Feemster, John

Abstract Study Objectives Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) carries a high lifetime risk for phenoconversion to a defined neurodegenerative disease (NDD) including Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. We aimed to examine iRBD patient values and preferences regarding prognostic counseling. Methods One hundred thirteen iRBD patient participants enrolled in the Mayo Clinic iRBD Patient Registry were sent an email survey concerning their values and preferences concerning NDD prognostic counseling and their experiences following diagnosis with iRBD. Results Of 81 respondents (71.7% response rate), the majority were men (74.0%) with an average age of 65.7 (±9.7) years. Responses indicated a strong preference toward receiving prognostic information about possible future NDD development. 92.5% of respondents felt knowledge concerning personal NDD risk was important, while 87.6% indicated prognostic discussions were important to maintaining trust in their physician. 95.7% indicated a desire for more information, while only 4.3% desired less information regarding their NDD prognostic risk. Most respondents strongly agreed that prognostic information was important to discuss with their family and friends and inform future life planning, and most expressed interest in learning more about future neuroprotective therapies and symptomatic treatments for parkinsonism and dementia. Conclusions Most iRBD patients indicated strong preferences for disclosure of NDD prognostic risk and indicated that prognostic information was important for family discussions and future life planning. Future broader surveys and qualitative studies of clinic-based and ultimately community dwelling iRBD patients’ values and preferences are needed to guide appropriately tailored and individualized prognostic counseling approaches following iRBD diagnosis.

Abstract Introduction Accurate, early diagnosis of isolated rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is crucial given its injury potential and neurological prognosis. We aimed to analyze visual and automated REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) diagnostic thresholds in a current cohort of iRBD patients using submentalis (SM) and individual four limb electromyography (EMG) recordings, including bilateral flexor digitorum superificialis (FDS) and anterior tibialis (AT) during polysomnography. Methods We analyzed RSWA in 20 iRBD patients and 20 age-sex-AHI matched controls who underwent polysomnography between 2017-2021 for phasic burst durations, phasic, tonic, and "any" muscle activity, and automated REM atonia index (RAI). Group RSWA metrics were analyzed with non-parametric comparisons, logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to determine optimal diagnostic cutoff thresholds for iRBD. Correlation explored associative relationships between RSWA metrics, and principal components analysis (PCA) defined determinants of RSWA metric variance. Results All mean RSWA metrics were higher in iRBD patients than controls (p<0.05), except for left and bilateral AT phasic density and duration. RSWA(phasic%, AUC; "any"%, AUC) cutoffs were: SM (6.5%, AUC=90.2; 6.5%, AUC=92.5); L FDS (7.3%, AUC=95.8; 7.3%, AUC=95.8%); R FDS (5.4%, AUC=93.5; 5.8%, AUC=93.2%); Bilateral FDS (10.7%, AUC=96; 15.3%, AUC=95.8); L AT (6.7%, AUC=74.5; 6.7%, AUC=74.8%); R AT (4.7%, AUC=76.8; 4.7%, AUC=76.8%); Bilateral AT (7.5%, AUC=77.5; 7.5%, AUC=77.5%), combined SM/FDS (15.0%, AUC=95.5; 15.1%; AUC=95.8), combined SM/AT (16.5%, AUC=85.8; 21.0%; AUC=88.8),tonic (0.5%; AUC=85.9), and RAI (0.90; AUC=91.4). Phasic burst duration cutoffs were: SM=0.7s (AUC=90.2), L FDS=0.5 s (AUC=83.2), R FDS=0.6 (AUC=85.2), L AT=0.3 s (AUC=65.0) and R AT=0.4 s (AUC=77.0). PCA demonstrated that FDS and combined SM/FDS and SM/AT RSWA metrics best explained RSWA variance and differentiated controls from RBD, while SM and AT alone were less explanatory. Conclusion This study provides evidence for quantitative RSWA diagnostic thresholds applicable in current iRBD populations, and confirms the key importance of FDS to assure accurate iRBD diagnosis. Interestingly, these RSWA diagnostic thresholds are lower than previously determined thresholds, suggesting secular trends toward earlier iRBD detection and heterogeneous disease duration relative to polysomnography acquisition, underscoring the necessity of future large scale prospective, multicenter polysomnographic analyses to determine definitive iRBD diagnostic RSWA thresholds. Support (If Any)

