Litzow, Mark R.

Abstract A041202 (NCT01886872) is a phase 3 study comparing bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) with ibrutinib and the combination of ibrutinib plus rituximab (IR) in previously untreated older patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The initial results showed that ibrutinib-containing regimens had superior progression-free survival (PFS) and rituximab did not add additional benefits. Here we present an updated analysis. With a median follow-up of 55 months, the median PFS was 44 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 38-54) for BR and not yet reached in either ibrutinib-containing arm. The 48-month PFS estimates were 47%, 76%, and 76% for BR, ibrutinib, and IR, respectively. The benefit of ibrutinib regimens over chemoimmunotherapy was consistent across subgroups of patients defined by TP53 abnormalities, del(11q), complex karyotype, and immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV). No significant interaction effects were observed between the treatment arm and del(11q), the complex karyotype, or IGHV. However, a greater difference in PFS was observed among the patients with TP53 abnormalities. There was no difference in the overall survival. Notable adverse events with ibrutinib included atrial fibrillation (afib) and hypertension. Afib was observed in 11 patients (pts) on BR (3%) and 67 pts on ibrutinib (18%). All-grade hypertension was observed in 95 pts on BR (27%) and 263 pts on ibrutinib (55%). These data show that ibrutinib regimens prolong PFS compared with BR for older patients with treatment-naïve CLL. These benefits were observed across subgroups, including high-risk groups. Strikingly, within the ibrutinib arms, there was no inferior PFS for patients with abnormalities in TP53, the highest risk feature observed in CLL. These data continue to demonstrate the efficacy of ibrutinib in treatment-naïve CLL.

Abstract Venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven‐HMA) is currently the standard frontline therapy for older/unfit patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND‐AML). Our objective in the current retrospective study of 301 adult patients (median age 73 years; 62% de novo) with ND‐AML was to identify molecular predictors of treatment response to Ven‐HMA and survival; European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic risk assignment was favorable 15%, intermediate 16%, and adverse 69%. Complete remission, with (CR) or without (CRi), count recovery, was documented in 182 (60%) patients. In multivariable analysis, inclusive of mutations only, “favorable” predictors of CR/CRi were NPM1 (86% vs. 56%), IDH2 (80% vs. 58%), and DDX41 (100% vs. 58%) and “unfavorable” TP53 (40% vs. 67%), FLT3‐ ITD (36% vs. 63%), and RUNX1 (44% vs. 64%) mutations; significance was sustained for each mutation after adjustment for age, karyotype, and therapy‐related qualification. CR/CRi rates ranged from 36%, in the presence of unfavorable and absence of favorable mutation, to 91%, in the presence of favorable and absence of unfavorable mutation. At median follow‐up of 8.5 months, 174 deaths and 41 allogeneic stem cell transplants (ASCT) were recorded. In multivariable analysis, risk factors for inferior survival included failure to achieve CR/CRi (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.5–4.8), adverse karyotype (1.6, 1.1–2.6), TP53 mutation (1.6, 1.0–2.4), and absence of IDH2 mutation (2.2, 1.0–4.7); these risk factors were subsequently applied to construct an HR‐weighted risk model that performed better than the ELN genetic risk model (AIC 1661 vs. 1750): low ( n = 130; median survival 28.9 months), intermediate ( n = 105; median 9.6 months), and high ( n = 66; median 3.1 months; p < .001); survival in each risk category was significantly upgraded by ASCT. The current study identifies genotype signatures for predicting response and proposes a 3‐tiered, CR/CRi‐based, and genetics‐enhanced survival model for AML patients receiving upfront therapy with Ven‐HMA.

