Litzow, Mark R.

Abstract Abstract 460 Background: CYT387 is a potent JAK-1/2 inhibitor that suppresses the in vitro growth of cells harboring JAK2V617F (Leukemia 2009;23:1441) and was effective in a murine model of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) (Blood 2010;115:5232). Aims/Methods: To assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic behavior of CYT387 in a Phase I dose-escalation study in patients with high- or intermediate-risk primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-PV or post-essential thrombocythemia (ET) myelofibrosis. The secondary objective was evaluation of preliminary efficacy. CYT387 was administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles. Once dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was identified, a dose-confirmation cohort initiated treatment at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or lower. Result: Thirty six subjects (median age 64 years) have been enrolled (targeted accrual 120); 18 each in the dose escalation and dose confirmation phases. Twenty-three subjects had PMF, 8 post-PV MF, and 5 post-ET MF; 81% were JAK2V617F-positive. Median palpable spleen size was 18 cm and 20 subjects (56%) were red cell transfusion-dependent at study entry. Prior treatment included JAK inhibitors (9 and 1 subjects with INCB018424 and TG101348, respectively) and pomalidomide in 9 patients. The median treatment duration to date is 15 weeks (range 4–38). Dose-linear plasma exposures were observed up to 300 mg/day, with mean elimination T1/2 at steady state ranging from 3.9 to 5 hours across doses. Toxicity: All 36 subjects were evaluable for toxicity. At 400 mg/day, 2 of 6 subjects experienced DLT (1 each with asymptomatic grade 3 hyperlipasemia and grade 3 headache that were reversible upon holding drug); consequently, the MTD was declared at 300 mg/day. In the dose-confirmation phase, subjects were started at one of 2 dose levels that were deemed clinically effective: 150 mg/day (n=15) and 300 mg/day (n=3). Thirty-five subjects are currently on active therapy: 100 mg/day (n=2), 150 mg/day (n=20), 300 mg/day (n=10), and 400 mg/day (n=3). CYT387 was well tolerated. No grade 4 non-hematological toxicities were observed. Grade 3 non-hematologic adverse events were infrequent and included increased transaminases (n=2), increased alkaline phosphatase (n=2), headache/head pressure (n=2), increased lipase (n=1), and QTc prolongation (n=1). Thirteen (36%) subjects experienced “first-dose effect” characterized by grade 1 lightheadedness and hypotension; this phenomenon was self-limited and generally resolved within 3–4 hours with rare recurrence. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 8 (22%) subjects, and treatment-emergent grade 3 anemia was seen in 1 subject only (3%). Treatment-emergent grade 3/4 neutropenia was not observed. Efficacy: Thirty two of 36 subjects who completed at least 1 cycle were eligible for response assessment: Anemia: Twenty two subjects were evaluable for anemia response (baseline Hgb <10 g/dL or red cell transfusion-dependent). Of these, 9 subjects (41%) achieved the threshold of response for “Clinical Improvement (CI)” per the International Working Group for MPN Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria, including 2 of 4 subjects who were previously treated with INCB018424. An additional 5 subjects experienced a >50% reduction in transfusion requirement, thus increasing the total anemia response rate to 63%. Splenomegaly: Thirty of 32 evaluable subjects had splenomegaly at baseline: median 20 cm; range 10–32 cm. Twenty nine subjects (97%) had some degree of spleen size reduction (median 9 cm; range 2–18 cm): 11 (37%) patients have achieved a minimum 50% decrease in palpable spleen size, thus qualifying them for a CI, including 3 of 8 subjects (38%) who were previously treated with INCB018424. Constitutional symptoms: The proportion of patients with the following symptoms at baseline, are: fatigue (97%), pruritus (22%), night sweats (38%), cough (13%), bone pain (28%), and fever (16%). At last follow up, improvement (complete resolution) in these symptoms was reported by 68% (16%), 86% (57%), 83% (75%), 75% (50%), 78% (44%), and 100% (100%), respectively. Conclusion: CYT387 is first-in-class of the JAK inhibitors with a significant response rate in anemia in myelofibrosis patients. The drug also shows substantial activity in reducing spleen size and controlling constitutional symptoms. CYT387 is well tolerated, and treatment responses have been seen both at (300 mg/day) and below (150 mg/day) the MTD. Disclosures: Pardanani: Cytopia Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Clinical trial data for CYT387 use in Myelofibrosis. Fida:YM Biosciences Australia: Employment, Equity Ownership. Burns:YM Biosciences Australia: Employment, Equity Ownership. Smith: YM Biosciences Australia: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Abstract