Limburg, Paul J.

Abstract Background: Despite recent advances in prevention and therapy, colorectal cancer (CRC) continues to account for nearly 50,000 deaths per year in the US. TNM stage is the current CRC prognostic standard, yet within-stage prognostic heterogeneity is well documented. Microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylation phenotype (CIMP), and BRAF- and KRAS-mutation status represent candidate prognostic markers. However, associations between these markers and CRC survival have not been described in a population-based setting. Methods: Data and tissue resources were obtained from the Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS), which recruited 41,836 women, ages 55-69 years, at study entry (1986). Incident CRC cases were ascertained by annual linkage with the Iowa Cancer Registry. Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were collected from 732 representative CRC cases diagnosed through 12/31/2002. Established laboratory methods were used to characterize CRC cases: MSI-H or MSS/MSI-L (by instability in β3 vs. <3 out of 10 markers, respectively); CIMP+ or CIMP− (by promoter hypermethylation in β3 vs. 0-2 out of 5 genes, respectively); BRAFwt or BRAFmut (by fluorescent allele specific PCR to detect the V600E point mutation in exon 15); and KRASwt or KRASmut (by direct sequence analysis of codons 12 and 13 in exon 2). Cox regression models were fit to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for time to death of any cause adjusted for age, stage, grade, and treatment status. Results: CRC cases with informative molecular marker data ranged from 515/732 (70%) for KRAS to 548/732 (75%) for MSI status. Mean follow-up was 4.4 years for deceased individuals and 11.2 years for women alive at last contact. After multivariable adjustment, both MSS/MSI-L (p=0.004) and KRASmut (p=0.048) tumors were associated with poorer survival. Survival did not significantly differ across levels of CIMP and BRAF status. Conclusions: MSI and KRAS status may influence CRC survival among older women. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4492. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4492

Abstract Background: Folate intake (FI) appears to affect colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, but the molecular mechanism(s) involved are incompletely defined. In this study, we analyzed associations between FI and incident CRC, overall and by KRAS mutation status, in the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS). Methods: The IWHS recruited 41,836 randomly selected Iowa women, ages 55-69 years, with a valid driver's license at study entry (1986). FI and other exposure variables were assessed at baseline, by self-report. Incident CRC cases were ascertained by annual linkage with the Iowa Cancer Registry. Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were recently collected from 732 representative CRC cases diagnosed through 12/31/2002. FI (including supplements) was categorized by quartiles. KRAS mutation status (wildtype [wt] vs. mutated [mut]) was determined by direct sequence analysis of codons 12 and 13 (exon 2). Multivariate Cox regression models were fit to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of the 732 available CRC cases, 470 (64%) had complete FI and KRAS data. FI was not associated with incident CRC overall (for quartile 4 vs. quartile 1, RR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.82-1.28; p trend = 0.90), or with the KRAS-wt or KRAS-mut subtypes (see Table). Conclusions: These data do not support an association between FI and incident CRC, overall or by KRAS-defined subtypes, among older, predominately white, non-Hispanic women. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1892. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1892

Abstract Background: Cigarette smoking (CS) is an established, although relatively modest, colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factor. Emerging data suggest that CS might affect distinct pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis. In this study, we examined CS-associated CRC risks by KRAS mutation status in the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS). Methods: The IIWHS recruited 41,836 randomly selected Iowa women, ages 55-69 years, with a valid driver's license at study entry (1986). CS and other exposure variables were assessed at baseline, by self-report. Incident CRC cases were ascertained by annual linkage with the Iowa Cancer Registry. Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were collected from 732 representative CRC cases diagnosed through 12/31/2002. CS was categorized by smoking status (current, former), average number of cigarettes per day (1-19, 20-39, > 40) and pack-years (1-19, 20-39, > 40); never smokers were defined as the reference group. KRAS mutation status (wildtype [wt] vs. mutated [mut]) was determined by direct sequence analysis of codons 12 and 13 (exon 2). Multivariate Cox regression models were fit to estimate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Of the 732 available CRC cases, 507 (69%) had complete CS and KRAS data. Each of the CS-related variables was more strongly associated with KRAS-wt vs. KRAS-mut tumors (see Table). However, event rates were relatively small in some cells, and tests for heterogeneity between KRAS-defined subtypes were not statistically significant (p > 0.05 for each comparison). Conclusions: These findings suggest that CS may affect colorectal carcinogenesis through KRAS-independent pathways, but additional data are needed from larger, more diverse study populations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1891. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1891

