Sui, Yi

Abstract Background: MR fingerprinting (MRF) is a novel imaging method proposed for the diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis (MS). This study aims to determine if MR Fingerprinting (MRF) relaxometry can differentiate frontal normal appearing white matter (F-NAWM) and splenium in patients diagnosed with MS as compared to controls and to characterize the relaxometry of demyelinating plaques relative to the time of diagnosis.Methods: Three-dimensional (3D) MRF data were acquired on a 3.0T MRI system resulting in isotropic voxels (1x1x1mm3) and a total acquisition time of 4min 38s. Data were collected on 18 subjects paired with 18 controls. Regions of interested were drawn over MRF-derived T1 relaxometry maps encompassing selected MS lesions, F-NAWM and splenium. T1 and T2 relaxometry features from those segmented areas were used to classify MS lesions from F-NAWM and splenium with T-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding algorithms (T-SNE). Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed to discriminate NAWM and Splenium in MS compared with controls. Results: Mean out-of-fold machine learning prediction accuracy for discriminant results between MS patients and controls for F-NAWM was 65% and approached 90% for the splenium. There was significant positive correlation between time since diagnosis and MS lesions mean T2 (p=0.015), minimum T1 (p=0.03) and negative correlation with splenium uniformity (p=0.04). Perfect discrimination (AUC=1) was achieved between selected features from MS lesions and F-NAWM.Conclusions: 3D-MRF has the ability to differentiate between MS and controls based on relaxometry properties from the F-NAWM and splenium. Whole brain coverage allows the assessment of quantitative properties within lesions that provide chronological assessment of the time from MS diagnosis.

PurposeTo develop a novel magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) acquisition using a hybrid radial EPI readout scheme (TURBINE), and to demonstrate its feasibility to obtain wave images and stiffness maps in a phantom and in vivo brain.MethodThe proposed 3D TURBINE‐MRE is based on a spoiled gradient‐echo MRE sequence with the EPI readout radially rotating about the phase‐encoding axis to sample a full 3D k‐space. A polyvinyl chloride phantom and 6 volunteers were scanned on a compact 3T GE scanner with a 32‐channel head coil at 80 Hz and 60 Hz external vibration, respectively. For comparison, a standard 2D, multislice, spin‐echo (SE) EPI‐MRE acquisition was also performed with the same motion encoding and resolution. The TURBINE‐MRE images were off‐line reconstructed with iterative SENSE algorithm. The regional ROI analysis was performed on the 6 volunteers, and the median stiffness values were compared between SE‐EPI‐MRE and TURBINE‐MRE.ResultsThe 3D wave‐field images and the generated stiffness maps were comparable between TURBINE‐MRE and standard SE‐EPI‐MRE for the phantom and the volunteers. The Bland–Altman plot showed no significant difference in the median regional stiffness values between the two methods. The stiffness measured with the 2 methods had a strong linear relationship with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.943.ConclusionWe demonstrated the feasibility of the new TURBINE‐MRE sequence for acquiring the desired 3D wave‐field data and stiffness maps in a phantom and in‐vivo brains. This pilot study encourages further exploration of TURBINE‐MRE for functional MRE, free‐breathing abdominal MRE, and cardiac MRE applications.

PurposeTo introduce newly developed MR elastography (MRE)‐based dual‐saturation imaging and dual‐sensitivity motion encoding schemes to directly measure in vivo skull–brain motion, and to study the skull–brain coupling in volunteers with these approaches.MethodsSix volunteers were scanned with a high‐performance compact 3T‐MRI scanner. The skull–brain MRE images were obtained with a dual‐saturation imaging where the skull and brain motion were acquired with fat‐ and water‐suppression scans, respectively. A dual‐sensitivity motion encoding scheme was applied to estimate the heavily wrapped phase in skull by the simultaneous acquisition of both low‐ and high‐sensitivity phase during a single MRE exam. The low‐sensitivity phase was used to guide unwrapping of the high‐sensitivity phase. The amplitude and temporal phase delay of the rigid‐body motion between the skull and brain was measured, and the skull–brain interface was visualized by slip interface imaging (SII).ResultsBoth skull and brain motion can be successfully acquired and unwrapped. The skull–brain motion analysis demonstrated the motion transmission from the skull to the brain is attenuated in amplitude and delayed. However, this attenuation (%) and delay (rad) were considerably greater with rotation (59 ± 7%, 0.68 ± 0.14 rad) than with translation (92 ± 5%, 0.04 ± 0.02 rad). With SII the skull–brain slip interface was not completely evident, and the slip pattern was spatially heterogeneous.ConclusionThis study provides a framework for acquiring in vivo voxel‐based skull and brain displacement using MRE that can be used to characterize the skull–brain coupling system for understanding of mechanical brain protection mechanisms, which has potential to facilitate risk management for future injury.

PurposeTo implement a reduced field of view (rFOV) technique for cardiac MR elastography (MRE) and to demonstrate the improvement in image quality of both magnitude images and post‐processed MRE stiffness maps compared to the conventional full field of view (full‐FOV) acquisition.MethodsWith Institutional Review Board approval, 17 healthy volunteers underwent both full‐FOV and rFOV cardiac MRE scans using 140‐Hz vibrations. Two cardiac radiologists blindly compared the magnitude images and stiffness maps and graded the images based on several image quality attributes using a 5‐point ordinal scale. Fisher's combined probability test was performed to assess the overall evaluation. The octahedral shear strain‐based signal‐to‐noise ratio (OSS‐SNR) and median stiffness over the left ventricular myocardium were also compared.ResultsOne volunteer was excluded because of an inconsistent imaging resolution during the exam. In the remaining 16 volunteers (9 males, 7 females), the rFOV scans outperformed the full‐FOV scans in terms of subjective image quality and ghosting artifacts in the magnitude images and stiffness maps, as well as the overall preference. The quantitative measurements showed that rFOV had significantly higher OSS‐SNR (median: 1.4 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2–1.5] vs. 2.1 [95% CI: 1.8–2.4]), P < 0.05) compared to full‐FOV. Although no significant change was found in the median myocardial stiffness between the 2 scans, we observed a decrease in the stiffness variation within the myocardium from 2.1 kPa (95% CI: [1.9, 2.3]) to 1.9 kPa (95% CI: [1.7, 2.0]) for full‐FOV and rFOV, respectively (P < 0.05) in a subgroup of 7 subjects with ghosting present in the myocardium.ConclusionThis pilot volunteer study demonstrated that rFOV cardiac MRE has the capability to reduce ghosting and to improve image quality in both MRE magnitude images and stiffness maps. Magn Reson Med 80:231–238, 2018. © 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.