Vile, Richard G.

Surface disinfection is part of a larger mitigation strategy to prevent the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus causing coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Research evaluating the time, nature, and extent of surface disinfection of replication-competent viruses is needed. We evaluated the efficacy of two disinfectants against a replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 surrogate on three common public surfaces. Vesicular stomatitis virus expressing green fluorescent protein (VSV-GFP) was our replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 surrogate. Disinfection occurred using Super Sani-Cloth Germicidal Disposable Wipes and Oxivir Tb spray per manufacturer instructions to test the efficacy at reducing the presence, viability, and later replication of VSV-GFP on stainless steel, laminate wood, and porcelain surfaces using standardized methods after recovery and toxicity testing. During the main trials, we placed 100 µL spots of VSV-GFP at viral titers of 108, 107, and 106 PFU/mL on each surface prior to disinfection. Trials were completed in triplicate and post-disinfection measurements on each surface were compared to the measurements of non-disinfected surfaces. Disinfectants were considered efficacious when ≥3-log10 reduction in the number of infectious VSV-GFP virus units was observed on a given surface during all trials. Both disinfectants produced a ≥3.23-log10 reduction in infectious VSV-GFP virus unit numbers, with all trials showing no viable, replication-competent VSV-GFP present on any tested surface. The two disinfectants eliminated the presence, viability, and later replication of VSV-GFP, our SARS-CoV-2 surrogate, on all surfaces. This information suggests that, if following manufacturer instructions, overcleaning surfaces with multiple disinfectant solutions may be unnecessary.

Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a particularly aggressive primary brain tumor that is relatively common in adults. The disease comes with a dismal prognosis, often with expected survival just over a year when treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. A promising addition to our GBM treatment arsenal are oncolytic viruses (OVs), a class of immunotherapy now in clinical trials. The most effective OVs home in on tumor cells, killing them and releasing tumor-associated antigens that elicit antitumor immunity. This effectiveness, however, varies depending on the cell state—a property that may be influenced by the composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of GBM. Cellular communication network factor 1 (CCN1) is found in the ECM of the majority of GBMs and is predictive of resistance to OVs, particularly those derived from herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). In this study, our aim is to understand how extracellular CCN1 alters the GBM intracellular state in a manner that confers resistance to OVs. We began by using our NetDecoder platform to build CCN1-specific prioritized protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks from published LN229 human GBM transcriptomic datasets. From this network, we identified 12 PPI edges that dominate the network flow in CCN1-high LN229 cells when compared to CCN1-low controls. The 21 unique nodes that comprise these binary PPI edges were extracted and subjected to downstream biological process overrepresentation analyses using Gene Ontology. We found that the cytokine-mediated signaling pathway (FDR = 4.2 x 10-11; enrichment ratio = 15.8) and the cellular response to cytokine stimulus (FDR = 3.1 x 10-9; enrichment ratio = 10.9) were highly enriched when mapped to these nodes. We conclude that CCN1, acting as a paracrine signal in the GBM tumor microenvironment, primes the cell to inhibit HSV-1 and other candidate OV replication prior to any virus interactions, thus contributing to immunovirotherapy resistance. While CCN1 and its cell surface integrin binding partners are ostensible drug targets for overcoming this resistance, pharmacologic interventions that target CCN1-specific high flow edges in our prioritized PPI network may be more effective. Citation Format: Dileep D. Monie, Cristina Correia, Cheng Zhang, Choong Ung, Richard G. Vile, Hu Li. Innate immunity and cytokine signaling pathways drive resistance to HSV-1 oncolytic immunovirotherapy in glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1679.