Abstract B128 Background The B vitamin folate affects colorectal carcinogenesis through effects on nucleotide synthesis and possibly DNA methylation. Animal models and epidemiologic evidence suggest that folate from diet and supplements can prevent the development of colorectal cancer (CRC), but that high folate intake after adenomas or cancer are established may accelerate progression or recurrence. The chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil inhibits thymidylate synthase, a folate-metabolizing enzyme, and the effect of folate intake on treatment efficacy is unknown. Supplement use and folate intake are high among adults in the U.S., particularly with food supply fortification, and higher still among cancer patients and survivors. However, few studies have addressed use of folic acid-containing supplements (FAS) among colorectal cancer patients, how use changes after diagnosis, and what factors determine changes in FAS use. Methods The Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR) is a multicenter study of colorectal cancer cases, their family members and controls, recruited since 1998 at six sites in the United States, Australia and Canada. The current analysis includes 1,092 CRC cases with epidemiologic data available from questionnaires administered at enrollment, asking about supplement use and other risk factors before diagnosis, and from follow-up questionnaires about 5 years later. Baseline characteristics for cases who began using FAS (including multivitamins) after diagnosis were compared to those for cases who used FAS neither before nor after diagnosis. We used logistic regression models to evaluate associations between age, sex, CCFR site, race, education, income, lifetime exercise, smoking, body mass index, and diet and change in FAS use, adjusting each model for age, sex and site, when appropriate. Results FAS use before CRC diagnosis was 35.4%, while 55.1% of cases used FAS after diagnosis. Women were more likely to begin FAS use after diagnosis (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.17-2.19). Current smokers were less likely than nonsmokers to begin FAS use (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.97), as were those consuming more red meat (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.70 for those in the highest versus lowest intake categories, ptrend=0.012). Subjects with higher fruit intake were more likely to begin FAS use (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.16-3.30 for highest versus lowest intake, ptrend=0.013). We also observed a suggestive association between lifetime physical activity and change in FAS use for active versus less active subjects (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.01-2.16), though there was no trend with increasing levels of physical activity (ptrend=0.27). Finally, we found that residents of non-U.S. countries were less likely to begin FAS use (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.96 for Ontario, Canada and OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.11-0.38 for Australia). Conclusions: Our analysis showed substantial increases in the use of folic acid-containing supplements after diagnosis with colorectal cancer in CCFR participants, especially among women, U.S. residents, nonsmokers, and those who consumed more fruit and less meat. This study begins to characterize CRC patients likely to be using FAS, and suggests that its use is widespread. This finding is notable given evidence that folate may accelerate progression of colorectal cancer, and the unknown effect that FAS intake may have on the efficacy of cancer treatment and on survival. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2008;1(7 Suppl):B128.

Abstract Despite ongoing advances in drug discovery science, anticancer agent development remains a laborious, time-consuming process. Discouragingly, the overall approval rate for new oncology drugs is approximately ∼ 5%, with estimated R & D costs ranging from $0.8–1.7 billion for each new agent. Lack of efficacy, suboptimal formulation, poor bioavailability and other factors contribute to the high pre-registration attrition rate, suggesting an urgent need for process enhancements that can facilitate earlier differentiation between viable and non-viable candidate compounds. In January 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a guidance document on Exploratory IND Studies (a.k.a. phase 0 trials). In brief, phase 0 trials should (a) be conducted prior to traditional phase I, dose-limiting toxicity trials; (b) involve limited human exposure (usually ≤ 30 subjects); (c) have no therapeutic or diagnostic intent; and (d) be of relatively short duration (typically ≤ 7 days). Realistic goals for phase 0 trials include:replicate preclinical mechanism(s) of action in a human intervention trial;characterize initial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles;evaluate biodistribution patterns, based on imaging technologies. Achieving one or more of these goals in phase 0 trials would permit better selection of active versus inactive compounds for further development. By design, phase 0 trials portend lower risks to human subject than traditional phase I trials. As such, fewer preclinical supporting data are required prior to conducting a phase 0 trial. The initial agent dose depends in part on the stated trial objectives, but should be no greater than 1/50th of the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) estimated from animal toxicology testing. Validated pharmacodynamic assays, ideally with low variability in the molecular target, are suitable for application to phase 0 trials if the investigational agent can reasonably be expected to demonstrate target modulation at a non-toxic dose. Standard operating procedures for tissue collection and biospecimen handling should be defined in advance and revised as necessary based on results of the phase 0 trial. Chemoprevention agent development is uniquely challenged by the need to identify widely acceptable, minimally toxic compounds (even when chronically administered) that favorably affect carcinogenesis when measured against surrogate biomarkers, rather than direct cancer endpoints. Methods to identify bioavailable, pharmacodynamically active candidates earlier in the drug development cycle would offer clear advantages with respect to process efficiency, resource utilization and other parameters. Natural products (or derivatives thereof) represent an attractive source for chemoprevention agent discovery and, given their oftentimes demonstrated favorable safety profile at standard doses, provide an excellent opportunity to explore potential benefits gained through the phase 0 trial paradigm. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(1 Suppl):ED04-02.

