Dickson, Dennis W.

AbstractBackgroundSummarizing the multiplicity and heterogeneity of cerebrovascular disease (CVD) features into a single measure has been difficult in both pathology and imaging studies. The objective of this work was to evaluate the association between neuroimaging surrogates of CVD and two available neuropathologic CVD scales in those with both antemortem imaging CVD measures and post‐mortem CVD evaluation. We used (1) Strozyk scale (Strozyk et. al. NBA 2010) which is based on presence and number of three macroscopic lesions (large infarctions, lacunar infarctions, and leukoencephalopathy) and (2) Kalaria scale (Deramecourt et. al. Neurology 2012) which summarizes detailed evaluation of vessel wall modifications (arteriolosclerosis, amyloid angiopathy), perivascular spaces, myelin loss, microinfarctions, and large infarctions.MethodWe identified n=51 individuals in Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (mean age of 83.8 years, 37% female) with MRI scans within 5 years of death. We computed CVD measures from DTI (fractional anisotropy of the genu of the corpus callosum [FAGCC] and fractional anisotropy of cingulum adjoining the hippocampus [FACGH]), FLAIR (white matter hyperintensities [WMH] and total number of infarctions), and T2* GRE (total number of microbleeds). We also computed our recently developed imaging CVD composite score which summarizes the variability in all individual CVD imaging measures described above. We computed the Strozyk and Kalaria scales on postmortem tissue. We used weighted linear regression models with adjustments for MRI scan time to death to evaluate the associations between the antemortem neuroimaging measures and pathology scales in those who had scans within 3 years of death (N=31) and 5 years of death (N=51) (tables 1 and 2).ResultOf all the neuroimaging measures, DTI measures were the best predictors of the Strozyk and Kalaria Scales (p<0.05). In sensitivity analyses of data in Table 1, FAGCC explained 44% and FACGH predicted only 5.5% variability in white matter sub‐component of the Strozyk scale. The CVD composite score was a poor surrogate of the composite pathological scales.ConclusionMicrostructural white matter injury measurement using DTI may be a good surrogate of pathological CVD scales and possibly captures diffuse (and early) changes to white matter and secondary neurodegeneration due to lesions.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders (FTD) display complex neuropathological substrates and poor clinicopathological correlations, which hinders therapy development. Plasma P‐tau217 is an emerging tool to screen for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology and may have diagnostic value in FTD.MethodPlasma P‐tau217 was measured cross‐sectionally by electrochemiluminescence in FTD patients referred to ALLFTD from ARTFL (n = 628, 45.7% female, median age 66 ± 12 years). P‐tau217 differences by baseline phenotype, disease severity and genotype were determined with non‐parametric tests and general linear models. Associations between P‐tau217 and measures of disease severity and neuropsychological performance were determined with linear regressions corrected for age, sex, phenotype and APOE.ResultThe sample included 33% behavioral variant FTD, 23.6% primary progressive aphasia (PPA), 28.5% atypical parkinsonism, 1.6% amnestic dementia (AmDem), 2.8% FTD/motoneuron disease, 3% mild cognitive/behavioral impairment and 7.5% healthy controls. Only 1.6% carried FTD‐causing mutations. P‐tau217 was not related to age (r = 0.034, 95%CI ‐0.03 – 0.12, p = 0.4). Compared to controls (0.18 ± 0.07 pg/mL), P‐tau217 was elevated only in AmDem (0.58 ± 0.9 pg/mL, p = 0.001) and logopenic PPA (lvPPA, 0.71 ± 0.62 pg/mL p < 0.001). P‐tau217 ≥ 0.42 pg/mL effectively discriminated AmDem and lvPPA from all other phenotypes (AUC 0.87, 95%CI 0.77 – 0.96, p = 0.001, 77% sensitivity, 92% specificity). AmDem (60%) and lvPPA (91.7%) had the highest prevalence of high (≥ 0.42 pg/mL) P‐tau217, and the highest prevalence of APOE4 (AmDem 40%, lvPPA 63.6%). APOE4 carriers (0.23 ± 0.22 pg/mL) had higher P‐tau217, than non‐carriers (0.19 ± 0.09 pg/mL), regardless of phenotype (APOE effect p = .002, APOE x phenotype, p = 0.44). P‐tau217 was associated with worse clinical severity, mood, memory and executive function, but not with worse motor symptoms or social cognition.ConclusionWhen FTD is suspected, high plasma P‐tau217 is strongly associated with amnestic dementia and logopenic PPA phenotypes. Pending completion of ongoing neuropathological, CSF and molecular neuroimaging analyses, the data support the use of plasma P‐tau217 to identify atypical AD as a cause or AD as a co‐pathology contributing to FTD clinical presentation.

