippo (see Table 1 for abbreviations). As of April 25, 2024, the following numbers of quantitative analyses are available: FreeSurfer 10,997; BSI 6120; tensor based morphometry (TBM) and TBM‐SYN 12,019; WMH 9944; dMRI 1913; ASL 925; TF‐fMRI NFQ 2992; and medial temporal subregion volumes 2726 (see Table 4 for abbreviations). ADNI MRI is an underutilized resource that could be more useful to the research community.

Abstract There is increasing interest in Alzheimer’s disease related plasma biomarkers due to their accessibility and scalability. We hypothesized that integrating plasma biomarkers with other commonly used and available participant data (MRI, cardiovascular factors, lifestyle, genetics) using machine learning (ML) models can improve individual prediction of cognitive outcomes. Further, our goal was to evaluate the heterogeneity of these predictors across different age strata. This longitudinal study included 1185 participants from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who had complete plasma analyte work-up at baseline. We used the Quanterix Simoa immunoassay to measure neurofilament light, Aβ1–42 and Aβ1–40 (used as Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio), glial fibrillary acidic protein, and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181). Participants’ brain health was evaluated through gray and white matter structural MRIs. The study also considered cardiovascular factors (hyperlipidemia, hypertension, stroke, diabetes, chronic kidney disease), lifestyle factors (area deprivation index, body mass index, cognitive and physical activities), and genetic factors (APOE, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and polygenic risk scores). An ML model was developed to predict cognitive outcomes at baseline and decline (slope). Three models were created: a base model with groups of risk factors as predictors, an enhanced model included socio-demographics, and a final enhanced model by incorporating plasma and socio-demographics into the base models. Models were explained for three age strata: younger than 65 years, 65–80 years, and older than 80 years, and further divided based on amyloid positivity status. Regardless of amyloid status the plasma biomarkers showed comparable performance (R² = 0.15) to MRI (R² = 0.18) and cardiovascular measures (R² = 0.10) when predicting cognitive decline. Inclusion of cardiovascular or MRI measures with plasma in the presence of socio-demographic improved cognitive decline prediction (R² = 0.26 and 0.27). For amyloid positive individuals Aβ42/Aβ40, glial fibrillary acidic protein and p-tau181 were the top predictors of cognitive decline while Aβ42/Aβ40 was prominent for amyloid negative participants across all age groups. Socio-demographics explained a large portion of the variance in the amyloid negative individuals while the plasma biomarkers predominantly explained the variance in amyloid positive individuals (21% to 37% from the younger to the older age group). Plasma biomarkers performed similarly to MRI and cardiovascular measures when predicting cognitive outcomes and combining them with either measure resulted in better performance. Top predictors were heterogeneous between cross-sectional and longitudinal cognition models, across age groups, and amyloid status. Multimodal approaches will enhance the usefulness of plasma biomarkers through careful considerations of a study population’s socio-demographics, brain and cardiovascular health.

AbstractPhase four of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI4) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols aim to maintain longitudinal consistency across two decades of data acquisition, while adopting new technologies. Here we describe and justify the study's design and targeted biomarkers. The ADNI4 MRI protocol includes nine MRI sequences. Some sequences require the latest hardware and software system upgrades and are continuously rolled out as they become available at each site. The main sequence additions/changes in ADNI4 are: (1) compressed sensing (CS) T1‐weighting, (2) pseudo‐continuous arterial spin labeling (ASL) on all three vendors (GE, Siemens, Philips), (3) multiple‐post‐labeling‐delay ASL, (4) 1 mm3 isotropic 3D fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery, and (5) CS 3D T2‐weighted. ADNI4 aims to help the neuroimaging community extract valuable imaging biomarkers and provide a database to test the impact of advanced imaging strategies on diagnostic accuracy and disease sensitivity among individuals lying on the cognitively normal to impaired spectrum.Highlights A summary of MRI protocols for phase four of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI 4). The design and justification for the ADNI 4 MRI protocols. Compressed sensing and multi‐band advances have been applied to improve scan time. ADNI4 protocols aim to streamline safety screening and therapy monitoring. The ADNI4 database will be a valuable test bed for academic research.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONPatients with dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) may have Alzheimers disease (AD) pathology that can be detected by plasma biomarkers. Our objective was to evaluate plasma biomarkers of AD and their association with positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers of amyloid and tau deposition in the continuum of DLB, starting from prodromal stages of the disease.METHODSThe cohort included patients with isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD), mild cognitive impairment with Lewy bodies (MCI‐LB), or DLB, with a concurrent blood draw and PET scans.RESULTSAbnormal levels of plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were found at the prodromal stage of MCI‐LB in association with increased amyloid PET. Abnormal levels of plasma phosphorylated tau (p‐tau)‐181 and neurofilament light (NfL) were found at the DLB stage. Plasma p‐tau‐181 showed the highest accuracy in detecting abnormal amyloid and tau PET in patients with DLB.DISCUSSIONThe range of AD co‐pathology can be detected with plasma biomarkers in the DLB continuum, particularly with plasma p‐tau‐181 and GFAP.

