Cochuyt, Jordan J.

Abstract Background Venous stenosis is a well-recognized complication of transvenous leads when patients require lead revisions or device upgrade. In these cases, balloon venoplasty or alternative venous access with subcutaneous tunneling can be performed. Purpose Compare the outcomes of venoplasty vs. tunneling in patients requiring additional transvenous lead implantation. Methods A single center retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing lead implantation/revision requiring venoplasty or tunneling from 2005–2017. Chi-squared and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables. Results Ninety five patients met our inclusion criteria (60 venoplasty & 35 tunneling). There was no difference in procedure success rates (p-value=0.98). Tunneling was associated with less fluoroscopy time but higher incidence of acute complications (0% vs. 23%, p-value=0.002) most requiring invasive intervention and/or blood product transfusion. Long term outcomes were comparable and related to lead failure or infection. Outcomes for tunneling vs. venoplasty Variable Tunneling (n=35) Venoplasty (n=60) p-value Age Y 67 (23–84) 70 (29–91) 0.25 Male (%) 24 (69%) 41 (68%) 0.98 Number of existing leads 2.1 (1–4) 2.4 (0–4) 0.1 Age of oldest lead 7.0 (0–21) 7.2 (0–33) 0.73 Number of new leads 1.2 (1–3) 1.4 (1–3) 0.26 Fluoroscopy time (SD) min 29.2 (21.3) 39.7 (21.5) 0.012 Procedure success (%) 35 (100%) 55 (92%) 0.9 Acute complications (%) 8 (23%)1 0 (0%) 0.0002 Pocket hematoma/bleed 4 (11%)2 Hemothorax 2 (6%)3 Pericarditis 1 (3%) Lead compromise 1 (3%) Follow up M 18 (0–76) 28 (0–98) N/A Long term lead issues (%) 6 (17%) 10 (17%) 0.95 Long term complication requiring intervention 4 (11%) 8 (13%) N/A Procedure success: functional lead placed as a result of venoplasty or tunneling. 1Two patients required blood products. 2Two patients required invasive intervention. 3One patient required chest tube and the other ICU admission. Conclusions Balloon venoplasty is associated with similar rates of success and a less incidence of acute complications when compared subcutaneous tunneling. Acknowledgement/Funding NIH T32 Training Grant HL07111-40

e15063 Background: Bone metastasis from colorectal cancer is a relatively rare phenomenon. The aim of this study is to identify the risk factors and survival patterns of bone metastasis after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Methods: A total of 23,846 colorectal cancer patients who were diagnosed between 1972 and 2017 at Mayo Clinic were included in the analysis. Freedom from bone metastasis since diagnosis at 5, 10, 15, 25 and 35-years were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess the differences in overall survival rate for patients with different cancer sides and cancer locations. All tests were two-sided with alpha level set at 0.05. Results: A total of 798 (3.3%) patients had a diagnosis of bone metastasis after colorectal cancer diagnosis over a median follow up of 3.2 years. Thirty-five year freedom from bone metastasis was 83% (95%CI: 80%-86%) for all patients, and were 87.13%, 82.29% and 77.26% for left colon, right colon and rectal cancer patients. Male gender, recent surgical years, and higher cancer stage were associated with higher risk of developing bone metastasis after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Rectal cancer patients had higher hazard of developing bone metastases compared to left and right colon cancer patients. Conclusions: We were able to identify several patient and tumor-related factors associated with the development of bone metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. The proportion and factors identified are similar to other studies. Future directions would be to analyze other molecular determinants within this subset of patients.[Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Laparoscopy and more recently robotics are increasingly used for colorectal cancer surgery in the United States. We examined the current trends of minimally invasive surgical resections for colorectal cancer in Florida. Methods: The Florida Inpatient Discharge Dataset was used to examine the clinical data of patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal cancer during 2013–2015. Multivariate analyses were performed to compare patient characteristics associated with the use of open and minimally invasive surgeries. Results: A total of 10,513 patients were analyzed; 5451 (52%) had open surgery, 4403 (42%) laparoscopy, and 659 (6%) robotic surgery. The rates of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) increased from 46.95% in 2013 to 48.72% in 2015. Among minimally invasive surgical procedures, the use of robotics increased from 9.82% in 2013 to 15.48% in 2015. Metastatic cancer (odds ratio [OR] 0.61, confidence interval [CI] 0.55–0.67), Elixhauser score of 3–5 (OR 0.85, CI 0.76–0.95) or more than 5 (OR 0.78, CI 0.63–0.97), Medicaid insurance (OR 0.73, CI 0.6–0.89), Black race (OR 0.88, CI 0.77–0.99), and rural residence (OR 0.83, CI 0.69–0.99) were associated with lower odds of MIS than open surgery. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the overall rates of MIS for colorectal cancer in Florida increased from 2013 to 2015. Socially deprived and very sick patient populations with colorectal cancer are less likely to undergo MIS.