Abstract 2525 Background: Patients with relapsed AML have a very poor outcome. The molecular signature at diagnosis has emerged as a significant marker for prognostic, and possibly therapeutic, values in newly-diagnosed AML. FLT3 mutations are found in about 25–30% of AML pts. In the absence of FDA-approved agents for FLT3, the prognostic value of FLT3 mutation on clinical outcome for relapsed AML (rAML) is not well documented. Aim: To study clinical implications of FLT3 status on rAML. Methods: All adult pts with AML diagnosed and treated at Mayo Clinic between 2003–2011were studied. Retrospective data collection included pts' demographics, laboratory tests, bone marrow biopsies, FLT3 mutation (internal tandem duplication (ITD) and tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutation), and survival information. IRB approval was obtained in accordance with Helsinki declaration. Chi-Square and T-test were used for comparatives between groups and Kaplan-Meier test was applied for survival estimates using JMP 9.0 software. Results: A total of 192 pts with newly-diagnosed with AML were identified. Sixty percent (115) were males, 88% (168) were Caucasians, 26% (49) had antecedent hematological disease (AHD), and 13% (25) had previous exposure to chemo- or radiotherapy. Forty-seven percent had a normal chromosomal analysis, and 18% (35) had FLT3 mutation (28 ITD, 7 TKD). In FLT3-mutated pts, median WBC was 70 x109/L (p=0.0016), hemoglobin 9.5 g /dL, and platelets 48 x109/L, compared to 8.8 x109/L, 9.1 g/dL, 50 x109/L in the rest of pts, respectively. Peripheral blood blasts were elevated in FLT3-mutated group compared to rest of pts (p 0.0059). A total of 128 pts achieved complete remission (CR), with 79 (62%) subsequently relapsed. Of the relapsed patients, 93% (74) were Caucasians, 54% (43) males, 22% (17) had AHD, and 8% (6) had prior chemo- or radiotherapy. Cytogenetics were diploid in 49% (39) and complex in 15% (12). Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was performed in 30% (24) of pts. Eleven of 79 (14%) pts were FLT3-mutated at relapse (Group 1); with 1 pt having TKD-mutation. Forty-eight percent (38) of pts had unmutated-FLT3 (Group 2), and 38% (30) pts were FLT3-unknown (Group 3). In group 1, median WBC was 9.9 x109/L, hemoglobin 10.55 g /dL, platelets 55 x109/L, compared to 3.2 x109/L (p=0.0034), 10.55 g/dL, and 58 x109/L in group 2, respectively. Peripheral blasts were significantly elevated in group 1 compared to group 2 (38% vs 4%, p <0.0001). Surprisingly, 3/11 pts (27%) with FLT3 mutation at relapse were unmutated at diagnosis. CR was achieved in 2/11 (18%) pts in group 1 compared to 15/38 (39%) in group 2 (p=0.19). Median overall survival in rAML was significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2 (90 days vs 229 days, p 0.0076). This survival difference was statistically more significant in pts with diploid cytogenetics at relapse compared to the rest (p 0.0009 vs 0.48, respectively). Within 1.5 years, all pts in group 1 died, compared to 21% survived in group 2. Conclusion: FLT3-mutated AML pts had a significantly higher peripheral WBC and blasts at both diagnosis and relapse. Importantly, FLT3 at relapse was found to be mutated in one quarter of pts who were wild-type FLT3 at diagnosis; raising the importance of assessing FLT3 gene on all relapses. FLT3 mutation significantly predicted worse median overall survival in rAML raising the need for novel agents, such as FLT3 inhibitors, in this population. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) remains the backbone of most regimens for the treatment of AML. The incorporation of ara-C into DNA activates checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) causing replication fork slowing, the accumulation of cells in S phase, and diminished ara-C cytotoxicity. The selective Chk1 inhibitor MK-8776 abrogates ara-C-induced S-phase arrest, thereby enhancing ara-C-induced apoptosis in vitro.1 A phase I trial demonstrated the safety of MK-8876 in combination with infusional ara-C and correlative studies demonstrated increased ara-C-induced H2Ax phosphorylation in AML cells, consistent with unrepaired DNA damage.2 Herein, we report data from a phase II trial comparing ara-C plus MK8876 with ara-C alone. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory AML were randomized to receive either ara-C 2 gm/m2 via continuous infusion (CIV) over 72 hours on days 1 and 10 with MK-8776 100 mg flat dose infused over 30 minutes on days 2, 3, 11, and 12 (combo); or ara-C alone on the same schedule (control). The primary end point was response rate (CR+CRi). Adverse events (AEs) for all patients were reported according to the NCI-CTCAE version 4.0. Correlative studies were performed on blood and marrow samples collected prior to treatment on days 1, 2 and 3 and at one hour after MK-8776 infusion (PB only). Marrow and circulating blasts were analyzed using semi-quantitative flow cytometric determinations of blast cell gH2AX expression, a marker of DNA damage. Results: Thirty-two patients were treated at 4 sites with 14 assigned to the combo arm and 18 to the control arm. The study was stopped early due to lack of drug availability. The median age was 60 (range 29-72) and 17 (53%) were male. Nine (28%) had refractory AML, 16 (50%) were in first relapse, and 7 (22%) were in second relapse. Eleven (34%) had undergone a prior bone marrow transplant (BMT). Risk stratification classified 1 (3%) patient as favorable risk disease, 11 (34%) as intermediate-1, 8 (25%) as intermediate-2, and 11 (34%) as adverse risk. There were 5 (36%) responses (CR/CRi) and 1 (7%) partial response (PR) in the combo arm, and 8 (44%) responses and 1 (6%) PR in the control arm. Median survival did not differ significantly between the two groups (5.9 months in the combo arm vs. 4.2 months in the control arm). Sub-group analysis showed increased responses in the combo arm for the patients in first relapse (50% vs. 40%) and those with a prior BMT (50% vs. 29%). Most non-hematologic grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were similar in the two groups including febrile neutropenia (64% vs. 61%), infectious complications (50% vs. 50%), and sepsis (21% vs. 17%). Patients in the combo arm experienced more QT prolongation (21% vs. 0%), hypertension (21% vs. 0%), and GI toxicities (21% vs. 0%); while those in the control arm had increased renal (0% vs. 11%) and liver toxicity (7% vs. 17%). Two deaths were attributed to treatment, and both were in the control arm. Eight combo patients had serial PB samples and 2 had serial marrow samples studied by flow cytometry. There was an increase in the percentage of gH2AX+ CD34+ cells on Day 2 directly after MK-8876 infusion (16.9% prior and 36.4% at one hour), which occurred to a lesser extent on Day 3 after MK-8876 infusion (12.7% prior and 15.6% at one hour). Three of eight patients demonstrated a sustained increase in gH2AX+ CD34+ from Day 2 to Day 3, and all three achieved either a PR or CR. Conclusion: This is the first phase II study building on prior work suggesting that inhibition of Chk1 would increase response to ara-C in patients with relapsed or refractory AML. The study confirmed that treatment with the combination is feasible with similar toxicities between the treatment and control groups. The response rates were similar between the two groups with improved responses in patients receiving the combo in first relapse and following BMT. Correlative studies support the finding that responding patients show a sustained increase in DNA damage and this may serve as a biomarker in future studies. Chk1 remains a potential target to improve treatment outcomes with ara-C. References: 1. Schenk EL et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Oct 1; 18(19):5364-73. 2. Karp JE et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Dec 15; 18(24):6723-31. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background L-asparaginase (LASP) depletion of asparagine reduces antithrombin (AT) and fibrinogen and is associated with thromboembolic (TE) and hemorrhagic events (HE). AT replacement in pediatric ALL patients demonstrated safety and potential benefit as thromboprophylaxis in a prospective, randomized trial.(Mitchell et al, 2003) Current consensus supports AT replacement when AT activity is below 60%.(Stock et al, 2011) The incidence of TE and HE in adults receiving AT repletion during LASP or pegylated asparaginase (PEGASP) requires further investigation. Methods This single center, retrospective, observational study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Consecutive adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ALL receiving LASP or PEGASP containing chemotherapy regimens between January 2000 and October 2012 were evaluated. Patients with documented thrombophilia and pre-existing TE or HE were excluded. Patients receiving AT concentrate (ATC) compared to those that did not and were evaluated up to 60 days after the last LASP or PEGASP dose for objectively confirmed TE and HE. Results Of the 74 patients screened, 54 (73%) met inclusion criteria. Forty-seven (87%) received ATC and were evaluable. The remaining 7 (13%) did not meet follow up duration and were excluded from further analysis. Twenty-three (49%) patients received LASP, 20 (42%) received PEGASP and 4 (9%) received both. Distribution per treatment protocols was; CALGB 9111 (n=16 (34%), Larson et al, 1998), E2993 (n=12 (25%), Goldstone et al, 2008), C10403 (n=8 (17%), NLM: NCT00558519), CCG 1941 (n=6 (13%), Gaynon et al, 2006) and Augmented HyperCVAD (n=5 (11%), Faderl et al, 2011). A total of 1465 AT activity levels were analyzed, resulting in 378 doses of ATC. Ten patients (21%) experienced a clinical event, with all events occurring during cycle 1 of chemotherapy (table 