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) and adoptive T cell therapy (ACT) each possess direct tumour cytolytic capabilities, and their combination potentially seems like a match made in heaven to complement the strengths and weakness of each modality. While providing strong innate immune stimulation that can mobilize adaptive responses, the magnitude of anti-tumour T cell priming induced by OVs is often modest. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cells bypass conventional T cell education through introduction of a synthetic receptor; however, realization of their full therapeutic properties can be stunted by the heavily immune-suppressive nature of the tumour microenvironment (TME). Oncolytic viruses have thus been seen as a natural ally to overcome immunosuppressive mechanisms in the TME which limit CAR T cell infiltration and functionality. Engineering has further endowed viruses with the ability to express transgenes in situ to relieve T cell tumour-intrinsic resistance mechanisms and decorate the tumour with antigen to overcome antigen heterogeneity or loss. Despite this helpful remodeling of the tumour microenvironment, it has simultaneously become clear that not all virus induced effects are favourable for CAR T, begging the question whether viruses act as valets ushering CAR T into their active site, or vandals which cause chaos leading to both tumour and T cell death. Herein, we summarize recent studies combining these two therapeutic modalities and seek to place them within the broader context of viral T cell immunology which will help to overcome the current limitations of effective CAR T therapy to make the most of combinatorial strategies.

AbstractThe apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC) family protects against infection by degrading incoming viral genomes through cytosine deamination. Here, we review how the potential to unleash these potent DNA mutagens comes at a price as APOBEC DNA mutagenesis can contribute to development of multiple types of cancer. In addition, because viral infection induces its expression, APOBEC is seen as the enemy of oncolytic virotherapy through mutation of the viral genome and by generating virotherapy-resistant tumors. Therefore, overall APOBEC in cancer has received very poor press. However, we also speculate how there may be silver linings to the storm clouds (kataegis) associated with APOBEC activity. Thus, although mutagenic genomic chaos promotes emergence of ever more aggressive subclones, it also provides significant opportunity for cytotoxic and immune therapies. In particular, the superpower of cancer immunotherapy derives in part from mutation, wherein generation of tumor neoantigens—neoantigenesis—exposes tumor cells to functional T-cell repertoires, and susceptibility to immune checkpoint blockade. Moreover, APOBECs may be able to induce suprathreshold levels of cellular mutation leading to mitotic catastrophe and direct tumor cell killing. Finally, we discuss the possibility that linking predictable APOBEC-induced mutation with escape from specific frontline therapies could identify mutated molecules/pathways that can be targeted with small molecules and/or immunotherapies in a Trap and Ambush strategy. Together, these considerations lead to the counterintuitive hypothesis that, instead of attempting to expunge and excoriate APOBEC activity in cancer therapy, it might be exploited—and even, counterintuitively, encouraged.

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are a class of immunotherapeutic agents with promising preclinical results for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) but have shown limited success in recent clinical trials. Advanced bioengineering principles from disciplines such as synthetic and systems biology are needed to overcome the current challenges faced in developing effective OV-based immunotherapies for GBMs, including off-target effects and poor clinical responses. Synthetic biology is an emerging field that focuses on the development of synthetic DNA constructs that encode networks of genes and proteins (synthetic genetic circuits) to perform novel functions, whereas systems biology is an analytical framework that enables the study of complex interactions between host pathways and these synthetic genetic circuits. In this review, the authors summarize synthetic and systems biology concepts for developing programmable, logic-based OVs to treat GBMs. Programmable OVs can increase selectivity for tumor cells and enhance the local immunological response using synthetic genetic circuits. The authors discuss key principles for developing programmable OV-based immunotherapies, including how to 1) select an appropriate chassis, a vector that carries a synthetic genetic circuit, and 2) design a synthetic genetic circuit that can be programmed to sense key signals in the GBM microenvironment and trigger release of a therapeutic payload. To illustrate these principles, some original laboratory data are included, highlighting the need for systems biology studies, as well as some preliminary network analyses in preparation for synthetic biology applications. Examples from the literature of state-of-the-art synthetic genetic circuits that can be packaged into leading candidate OV chassis are also surveyed and discussed.