Abstract Introduction REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) is the neurophysiological substrate of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD), a form of prodromal parkinsonism in most older adults. Isolated RSWA (without clinical RBD) elevation was demonstrated recently in older adults following SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19) infection, but comparison to controls was not reported. We aimed to comparatively analyze RSWA between patients with previous COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 negative controls. Methods 25 patients with previous COVID-19 infection were compared to 25 age-sex matched controls who tested negative for COVID-19 prior to polysomnography. Patients receiving medications known to increase RSWA were excluded. We reviewed medical records to determine clinical features and quantitatively analyzed RSWA in the submentalis (SM) and anterior tibialis (AT) muscles for phasic, tonic, and “any” muscle activity, phasic burst duration, and the automated REM atonia index. Non-parametric analyses compared clinical and polysomnographic features between groups, with combined SM and AT RSWA as the defined primary outcome. The comparative frequency of COVID-19 positive cases and COVID-19 negative controls who met or exceeded proposed isolated RSWA thresholds was also determined. Results COVID-19 patients had significantly greater RSWA than COVID-19 negative controls in the combined SM and AT muscles (p = 0.00076). Most other RSWA metrics were also higher in COVID-19 patients than controls (p<0.03), except tonic muscle activity, phasic burst durations, and RAI. Isolated RSWA occurred more frequently in COVID-19 (9 patients, 36%) than controls (3, 12%; p>0.05). No patients had a clinical history or polysomnographic evidence for parasomnia behavior or a primary neurological condition. Conclusion Quantitative RSWA amounts were comparatively greater in COVID-19 patients than in COVID-19 tested-negative controls, suggesting association of previous COVID-19 infection with central nervous system brainstem dysfunction in the region of the dorsal pons and/or ventromedial medulla. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether RSWA is a predisposing influence to, or consequence of, COVID-19 infection in these patients, and whether COVID-19 survivors might harbor neurodegenerative risk or disease markers. Support (If Any)

AbstractBackgroundTo examine patient preferences regarding prognostic counseling for idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD). Idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) carries an approximate 73‐91% long term risk for phenoconversion to dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson disease (PD). Previous research has shown that most providers counsel their patients concerning this risk, yet patients’ values and preferences regarding counseling are unknown.Methods122 participants with iRBD in the Mayo Clinic iRBD Patient Registry enrolled. Participants were sent a survey concerning prognostic counseling and their experience in being diagnosed with iRBD.ResultsOf 81 respondents (67.2% response rate), 74% were men with an average age of 65.7 ± 9.7 years. Responses indicated a strong preference toward receiving prognostic information; 92.5% felt knowledge concerning neurodegenerative disease risk was important, while 87.6% felt prognostic discussion was important to maintain trust in their physician. Additionally, 95.7% indicated they desired more information, while only 4.3% would have desired less information regarding prognostic risk following iRBD diagnosis. Most respondents agreed strongly that prognostic information was important for discussions with their family and friends and future life planning, and expressed interest in learning more about future neuroprotective therapies and symptomatic treatments for parkinsonism and dementia.ConclusionsiRBD patients indicated a strong preference for disclosure of neurodegenerative prognostic risk information, preferred more rather than less information, and felt prognostic information was important for family discussions and life planning. This data informs prognostic counseling practices regarding iRBD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Abstract Study Objectives Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) share some common features including prominent nightmares and sleep disturbances. We aimed to comparatively analyze REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) between patients with chronic PTSD with and without dream enactment behavior (DEB), isolated RBD (iRBD), and controls. Methods In this retrospective study, we comparatively analyzed 18 PTSD with DEB (PTSD+DEB), 18 PTSD without DEB, 15 iRBD, and 51 controls matched for age and sex. We reviewed medical records to determine PTSD clinical features and quantitatively analyzed RSWA. We used nonparametric analyses to compare clinical and polysomnographic features. Results PTSD patients, both with and without DEB, had significantly higher RSWA than controls (all p < .025, excepting submentalis phasic duration in PTSD+DEB). Most RSWA measures were also higher in PTSD+DEB than in PTSD without DEB patients (all p < .025). Conclusions PTSD patients have higher RSWA than controls, whether DEB is present or not, indicating that REM sleep atonia control is abnormal in chronic PTSD. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether neurodegenerative risk and disease markers similar to RBD might occur in PTSD patients.