1). Median time from last LASP or PEGASP dose to TE was 13 days (range 3-56) with a median of 4 days (range 3-13) from last ATC dose to TE. Median AT activity level at time of TE was 56% (range 47-72). Thrombotic events included; line-related deep vein thrombosis (LRDVT, n=7), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST, n=1) and pulmonary embolism (PE, n=1). One patient with cerebral hemorrhage constituted the only HE. All LRDVT occurred in central venous catheters and management included; line removal (n=3), anticoagulation (n=1), line removal and anticoagulation (n=2) and no intervention (n=1). The single case of PE was managed with anticoagulation. Two patients had a recurrent LRDVT in different locations during subsequent chemotherapy in spite of ongoing ATC supplementation. Conclusions The incidence of TE in adult ALL patients receiving LASP or PEGASP during induction chemotherapy with AT thromboprophylaxis was 19%. LRDVT was the most common TE with a comparable incidence to adult ALL patients not receiving ATC (15%) (Grace et al 2011). There was a small incidence of non-LRDVT (4%) and HE (2%). As induction-phase chemotherapy and placement of central lines are independent risk factors for thrombosis, the cost-effectiveness of AT replacement for prevention of TE during adult ALL treatment requires prospective evaluation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: International Working Group (IWG) has set criteria in 2003 for response assessment in patients with AML; at which time intensive chemotherapy was the main therapy (Cheson, JCO 2003). Hypomethylating agents (HMA) were approved shortly after for the treatment of elderly AML (Fenaux, JCO 2009; Dombret et al Blood 2015). Although few patients achieve a deep response, the majority will have stable disease (SD), some of which could last several months while patients continue to receive HMA and gain clinical benefit. We hereby describe outcomes for patients who achieve SD with HMA for the treatment of elderly unfit AML patients. Methods: A total of 56 AML patients' data from Feb 2007 to June 2015 at Mayo Clinic were reviewed after appropriate IRB approval was obtained. All cases had their bone marrow slides reviewed at our institution. Patients were considered for our study if they received HMA as frontline therapy for their AML. Patients who received HMAs after induction chemotherapy failure or for their MDS were excluded. Response was identified based on 2003 IWG AML response criteria. Patients with SD were categorized into short-lasting (<6 cycles of HMA, cohort 1) or long-lasting (≥6 cycles of HMA, cohort 2) SD.Prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate analyses was based on log-rank testing using JMP software version 10. Results: i) Characteristics: Fifty six AML patients were treated with HMA as frontline therapy with median age of 76 years (range, 59-91), 68% of which were males. Therapy related AML (T-AML) was seen in 2% of the cases. Cytogenetics were favorable risk in 2%, intermediate in 62%, and poor in 36%. Complete remission (CR) was found in 10 (18%) patients, CR with incomplete count recovery in 3 (5%), partial remission (PR) in 3 (5%) patients. Forty patients were non-responders (SD). ii) Characteristics of HMA SD cohorts: Upon comparison of cohort 1 versus cohort 2 there was no statistical significance in median age, white blood count, absolute neutrophil count, platelets, peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts, bone marrow cellularity and sex. Median number of cycles was expectedly higher in cohort 2 vs 1 (9 vs 2, p<0.0001). Intermediate cytogenetic risk was more common in cohort 2 vs 1 (90% vs 43%, p=0.006), while poor risk was more common in cohort 1 vs 2 (57% vs 10%, p=0.006). Only 10% had complex karyotype in cohort 2 compared to 50% in cohort 1 (p=0.017). NPM1 mutation was absent in all cases, while FLT3 mutation was present 30% in cohort 1 and 25% in cohort 2 (p = 0.9). Decitabine was more commonly given in cohort 1 vs cohort 2 (80% vs 50%, p =0.07). iii) Clinical outcome of HMA SD cohorts : Median overall survival was higher in long-lasting SD patients (cohort 2) vs short-lasting SD (18 vs 4 months, p = 0.0002). Upon multivariate analysis, both age (p <0.0001) and long-lasting SD (p =0.01) were statistically significant for overall survival but not cytogenetics risk grouping nor type of HMA administered. Conclusions: Standard response criteria for AML by IWG were developed for intensive chemotherapy and do not apply to newer agents, specifically HMA. Stable disease (SD) could be meaningful to some elderly AML patients when treated with HMA. Intermediate cytogenetics and azacitidine use were more frequent in patients with long-lasting SD. Long-lasting SD did confer a survival benefit in elderly AML patients. Newer response criteria for assessing novel agents' efficacy are needed in this population. Figure Figure. Disclosures Tibes: Italfarmaco S.p.A.