Abstract Immunosuppression of unknown etiology is a hallmark feature of glioblastoma (GBM) and is characterized by decreased CD4 T cell counts and down regulation of MHC class II expression on peripheral blood monocytes in patients. This immunosuppression is a critical barrier to the successful development of immunotherapies for GBM. We recapitulated the immunosuppression observed in GBM patients in the C57BL/6 mouse and investigated the etiology of low CD4 T cell counts. We determined that thymic involution was a hallmark feature of immunosuppression in three distinct models of CNS cancer, including mice harboring GL261 glioma, B16 melanoma, and in a spontaneous model of Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG). In addition to thymic involution, we determined that tumor growth in the brain induced significant splenic involution, reductions in peripheral T cells, reduced MHC class II expression on hematopoietic cells, and a modest increase in bone marrow resident CD4 T cells with a naïve phenotype. Using parabiosis we report that thymic involution, declines in peripheral T cell counts, and reduced MHC class II expression levels were mediated through circulating blood-derived factors. Conversely, T cell sequestration in the bone marrow was not governed through circulating factors. Serum isolated from glioma-bearing mice potently inhibited proliferation and functions of T cells both in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, the factor responsible for immunosuppression in serum is nonsteroidal and of high molecular weight. Through further analysis of neurological disease models, we determined that the aforementioned immunosuppression was not unique to cancer itself, but rather occurs in response to CNS injury. Noncancerous acute neurological insults also induced significant thymic involution and rendered serum immunosuppressive. Both thymic involution and serum-derived immunosuppression were reversible upon clearance of brain insults. These findings demonstrate that CNS cancers cause multifaceted immunosuppression and pinpoint circulating factors as a target of intervention to restore immunity.

Abstract Immunosuppression of unknown aetiology is a hallmark feature of glioblastoma and is characterized by decreased CD4 T-cell counts and downregulation of major histocompatibility complex class II expression on peripheral blood monocytes in patients. This immunosuppression is a critical barrier to the successful development of immunotherapies for glioblastoma. We recapitulated the immunosuppression observed in glioblastoma patients in the C57BL/6 mouse and investigated the aetiology of low CD4 T-cell counts. We determined that thymic involution was a hallmark feature of immunosuppression in three distinct models of brain cancer, including mice harbouring GL261 glioma, B16 melanoma, and in a spontaneous model of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. In addition to thymic involution, we determined that tumour growth in the brain induced significant splenic involution, reductions in peripheral T cells, reduced MHC II expression on blood leucocytes, and a modest increase in bone marrow resident CD4 T cells. Using parabiosis we report that thymic involution, declines in peripheral T-cell counts, and reduced major histocompatibility complex class II expression levels were mediated through circulating blood-derived factors. Conversely, T-cell sequestration in the bone marrow was not governed through circulating factors. Serum isolated from glioma-bearing mice potently inhibited proliferation and functions of T cells both in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, the factor responsible for immunosuppression in serum is non-steroidal and of high molecular weight. Through further analysis of neurological disease models, we determined that the immunosuppression was not unique to cancer itself, but rather occurs in response to brain injury. Non-cancerous acute neurological insults also induced significant thymic involution and rendered serum immunosuppressive. Both thymic involution and serum-derived immunosuppression were reversible upon clearance of brain insults. These findings demonstrate that brain cancers cause multifaceted immunosuppression and pinpoint circulating factors as a target of intervention to restore immunity.

Background The aggressive clinical behavior of poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancers (PDTC and ATC) has proven challenging to treat, and survival beyond a few months from diagnosis is rare. Although 30%–60% of these tumors contain mutations in the BRAF gene, inhibitors designed specifically to target oncogenic BRAF have shown limited and only short-lasting therapeutic benefits as single agents, thus highlighting the need for improved treatment strategies, including novel combinations. Methods Using a BRAFV600E-driven mouse model of ATC, we investigated the therapeutic efficacy of the combination of BRAF inhibition and oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV). Analyses of samples from tumor-bearing mice were performed to immunologically characterize the effects of different treatments. These immune data were used to inform the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors into triple combination therapies. Results We characterized the immune landscape in vivo following BRAF inhibitor treatment and detected only modest immune changes. We, therefore, hypothesized that the addition of oncolytic virotherapy to BRAF inhibition in thyroid cancer would create a more favorable tumor immune microenvironment, boost the inflammatory status of tumors and improve BRAF inhibitor therapy. First, we showed that thyroid cancer cells were susceptible to infection with oHSV and that this process was associated with activation of the immune tumor microenvironment in vivo. Next, we showed improved therapeutic responses when combining oHSV and BRAF inhibition in vivo, although no synergistic effects were seen in vitro, further confirming that the dominant effect of oHSV in this context was likely immune-mediated. Importantly, both gene and protein expression data revealed an increase in activation of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells in the tumor in combination-treated samples. The benefit of combination oHSV and BRAF inhibitor therapy was abrogated when T cells or NK cells were depleted in vivo. In addition, we showed upregulation of PD-L1 and CTLA-4 following combined treatment and demonstrated that blockade of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis or CTLA-4 further improved combination therapy. Conclusions The combination of oHSV and BRAF inhibition significantly improved survival in a mouse model of ATC by enhancing immune-mediated antitumor effects, and triple combination therapies, including either PD-1 or CTLA-4 blockade, further improved therapy.