Background: The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) genetic-risk stratification for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), assigns favorable prognosis to t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/ RUNX1:: RUNX1T1, inv(16)(p13.1q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)/ CBFB:: MYH1, NPM1 mutations without FLT3-ITD or adverse karyotype, and bZIP in-frame CEBPA mutations (Döhner , Blood, 2022 ). This risk stratification was derived from intensively treated patients; accordingly, prognostication in ELN favorable genetic risk AML, following venetoclax and hypomethylating agent (VEN-HMA) therapy, remains unclear and was the subject of the current study. Methods: Under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol, the Mayo Clinic database was searched to identify AML patients with favorable genetic risk, who received treatment with VEN-HMA in the frontline setting. All patients received at least one cycle of either azacitidine 75 mg/m 2 days 1-7 or decitabine 20 mg/m 2 days 1-5 with VEN dose adjusted based on azole antifungal prophylaxis. Genetic risk stratification and treatment response were assessed according to the 2022 ELN criteria. Survival was estimated from the time of VEN-HMA treatment start to last follow-up or death. Results: Patient characteristics A total of 46 newly-diagnosed AML patients with ELN 2022 favorable genetic risk [ NPM1 mutation, n=36 (78%), CEPBA bZIP mutation, n=7 (15%) and t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/ inv(16)(p13.1q22), n=4 (9%)] received a median of 4 cycles (range 1-32) of VEN-HMA. Median age was 71 years, with 63% males, and 87% de novo AML. Additional mutations frequently involved TET2 in 17/43 (40%), DNMT3A in 14/45 (31%), SRSF2 in 10/43 (23%), K/NRAS in 10/45 (22%), IDH1 in 8/46 (17%), FLT3-TKD in 7/46 (15%), ASXL1 in 6/43 (14%) and IDH2 in 6/46 (13%),of informative cases.Myelodysplasia (MDS)-related gene mutations ( ASXL1, RUNX1, BCOR, EZH2, SRSF2, U2AF1, SF3B1, STAG2, and/or ZRSR2) were present in 15 of 40 (38%) of patients (93% males). Predictors of response Of the 39 (85%) patients that achieved complete remission, with (CR) ( n=24; 52%), or without count recovery (CRi) ( n=15; 33%); CR/CRi rates were not significantly higher in patients with NPM1 mutations (89%), t(8;21)(q22;q22.1)/ inv(16)(p13.1q22) (75%), or CEPBA bZIP mutations (67%) ( p=0.37). Among patients achieving CR/CRi, measurable residual disease by multiparametric flow cytometry was negative in 15 of 16 (94%) of evaluable cases after cycles 1 or 2. In addition, NPM1 qPCR was negative in 15 of 24 (63%) informative patients. Median time to response was 1.2 months with median response duration of 9.4 months. CR/CRi rates were significantly higher in females vs males (100% vs 76%, p=0.01), and in the absence vs presence of MDS-related gene mutations (96% vs 60%, p=0.004). Multivariable analysis confirmed superior response in the absence of MDS-related gene mutations ( p=0.04). Predictors of survival At a median follow-up of 10.6 months (range; 1.1-51 months), 21 patients (46%) have died, 9 relapsed (23% of those achieving CR/CRi), and 6 (13%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Median overall survival was 21 months with 1/2/3-year survival rates of 65%/41%/41% (Figure 1a); median relapse-free survival (RFS) was not reached; 1/2/3-year RFS rates were 81%/66%/57% (Figure 1b). Overall survival was superior in patients achieving CR/CRi (23 months vs 5.6 months; p&lt;0.01), in females vs males (not reached vs 9.7 months; p&lt;0.01), and in the absence of MDS-related gene mutations (not reached vs 5.6 months; p=0.01) (Figure 1c). Subsequent multivariable analysis identified female gender ( p=0.01), and absence of MDS-related mutations ( p=0.17) as independent predictors of superior survival. Similar results were obtained when analysis was restricted to NPM1 mutated patients. Conclusions: In the current retrospective study, VEN-HMA therapy in elderly/unfit AML patients with ELN 2022 favorable genetic risk, resulted in response rates that were comparable to those previously appreciated from published reports of patients receiving intensive induction therapy; however, follow-up in the current study was too short to accurately assess long-term overall and relapse-free survival impact. Our study also highlights the adverse prognosis retained by MDS-related gene mutations.

