Patlolla, Sri Harsha

Background There are limited data on the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction–cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) in patients with concomitant cancer. Methods A retrospective cohort of adult AMI-CS admissions was identified from the National Inpatient Sample (2000–2017) and stratified by active cancer, historical cancer, and no cancer. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography, use of percutaneous coronary intervention, do-not-resuscitate status, palliative care use, hospitalization costs, and hospital length of stay. Results Of the 557,974 AMI-CS admissions during this 18-year period, active and historical cancers were noted in 14,826 (2.6%) and 27,073 (4.8%), respectively. From 2000 to 2017, there was a decline in active cancers (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.63–0.79]; P < .001) and an increase in historical cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.89–2.25]; P < .001). Compared with patients with no cancer, patients with active and historical cancer received less-frequent coronary angiography (57%, 67%, and 70%, respectively) and percutaneous coronary intervention (40%, 47%, and 49%%, respectively) and had higher do-not-resuscitate status (13%, 15%, 7%%, respectively) and palliative care use (12%, 10%, 6%%, respectively) (P < .001). Compared with those without cancer, higher in-hospital mortality was found in admissions with active cancer (45.9% vs 37.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.24–1.34]; P < .001) but not historical cancer (40.1% vs 37.0%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.98–1.04]; P = .39). AMI-CS admissions with cancer had a shorter hospitalization duration and lower costs (all P < .001). Conclusion Concomitant cancer was associated with less use of guideline-directed procedures. Active, but not historical, cancer was associated with higher mortality in patients with AMI-CS.

Background: There is limited contemporary data exploring the impact of hospital characteristics on the outcomes of AMI-CA patients. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample database (2000-2017), to identify adult admissions with a primary diagnosis of AMI and concomitant CA. Inter-hospital transfers were excluded and hospitals were classified based on location and teaching status (rural, urban nonteaching and urban-teaching), and bed size (small, medium and large) as specified by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Results: Among 494,083 AMI-CA admissions, 9.3% received care at rural hospitals, 43.4% at urban non-teaching hospitals, and 47.3% at urban teaching hospitals. Compared to urban non-teaching and teaching hospitals, AMI-CA admissions at rural hospitals received lower rates of coronary angiography (36.5% vs 57.7% vs 69.1%), PCI (28.1% vs 42.6% vs 52.1%), CABG (3.4%, 7.6% vs. 10.1%), MCS (10.1% vs 17.8% vs 22.6%), and invasive mechanical ventilation (42.9%, 49.7% vs. 48.7%) (all p <0.001). Admissions to urban teaching hospitals had higher rates of acute organ failure, concomitant cardiogenic shock and higher rates of cardiac and non-cardiac procedures. When hospitals were stratified by bed-size, 9.8% of AMI-CA admissions were admitted to small hospitals, 26.0% to medium-sized, and 64.2% to large hospitals. Compared to medium and large hospitals, AMI-CA admissions at small hospitals had lower rates of coronary angiography (48.9% vs 56.8% vs 64.7%), PCI (37.5% vs 42.5% vs 48.4%), CABG (5.3%, 6.8% vs. 9.5%), MCS (14.3% vs 17.3% vs 21%), and invasive mechanical ventilation (48.3%, 50.1% vs. 48%) (all p <0.001). In-hospital mortality was higher in urban non-teaching (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.17 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.14-1.20]; p<0.001) and urban teaching hospitals (aOR 1.36 [95% CI 1.32-1.39]; p<0.001) compared to rural hospitals. Compared to small hospitals, medium (aOR 1.11 [95% CI 1.08-1.14]; p<0.001) and large hospitals (aOR 1.22 [95% CI 1.19-1.25]; p<0.001) were associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: AMI-CA admissions to large and urban hospitals had higher in-hospital mortality compared to small and rural hospitals potentially due to greater acuity.