Abstract Disruption of the default mode network is a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease, which has not been extensively examined in atypical phenotypes. We investigated cross-sectional and 1-year longitudinal changes in default mode network sub-systems in the visual and language variants of Alzheimer’s disease, in relation to age and tau. Sixty-one amyloid-positive Alzheimer’s disease participants diagnosed with posterior cortical atrophy (n = 33) or logopenic progressive aphasia (n = 28) underwent structural MRI, resting-state functional MRI and [18F]flortaucipir PET. One-hundred and twenty-two amyloid-negative cognitively unimpaired individuals and 60 amyloid-positive individuals diagnosed with amnestic Alzheimer’s disease were included as controls and as a comparison group, respectively, and had structural and resting-state functional MRI. Forty-one atypical Alzheimer’s disease participants, 26 amnestic Alzheimer’s disease participants and 40 cognitively unimpaired individuals had one follow-up functional MRI ∼1–2 years after the baseline scan. Default mode network connectivity was calculated using the dual regression method for posterior, ventral, anterior ventral and anterior dorsal sub-systems derived from independent component analysis. A global measure of default mode network connectivity, the network failure quotient, was also calculated. Linear mixed-effects models and voxel-based analyses were computed for each connectivity measure. Both atypical and amnestic Alzheimer’s disease participants had lower cross-sectional posterior and ventral and higher anterior dorsal connectivity and network failure quotient relative to cognitively unimpaired individuals. Age had opposite effects on connectivity in Alzheimer’s disease participants and cognitively unimpaired individuals. While connectivity declined with age in cognitively unimpaired individuals, younger Alzheimer’s disease participants had lower connectivity than the older ones, particularly in the ventral default mode network. Greater baseline tau-PET uptake was associated with lower ventral and anterior ventral default mode network connectivity in atypical Alzheimer’s disease. Connectivity in the ventral default mode network declined over time in atypical Alzheimer’s disease, particularly in older participants, with lower tau burden. Voxel-based analyses validated the findings of higher anterior dorsal default mode network connectivity, lower posterior and ventral default mode network connectivity and decline in ventral default mode network connectivity over time in atypical Alzheimer’s disease. Visuospatial symptoms were associated with default mode network connectivity disruption. In summary, default mode connectivity disruption was similar between atypical and amnestic Alzheimer’s disease variants, and discriminated Alzheimer’s disease from cognitively unimpaired individuals, with decreased posterior and increased anterior connectivity and with disruption more pronounced in younger participants. The ventral default mode network declined over time in atypical Alzheimer’s disease, suggesting a shift in default mode network connectivity likely related to tau pathology.

AbstractBackgroundDecreased image self‐similarity of repeated FDG‐PET scans has been suggested to indicate increased risk for disease progression. Here, we compared several self‐similarity measures based on conventionally used voxel‐ and ROI‐based approaches and those based on patterns of cortical metabolism.MethodFrom the MCSA/ADRC, we included 376 cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals and those with a clinical diagnosis of MCI (n = 55) or AD (n = 20) who had two FDG‐PET images within 2‐3 years and clinical follow‐up available. We compared image self‐similarity for three approaches: voxel, ROI and “eigenbrain” (Fig.1). For the voxel approach, FDG‐PET images were normalized to template space, grey matter masked, and intensity normalized to the pons to create standard uptake value ratios (SUVR) for each voxel. From these images, mean SUVR were extracted for 122 ROIs (MCALT‐ADIR122) for the ROI approach. For the “eigenbrain” approach, the SUVR images were transformed to a latent space embedding composed of 253 components (“eigenbrains”) and reflecting metabolism patterns, that was generated in an independent sample of 7008 FDG‐PET images. For each approach, image self‐similarity between baseline and follow‐up values (voxel, ROI or eigenbrain) was determined using three metrics (Pearson correlation, cosine, Euclidean distance). We computed AUC to determine which approach and metric would best discriminate between groups. We used Cox regression analyses to assess whether the metrics could predict disease progression.ResultComparing each distance metric across approaches, AUC was highest in differentiating clinical diagnoses using self‐similarity measures based on eigenbrains, then voxels, then ROIs (e.g., Euclidean distance CU vs AD AUC eigenbrain: 0.86, voxel: 0.75, ROI: 0.71; Fig.1). Across all approaches, Euclidean distance always discriminated best between classes. Eigenbrain‐based Euclidean distance was associated with risk for progression to MCI in CU (HR [95%CI]: 1.25 [1.05, 1.49]), and eigenbrain‐based cosine and Euclidean distances were associated with risk for progression to AD in MCI (1.61 [1.1, 2.34] and 1.53 [1.01, 2.31], respectively), while we found no associations for voxel‐ or ROI‐based distance measures.ConclusionEigenbrain‐based measures outperformed other, more conventional approaches in discriminating clinical diagnoses, and were associated with risk for disease progression. Our results suggest that decreased self‐similarity in metabolism patterns informs on disease stage and prognosis.