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common incident cancer among women in the United States. Alcohol use has been proposed as a CRC risk factor, but existing observational data remain inconsistent. To date, relatively few studies have examined associations between alcohol use and CRC risk based on molecularly-defined subtypes. Aim: To evaluate associations between alcohol use and incident CRC overall, as well as by molecularly-defined subtypes including microsatellite instability (MSI), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and BRAF mutation status in the prospective, population-based, Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS). Methods: The IWHS recruited 41,836 randomly selected Iowa women, ages 55–69 years at enrollment, in 1986. Women with prevalent cancers or no follow-up were excluded, leaving 38,001 eligible for this study. Alcohol use was obtained from a self-administered food frequency questionnaire at study baseline. Incident CRCs were identified through annual linkage with the State Health Registry of Iowa. Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were recently requested for incident CRC cases diagnosed through December 31, 2002. In the present study, useable tissue specimens were obtained and molecularly characterized for 563/1,255 cases (45%), whose baseline age, body mass index, physical activity level, total energy intake and alcohol use were similar to non-retrieved cases (p > 0.05 for each comparison). Alcohol use was categorized as never (n=21,464), < 3.4 g/day (n=8,313) and > 3.4 g/day (n=8,224), based on the median split among users. Molecularly-defined CRC subtypes were categorized as MSI-high (MSIH; n=148), MSI-low or microsatellite stable (MSI-L/MSS; n=400); CIMP-positive (n=167) or CIMP-negative (n=368); and BRAF-mutation (n=154) or BRAF-wildtype (n=391). Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated for alcohol use compared to never drinkers, using multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, smoking status, physical activity level, exogenous estrogen use, and daily intakes of total energy, total fat, red meat, sucrose, calcium, folate, methionine and vitamin E. Results: There was no statistically significant association between alcohol use and overall CRC risk (RR=1.00; 95% CI = 0.86–1.15 for < 3.4 g/day versus none; RR=1.06; 95% CI=0.91–1.24 for >3.4 g/day versus none). Further, there were no associations with alcohol use for specific, molecularly-defined CRC subtypes (RRs shown for > 3.4 g/day versus none): MSI-H (RR=1.07; 95% CI=0.70–1.64); MSI-L or MSS (RR=1.12; 95% CI=0.85–1.47); CIMP-positive (RR=0.97; 95% CI=0.64–1.47); CIMP-negative (RR=1.13; 95% CI=0.85–1.50); BRAF-mutation (RR=0.94; 95% CI=0.61–1.45); and BRAF-wildtype (RR=1.20; 95% CI=0.91–1.57). Conclusion: In this cohort of older women, alcohol use did not appear to be a risk factor for incident CRC, overall or by the defined molecular subtypes. Citation Information: Cancer Prev Res 2010;3(1 Suppl):A115.

Abstract Background: Postmenopausal hormone (PMH) therapy represents a controversial colorectal cancer (CRC) preventive intervention. Because colorectal carcinogenesis is a heterogeneous process, we evaluated associations between PMH therapy and incident CRC in relation to KRAS mutation status in a population-based cohort of older women [Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS)]. Methods: The IWHS enrolled 41,836 randomly selected women, ages 55 to 69 years, in 1986. PMH therapy and other exposure data were recorded at baseline. Tissue samples from prospectively identified CRC cases (n = 507) were analyzed for somatic KRAS mutations (exon 2, codons 12 and 13). Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: PMH therapy (ever vs. never) was inversely associated with KRAS mutation–negative (RR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.66–1.06; P = 0.14) and KRAS mutation–positive (RR = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.58–1.16; P = 0.27) tumors, although the observed risk estimates were not statistically significant. When anatomic subsite was additionally considered, the strongest association was found for KRAS mutation–negative, distal colorectal tumors (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43–0.96; P = 0.03). Conclusions: To our knowledge, we provide the first report of KRAS-defined CRC risks associated with PMH therapy. These data suggest that PMH therapy may reduce CRC risk through mechanisms beyond KRAS mutation status but might provide greater benefits for KRAS mutation–negative than mutation-positive tumors (at least in the distal colorectum). Impact: Findings from this prospective cohort study provide novel insights about the molecular biology of PMH therapy–related CRC risk reduction. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(4); 681–4. ©2012 AACR.