AbstractStudy ObjectivesRapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) and other sleep disturbances are frequent in leucine-rich, glioma inactivated protein 1-IgG (LGI1) and contactin-associated protein 2-IgG (CASPR2) autoimmunity, yet polysomnographic analyses of these disorders remain limited. We aimed to characterize clinical presentations and analyze polysomnographic manifestations, especially quantitative REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) in LGI1/CASPR2-IgG seropositive (LGI/CASPR2+) patients.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed clinical and polysomnographic features and quantitative RSWA between LGI1+/CASPR2+ patients and age-sex matched controls. Groups were compared with Wilcoxon rank-sum and chi-square tests. Combined submentalis and anterior tibialis (SM + AT) RSWA was the primary outcome.ResultsAmong 11 (LGI1+, n = 9; CASPR2+, n = 2) patients, Morvan syndrome sleep features were present in seven (63.6%) LGI1+/CASPR2+ patients, with simultaneous insomnia and dream enactment behavior (DEB) in three (27.3%), and the most common presenting sleep disturbances were DEB (n = 5), insomnia (n = 5), and sleep apnea (n = 8; median apnea-hypopnea index = 15/hour). Median Epworth Sleepiness Scale was nine (range 3–24; n = 10), with hypersomnia in four (36.4%). LGI1+/CASPR2+ patients had increased N1 sleep (p = .02), decreased REM sleep (p = .001), and higher levels of SM + AT any RSWA (p < .001). Eight of nine (89%) LGI1+ exceeded RBD RSWA thresholds (DEB, n = 5; isolated RSWA, n = 3). RSWA was greater in AT than SM. All 10 LGI1+/CASPR2+ patients treated with immunotherapy benefitted, and 5/10 had improved sleep disturbances.ConclusionsLGI1/CASPR2-IgG autoimmunity is associated with prominent dream enactment, insomnia, RSWA, sleep apnea, and shallower sleep. Polysomnography provides objective disease markers in LGI1+/CASPR2+ autoimmunity and immunotherapy may benefit associated sleep disturbances.

Abstract Introduction REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is characterized by disruptive, violent dream enactment behaviors (DEB), necessitating symptomatic treatment to prevent injury and reduce DEB frequency and severity. Melatonin and clonazepam are regarded as RBD therapeutic mainstays, although outcomes data remains limited. We surveyed RBD patients to determine their outcomes following melatonin, clonazepam, and melatonin-clonazepam combination therapy. Methods Mayo Clinic RBD Patient Registry participants received an electronic survey concerning treatment type(s) and dose(s), efficacy, and adverse effects. The primary outcome was treatment efficacy, determined by comparing DEB frequency/severity ratings on a visual analog scale (VAS). Adverse effects severity was assessed by Likert scales. We comparatively analyzed VAS before and after treatment and adverse effects between treatments using non-parametric statistical tests. Results Sixty-eight of 109 patients responded (62.3%; 64 had analyzable data) with a mean age of 67.7 years. Fifty-seven (85%) were men, with mean RBD symptom duration of 13.9 years. Patients receiving each treatment were: melatonin=30, clonazepam=8, and combination=12; 14 received other or no treatment. Baseline VAS ratings were similar between groups. Only melatonin (p=0.003) and combination therapy (p=0.039) improved VAS ratings; clonazepam monotherapy did not improve VAS. Only melatonin monotherapy was reported to lower VAS compared to untreated patients (p=0.02). Optimally effective mean dosages were melatonin 9.95±5.06 mg and clonazepam 0.81±0.48 mg. Patient frequencies reporting one or more moderately-severe side effect(s) were similar between melatonin (15%), clonazepam (7%), and combination therapies (9%). Twenty-five (36.8%) patients had received only one medication trial, while 41.2% required more than one medication. Of these, 15 (22.1%) tried 2 and 13 (19.1%) tried 3 or more treatments. Conclusion Melatonin therapy at an approximate mean 10 mg dosage improved patient-reported DEB frequency/severity on VAS, compared between both previous intraindividual baseline ratings and with untreated patients, while clonazepam monotherapy did not, without differential adverse effects. Clonazepam monotherapy data were limited. These data inform future prospective melatonin symptomatic therapy trials for RBD. Additionally, 41.2% required more than one RBD pharmacological treatment, suggesting a current therapeutic gap and unmet need for future development of biologically-informed, evidence-based symptomatic RBD therapeutics. Support (if any):