AbstractBackgroundBlood neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a robust predictor of phenoconversion in familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration (fFTLD). The comparative value of CSF NfL and other CSF markers of degeneration in fFTLD remains unexplored.MethodFLTD‐causing mutation carriers were recruited through ALLFTD (n = 113, 56.6% female, mean age 48.1 ± 13 years; 29 C9orf72, 16 GRN, 34 MAPT, 34 mutation non‐carriers) and prospectively evaluated for 3 years. Baseline CSF was analyzed for NfL, phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (p‐NfH), tau, phosphorylated tau181 (p‐tau) and neurogranin using fit‐for‐purpose immunoassays. Mixed effect linear models, with random slopes, corrected for age, sex, genotype and total intracranial volume related CSF biomarkers to longitudinal clinical variables.ResultNfL (β = 0.64, p < 0.001), p‐NfH (β = 0.68, p < 0.001) and tau (β = 0.46, p < 0.001) correlated with age. There were no differences in biomarker concentrations by phenotype or severity, except for higher NfL and p‐NfH in full phenotype, compared to prodromal disease and asymptomatic carriers. Low neurogranin (β = ‐0.39, p < 0.001), low p‐tau (β = ‐0.33, p < 0.001) and high NfL (β = 0.42, p < 0.001) correlated with worse baseline disease severity measured by the CDR® Dementia Staging Instrument plus behavior and language domains from the National Alzheimer’s Disease Coordinating Center FTLD module sum of boxes (CDR®+NACC‐FTLDsb), and with other measures of global cognition, instrumental and daily function, and frontal and temporal brain volumes. Regardless of genotype, the predicted annualized rate of CDR®+NACC‐FTLDsb score worsenings per higher baseline CSF biomarker Log pg/mL were tau: 3.0 ± 0.2, NfL: 2.8 ± 0.2 and p‐NfH: 2.8 ± 0.2. High tau, NfL and p‐NfH also predicted worsening in other measures of global cognition and instrumental and daily function. Neurogranin and p‐tau did not predict clinical decline.ConclusionCSF tau, p‐tau, neurogranin, NfL and p‐NfH reflect important aspects of disease severity in fFTLD. In contrast to Alzheimer’s disease, low p‐tau and neurogranin are inversely related to clinical severity, which suggests a distinctive pathophysiological process and has implications for therapeutic development. CSF NfL, p‐NfH and tau have strong prognostic value in fFTLD.

AbstractBackgroundUp to 30% of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cases are due to known pathogenic mutations (f‐FTD). Little is known about the factors that predict who will choose to learn their results. Upcoming clinical trials in f‐FTD may require disclosure prior to enrollment, even before symptom onset, and thus characterizing this sample is important. Furthermore, understanding the mood impacts of genetic disclosure may guide genetic counseling practice.MethodF‐FTD participants (n=568) from families with a known pathogenic mutation (MAPT, C9orf72, GRN) were enrolled through the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Longitudinal FTD Study (ALLFTD) and provided the opportunity for disclosure. Independent‐sample t‐tests compared demographic and psychosocial factors between participants who did and did not receive their results. In participants who were asymptomatic at baseline and follow up (n=199,177 with follow‐up), linear mixed effects modeling was used to investigate pre‐ to post‐disclosure changes in the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).ResultOf participants from families with a known pathogenic genetic mutation, 47% received genetic disclosure. Of the asymptomatic subset (n=386), 36% know their mutation status. Of these asymptomatic learners, 46% received disclosure through the study, and the remainder learned their genetic status prior to study enrollment. None of the analyzed demographic or psychosocial factors (i.e., sex, age, education, having children) differed between learners and non‐learners (p’s > 0.05). In the longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic participants, learners showed a pre‐ to post‐increase of 0.31 GDS points/year (95%CI: ‐0.08, 0.69, p = 0.12), whereas non‐learners showed a slight decline (‐0.15 points/year, 95%CI: ‐0.36, 0.06, p = 0.16). This difference between slopes was statistically significant (0.46, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.89, p=0.04) but represents a small clinical effect. In asymptomatic learners, slopes did not differ based on mutation status (0.28, 95%CI: ‐0.66, 1.20, p=0.55). Conclusions were based on the estimates and full range of confidence intervals.ConclusionThe majority of asymptomatic research participants do not know their genetic status, which will be a consideration for clinical trials that require disclosure. No considered demographic factors were strongly associated with the decision to receive disclosure. The findings suggest that disclosure in asymptomatic participants has minimal impact on depressive symptoms regardless of genetic results.