Citations 7

Unplanned implant removal in locally advanced breast cancer

The Breast Journal | March 14, 2021 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 466-471

10.1111/tbj.14224 | PMID 33715231

Comparison of Universal Genetic Testing vs Guideline-Directed Targeted Testing for Patients With Hereditary Cancer Syndrome

JAMA Oncology | October 30, 2020 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 230

10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6252 | PMID 33126242

Impact of adjuvant trastuzumab on locoregional failure rates in a randomized clinical trial: North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 (alliance) study

Cancer | September 21, 2020 | Volume: 126 | Issue: 24 | Pages: 5239-5246

10.1002/cncr.33154 | PMID 32931029

BackgroundThe goal of this study was to assess the impact of trastuzumab on locoregional failure.METHODSThe analysis included 2763 patients with HER2‐positive (HER2+) breast cancer who were randomly assigned to adjuvant doxorubicin (A), cyclophosphamide (C), paclitaxel (T) and trastuzumab (H) (arm A, AC→T [n = 922]; arm B, AC→T→H [n = 988]; arm C, AC→T+H→H [n = 853]). Radiotherapy was given after AC→T concurrently with H. Radiotherapy was given after lumpectomy (L) or after mastectomy (M) with ≥4 positive lymph nodes but was optional for 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes. Locoregional failures at 10 years (LFR10) as first events were compared using competing risk analysis.ResultsThe median follow‐up was 13.0 years. The first site of failure was local‐only in 96 cases, locoregional in 16 cases, regional in 32 cases, and not specified in 2 cases; LFR10 was 4.8% (95% CI 4.1%‐5.7%). LFR10 was 5.5% (95% CI 4.3%‐7.2%), 4.9% (95% CI 3.7%‐6.4%), and 2.8% (95% CI 1.9%‐4.1%) in arms A, B, and C (B vs A: hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, P = .62; C vs A: HR 0.72, P = .12). For estrogen receptor–positive patients, LFR10 was 3.7% (95% CI 2.8%‐4.8%) and for estrogen receptor–negative patients, it was 6.1% (95% CI 5.0%‐7.4%; HR 0.61, P = .004). Local treatment included L+RT (n = 1044 [38%]), M+RT (n = 1025 [37%]), and M (n = 694 [25%]). LFR10 was 6.% (95% CI 5.0%‐7.8%), 3.0% (95% CI 2.1%‐4.3%), and 5.5% (95% CI 4.0%‐7.4%) for L+RT, M+RT, and M, respectively (M+RT vs L+RT: HR 0.43, P < .001; M vs L+RT: HR 0.88, P = .57). For 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes, LFR10 was 6.5% (95% CI 4.8%‐8.9%), 4.1% (95% CI 2.4%‐7.0%), and 4.3% (95% CI 2.9%‐6.5%) in L+RT, M+RT, and M, respectively (M vs L+RT: HR 0.68, P = .14; M vs M+RT: HR 1.2, P = .6).ConclusionLow 10‐year LFRs were seen regardless of trastuzumab use. Differences in local therapy in patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes did not appear to improve local control. Local therapy studies for HER2+ and other tumor characteristics are important as the role of local therapies continues to evolve.
Acute toxicities after proton beam therapy following breast‐conserving surgery for breast cancer: Multi‐institutional prospective PCG registry analysis

The Breast Journal | April 16, 2020 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1760-1764

10.1111/tbj.13812 | PMID 32297453

Proton beam therapy reirradiation for breast cancer: Multi‐institutional prospective PCG registry analysis

The Breast Journal | July 24, 2019 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1160-1170

10.1111/tbj.13423 | PMID 31338974

Radiation and the heart: systematic review of dosimetry and cardiac endpoints

Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy | October 26, 2018 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 931-950

10.1080/14779072.2018.1538785 | PMID 30360659

First report of proton beam therapy for breast angiosarcoma from the prospective PCG registry

Acta Oncologica | January 5, 2018 | Volume: 57 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 992-994

10.1080/0284186x.2017.1423179 | PMID 29303019