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Foran:pfizer: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; medscape: Honoraria; karyopharm: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; agios: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding. Al-Kali:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 524 The International UKALLXII/E2993 trial enrolled 2091 pts with newly diagnosed adult ALL between 1993 and 2006. Patients received 2 months of combination induction chemotherapy followed by an intensification course of high dose methotrexate and L-asparaginase after which pts were randomized to autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) or consolidation and maintenance chemotherapy. Patients <55 years of age with a matched sibling donor were assigned myeloablative allogeneic HSCT (Goldstone, et al, Blood 2008; 111:1827). Here we report a detailed analysis of 1,229 pts from this trial with B-ALL, excluding Philadelphia-chromosome-positive patients. The median age was 30 years (range 14–65) and 59% were male. The median WBC was 9.2×109/L (range 0.1–930) and 73% of pts had a WBC <30 × 109/L. CNS involvement was present in 4% of pts at diagnosis. Comprehensive centralized immunophenotyping was performed in 372 of the 409 (91%) ECOG pts enrolled and initial analysis demonstrated pro-B/pre-pre-B in 17%, early pre-B in 52%, pre-B in 14%, either early pre-B or pre-B in 6%, mature B in 2% and B-lineage, not otherwise specified, in 9%. Outcomes were similar between patients with immunophenotyping data and those without. The complete remission (CR) rate was 93% and there were 4% induction deaths. The overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), relapse risk (RR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 5 years for the overall group is shown in the table. There were no significant differences in CR rate, OS, EFS, RR or NRM for the immunophenotypic subgroups. There was better OS and EFS with less relapse and similar risk of NRM for pts randomized to chemotherapy as compared with autologous HSCT (Figure 1). In the matched sibling donor-no donor comparison, OS and EFS were improved, RR was less and NRM was higher in the donor group (Figure 2). Cytogenetic analysis confirmed that patients with t(4;11) (n=77, 8% total), t(8;14) (n=19, 2% total), a complex karyotype (≥5 abnormalities in the absence of an established chromosomal abnormality) (n=38, 5% total), or low hypoploidy/near triploidy (n=41, 5% total) had an inferior OS and patients with high hyperdiploidy had a superior OS when compared to other patients. In conclusion, this is the largest series of B-ALL in uniformly treated adults ever reported and confirms the superior outcome of patients randomized to chemotherapy as compared with autologous HSCT and shows that patients with a matched sibling donor have an improved survival over patients without a donor. No difference in CR rates or outcome was noted for patients with different immunophenotypic subtypes of B-ALL. Future improvements in outcome of pts with B-ALL will rely on the addition of new agents such as B cell monoclonal antibodies and improvements in allogeneic HCT.Table.Outcomes at 5 years of follow-upnCR rate (%)OSEFSRRNRMOverall12299342375021Pro-B/pre-pre-B639236345421Early pre-B/pre-B2689340345421Age ≤ 35 years746 (61%)9653454516Chi square p<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001Age >35 years483 (39%)8932265930Randomized to autologous HSCT15735316610Log rank p0.030.010.01NSRandomized to chemotherapy1694742558Matched sib donor34452483032Chi square p0.050.03<0.001<0.001No Donor47445415510Values are % except n and p values. CR=complete remission, OS=overall survival, EFS=event-free survival, RR=relapse risk, NRM=non-relapse mortality NS=not significant. The p values represent the difference between age groups for the first comparison, randomized to autologous HSCT versus chemotherapy for the second comparison and between matched sibling donor and no donor for the third comparison. Overall survival by randomized allocation at 10 years Overall survival by donor availability at 10 years Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: AML outcome in elderly patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy continues to be challenging. Hypomethylating agents (HMA) can be effective in these patients but responses are short-lived (Fenaux et al, JCO 2009; Dombret et al Blood 2015). Even though HMAs achieve superior response rates to supportive care alone, complete remissions (CR) are rarely achieved and often quickly lost when they occur. The majority of patients will either have stable disease or progress through therapy. We hereby describe the outcome of these patients at our institution after they fail HMAs. Methods: A total of 56 AML patients' data from Feb 2007 to June 2015 at Mayo Clinic were reviewed after appropriate IRB approval was