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative conditions, affecting the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Ongoing research has provided insight into developing clinical trials for FTLD and key clinical measures such as structural MRI. To inform clinical trial design and optimize participation, it is imperative to explore facilitators and barriers for potential candidates.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to participating in future clinical trials for FTLD.MethodsAdvancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS) are observational studies focused on characterizing FTLD syndromes in preparation for clinical trials. The 584 participants enrolled across 18 research sites in the United States and Canada completed a survey assessing interest in clinical trial participation.Results29% of respondents self‐reported as patients (63±10 years), 26% self‐reported as caregivers answering on behalf of patients (65±10 years), and 45% self‐reported as healthy but at risk for FTLD (48±14 years). Travel reimbursement was the most common factor reported to positively influence participation (≧66%), with the healthy but at risk group showing the strongest endorsement (83%). Cost and time involved in travel were possible barriers for about half of the patients (48%) and healthy but at risk respondents (53%). The respondents value receiving feedback on the study findings (≧80%) and being informed of their individual disease progression (≧75%). Particularly, keeping participation confidential was very important for the healthy but at risk group (62%). In regard to research assessments, most participants demonstrated a high interest in physical and neurological exams at a research center (≧87%) whereas only half were interested in doing more invasive procedures such as the lumbar puncture (≧52%). Overall, respondents showed a positive attitude and support for research participation (≧77%) and trusted that their health information would remain confidential in a clinical trial (≧53%).ConclusionsFavorable attitudes and interest towards medical research exist among participants. To optimize participation, clinical trials should allocate funding for travel and involve participants in feedback about study results and their disease progression. Alternatives to invasive assessments may increase participation.

Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a progressive language disorder often due to an underlying neurodegenerative disease. The most common pathologies associated with PPA include frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD)‐tau, FTLD‐associated with transactivation response DNA‐binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP‐43) (FTLD‐TDP), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Accumulating evidence has suggested that Lewy body disease (LBD) can also be associated with PPA. We herein report a 78‐year‐old Caucasian woman who initially presented with levodopa‐responsive parkinsonism at age 67 and later developed cognitive impairment, visual hallucinations, rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, and progressive aphasia, characterized by reduced spontaneous speech, word‐finding difficulty, and difficulties in writing and reading. 18Fluorodeoxyglucoase (FDG)‐positron emission tomography (PET) performed at the age of 73 years identified hypometabolism in the frontal (right > left), temporal (left > right), and parietal (left > right) lobes. Neuropathological assessment revealed diffuse LBD (DLBD), AD, and TDP‐43 stage 6 with prehippocampal sclerosis. Senile plaques were numerous, but only a few neurofibrillary tangles were present in the neocortex. The Braak neurofibrillary tangle stage was IV, and the Thal amyloid phase was 3. Lewy‐related pathology was severe in the neocortex, as well as limbic cortices, basal forebrain, amygdala, and brainstem. Compared to 166 DLBD cases with a clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), the Lewy body count of the patient in this report was highest in the inferior parietal cortex, followed by midfrontal and superior temporal cortices. The findings suggest that severe cortical LBD pathology has contributed to her progressive aphasia. Autopsy cases of LBD presenting as PPA have been reported, but patients with PD and autopsy‐proven DLBD who later developed progressive aphasia have not been reported. Our findings indicate that PD can be associated with progressive aphasia later in the disease course. Although uncommon, LBD should be considered as a differential diagnosis of progressive aphasia.