Abstract Introduction Idiopathic/isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is a prodromal alpha-synucleinopathy characterized by dream enactment behavior and REM sleep without atonia (RSWA). We sought to define quantitative RSWA diagnostic thresholds in the North American Prodromal Synucleinopathy (NAPS) Consortium cohort. We analyzed RSWA between iRBD patients across participating NAPS sleep centers, compared to normative controls, and hypothesized that previous diagnostic RSWA thresholds were overestimates. Methods All digital polysomnography files were converted to European Data Format and scored at a central laboratory (Mayo Clinic) which standardized display scoring montages, channel sensitivities, and filtering, and scripted computational analyses for visual scoring. RSWA was quantitatively analyzed in the submentalis (SM) and anterior tibialis (AT) muscles in iRBD (n=86) patients and controls (n=118) utilizing well validated visual (Mayo) and automated (RAI) methods. Parametric statistics were used to compare RSWA metrics, and RSWA thresholds were developed using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results RSWA was significantly higher for the RAI and all visual individual and combined muscle activity metrics in iRBD compared to controls (all p<0.001). Average SM phasic measures were: 14.2% (Mayo), 17.9% (McGill), 18.5% (UCLA), and 9.4% (Washington University). Average AT phasic measures at each site were: 26.7% (Mayo), 17.1% (McGill), 23.3% (UCLA), and 17.4% (Washington University). Average SM/AT ‘any’ measures at each site were: 45.4% (Mayo), 35.9% (McGill), 53.4% (UCLA), and 23.5% (Washington University). Overall cohort RBD diagnostic thresholds (AUC, specificity/sensitivity) were: SM phasic 4.9% (90.0, 82.2%/83.7%); AT phasic 7.6% (88.7%, 82.2%/81.4%) and combined SM/AT ‘any’ 13% (94.6, 83.9%/96.5%). Conclusion RSWA thresholds in the NAPS cohort were substantially lower than previously reported, suggesting previously overestimated diagnostic RSWA thresholds due to smaller, enriched patient samples and overfit statistical modeling. Confirmation of these findings in the complete NAPS cohort (n=300 iRBD patients across all 10 NAPS centers) is planned. Support (if any):

ABSTRACTBackgroundRapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD) occurs occasionally in essential tremor (ET), but polysomnographic REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) analyses have been sparse.ObjectiveTo characterize the amount and distribution of polysomnographic RSWA, the electrophysiologic substrate of RBD, in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and ET.MethodsWe analyzed quantitative RSWA in 73 patients: PD (23), ET (23), and age‐sex‐matched controls (27). None had dream‐enactment behavior history or received antidepressants. Phasic, tonic, “any,” and phasic‐burst duration RSWA measures were calculated in the submentalis (SM) and anterior tibialis (AT) muscles. The automated REM atonia index (RAI) was also determined. Statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal‐Wallis rank‐sum and Mann‐Whitney tests.ResultsSM phasic RSWA was significantly greater for PD than ET patients and controls (12.5% ± 12.8% vs. 4.9% ± 6.7%, 3.9% ± 2.6%), as was SM “any” (13.54% ± 14.30% vs. 5.2% ± 7.6%, 4.2% ± 2.6%). RAI was significantly lower in PD than in ET and controls (0.78 ± 0.23 vs. 0.92 ± 0.09 vs. 0.90 ± 0.17, P ≤ 0.005), but no different between ET and controls. AT phasic and “any” RSWA was similar between the 3 groups. ET and control RSWA was similar in all measures. Two ET patients (8.7%) had SM RSWA similar to PD patients.ConclusionsElevated SM RSWA distinguished PD from ET in patients without dream‐enactment symptoms and occurs frequently in PD patients, and in isolated tremor suggests underlying synucleinopathy. Prospective studies will further validate these findings.