Munoz, Freddy Del‐Carpio

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that can impair quality of life and increase cardiovascular mortality. Previous studies have shown potentially better outcomes with rate-control agents in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Yet, optimal treatment of AF is not yet known. Methods: Leveraging data from the AFFIRM trial, we performed a post-hoc analysis examining outcome differences in patients on rate vs. rhythm-control agents, based on CAD status. The primary outcome was defined as death from any cause; secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke, major bleeding, and hospitalization after baseline. Univariate and multivariate modeling were used to determine risk factors associated with designated outcomes. Results: Of 4060 patients enrolled, 1551 patients had CAD at baseline. There were no differences in treatment randomization based on CAD status; however, more patients with CAD had worse heart function and comorbid CHF. More patients with CAD ultimately used some form of rate-control compared to those without. Overall, CAD patients were more likely to experience death (HR 2.08 [1.79-2.42], P<0.001), specifically those on rhythm-control (HR 1.24 [1.01-1.52], P=0.04, Figure). CAD patients were also more likely to have ischemic stroke (HR 1.24 [1.00-1.53], P=0.05). When comparing CVD vs. non-CVD death, only CAD patients on rhythm-control exhibited a significantly higher rate of CVD death (HR 1.39 [1.03-1.89], P=0.03), while no differences in primary outcomes were noted for all other groups (P>0.05, Figure). In multivariate modeling, the effect of treatment arm on risk of CVD death in CAD patients diminished upon accounting for age, smoking, rhythm at randomization, first episode of AF, CHF, and LVEF<50% (HR 1.18 [0.93-1.50], P=0.17). Conclusions: AF patients with CAD on rhythm-control agents exhibited worse CVD outcomes, which may be more reflective of heart disease severity rather than treatment effects.

Abstract Background/Introduction Arrhythmogenic mitral valve prolapse syndrome (AMVPS) is a female-predominant sudden cardiac death (SCD)-predisposing disorder characterized clinically by myxomatous mitral valve prolapse (MVP), inferolateral T-wave inversions and complex ventricular ectopy. However, insights into the pathogenesis and potential genetic basis of AMVPS are currently lacking. Purpose Considering recent case reports that suggest a potential role for genetic cardiomyopathies in the pathogenesis of AMVPS, we sought to determine the yield of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) genetic variants in strong evidence cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes amongst AMVPS patients who underwent clinical genetic testing. Methods In this retrospective study, the medical records of 4,907 patients referred to our cardiovascular genetics clinic was used to identify those patients with a clinical phenotype consistent with AMVPS. After exclusion of individuals with severe mitral valve regurgitation, pertinent clinical, electrocardiographic, imaging and genetic testing data was extracted from the electronic record. For those AMVPS that underwent a form of genetic testing that encompassed 23 Clinical Genome Resource-defined strong/definitive evidence cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes, ultra-rare (minor allele frequency ≤ 0.00005 in the Genome Aggregation Database [n=141,456 individuals]) non-synonymous variants identified within these genes were adjudicated independently as P, LP or variant of uncertain significance with the assistance of Varsome. The frequency of P/LP variants was then compared to a previously published cohort of 973 ostensibly healthy control exomes. Results Overall, 56 unrelated patients with suspected AMVPS were identified (82% female; average age at presentation of 31 ± 13 years; 32% with a family history of MVP and/or SCD). Of these, 24/56 (43%) underwent a form of clinical genetic testing that encompassed the pre-defined panel of cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes. In comparison to control exomes (n=973), P/LP variants in strong/definitive evidence cardiomyopathy-susceptibility genes were over-represented in AMVPS patients [4/24 (16.7%) vs 20/973 (2.1%); p=0.002]. Interestingly, this enrichment was driven in large part by an excess number of A-band-localizing P/LP truncating variants in TTN-encoded titin in AMVPS cases [3/24 (12.5%) versus 4/973 (0.4%); p=0.0004]. Conclusion This study provides further evidence that a subset of AMVPS may arise secondary to a "two-hit" model whereby an underlying cardiomyopathic genetic substrate is exacerbated by the mechanical force generated by genetically unrelated myxomatous MVP resulting in maladaptive and ventricular arrhythmia-predisposing fibrosis within the inferobasal left ventricle and posteromedial papillary muscles. Larger studies are needed to better understand the potential role of genetic testing in the diagnosis, risk-stratification and management of patients with suspected AMVPS.

The spiked-helmet sign (SHS) is an electrocardiographic finding characterised by a distinctive pattern associated with critical illness, resolving once the clinical condition improves. While the underlying mechanism remains uncertain, different mechanisms have been proposed to account for these findings including changes in intrathoracic or intra-abdominal pressures, transient compression of the coronary arteries, repolarisation abnormalities and electromechanical artefacts. We describe the development of the SHS in a patient with underlying left bundle branch pacing following the development of respiratory failure due to haemoptysis and review proposed mechanisms for its pathophysiology.

