Forte, Antonio J.

Background Oculo-orbital disproportion in patients with craniosynostosis have similarities and dissimilarities between syndromic and nonsyndromic cases. We hypothesize these two conditions have specific individual influences as it relates to development of the orbital and periorbital skeletons. Method A total of 133 preoperative CT scans (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n=38; Apert syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n=33; Crouzon syndrome bicoronal synostosis subtype, n=10; controls, n=52) were included. Craniometric and volumetric analyses related to the orbit and periorbital anatomy were performed. Results The orbital cavity volume is mildly restricted in nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis (7%, p=0.147), but more so in Apert and Crouzon syndromes, 17% (p=0.002) and 21% (p=0.005), respectively. The sphenoid side angle in Apert syndrome is wider than when compared to Crouzon syndrome (p=0.043). The ethmoid side angle in Apert patients however is narrower (p=0.066) than that in Crouzon patients. Maxilla anteroposterior length is more restricted in Apert syndrome than Crouzon syndrome (21%, p=0.003) and nonsyndromic cases (26%, p<0.001). The posterior nasal spine position is retruded in Crouzon syndrome (39%, p<0.001), yet the anterior nasal spine position is similar in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Conclusion Orbit and periorbital malformation in syndromic craniosynostosis is likely the combined influence of syndromic influences and premature suture fusion. Apert syndrome expands the anteriorly contoured lateral orbital wall associated with bicoronal synostosis, while Crouzon syndrome has more infraorbital rim retrusion, resulting in more severe exorbitism. Apert syndrome develops maxillary hypoplasia, in addition to the maxillary retrusion, observed in Crouzon syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis patients.

Background: We propose a landmark-based, virtual coordinate system, specifically designed for assessment of asymmetrical craniofacial anatomy associated with unicoronal synostosis. Method: CT scans of 33 patients with nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis were included. Proposed mid-sagittal plane was compared with commonly used sagittal planes: (1) nasion, sella, and basion (N-S-BA); (2) midplane of bilateral frontozygomatic sutures (midFZ); and (3) the skull gravity center plane, to evaluate reliability and validity in the assessments of the anterior and posterior skull base. Results: The proposed midplane is similar to the midFZ plane in describing the direction of the anterior skull base. However, it has less bias than the N-S-BA (P < 0.001), and the gravity center planes (P < 0.001). The proposed midplane measures the direction of the posterior skull base plane, similar to the midFZ and gravity center planes, but it has less measurement deviation than the N-S-BA plane (P < 0.001). The most protrusive point on the frontal bone in unicoronal patients is contralateral to the fused suture and distant from the mid-sagittal plane by 13.93 ± 4.01 mm. In addition, it is more anteriorly positioned, by 5.32 mm (P < 0.001), when compared with the corresponding point on the synostotic side. The uppermost point of the supraorbital rim on the synostotic side is cephalic to that of the contralateral side by 4.09 mm (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Prioritized orientation of an averaged Frankfort horizontal plane, followed by the location of the mid-sagittal and coronal planes, can generate a reliable and valid coordinate framework for the assessment of asymmetric skull shape in unicoronal synostosis.

Purpose: Classic features of Saethre-Chotzen syndrome (SCS) described in the literature include a prominent nasal bridge, eyelid ptosis, telorbitism, maxillary hypoplasia, and mandibular prognathism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate objectively the bony features of SCS. Methods: Preoperative computer tomography scans of 15 SCS patients, 23 normal controls, 13 bicoronal nonsyndromic, and 7 unicoronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis patients were included for analysis. Unaffected controls and nonsyndromic patients were age- and sex-matched to SCS patients. Morphometric cephalometrics were analyzed using three-dimensional computer tomography reconstructions. Mann–Whitney U were used to compare facial measurements between SCS and normal and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis controls. Results: Telorbitism was present in bicoronal SCS patients only (P = 0.04) but absent in the unicoronal and bicoronal/metopic cohorts. The angle of the nasal bone relative to the sella was not different between SCS and controls (P = 0.536), although the angle of the nasal bone relative to the forehead was decreased in SCS by 15.5° (P < 0.001). Saethre-Chotzen syndrome had a 2.6° maxillary retrusion relative to controls (P = 0.03). In addition, SCS patients aged 4 to 7 months had a wider (39.34 versus 35.04, P = 0.017) and anteroposteriorly foreshortened (32.12 versus 35.06, P = 0.039) maxilla. There was no difference in mandibular prognathism among SCS patients as measured by the sella-nasion-B point angle compared to controls (P = 0.705). Conclusions: Despite classic descriptions, on morphometric analysis SCS patients did not demonstrate consistency across all suture subtypes in terms of telorbitism, a broad nasal bridge, or mandibular prognathism. Rather, SCS subtypes of SCS based on suture pathology more closely resemble nonsyndromic patients.