Background: Non-transplant treatment options in myelofibrosis MF are palliative in scope and include Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors (JAKi). FDA-approved JAKi for the treatment of MF include ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. A fourth JAKi, momelotinib, is currently under review. We have previously reported long-term survival data on momelotinib and drug survival that was significantly longer, retrospectively compared to ruxolitinib ( AJH. 2022;97:E433). In the current study, we focused on molecular predictors of drug survival (i.e., drug retention) and longevity without allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant AHSCT (transplant-censored survival). Methods : The current study included data from Mayo Clinic patients who participated in a phase-1/2 core study of momelotinib (NCT00935987). Study design, drug doses and schedule, and additional details on treatment effect and side effects have previously been published. Drug survival was calculated from time of initiation of momelotinib to time of treatment discontinuation. Survival analysis required censoring of patients at time of AHSCT. Conventional statistical methods were applied using JMP Pro 16.0.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results : 79 JAKi-naïve patients with MF were considered: median age 67 years; males 54%; PMF 65%, post-PV MF 20%, post-ET MF 15%; JAK2 71%, type 1/like CALR ( CALR-1) 14%, CALR-2 3%, MPL 8%, triple-negative 5%. Risk category according to DIPSS was high/intermediate in 80% of the patients and unfavorable karyotype in 29%. Non-driver mutation information was available in a subset of patients and included ASXL1 22% and SRSF2 18%. Median time from diagnosis to study entry was 25.2 months; patients were enrolled between November 2009 and March 2011 with follow-up information updated through July 2023; during this period, 68 (86%) deaths, 13 (16%) leukemic transformations, and 7 (9%) AHSCTs were recorded. Median follow-up for alive patients was 12.5 years (range 11.3-13.1). Anemia response rate was 48% and spleen 47%. Median treatment duration was 25 months (range 0.1-157); the proportion of patients remaining on active therapy was 68% at 1 year, 30% at 3 years, 16% at 5 years, and 7% at 10 years (Figure 1a). At the time of this writing, 5 (6.3%) patients were still receiving momelotinib therapy with treatment durations of 152 to 157 months. In univariate analysis, molecular predictors of drug survival included CALR-1 (p=0.006) but not ASXL1 (p=0.6) or SRSF2 (p=0.3) mutation, or unfavorable karyotype (p=0.08). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year drug survival rates for CALR-1-mutated patients were 64%, 40%, and 18%, respectively, and for CALR-1 wild-type 25%, 11%, and 4% (p=0.01, Figure 1b). CALR-1 independent association with longer drug survival was also appreciated for younger age (p&lt;0.01) and absence of baseline transfusion dependency at time of study entry (p=0.02); all three risk factors remained significant during multivariable analysis with HR (95% CI) rates of 0.4 (0.2-0.87) for CALR-1, 0.5 (0.3-0.89) for age &lt;63 years, and 0.6 (0.3-0.9) for absence of transfusion-dependency. Spleen response (p&lt;0.01) but not anemia response (p=0.23) was also associated with longer drug survival; in multivariable analysis all 4 risk factors retained significance. Multivariable analysis of genetic variables for transplant-censored survival identified absence of CALR-1 (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.5; p=0.03) and presence of high molecular risk (HMR; ASXL1/ SRSF2) mutations (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.6; p=02) to independently predict inferior survival. Among 11 patients with CALR-1 mutation, median transplant-censored survival was 125 months with 10-year survival rate of 60% (Figure 1c); by contrast, the corresponding figures were 37 months and 12%, in the 68 patients not harboring CALR-1 mutation (Figure 1c). In multivariable analysis, absence of CALR-1 (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.02-8.1), age ≥63 years (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.5-6.0), and absence of spleen response (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.5) were identified as being most significant in predicting inferior transplant-censored survival. Conclusions : CALR-1 mutation is the most important risk factor for both drug survival and longevity without AHSCT, in momelotinib-treated patients with MF. Such information might help identify MF patients who might benefit from treatment with momelotinib and in whom AHSCT might be deferred or not.