Abstract Background Diffuse midline glioma, formerly DIPG (diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma), is the deadliest pediatric brainstem tumor with median survival of less than one year. Here, we investigated (i) whether direct delivery of adenovirus-expressing cluster of differentiation (CD)40 ligand (Ad-CD40L) to brainstem tumors would induce immune-mediated tumor clearance and (ii) if so, whether therapy would be associated with a manageable toxicity due to immune-mediated inflammation in the brainstem. Methods Syngeneic gliomas in the brainstems of immunocompetent mice were treated with Ad-CD40L and survival, toxicity, and immune profiles determined. A clinically translatable vector, whose replication would be tightly restricted to tumor cells, rAd-Δ24-CD40L, was tested in human patient–derived diffuse midline gliomas and immunocompetent models. Results Expression of Ad-CD40L restricted to brainstem gliomas by pre-infection induced complete rejection, associated with immune cell infiltration, of which CD4+ T cells were critical for therapy. Direct intratumoral injection of Ad-CD40L into established brainstem tumors improved survival and induced some complete cures but with some acute toxicity. RNA-sequencing analysis showed that Ad-CD40L therapy induced neuroinflammatory immune responses associated with interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, and tumor necrosis factor α. Therefore, to generate a vector whose replication, and transgene expression, would be tightly restricted to tumor cells, we constructed rAd-Δ24-CD40L, the backbone of which has already entered clinical trials for diffuse midline gliomas. Direct intratumoral injection of rAd-Δ24-CD40L, with systemic blockade of IL-6 and IL-1β, generated significant numbers of cures with readily manageable toxicity. Conclusions Virus-mediated delivery of CD40L has the potential to be effective in treating diffuse midline gliomas without obligatory neuroinflammation-associated toxicity.

Abstract Systemic immunosuppression following neurological insults including stroke, traumatic brain injury, and glioblastoma (GBM) causes mortality and leads to failure of immune-modulating therapies. Exact immunological nature and the underlying mechanisms of this immunosuppression are unknown. Our goal was to define effects of neurological insults given exclusively to the brain on the thymus. The thymus is the primary immune organ responsible for T-cell development and maintenance both in children and in adults. We evaluated the brain-thymus communication using the following neurological insults: physical injury, CNS viral infection, sterile injury, tumor implantation, and seizures. All insults resulted in significant thymic involution that was reversible upon clearance of the insult. Thymic involution did not occur following similar peripheral insults. We next demonstrated that the GL261 model of GBM recapitulates hallmark features of peripheral immunosuppression observed in GBM patients including low CD4 T-cell counts. Thus, we aimed to further study the immunosuppression affecting the thymus in this clinically relevant model. Principle component analysis following RNA-sequencing of thymi from naïve and glioma-bearing mice revealed unbiased separation of the groups suggesting that the thymus is directly affected by a brain tumor. To determine the extent to which thymic involution was caused by a soluble factor we employed parabiosis. We demonstrated that thymic involution was transferable from glioma-bearing to non-tumor-bearing parabionts. Similarly, serum taken from GL261 glioma-bearing mice potently inhibited proliferation of T-cells in vitro. Together our data demonstrate that CNS-specific insults, regardless of nature, cause immunosuppression by prompting thymic involution through circulating factors. This accounts at least partially for immune deficiencies observed following neurological injuries. Identification of this suppressive factor is crucial in designing future therapeutics for GBM patients, and patients with other acute and chronic neurological trauma.