Introduction: Regional variation in the uptake of newer techniques, procedures, and management strategies have been previously reported with acute cardiac care. Limited contemporary information exists on regional differences in the care of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with cardiac arrest (CA). Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (2000-2017), we identified adults with AMI and concomitant CA admitted to the United States census regions of Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Clinical outcomes of interest including in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mechanical circulatory support (MCS), hospitalization costs, and length of stay were compared across these four regions. Results: Of 9,680,257 admissions for AMI, 494,083 (5.1%) had concomitant CA. The prevalence of CA in AMI was highest in the West (6.0%) compared to the Northeast (4.4%), Midwest (5.0%), and South (5.1%), p<0.001. Admissions in the West had higher rates of STEMI presentation, cardiogenic shock, multiorgan failure, mechanical ventilation, and hemodialysis. Northeast AMI-CA admissions had lower use of coronary angiography (52.0% vs. 67.9% vs. 60.9% vs. 61.5%), PCI (38.7% vs. 51.9% vs. 44.8% vs. 46.7%), and MCS (18.4% vs. 21.8% vs. 18.1%, vs. 20.0%) compared to the Midwest, West and South (all p<0.001). Compared with the Northeast, adjusted in-hospital mortality for AMI-CA was higher in the Midwest (odds ratio [OR] 1.06 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.03-1.08]; p<0.001), South (OR 1.11 [95% CI 1.09-1.13]; p<0.001), and highest in the West (OR 1.16 [95% CI 1.13-1.18]; p<0.001). Temporal trends showed a decline in in-hospital mortality except in the West, which showed a slight increase. Compared to other regions, AMI-CA admissions from the Northeast had longer in-hospital stays and less frequent palliative care consultations (all p<0.001). Admissions in the West had higher rates of palliative care consultations, DNR status, and highest hospitalization costs. Conclusions: We identified significant regional disparities in the management and outcomes of AMI-CA. Efforts to improve and provide uniform care for AMI-CA across regions may be essential.

Background: There are limited data on uninsured patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). This study sought to compare the management and outcomes of AMI-CS between uninsured and privately insured individuals. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (2000–2016), a retrospective cohort of adult (≥18 years) uninsured admissions (primary payer—self-pay or no charge) were compared with privately insured individuals. Interhospital transfers were excluded. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, temporal trends in admissions, use of cardiac procedures, do-not-resuscitate status, palliative care referrals, and resource utilization. Results: Of 402 182 AMI-CS admissions, 21 966 (5.4%) and 93 814 (23.3%) were uninsured and privately insured. Compared with private insured individuals, uninsured admissions were younger, male, from a lower socioeconomic status, had lower comorbidity, higher rates of acute organ failure, ST-segment elevation AMI-CS (77.3% versus 76.4%), and concomitant cardiac arrest (33.8% versus 31.9%; all P <0.001). Compared with 2000, in 2016, there were more uninsured (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.13–1.17]; P <0.001) and less privately insured admissions (adjusted odds ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.83–0.87]; P <0.001). Uninsured individuals received less frequent coronary angiography (79.5% versus 81.0%), percutaneous coronary intervention (60.8% versus 62.2%), mechanical circulatory support (54% versus 55.5%), and had higher palliative care (3.8% versus 3.2%) and do-not-resuscitate status use (4.4% versus 3.2%; all P <0.001). Uninsured admissions had higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.55–1.68]; P <0.001) and resource utilization. Conclusions: Uninsured individuals have higher in-hospital mortality and lower use of guideline-directed therapies in AMI-CS compared with privately insured individuals.

OBJECTIVES: Mixed cardiogenic-septic shock is common and associated with high mortality. There are limited contemporary data on concomitant sepsis in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Twenty percent stratified sample of all community hospitals (2000–2014) in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (> 18 yr) with AMI-CS with and without concomitant sepsis. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcomes of interest included inhospital mortality, development of noncardiac organ failure, complications, utilization of guideline-directed procedures, length of stay, and hospitalization costs. Over 15 years, 444,253 AMI-CS admissions were identified, of which 27,057 (6%) included sepsis. The sepsis cohort had more comorbidities and had higher rates of noncardiac multiple organ failure (92% vs 69%) (all p < 0.001). In 2014, compared with 2000, the prevalence of sepsis increased from 0.5% versus 11.5% with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 11.71 (95% CI, 9.7–14.0) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and 24.6 (CI, 16.4–36.7) (all p < 0.001) in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The sepsis cohort received fewer cardiac interventions (coronary angiography [65% vs 68%], percutaneous coronary intervention [43% vs 48%]) and had greater use of mechanical circulatory support (48% vs 45%) and noncardiac support (invasive mechanical ventilation [65% vs 41%] and acute hemodialysis [12% vs 3%]) (p < 0.001). The sepsis cohort had higher inhospital mortality (44.3% vs 38.1%; aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.18–1.25; p < 0.001), longer length of stay (14.0 d [7–24 d] vs 7.0 d [3–12 d]), greater hospitalization costs (×1,000 U.S. dollars) ($176.0 [$85–$331] vs $77.0 [$36–$147]), fewer discharges to home (22% vs 44%) and more discharges to skilled nursing facilities (51% vs 28%) (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In AMI-CS, concomitant sepsis is associated with higher mortality and morbidity highlighting the need for early recognition and integrated management of mixed shock.