Background Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agent (HMA) is the standard treatment for newly diagnosed elderly/unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) disease following Ven-HMA are limited in the absence of targetable mutations. In a recent phase 2 study, the addition of Ven to cladribine (CDA) plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC), in newly-diagnosed elderly/unfit AML, resulted in complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery rate of 93% ( J Clin Oncol 20;40(33)). In the current study, we share our experience with this regimen in patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, treated outside of clinical trials. Methods Under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol, the Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL) database was searched to identify patients with AML who failed treatment with Ven-HMA and subsequently received at least one cycle of salvage therapy with Ven-CDA-LDAC: Ven 100-400 mg, dose adjusted, d1-21, CDA 5 mg/m 2 d1-5, LDAC 20 mg twice daily d1-10, outside of clinical trials. Cytogenetic and molecular studies were performed at the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC initiation in most cases, by conventional karyotype and next-generation sequencing, respectively. The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria were applied to define risk and response. Survival was calculated from the time of Ven-CDA-LDAC treatment start to last follow-up or death. Results Patient characteristics A total of 39 RR AML patients (median age 65 years, 67% male, 64% de novo), with prior exposure to Ven-HMA, received Ven-CDA-LDAC (median 1 cycle; range 1-5). Study patients had received one ( n=16), two ( n=14), three ( n=5), four ( n=2), five ( n=1) or nine ( n=1) prior therapies, including Ven-HMA. Nine (23%) patients had relapsed following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT). ELN cytogenetic risk included intermediate (46%, n=18), and adverse (54%, n=21). Mutations involved TP53 in 9 patients (23%), K/ NRAS in 8 (21%), RUNX1 in 7 (18%), TET2 in 6 (15%), ASXL1 in 5 (13%), and STAG2 in 5 (13%). Response and toxicity Eleven (28%) patients achieved CR ( n=2; 5%) or CRi ( n=9; 23%); median time to response was 1 month and median response duration 3.4 months. In addition, 2 (5%) patients each experienced partial remission (PR) and bone marrow aplasia without fulfilling criteria for morphologic leukemia free state. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was negative by multiparametric flow cytometry in 2 of 7 (29%) informative CR/CRi cases. CR/CRi rates were higher in females (54% vs 15%; p=0.01), de novo vssecondary AML (40% vs 7%; p=0.02), and absence of adverse karyotype (50% vs 9%; p&lt;0.01), K/NRAS (35% vs 0%, p=0.01), ASXL1 (32% vs 0%, p=0.05), or STAG2 mutations (32% vs 0%, p=0.05) (Table 1). Multivariable analysis confirmed superior response in de novo AML (p&lt;0.01), absence of adverse karyotype, (p&lt;0.01), and absence of K/NRAS mutations (p=0.02). CR/CRi rates were not significantly affected by relapsed vs refractory setting ( p=0.95), number of prior therapies ( p=0.51), prior AHSCT ( p=0.64), or TP53 mutations ( p=0.64) (Table 1). Treatment-emergent toxicities included infections (49%, n=19), comprising bacteremia ( n=11), pneumonia ( n=10), peri-rectal abscess ( n=6), and laboratory evidence of tumor lysis syndrome (3%, n=1). Survival At a median follow-up of 3.9 months, from initiation of Ven-CDA-LDAC, 31 deaths (79%), 6 relapses (15%), and 7 AHSCT (18%; including 5 in CR/CRi, 1 in aplasia) were documented. Median survival following Ven-CDA-LDAC was 4.6 months, and superior in the presence vs absence of CR/CRi (8.1 vs 2.9 months; p=0.01), and in patients receiving AHSCT (10.5 vs 3.4 months; p=0.02). Absence of adverse karyotype was also associated with superior survival (6 vs 3.4 months; p=0.05). Multivariable analysis confirmed the favorable survival impact of CR/CRi ( p=0.03) and AHSCT ( p=0.05); survival impact was not apparent for secondary AML ( p=0.29) or K/NRAS ( p=0.70) or TP53 ( p=0.10) mutations. Conclusions The current study suggests transplant bridging value for Ven-CDA-LDAC in AML patients relapsed or refractory to Ven-HMA, especially in the absence of adverse karyotype or K/NRAS mutation. AHSCT and achievement of CR/CRi appear to be indispensable for favorable post-Ven-CDA-LDAC survival.