obtained. All cases had their bone marrow slides reviewed at our institution. Patients were considered for our study if they received HMA as frontline therapy for their AML. Patients who received HMAs after induction chemotherapy failure or for their MDS were excluded. Response was identified based on IWG AML criteria (Cheson et al, JCO 2003). Prognostic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and univariate and multivariate analyses was based on log-rank testing using JMP software version 10. Results: i) Characteristics at Diagnosis: We identified 56 AML patients treated with HMA as frontline therapy with median age of 76 years (range, 59-91), 68% of which were males. Cases were classified as AML with myelodysplasia related changes in 25%, and therapy related myeloid neoplasm in 2%, and not otherwise specific in 73%. Out of 56 cases, 23% were secondary to MDS, 2% ET (Essential Thrombocytopenia), 5% PV (Polycythemia Vera), 5% MF (Myelofibrosis), 4% from CMML (Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia); while 61% were de novo AML. Per cytogenetics data, 2% were considered favorable risk, 62% intermediate, and 36% poor (34% had complex karyotype). ii) Clinical outcome to Frontline HMA: Out of 56 patients, 15(27%) patients received azacitidine (AZA) and 41 (73%) received decitabine (DAC) with a median number of cycles of 4 (range 1-62). Median number of cycles was higher for AZA vs DAC (8 vs 4, p =0.3). CR was found in 10 (18%), CR with incomplete count recovery in 3 (5%), partial remission (PR) in 3 (5%) patients, with overall response of 28% and median response duration of 10 months (range, 1-78 months). Thirteen (81%) out of 16 responders relapsed. Therefore, only 53 patients were included in primary or secondary failure analysis. iii) Clinical outcome to Frontline HMA failure: Out of 53 patients, 12 (23%) received subsequent treatments. Out of the 12 patients, 3 (25%) received another HMA (switch), 2 (17%) subcutaneous low dose cytarabine, 4 (33%) intensive chemotherapy, while 3 (25%) received either therapy on a clinical trial or targeted therapy. None of the 12 patients who got first salvage therapy achieved remission. Five out of the 12 patients received second salvage therapy, 2 (40%) of which achieved CR. Only one patient had third salvage therapy and did not respond. No patient was able to proceed to allogenic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Median overall survival (mOS) for this group was 2 months. Median OS for patients who received subsequent salvage therapies was better than those who did not receive any subsequent therapy after failing HMA (9.5 vs 2 months, p = 0.0009). Conclusions: Elderly patients diagnosed with AML who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. HMA can get some patients into remission but most patients will ultimately fail. Outcome for patients who have primary or secondary (relapse) failure is very poor with a median OS of 2 months. Switch of HMA did not result in any response. Response to salvage therapy continues to be low but offering salvage therapies seem to improve OS. Our study provides historical data for future novel therapies, which are sorely needed for these patients. Figure Figure. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding; Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 579 Background: In AML, age and cytogenetics remain among the major prognostic factors. Age above 55 years and a complex karyotype (CK; ≥ 3 abnormal clones) or the presence of monosomy 7 (M7) are universally associated with unfavorable prognosis. Recent data from HOVON-SAKK (J Clin Onc 26: 4791) suggest that in patients under the age of 60 years, subgroups with poor risk versus very poor risk can be delineated based on the presence of a MK. MK was defined as either the presence of at least two autosomal monosomies or one monosomy plus at least one structural abnormality. Limited data exists regarding the impact of MK in AML patients over the age of 55 years. Methods: Data from 935 AML patients above age 55 enrolled on three prospective ECOG therapeutic clinical trials (E1490, E3993, E3999) between 1990 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed to identify those with MK with single and/or multiple monosomies, MK in the presence or absence of a CK, CK with/without MK, MK with/without M7, and normal karyotype (CN). CK was defined as ≥ 3 clonal abnormalities for the purposes of this study. Complete remission (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: The median age of evaluable patients was 68 years (range 56 – 93) with a male/female ratio of 391/299. Cytogenetic data were evaluable in 690 (74%) subjects. Clonal cytogenetic abnormalities occurred in 399 (58%). Core-binding factor (CBF) abnormalities accounted for 16/399 (4%) whereas CK was detected in 181/399 (45%). MK was present in 172 (25%) evaluable cases, predominantly in the setting of CK (140/172, 