Background: Little is known about the detailed growth of the cranial fossae, even though they provide an important structural connection between the cranial vault and the facial skeleton. This study details the morphologic development of isolated cranial vault synostosis and associated syndromes on cranial fossa development. Methods: A total of 125 computed tomographic scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 36; Apert syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 24; Crouzon syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 11; and controls, n = 54). Three-dimensional analyses were produced using Materialise software. Results: The regional anterior and middle cranial fossae volumes of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis are characterized by significant increases of 43 percent (p < 0.001) and 60 percent (p < 0.001), respectively, and normal posterior cranial fossa volume. The cranial fossae depths of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis were increased, by 37, 42, and 21 percent (all p < 0.001) for anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae, respectively, accompanying the shortened cranial fossae lengths. The volume and morphology of all cranial fossae in Apert syndrome nearly paralleled nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. However, Crouzon syndrome had reduced depths of cranial fossae, and more restricted fossa volumes than both Apert syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. Conclusions: Cranial vault suture synostosis is likely to be more influential on cranial fossae development than other associated influences (genetic, morphologic) in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Isolated Apert syndrome pathogenesis is associated with an elongation of the anterior cranial fossa length in infants, whereas in Crouzon syndrome, there is a tendency to reduce cranial fossa depth, suggesting individual adaptability in cranial fossae development related to vault synostosis.

AbstractWearable electronic devices are a convenient solution to pain intensity assessment as they can provide continuous monitoring for more precise medication adjustments. However, there is little evidence regarding the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. Our primary objective was to examine the physiologic parameters used by wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We initially inquired PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase for studies evaluating the use of wearable electronic devices for chronic pain intensity assessment. We updated our inquiry by searching on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. English peer‐reviewed studies were included, with no exclusions based on time frame or publication status. Of 348 articles that were identified on the first inquiry, 8 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Of 179 articles that were identified on the last inquiry, only 1 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. We found articles evaluating wristbands, smartwatches, and belts. Parameters evaluated were psychomotor and sleep patterns, space and time mobility, heart rate variability, and skeletal muscle electrical activity. Most of the studies found significant positive associations between physiological parameters measured by wearable electronic devices and self‐reporting pain scales. Wearable electronic devices reliably reflect physiologic or biometric parameters, providing a physiological correlation for pain. Early stage investigation suggests that the degree of pain intensity can be discerned, which ideally will reduce the bias inherent to existing numeric/verbal scales. Further research on the use of these devices is vital.

Background Wearable devices and sensor technology provide objective, unbiased range of motion measurements that help health care professionals overcome the hindrances of protractor-based goniometry. This review aims to analyze the accuracy of existing wearable sensor technologies for hand range of motion measurement and identify the most accurate one. Methods We performed a systematic review by searching PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase for studies evaluating wearable sensor technology in hand range of motion assessment. Keywords used for the inquiry were related to wearable devices and hand goniometry. Results Of the 71 studies, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies evaluated gloves and 1 evaluated a wristband. The most common types of sensors used were bend sensors, followed by inertial sensors, Hall effect sensors, and magnetometers. Most studies compared wearable devices with manual goniometry, achieving optimal accuracy. Although most of the devices reached adequate levels of measurement error, accuracy evaluation in the reviewed studies might be subject to bias owing to the use of poorly reliable measurement techniques for comparison of the devices. Conclusion Gloves using inertial sensors were the most accurate. Future studies should use different comparison techniques, such as infrared camera–based goniometry or virtual motion tracking, to evaluate the performance of wearable devices.

Background: Financial key performance indicators are often used to evaluate performance. Understanding of key performance indicators can be crucial for career advancement and bargaining leverage in resource negotiations. This study aimed to identify the most important key performance indicators used in surgical funding requests and understand how to use these metrics in clinical practice. Methods: In two tertiary medical centers, funding requests for surgeon gap support (2019 to 2020) and equipment (2017 to 2019) within departments of surgery were reviewed. The requesting department, approval status, and amount allotted were recorded. In requests for gap support, projections for contribution margin, operating room volume, charges, collections, and relative value units were tracked. Projected contribution margin and cost savings were recorded for equipment funding requests. Results: There were 40 gap support and 24 equipment requests, and all were approved. Most gap support requests included collections (90.0 percent), charges (87.5 percent), operating room cases (80.0 percent), relative value units (77.5 percent), and hospital contribution margin (77.5 percent). The most represented departments were general surgery (37.5 percent), neurosurgery (22.5 percent), and plastic surgery (15.0 percent). The departments that submitted the most equipment requests were general surgery (28.0 percent) and neurosurgery (28.0 percent). Most requests included projections for contribution margin (95.8 percent) and cost savings (87.4 percent). Projected hospital contribution margin correlated with the amount of funds allotted for surgeon support (r = 0.409; p = 0.022). Conclusions: This multicenter study identified the importance of using key performance indicators for a successful financial outcome in funding requests. In addition, the authors demonstrate the need for surgeons to understand their own key performance indicators. Surgeons should advocate for increased transparency to better understand their financial contributions and performance.

Abstract In patients with breast hypertrophy, excessive breast weight applies pressure on the thorax, which may disrupt the normal breathing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the breast hypertrophy and reduction mammoplasty on respiratory function. A comprehensive search of 3 databases, PubMed, Ovid, and Scopus databases, was performed. “Mammoplasty” and “respiration or pulmonary function tests” were the keywords used to search for relevant articles. Ten studies involving 280 patients with breast hypertrophy were included in the final review. Seven articles demonstrated an increase in at least 1 pulmonary function test value after the surgery. This systematic review revealed that, preoperatively, pulmonary function test values of the patients are usually in the normal range. Nonetheless, reduction mammoplasty still improves lung function parameters. Additionally, patients with respiratory complaints felt improvement in their symptoms after the surgery. However, future studies are needed, as heterogeneity among studies was observed.