Background Despite a continued focus on improved cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality, survival remains low from in-hospital cardiac arrest. Advanced Resuscitation Training has been shown to improve survival to hospital discharge and survival with good neurological outcome following in-hospital cardiac arrest at its home institution. We sought to determine if Advanced Resuscitation Training implementation would improve patient outcomes and cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality at our institution. Methods This was a prospective, before–after study of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest victims who had cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed. During phase 1, standard institution cardiopulmonary resuscitation training was provided. During phase 2, providers received the same quantity of training, but with emphasis on Advanced Resuscitation Training principles. Primary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge, and neurologically favorable survival. Secondary outcomes were cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality parameters. Results A total of 156 adult in-hospital cardiac arrests occurred during the study period. Rates of return of spontaneous circulation improved from 58.1 to 86.3% with an adjusted odds ratios of 5.31 (95% CI: 2.23–14.35, P < 0.001). Survival to discharge increased from 26.7 to 41.2%, adjusted odds ratios 2.17 (95% CI: 1.02–4.67, P < 0.05). Survival with a good neurological outcome increased from 24.8 to 35.3%, but was not statistically significant. Target chest compression rate increased from 30.4% of patients in P1 to 65.6% in P2, adjusted odds ratios 4.27 (95% CI: 1.72–11.12, P = 0.002), and target depth increased from 23.2% in P1 to 46.9% in P2, adjusted odds ratios 2.92 (95% CI: 1.16–7.54, P = 0.024). Conclusions After Advanced Resuscitation Training implementation, there were significant improvements in cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and rates of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to discharge.

Background. Individuals after solid organ transplant may develop secondary malignancies. In our clinical practice, we noted an increasing number of individuals who developed colorectal cancers after solid organ transplantation. The primary aim of this study was to describe the characteristics and outcomes of the patients who developed colorectal cancer after solid organ transplant. Materials and Methods. Data was gathered and merged from several registries at Mayo Clinic to identify all patients who received a diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer and solid organ transplant. Continuous variables were summarized as mean (standard deviation) and median (range), while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). Time to colorectal cancer after transplant and overall survival after cancer diagnosis were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Results. Initially, 115 colorectal cancer patients who also had a transplant were identified. The diagnosis of colorectal cancer was noted after solid organ transplant in 63 patients. The mean age at transplant was 57 years. Majority had received a kidney transplant (44.4%) followed by liver (36.5%). The median time to develop colorectal cancer was 59.3 months (range: 4.4-251.4 months). 15 (24.6%) were stage 4 at diagnosis and 13 (21.3%) had stage 3 colorectal cancer. Median overall survival was 30.8 months; 5-, 10- and 15-year survival were noted to be 42.5%, 17.9%, and 7.5%, respectively. None of the stage 4 patients were alive at 5 years; 5-year survival rate for stage 1, 2, and 3 patients was 77%, 50%, and 42%, respectively. Conclusions. Our study reports on one of the largest cohorts of patients of colorectal cancer that developed the cancer after solid organ transplant. Survival is extremely poor for advanced cases. However, long-term survivors are noted who developed the cancer at a relatively early stage. Colorectal screening recommendations may need to be revised for patients after solid organ transplant.