Limburg, Paul J.

AbstractThe WHO Classification of Tumours provides the international standards for the classification and diagnosis of tumours. It enables direct comparisons to be made between different countries. In the new fifth edition, the series has gone digital with the launch of a website as well as a series of books, known widely as the WHO Blue Books. The first volume to be produced is on the classification of Digestive System tumours, replacing the successful 2010 version. It has been rewritten and updated accordingly. This article summarises the major diagnostic innovations that have occurred over the last decade and that have now been incorporated in the classification. As an example, it incorporates the recently proposed classification of neuroendocrine tumours, based on the recognition that neuroendocrine tumours and carcinomas differ substantially in the genetic abnormalities that drive their growth, findings relevant to treatment selection and outcome prediction. Several themes have emerged during the production process. One is the importance of the progression from hyperplasia to dysplasia to carcinoma in the evolution of the malignant process. Advances in imaging techniques and endoscopy have resulted in enhanced access to precancerous lesions in the gastrointestinal and biliary tract, necessitating both changes in classification schema and clinical practice. Diagnosis of tumours is no longer the sole purview of pathologists, and some patients now receive treatment before tissue is obtained, based on clinical, radiological and liquid biopsy results. This makes the classification relevant to many disciplines involved in the care of patients with tumours of the digestive system.

Abstract Background: Emerging colorectal cancer trends demonstrate increased incidence and mortality in younger populations, prompting consideration of average-risk colorectal cancer screening initiation at age 45 versus 50 years. However, screening test performance characteristics in adults 45–49 years have been minimally described. To inform the biologic rationale for multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) screening in younger patients, we analyzed and compared tissue levels of methylation (BMP3, NDRG4) and mutation (KRAS) markers included in the FDA-approved, mt-sDNA assay (Cologuard; Exact Sciences Corporation). Methods: Within 40–44, 45–49, and 50–64 year age groups, archived colorectal tissue specimens were identified for 211 sporadic colorectal cancer cases, 123 advanced precancerous lesions (APLs; adenomas >1 cm, high-grade dysplasia, ≥25% villous morphology, or sessile serrated polyp; 45–49 and 50–64 age groups only), and 204 histologically normal controls. Following DNA extraction, KRAS, BMP3, and NDRG4 were quantified using QuARTS assays, relative to ACTB (reference gene). Results: None of the molecular marker concentrations were significantly associated with age (P > 0.05 for all comparisons), with the exception of NDRG4 concentration in APL samples (higher in older vs. younger cases; P = 0.008). However, NDRG4 levels were also statistically higher in APL case versus normal control samples in both the 45–49 (P < 0.0001) and 50–64 (P < 0.0001) year age groups. Conclusions: Overall, these findings support the potential for earlier onset of average-risk colorectal cancer screening with the mt-sDNA assay. Impact: These novel data address an identified knowledge gap and strengthen the biologic basis for earlier-onset, average-risk screening with the mt-sDNA assay.

3526 Background: Prior observational studies have suggested that smoking is associated with poorer overall survival after colon cancer (CC) diagnosis. Using data from N0147, a phase III randomized adjuvant trial of patients with stage III CC, we assessed the relationship between smoking status and cancer outcomes (disease-free survival (DFS) and time to recurrence (TTR)), accounting for possible heterogeneity by patient and tumor characteristics. Methods: Patients completed a risk factor questionnaire at baseline prior to randomization to FOLFOX or FOLFOX+cetuximab (N=1968). Information was collected on smoking and other lifestyle factors, including alcohol consumption, body mass index (BMI), and physical activity. Multivariate Cox models assessed the association between smoking history and the primary trial outcome of DFS, as well TTR, adjusting for other lifestyle and clinical factors. The median follow-up was 3.5 years. Results: Overall, 52% of patients were former or current smokers. Compared to never smokers, ever smokers experienced significantly shorter DFS [3-year DFS: 70% vs 74%, hazard ratio (HR)=1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.42]. This association persisted after adjusting for age, sex, tumor subsite, number of nodes involved, T-stage, mismatch repair deficiency, BRAF mutation status, performance score, physical activity, BMI, and alcohol consumption (HR=1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.49). There was significant interaction in this association by BRAF mutation status (p=0.02): smoking was associated with shorter DFS in BRAF wildtype CC patients (HR=1.25, 95% CI: 1.04-1.51) but not in BRAF mutant CC patients (HR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.47-1.10). Patterns of association with smoking, overall and by BRAF status, were identical in analyses of TTR. Conclusions: Overall, smoking was significantly associated with shorter DFS and TTR in CC patients. These adverse relationships were most evident in patients with BRAF wildtype CC.