Dyck, Peter James

AbstractIntroduction/AimsIn the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT), the minimal nerve conduction (NC) criterion for diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) was abnormality of NC in more than one peripheral nerve without specifying the attributes of NCs to be evaluated. In the present study, we assess individual and composite scores of NCs meeting the DCCT criterion and signs for improved diagnosis and assessment of DSPN severity.MethodsEvaluated were 13 attributes and 6 composite NC scores and signs and symptoms in 395 healthy subjects (HS) and 388 persons with diabetes (DM).ResultsPercent abnormality between subjects with DM and HS was remarkably different among individual attributes and the six composite NC scores. For diagnosis of DSPN using the DCCT criterion, assessment of conduction velocities (CVs) and distal latencies (DLs) provided sensitive diagnoses of DSPN. NC amplitudes provided stronger measures of severity. In studied cohorts, DSPN was staged: N0, no NC abnormality using NC score 2 (CVs and DLs), 60.0%; N1, NC abnormality only, 18.4%; N2, NC abnormality and signs of feet or legs, 16.3%; and N3, NC abnormality and signs of thighs, 5.3%.DiscussionFor sensitive and standard diagnosis of DSPN using the DCCT NC criterion, specifically defined composite scores of CVs and DLs, e.g., score 2, is recommended. A composite score of amplitudes, e.g., score 4, provides a stronger measure of neuropathy severity. Also, provided are HS reference values of evaluated attributes of NCs and estimates of staged severity of DSPN of mid North American DM cohorts.

Abstract Objectives: The objective of the study is to distinguish the mechanisms of disease for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), which we believe to be fundamentally different. However, distinguishing the mechanisms is more difficult when the presentation of CIDP is motor-predominant, focal, or asymmetric. Methods: We describe 3 focal, motor-predominant, representative cases that could be interpreted on clinical and/or electrophysiological grounds as either MMN or focal CIDP, and present pathological findings. Results: We highlight pathological differences in these cases, and provide an argument that CIDP and MMN are distinct entities with different pathophysiological mechanisms—chronic demyelination for CIDP, and an immune-mediated attack on paranodal motor axons for MMN. Conclusions: Based on clinical evaluation, electrophysiology, and nerve biopsy pathology, we can divide the conditions into inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy (focal CIDP) versus chronic axonal neuropathy (MMN). The divergent pathological findings provide further evidence that CIDP and MMN are fundamentally different disorders.

Abstract Patients with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) are at higher fracture risk despite having relatively normal or even increased BMD by DXA. Increased cortical porosity has emerged as a potential factor contributing to fragility fractures in T2D. However, there is conflicting evidence whether T2D patients have increased cortical porosity. We hypothesized that microvascular complications have an important role in cortical porosity. Thus, we performed high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography imaging at the distal radius and tibia to evaluate bone microarchitecture in men with T2DM age ≥ 50 yrs or postmenopausal women with T2DM and nondiabetic controls. Comprehensive diabetic complications were assessed in all patients including urine microalbuminuria, retinopathy, neuropathy (touch, temperature, and vibration sensation), ankle brachial index (ABI) and transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2). Percent differences between groups were obtained from linear regression models adjusting for age, BMI, and sex. Relationships between variables were assessed using adjusted Spearman correlations. A total of 164 T2D patients (mean age 68.9 ±7.8 yrs.; 56.7% men; HbA1C=7.7 ±0.9%; mean diabetes duration 15.2 yrs.) and 107 nondiabetic controls (mean age 67.3±8.8 yrs.; 42.1% men; HbA1C =5.4 ±0.3%) were recruited to the study. Overall, there was a trend for increased cortical porosity at the distal tibia in the T2D group (+12.2%; p=0.063) compared with nondiabetic controls. Of note, TcPO2 was negatively correlated with cortical porosity at the distal radius (r= -0.17; p= 0.039) and distal tibia (r= -0.15; p= 0.073). In particular, the Low TcPO2 (≤40 mmHg) group (n=29) had greater cortical porosity at the distal tibia (+19.6 %; p=0.037) compared with the High TcPO2 (>40 mmHg) group (n=133). In addition, the low TcPO2 group had a significant increase in cortical porosity in the distal tibia (+24.8% p=0.020) compared with nondiabetic controls. In conclusion, this is the first evidence in humans indicating that TcPO2, a measure of microvascular blood flow, is linked to cortical porosity in the distal radius and tibia in T2D patients. Our findings may explain the conflicting findings regarding cortical porosity in T2D because only T2D patients with impaired microvascular blood flow have increased cortical porosity. Collectively, our data indicate that cortical porosity is a microvascular complication of longstanding T2D.

Abstract Objectives: Mild inflammatory diabetic neuropathies (IDNs) overlap with diabetic sensorimotor neuropathy (DPN) in clinical presentation and electrophysiological and laboratory tests. This study is to determine whether IDN can be differentiated from DPN by clinical features, electrophysiological, pathological, or laboratory tests. Methods: Suspected IDN cases were identified by a subacute onset and progressive sensory or motor neuropathy in patients with diabetes. Results: IDN occurred earlier in the course of diabetes mellitus and had higher prevalence of limb weakness, walking difficulty, and more severe electrophysiological abnormalities suggesting both demyelination and axonal loss. Sensory nerve biopsies in IDN showed perivascular inflammatory infiltrates, decreased fiber density, increased demyelination, and axonal degeneration. Most patients with IDN improved with immunotherapy. Conclusions: Features that favor IDN over DPN are limb weakness, more severe nerve conduction abnormalities, inflammatory infiltrates on nerve biopsy, and a favorable response to immunotherapy. A nerve biopsy can help establish an inflammatory cause.

ABSTRACTIntroduction: For sequential and somatotopic assessment of small fiber neuropathy, heat pain (HP) tests of hypoalgesia might be used instead of decreased counts of epidermal nerve fibers (ENFs), but then healthy subject reference values of HP thresholds are needed. Methods: Using the Computer Assisted Sensation Evaluator IVc system, HP thresholds of hypoalgesia were estimated for 10 unilateral sites and counts of ENFs for 4 of them in healthy subjects. Results: In healthy subjects, small but statistically significant differences of both HP thresholds of hypoalgesia and counts of ENFs were observed among tested sites. Significant correlations between HP thresholds and counts of ENFs were not found. Discussion: For the studied somatotopic sites, we provide ≥95th and ≥99th percentile reference limits for HP 0.5 and 5 of 1–10 HP thresholds of hypoalgesia and decreased counts of ENFs at ≤5th and ≤1st percentile levels. Muscle Nerve 58: 509–516, 2018