81%). Overall CR was 44%. CR was achieved in 49% MK−, 29% MK+, 31% CK+, and 49% of CK−. Data for the combinations of MK and CK are presented in Table 1. Median follow-up for survivors was 5.0 years. OS at 4-years was 9% for all evaluable patients and 4y-DFS was 12% in those achieving CR. Median OS of MK+/CK+ (0.3y) was significantly worse (p<0.001) than MK+/CK−(0.6y), MK−/CK+ (0.8y), and MK−/CK−(0.9y). Median DFS of MK+/CK+ (0.3y) was also significantly poorer (p<0.001) than MK+/CK− (0.9y), MK−/CK+ (0.8y), and MK−/CK− (0.9y). M7 was present in 82 (13%) enrolled patients with 98% (80/82) of M7 occurring within a MK. CR was achieved in 31% of MK+/M7+ and 27% of MK+/M7−. Neither median OS nor DFS were significantly impacted by M7 status as noted in Table 2. Conclusions: AML patients above the age of 55 years have an unfavorable prognosis with the majority of patients harboring adverse clonal cytogenetic abnormalities and failing to achieve a CR. Fewer than 10% survive 4-years from diagnosis. Results from the ECOG experience demonstrate the prognostic predictive value of MK in older AML patients. In contrast to the data presented by the HOVAN-SAKK group, the prognostic value of MK in patients over 55 years is limited to those with MK in combination with CK. These results also demonstrate the failure of monosomy 7 to provide prognostic value in the setting of MK. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: In a previously published phase-1/2 study, momelotinib (a JAK 1/2 inhibitor) induced 53% anemia, 39% spleen and >50% constitutional symptoms response rates in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) (Pardanani A, et al. Leukemia. 2013;27:1322). The particular study included 100 patients from the Mayo Clinic who experienced 43% spleen and 44% anemia response rates (Pardanani et al. Leukemia. 2015;29:741); CALR and ASXL1 mutations independently predicted spleen but not anemia response. In the current study, we examined the impact of momelotinib therapy on DIPSS-plus- and molecular risk-adjusted survival. Methods: The current study represents sponsor-independent analysis of long-term survival among 100 consecutive Mayo Clinic patients who received momelotinib therapy as part of a larger (n =166) phase-1/2 study (NCT00935987). Safety and efficacy data from NCT00935987, as well as protocol design and drug dosing and schedule, have already been formally reported and not reiterated here (Pardanani A, et al. Leukemia. 2013;27:1322; Pardanani A, et al. Leukemia. 2015;29:741; Abdelrahman RA, et al. BJH. 2015;169:77). All statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at the time of entry to study. Survival analysis was considered from the date of study entry to date of death or last contact. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for multivariable analysis of survival. Samples from time of study entry were used for mutation screening. Driver mutations were classified into two prognostically-relevant groups: CALR type 1/type 1-like (favorable) vs all others including CALR type 2/type 2-like, JAK2, MPL and triple-negative (unfavorable). Results: 100 patients with MF (median age 66 years; 58% males) were treated at the Mayo Clinic between 11/20/09 and 11/10/10; 64 patients had primary MF, 22 post-polycythemia vera MF and 14 post-essential thrombocythemia MF. Baseline data: DIPSS-plus risk distribution was 63% high, 36% intermediate-2 and 1% intermediate-1 (JCO 2011;29:392); for the purposes of the current analysis, the single patient with intermediate-1 risk disease was included in the intermediate-2 category. 54 (54%) patients displayed abnormal karyotype. 73 (73%) patients harbored JAK2, 16 (16%) CALR, 7 MPL and 4 "triple-negative". Among the 16 CALR -mutated cases, 13 were classified as "type 1/type 1-like". 94 patients were screened for ASXL1 mutations; 41 (44%) were mutated. Follow-up data was updated in July 2015, providing a minimum follow-up of over 4.5 years since the last patient registration on the protocol. At a median follow-up of 3.2 years, 67 (67%) deaths and 13 (13%) leukemic transformations were documented. Median survival from the time of study entry was 3.2 years and was affected by driver mutation prognostic groups (median survival "not reached" for "favorable" vs 3 years for "unfavorable"; p=0.01), ASXL1 mutational status (median survival 3.9 years in unmutated vs 2.5 years in mutated; p=0.02) and DIPSS-plus risk stratification (median survival 2.6 years in high-risk vs 4 years in intermediate-2 risk; p=0.07). In order to assess the impact of momelotinib on long-term outcome, we compared survival of the study cohort (n =100) with that of 442 consecutive Mayo Clinic patients with high or intermediate-2 risk primary MF (median age 67 years; 66% males). There was no significant difference between this control group of PMF patients versus the momelotinib patient cohort in distribution of age (p=0.56), sex (p=0.12), JAK2/CALR/MPL mutational status (p=0.41) or ASXL1 mutational status (p=0.9); however, the momelotinib cohort had a higher fraction of patients with DIPSS-plus high-risk disease (63% vs 47%; p=0.004). Overall survival was similar between the momelotinib cohort and the control group of PMF patients who were not treated with momelotinib (Figure 1; p=0.99); the difference in survival remained not significant during multivariable analysis that included risk stratification by DIPSS-plus (p=0.32), "favorable" vs "unfavorable" driver mutational status (p=0.78) or ASXL1 mutational status (Figure 2; p=0.61). Conclusions: In the current long-term study, we could not demonstrate a survival impact from momelotinib therapy in myelofibrosis. Although adjusted for clinical and molecular risk status, our study is retrospective and cannot be relied upon to discount marginal survival effect. Disclosures Al-Kali: Novartis: Research Funding. Pardanani:Stemline: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 349 Failure to collect enough CD34+ cells following poor hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) mobilization is generally thought to be due to marrow damage following previous therapies. However, marrow damage alone cannot account for all poor mobilizations since there are donors who have good marrow cellularity but fail to adequately mobilize. In addition, the relationship between CD34+ cell dose and engraftment rate is not linear, suggesting other factors play a role during engraftment. Previous animal studies suggest CD8+ T cells are important for CD34+ cell homing to the marrow. We hypothesized that CD8+ T cells have dual roles by inhibiting CD34+ cell mobilization and facilitating engraftment. To test our hypothesis, we followed 192 autologous HPC donors to assess the role of CD8+ T cells in HPC mobilization and engraftment. The median donor age was 58.5 years (range 18 – 76), and 110 of the 192 patients were males. Donors were diagnosed with plasma cell disease, primarily multiple myeloma, or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CD34+ and CD8+ T cell content in the patients' apheresis products were enumerated using flow cytometry, quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry. The median CD34+ cell/kg was 4.7 × 106. Patients were categorized as low, moderate or high mobilizers according to their total CD34+ cell collection quartile distribution: <3.7, 3.8 – 5.5 and ≥5.6 × 106/Kg respectively. We found that HPC products from low mobilizers contained significantly more CD8+ T cells (median 1.25 × 108/Kg) than HPC products from moderate and high mobilizers (Table 1 p = 0.04). Therefore, the ratio of CD8+ T cells to CD34+ cells was 4 – 8 folds higher in low mobilizers than in moderate and high mobilizers. Moreover, CD8 antigen expression measured using qPCR, normalized with 18s ribosomal RNA, was significantly higher in low mobilizers than in moderate or high mobilizers. Similar analysis with CD4+ T cells did not demonstrate significant correlation with mobilization. To assess the role of CD8+ T cells in HPC mobilization, we purified CD8+ T and CD34+ cells from both low and moderate or high mobilizers. Using chemotaxis assay, we assessed the effect of CD8+ T cells on CD34+ cell migration away from high stromal cell derived factor (SDF1-a) concentrations. Purified CD34+ cells were plated in bone marrow epithelial cell coated trans-wells and co-cultured with purified CD8+ T cells at 1:2 and 1:5 ratios in the presence of SDF-1a at 0, 200 and 400ng/ml concentrations. Cells that migrated through the micro-pores of the trans-well into the lower wells were enumerated and analyzed. Our studies showed CD8+ T cells inhibit migration of CD34+ cells in-vitro independent of SDF1-a concentration. (Figure 1) The inhibitory properties of CD8+ T cells were more pronounced on CD34+ cells from low mobilizers than on CD34+ cells from moderate or high mobilizers. We also assessed if CD8+ cell content was associated with days to neutrophil engraftment. Our analysis showed the higher the CD8+ T cell content per unit CD34+ cell, the faster the rate of neutrophil engraftment. In summary, HPC products from low mobilizers contained significantly higher numbers of CD8+ T cells. CD8+ T cells, independent of SDF1-a concentration, significantly inhibited migration of purified CD34+ cells. In addition, CD8+ T cell content per unit CD34+ cell was inversely proportional to the time to neutrophil engraftment. These findings suggest CD8+ T cells may play dual roles by inhibiting CD34+ cell mobilization and facilitating its homing and engraftment. Table 1 Association of CD8+ T cell number with CD34+ cell mobilization capacity Mobilization Quartiles Low Moderate High p-value Median CD34+ Cell × 106/Kg 3.03 4.55 6.73 <0.001 Median CD8+ T cell × 108/Kg 1.25 0.50 0.33 0.04 CD8+ T: CD34+ cell ratio 41 11 5 Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.