Background : Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) is the only potentially curative therapy for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML. Only a minority undergo alloHCT as they typically have dismal outcomes due to high relapse rates, especially those with TP53 mutations and active disease. Additionally, older pts cannot tolerate intensive treatment and hence are not eligible for alloHCT. 131I-apamistamab, an anti-CD45 radioimmunoconjugate, delivers high dose targeted radiation to hematopoietic cells, allowing for myeloablation and eradication of leukemic cells. 131I-apamistamab led induction and conditioning can thus provide these pts access to alloHCT potentially leading to better disease control and outcomes even in pts with the TP53 mutation. Methods: The SIERRA trial (NCT02665065) is a multi-center, randomized, controlled Phase 3 study comparing the rate of durable complete remission (dCR) lasting ≥6 months (mos) after complete remission with/without platelet recovery (CR/CRp) between two groups: 131I-apamistamab led induction and conditioning followed by alloHCT vs physician's choice of conventional care (CC). Pts were randomized (1:1) to CC or 131I-apamistamab with fludarabine and total body irradiation (2 Gy) followed by alloHCT. CR/CRp assessment was 28-56 days post alloHCT or 28-42 days post initiation of therapy in the CC group. Pts in the CC group not achieving leukemia-free state could crossover (CO) to 131I-apamistamab. We report the characteristics and outcomes of all pts with TP53 mutation who were enrolled in the SIERRA trial. Results: In total, 153 pts were randomized (CC, n=77; 131I-apamistamab, n=76). All pts who received the therapeutic dose of 131I-apamistamab (n=66) underwent HCT vs 14 (18.2%) in the CC group. Of evaluable pts, dCR rates at 6 months were 22% in the 131I-apamistamab group vs 0% in the CC group (95% CI;12.29, 34.73; p&lt;0.0001). A total of 37 pts with TP53 mutation were enrolled (CC=20; 131I-apamistamab =17) with a prevalence of 24.2%. Table 1 shows the baseline characteristics of these pts. Median overall survival (OS) for pts in the 131I-apamistamab group, who were TP53 negative was 6.37 mos compared to 5.72 mos for the TP53 mutation positive pts (HR=0.66; 95% CI [0.37, 1.18]; p=0.16). In the CC group (including CO pts), the median OS for TP53 positive pts was 2.96 mos. When the CC group without CO were analyzed, the median OS was 6.51 mos and 1.66 mos for the TP53 mutation negative and positive groups respectively (HR=0.28; 95% CI [0.12, 0.67]; p=0.0022). For TP53 mutation positive pts who received 131I-apamistamab ( 131I-apamistamab plus CO pts), the median OS was 5.49 mos compared to a median 1.66 mos in pts who did not receive 131I-apamistamab (CC pts without CO) [(HR=0.23; 95% CI [0.10, 0.52]; p=0.0002) (Figure 1)]. Conclusion: Pts with TP53 mutated R/R AML have a dismal prognosis and are seldom offered alloHCT due to high post-transplant relapse rates. 131I-apamistamab led alloHCT significantly improves survival outcomes in pts with TP53 mutations, commensurate with rates observed in pts with wildtype TP53, thereby overcoming the negative impact of this mutation. These data clearly support the use of 131I-apamistamab led induction and conditioning and alloHCT in R/R AML, including in patients with a TP53 mutation.

INTRODUCTION: The Stromal Antigen 2 ( STAG2), on Xq25, is the most common cohesin complex gene mutated in myeloid neoplasms (MN) (5-10%). STAG2 mutations ( STAG2m) were incorporated in the ELN2022 as AML-MDS defining genetic mutations inferring poor prognosis and is a genetic marker in IPSS-M risk stratification. The PHD-finger protein 6 ( PHF6) gene, on Xq26.3, is a tumor suppressor gene, mutated in 3% of MN, and is more common in T-ALL. PHF6m is believed to be a late event in MN with little data on its prognostic implications in MN. Both STAG2m and PHF6m are more prevalent in males, but their implications on the clinical presentation of MN have not been compared prior. METHOD: Our study is a multicenter study at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Florida, Arizona). After IRB approval, we retrospectively analyzed charts of 7935 patients who had NGS between 2016-2022. STAG2m was found in 96 patients, and PHF6m in 116 (including 3 with concurrent STAG2m and PHF6m). We excluded 4 PHF6m patients who had T-ALL. Data was captured at time of NGS. MDS risk stratification was by IPSS-M and AML by ELN2022. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from date of NGS to date of last follow-up. BlueSky Software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Characteristics: We compared 96 STAG2m vs 112 PHF6m MN patients. Of STAG2m cases, 78% were male vs 76% in PHF6m MN. Median age was 72 vs 73 years, respectively. Diagnoses included AML (29% of STAG2m vs 34% of PHF6m MN), MDS (54% vs 28%), MDS/MPN (10% vs 21%) and MPN (3% vs 9%). MDS was more common among STAG2m MN (p&lt;.001) while MDS/MPN was more common among PHF6m MN (=.05). MDS-IB was the most common subtype in both (69% vs 52% in STAG2m vs PHF6m MDS). MDS-LB and 5q subtypes were only found in PHF6m MDS, and there was more PHF6m MDS-RS (13% vs 2%). Median IPSS-M score was 0.9 vs 0.8 in STAG2m vs PHF6m MDS (both high-risk). Majority of STAG2m AML were adverse risk (96%) while PHF6m AML were intermediate (79%) (p&lt;.001). AML cases included 43% vs 30% secondary AML (sAML) in STAG2m vs PHF6m AML. Among STAG2m and PHF6m MN, 17% of each were tMN. Cytogenetic abnormalities were more common in PHF6m MN (50% vs 31%, p=.005). The median bone marrow (BM) blasts count among STAG2m MN was 7% vs 4% in PHF6m MN (p=.03). Genetic characteristics: STAG2m were nonsense, frameshift and splice site (54%, 36% and 11%). PHF6m were nonsense, frameshift, splice site, missense and start loss variant mutations (44%, 33%, 12%, 10% and 1%). The median variant allele frequency (VAF) of STAG2m MN was 50% compared to 32% in PHF6m MN (p=.008). Co-mutations: The median number of co-mutations was 3 in STAG2m and 4 in PHF6m MN (p=.04). The most common were TET2m (37% in STAG2m MN vs 45% in PHF6m MN), RUNX1m (31% in both), SRSF2m (39% vs 20%), ASXL1m (66% vs 38%), BCORm (19% vs 6%), U2AF1m (13% vs 14%) and IDH2m (18% vs 7%). ASXL1m, SRSF2m, BCORm, IDH2m and SF3B1m were more common among STAG2m MN (p=&lt;.001, .003, .006, .02, .09). JAK2m, IDH1m are more common among PHF6m MN (p=.02, .06). Survival: Of STAG2m and PHF6m MN, 70% and 72% of patients received treatment. HSCT was performed in 23 (24%) and 23 (21%) of STAG2m and PHF6m patients, including AML (n=9, n=10), MDS (n=12, n=8), MDS/MPN (n=2, n=2). OS among STAG2m and PHF6m MN was 20.5 and 22.1 months, respectively. OS among AML cases was 13.5 vs 21 months (p=.6) in STAG2m vs PHF6m, was NR vs 22 months (p=.4) in MDS, 11.7 vs 17.6 months in MDS/MPN (p=.4), and 10.4 vs 27.4 months (p=.5) in MPN. There was no difference between males and females in either STAG2m or PHF6m MN. HSCT led to longer OS among both STAG2m (NR vs 19.9 months, p=.01) and PHF6m MN patients (NR vs 17.6 months, p=.07). Among AML patients, HSCT did not significantly impact OS (18 vs 9.6 months, p=.3 and 25.1 vs 21 months, p=.2, in STAG2m and PHF6m). HSCT improved OS in STAG2m MDS (NR vs 20.5 months, p=.03). In PHF6m MDS, OS was 22.1 vs 13.1 months in HSCT vs non-HSCT (p=.3). CONCLUSION: STAG2m and PHF6m are 2 X-linked mutations that occur in MN. Both commonly occur in elderly males. MDS was the most common diagnosis in STAG2m MN. STAG2m co-occurred particularly with SRSF2m ASXL1m and BCORm, which are associated with poor prognosis. In our cohort, STAG2m AML carried a poorer prognosis than PHF6m AML. Our study confirms the ELN2022 AML risk stratification. MDS risk classification and OS did not differ between STAG2m and PHF6m in our cohort. A larger cohort is required to confirm our findings and may provide stronger validation.