Abstract Background: Increasing colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) is important for attaining the Healthy People 2020 goal of reducing CRC-related morbidity and mortality. Evaluating CRCS trends can help identify shifts in CRCS, and specific groups that might be targeted for CRCS. Methods: We utilized medical records to describe population-based adherence to average-risk CRCS guidelines from 1997 to 2008 in Olmsted County, MN. CRCS trends were analyzed overall and by gender, age, and adherence to screening mammography (women only). We also carried out an analysis to examine whether CRCS is being initiated at the recommended age of 50. Results: From 1997 to 2008, the size of the total eligible sample ranged from 20,585 to 21,468 people. CRCS increased from 22% to 65% for women and from 17% to 59% for men (P < 0.001 for both) between 1997 and 2008. CRCS among women current with mammography screening increased from 26% to 74%, and this group was more likely to be adherent to CRCS than all other subgroups analyzed (P < 0.001).The mean ages of screening initiation were stable throughout the study period, with a mean age of 55 years among both men and women in 2008. Conclusion: Although overall CRCS tripled during the study period, there is still room for improvement. Impact: Working to decrease the age at first screening, exploration of gender differences in screening behavior, and targeting women adherent to mammography but not to CRCS seem warranted. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 21(2); 347–50. ©2011 AACR.

Background Postmenopausal hormone (PMH) therapy may reduce colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, but existing data are inconclusive. Objectives To evaluate associations between PMH therapy and incident CRC, overall and by molecularly defined subtypes, in the population-based Iowa Women's Health Study of older women. Methods Exposure data were collected from Iowa Women's Health Study participants (55–69 years) at baseline (1986). Archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens for 553 CRC cases were collected and analysed to determine microsatellite instability (MSI-L/MSS or MSI-H), CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP-negative or CIMP-positive) and BRAF mutation ( BRAF -wildtype or BRAF -mutated) status. Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to estimate RRs and 95% CIs. Results PMH therapy (ever vs never use) was inversely associated with incident CRC overall (RR=0.82; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.93), with a significantly lower risk for MSI-L/MSS tumours (RR=0.75; 95% CI 0.60 to 0.94), and borderline significantly lower risks for CIMP-negative (RR=0.79; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.01) and BRAF -wildtype (RR=0.83; 95% CI 0.66 to 1.04) tumours. For PMH therapy >5 years, the subtype-specific risk estimates for MSI-L/MSS, CIMP-negative and BRAF -wildtype tumours were: RR=0.60, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.91; RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.03; and RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.05, respectively. PMH therapy was not significantly associated with the MSI-H, CIMP-positive or BRAF -mutated CRC subtypes. Conclusions In this prospective cohort study, PMH therapy was inversely associated with distinct molecularly defined CRC subtypes, which may be related to differential effects from oestrogen and/or progestin on heterogeneous pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Abstract Increased alcohol consumption is a putative colorectal cancer (CRC) risk factor. However, existing data are less conclusive for women than men. Also, to date, relatively few studies have reported alcohol-related CRC risks based on molecularly defined tumor subtypes. We evaluated associations between alcohol intake and incident CRC, overall and by microsatellite instability [MSI high (MSI-H) or MSI low/microsatellite stable (MSI-L/MSS)], CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP positive or CIMP negative), and BRAF mutation (mutated or wild-type) status in the prospective, population-based Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS; n = 41,836). Subjects were 55 to 69 years at baseline (1986), and exposure data were obtained by self-report. Incident CRCs were prospectively identified and archived, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were collected from 732 representative cases, diagnosed through December 31, 2002. Multivariate Cox regression models were fit to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among alcohol consumers, the median intake (range) was 3.4 (0.9–292.8) g/d. Compared with nonconsumers, alcohol intake levels of 3.4 g/d or less (RR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.86–1.15) and more than 3.4 g/d (RR = 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91–1.24) were not significantly associated with overall CRC risk. Analyses based on alcohol intake levels of 30 g/d or less and more than 30 g/d or quartile distributions yielded similar risk estimates. Null associations were also observed between each alcohol intake level and the MSI-, CIMP- or, BRAF-defined CRC subtypes (P > 0.05 for each comparison). These data do not support an adverse effect from alcohol intake on CRC risk, overall or by specific molecularly defined subtypes, among older women. Cancer Prev Res; 4(12); 2035–43. ©2011 AACR.