Summary Background There are limited data on the influence of seasons on the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction-cardiac arrest (AMI-CA). Aim To evaluate the outcomes of AMI-CA by seasons in the United States Design Retrospective cohort study Methods Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2000 to 2017, adult (&gt;18 years) admissions with AMI-CA were identified. Seasons were defined by the month of admission as spring, summer, fall and winter. The outcomes of interest were prevalence of AMI-CA, in-hospital mortality, use of coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), hospital length of stay, hospitalization costs and discharge disposition. Results Of the 10 880 856 AMI admissions, 546 334 (5.0%) were complicated by CA, with a higher prevalence in fall and winter (5.1% each) compared to summer (5.0%) and spring (4.9%). Baseline characteristics of AMI-CA admissions admitted in various seasons were largely similar. Compared to AMI-CA admissions in spring, summer and fall, AMI-CA admissions in winter had slightly lower rates of coronary angiography (63.3–64.3% vs. 61.4%) and PCI (47.2–48.4% vs. 45.6%). Compared to those admitted in the spring, adjusted in-hospital mortality was higher for winter {46.8% vs. 44.2%; odds ratio (OR) 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–1.10]; P &lt; 0.001}, lower for summer [43% vs. 44.2%; OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.95–0.98); P &lt; 0.001] and comparable for fall [44.4% vs. 44.2%; OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.99–1.03); P = 0.31] AMI-CA admissions. Length of hospital stay, total hospitalization charges and discharge dispositions for AMI-CA admissions were comparable across the seasons. Conclusions AMI-CA admissions in the winter were associated with lower rates of coronary angiography and PCI, and higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared to the other seasons.

Background and Objectives: Contemporary data on the prevalence, management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in relation to body mass index (BMI) are limited. Materials and Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample from 2008 through 2017, we identified adult AMI hospitalizations and categorized them into underweight (BMI < 19.9 kg/m2), normal BMI and overweight/obese (BMI > 24.9 kg/m2) groups. We evaluated in-hospital mortality, utilization of cardiac procedures and resource utilization among these groups. Results: Among 6,089,979 admissions for AMI, 38,070 (0.6%) were underweight, 5,094,721 (83.7%) had normal BMI, and 957,188 (15.7%) were overweight or obese. Over the study period, an increase in the prevalence of AMI was observed in underweight and overweight/obese admissions. Underweight AMI admissions were, on average, older, with higher comorbidity, whereas overweight/obese admissions were younger and had lower comorbidity. In comparison to the normal BMI and overweight/obese categories, significantly lower use of coronary angiography (62.3% vs. 74.6% vs. 37.9%) and PCI (40.8% vs. 47.7% vs. 19.6%) was observed in underweight admissions (all p < 0.001). The underweight category was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (10.0% vs. 5.5%; OR 1.23 (95% CI 1.18–1.27), p < 0.001), whereas being overweight/obese was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared to normal BMI admissions (3.1% vs. 5.5%; OR 0.73 (95% CI 0.72–0.74), p < 0.001). Underweight AMI admissions had longer lengths of in-hospital stay with frequent discharges to skilled nursing facilities, while overweight/obese admissions had higher hospitalization costs. Conclusions: In-hospital management and outcomes of AMI vary by BMI. Underweight status was associated with worse outcomes, whereas the obesity paradox was apparent, with better outcomes for overweight/obese admissions.

Background The role of race and ethnicity in the outcomes of cardiac arrest (CA) complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is incompletely understood. Methods and Results This was a retrospective cohort study of adult admissions with AMI‐CA from the National Inpatient Sample (2012–2017). Self‐reported race/ethnicity was classified as White, Black, and others (Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander, Native American, Other). Outcomes of interest included in‐hospital mortality, coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, palliative care consultation, do‐not‐resuscitate status use, hospitalization costs, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition. Of the 3.5 million admissions with AMI, CA was noted in 182 750 (5.2%), with White, Black, and other races/ethnicities constituting 74.8%, 10.7%, and 14.5%, respectively. Black patients admitted with AMI‐CA were more likely to be female, with more comorbidities, higher rates of non–ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction, and higher neurological and renal failure. Admissions of patients of Black and other races/ethnicities underwent coronary angiography (61.9% versus 70.2% versus 73.1%) and percutaneous coronary intervention (44.6% versus 53.0% versus 58.1%) less frequently compared to patients of white race ( p <0.001). Admissions of patients with AMI‐CA had significantly higher unadjusted mortality (47.4% and 47.4%) as compared with White patients admitted (40.9%). In adjusted analyses, Black race was associated with lower in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91–0.99; P =0.007) whereas other races had higher in‐hospital mortality (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.08–1.15; P <0.001) compared with White race. Admissions of Black patients with AMI‐CA had longer length of hospital stay, higher rates of palliative care consultation, less frequent do‐not‐resuscitate status use, and fewer discharges to home (all P <0.001). Conclusions Racial and ethnic minorities received less frequent guideline‐directed procedures and had higher in‐hospital mortality and worse outcomes in AMI‐CA.