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). There is limited data regarding the outcomes of AF catheter ablation in HCM patients. In this study, we aimed to synthesize all available evidence on the effectiveness of ablation of AF in patients with HCM compared to those without HCM. Methods and results We systematically reviewed bibliographic databases to identify studies published through February 2023. We included cohort studies with available quantitative information on rates of recurrent atrial arrhythmias, anti-arrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy, and repeat ablation procedures after initial AF ablation in patients with vs without HCM. Estimates were combined using random-effects meta-analysis models and reported as risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eight studies were included in quantitative synthesis (262 HCM and 642 non-HCM patients). During median follow-up 13–54 months across studies, AF recurrence rates ranged from 13.3% to 92.9% in HCM and 7.6% to 58.8% in non-HCM patients. The pooled RR for recurrent atrial arrhythmia after the first AF ablation in HCM patients compared to non-HCM controls was 1.498 (95% CI = 1.305–1.720; P &lt; 0.001). During follow-up, HCM patients more often required AAD therapy (RR = 2.844; 95% CI = 1.713–4.856; P &lt; 0.001) and repeat AF ablation (RR = 1.544; 95% CI = 1.070–2.228; P = 0.02). The pooled RR for recurrent atrial arrhythmias after the last AF ablation was higher in patients with HCM than those without HCM (RR = 1.607; 95% CI = 1.235–2.090; P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions Compared to non-HCM patients, those with HCM had higher rates of recurrent atrial arrhythmias, AAD use, and need for repeat AF ablation after initial ablation of AF.

AbstractIntroductionData regarding ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation in patients with aortic valve (AV) intervention (AVI) is limited. Catheter ablation (CA) can be challenging given perivalvular substrate in the setting of prosthetic valves. We sought to investigate the characteristics, safety, and outcomes of CA in patients with prior AVI and ventricular arrhythmias (VA).MethodsWe identified consecutive patients with prior AVI (replacement or repair) who underwent CA for VT or PVC between 2013 and 2018. We investigated the mechanism of arrhythmia, ablation approach, perioperative complications, and outcomes.ResultsWe included 34 patients (88% men, mean age 64 ± 10.4 years, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 35.2 ± 15.0%) with prior AVI who underwent CA (22 VT; 12 PVC). LV access was obtained through trans‐septal approach in all patients except one patient who had percutaneous transapical access. One patient had combined retrograde aortic and trans‐septal approach. Scar‐related reentry was the dominant mechanism of induced VTs. Two patients had bundle branch reentry VTs. In the VT group, substrate mapping demonstrated heterogeneous scar that involved the peri‐AV area in 95%. Despite that, the site of successful ablation included the periaortic region only in 6 (27%) patients. In the PVC group, signal abnormalities consistent with scar in the periaortic area were noted in 4 (33%) patients. In 8 (67%) patients, the successful site of ablation was unrelated to the periaortic area. No procedure‐related complications occurred. The survival and recurrence‐free survival rate at 1 year tended to be lower in VT group than in PVC group (p = .06 and p = .05, respectively) with a 1‐year recurrence‐free survival rate of 52.8% and 91.7%, respectively. No arrhythmia‐related death was documented on long‐term follow‐up.ConclusionCA of VAs can be performed safely and effectively in patients with prior AVI.

Abstract Background The use of irreversible electroporation (IRE) for cardiac ablation in the management of cardiac arrhythmias, known as Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA), has gained the attention of many researchers, physicians and companies. Despite the demonstrated efficacy and safety profiles of the technique, there are still many open questions. One of them deals with the effective electric field thresholds necessary for cardiac tissue ablation. Contrary to radiofrequency (RF) ablation, where the thermotemporal thresholds for tissue damage are well established, the electric field thresholds for effective IRE are uncertain and depend on the tissue type and the waveform characteristics of the delivered electric field. Purpose The use of numerical models to understand the electric field distribution and the corresponding lesion for a specific electrode geometry are widely used in IRE for cancer treatment. Models can predict ablation volumes when the field thresholds are known or can be used to estimate the field thresholds when the lesion geometry is established post-treatment. The goal of the present study was to build a subject-specific realistic 3D numerical model to assess the ability of modeling to predict PFA lesions. Methods PFA experiments were performed in male mongrel dogs following a protocol approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Briefly, animals were sedated and intubated, and two non-irrigated deflectable catheters with an 8-mm tip were positioned on both sides of the interventricular septum under fluoroscopy guidance. Submicrosecond pulses were delivered in a bipolar fashion across both catheters. Sequences of pulses of 300 ns duration (or other durations in that range) were repetitively applied with voltage levels in the kV range. 30 days after the procedure, MRI with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were acquired to assess the presence of ablation lesions in the treated tissue. Ventricular areas were segmented from MRI images and 3D volumes were created. The generated 3D geometries were imported into software COMSOL Multiphysics. Realistic 3D geometries of the catheters were placed in the same positions than during the experiments, fluoroscopy videos recorded during the procedures were used as a guidance. The computed electric field intensity distributions were compared to the LGE areas to extract the range of electric field thresholds where the predicted lesion size was compatible with the real size of the LGE areas for each application site and pulsing protocol. Results and conclusions Our results show how the numerical model is able to reproduce the shape of the LGE fibrotic lesion areas observed 30 days after the procedure. Additionally, the model clearly confirms the dose-dependent lesion sizes observed experimentally. This study supports that numerical modeling is a valuable tool for understanding PFA treatments and that it could be used as patient-specific treatment planning tool. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie

Background: Previous animal studies have shown no significant vascular injury from pulsed electrical field (PEF) ablation. We sought to assess the effect of PEF on swine coronary arteries. Methods: We performed intracoronary and epicardial (near the coronary artery) PEF ablations in swine pretreated with dual antiplatelet and antiarrhythmic therapy. Intracoronary PEF was delivered using MapiT catheters (Biotronik, Berlin), whereas epicardial PEF was delivered using EPT catheters (Boston Scientific, MA). PEF pulse duration was microseconds (Nanoknife 3.0, Angio Dynamics, NY) or nanoseconds (CellFX, Pulse Biosciences, CA). Results: We performed 39 intracoronary ablations in 10 swine and 20 epicardial-pericoronary ablations in 4 separate swine. Intracoronary PEF was delivered at higher energy compared with epicardial PEF (46 [interquartile range, IQR 20–85] J versus 10 [IQR 10–11] J, P < 0.01). Reversible coronary spasm occurred in 49% intracoronary ablations and 45% epicardial ablations ( P =0.80). At the end study, fixed coronary stenosis was demonstrated in 44% intracoronary ablations (80% for microsecond PEF and 18% for nanosecond PEF) and 0% epicardial ablations. Visible hemorrhagic and/or fibrotic myocardial lesions were observed at necropsy with similar frequency between intracoronary and epicardial PEF (45% versus 50%, P =0.70). Nanosecond PEF (49 ablations in 11 swine), when compared with microsecond PEF (10 intracoronary ablations in 3 swine), resulted in lower energy delivery (21 [IQR 10–46] J versus 129 [IQR 24–143] J, P =0.03) and less incidence of fixed coronary stenosis (18% versus 80%, P =0.04). Conclusions: In the swine model, intracoronary PEF resulted both in significant coronary spasm and fixed coronary stenosis. Epicardial PEF, delivered at lower energy, resulted in reversible spasm but no fixed coronary stenosis.

Background: Mitral annular disjunction (MAD) has recently been recognized as an arrhythmogenic entity. Data on the electrophysiological substrate as well as the outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with MAD is limited. Methods: Forty patients with MAD (mean age 47±15 years; 70% female) underwent catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias. Detailed clinical, electrocardiographic, cardiac imaging, and procedural data were collected. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients who had substrate modification in the MAD area and those who did not. Results: Twenty-three (57.5%) patients had ablation for premature ventricular contractions, 10 (25%) patients for sustained ventricular tachycardia, and 7 (17.5%) patients for premature ventricular contraction-triggered ventricular fibrillation. Mean end-systolic MAD length was 10.58±3.49 mm on transthoracic echocardiography. Seventeen (42.5%) patients had preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and 5 (29%) patients had late gadolinium enhancement. Among the 18 (45%) patients who had abnormal local electrograms (low voltage, long-duration, fractionated, isolated mid-diastolic potentials) during electroanatomical mapping, 10 (25%) patients had abnormal electrograms in the anterolateral mitral annulus and/or MAD area. Substrate modification was performed in 10 (25%) patients. Catheter ablation was acutely successful in 36 (90%) patients (elimination of premature ventricular contraction or noninducibility of ventricular tachycardia). After a median follow-up duration of 54.08 (interquartile range, 10.67–89.79) months, premature ventricular contraction burden decreased from a median of 9.75% (interquartile range, 3.25–14) before the ablation to a median of 4% (interquartile range, 1–7.75) after the ablation ( P =0.03 [95% CI, 0.055–6.5]). Eight (20.5%) patients had repeat ablation for ventricular arrhythmias. Substrate modification of the MAD was associated with a trend toward lower rates of repeat ablation (0% versus 26.7%; P =0.16). Conclusions: Patients with MAD have a complex arrhythmogenic substrate, and catheter ablation is effective in reducing recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. Substrate mapping and ablation may be considered in these patients.