Introduction The advent of venetoclax (VEN) based chemotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with improvement in remission rates from historical 10%-20% to 60%-70%. However, remission duration is short-lived in patients (pts) with high-risk AML with consequent dismal outcome. As our knowledge of genomic landscape of AML expands and more immunotherapies become available, exploration of the immune tumor microenvironment (TME) of AML may allow identification of subsets of pts that may benefit from immune based therapy. We conducted an investigator initiated prospective study to evaluate TME of pts receiving VEN plus hypomethylating agent (HMA; azacitidine or decitabine) combination. We hypothesize that these pts will cluster into immune-infiltrated vs. immune-depleted sub-types by high-definition immune cell profiling. Methods In 26 newly diagnosed AML pts, who were planned to receive VEN plus HMA therapy, we isolated bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) derived mononuclear cells (MC) by density gradient centrifugation and cryopreserved. We performed CyTOF (cytometry time-of-flight) analysis to study their immune signatures. Thawed cells were labeled with metal-conjugated antibodies that bind CD33, CD196, CD19, CD127, CD11b, CD4, IgD, CD11c, CD14, CD56, CD123, TCRgd, CD185/CXCR5, CD45RA, CD27, CD28, CD66b, CD183 (CXCR3), CD161, CD45RO, CD197 (CCR7), CD8a, CD25, CD3, CD20, CD38, HLA-DR, CD194 (CCR4), CD57, CD16 and CD45. We performed a Rphenograph clustering on 25 paired BMMC and PBMC samples (one patient only had PBMC) to create 35 unique clusters for each ( Figure 1). Then we broke down the distribution of cluster by two different groupings: pts with TP53 mutation (m) and those who achieve complete remission. Statistical significance of clusters calculated using t-test. We performed Pearson correlation test on the paired BMMC and PBMC samples to assess correlation between BMMC and PBMC samples. Results Baseline characteristics The median age of the pts was 74 years (range, 53-88), and 17 (65%) pts were male. Ten (37%) pts had secondary AML, and 12 (46%) pts had ELN adverse risk disease (n=6; TP53m). There was no significant difference in median age (p= &gt;0.99), proportion of pts with secondary AML (p= 0.64), acute myelomonocytic leukemia (p= 0.14) white blood cell count (WBC) ≥ 100 (10 9/L) (p= &gt;0.99), and frequency of commonly occurring co-mutations ( ASXL1 [p=0.35]), FLT3 ITD [p=0.54], splicing [p=0.29], IDH1/2 [p=0.28], DNMT3A [p=0.29], NPM1 [p=0.29], TET2 [p=0.35]) in TP53m and TP53 wild-type group. Response 12/20 (60%) evaluable pts achieved complete remission with or without count recovery (CR/CRi). There was no significant difference in median age (p= 0.06), proportion of pts with secondary AML (p= 0.16), therapy related AML (p= 0.60) WBC ≥ 100 (10 9/L) (p= 0.40), and frequency of commonly occurring mutations ( TP53 [p=0.60], ASXL1 [p &gt; 0.99]), FLT3 ITD [p=0.54], splicing [p &gt; 0.99], IDH1/2 [p=0.60], DNMT3A [p=&gt;0.99], NPM1 [p=0.61], TET2 [p &gt;0.99]) in CR/CRi and no-CR/CRi group. CyTOF analysis and Rphenograph clustering on 25 paired BMMC and PBMC samples We found significant clustering with high expression of B-cell activated (cluster 2; p= 0.005), NK cell rich (cluster 1; p= 0.005, cluster 35; p= 0.0009), CD8 T-cells (cluster 31; p= 0.01) and CD4 effector cells (cluster 17; p= 0.005) phenotype among TP53m AML ( Table 1). Among pts who achieved CR/CRi, significant clustering with low expression of B-cell activated (cluster 29; p= 0.01), CD8 cytotoxic (cluster 14; p= 0.01) CD4 activated (cluster 21; p= 0.03) phenotypes observed. Correlation between BMMC and PBMC clustering Among clusters which showed significance for a particular phenotype, we performed Pearson correlation (R 2) and observed strong correlation between BMMC and PBMC samples clustering in cluster 1 (R 2 = 0.99), cluster 2 (R 2 = 0.95), cluster 17 (R 2 = 0.96), cluster 21 (R 2 = 0.99) and cluster 29 (R 2 = 0.93). Conclusion In this single institutional study using CyTOF analysis we have identified novel clustering with immune- infiltrated phenotype among pts with TP53m AML and conversely immune-depleted phenotype among AML pts who responded to VEN plus HMA. Moreover, we found strong correlation in CyTOF analysis conducted from BMMC and PBMC samples. Future studies with larger sample size needed to validate our findings.

Background: BMT CTN 1506/MORPHO was a randomized study of the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib versus placebo as post-transplant (HCT) maintenance therapy for patients (pts) with FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients with FLT3-ITD AML in first remission underwent HCT and then were randomized, in double-blind fashion, to either gilteritinib or placebo for 24 months. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS), and a pre-specified secondary endpoint was the effect of measurable residual disease (MRD) on survival as detected by a highly sensitive assay for FLT3-ITD mutations. In the primary analysis, while RFS was higher for pts randomized to gilteritinib, the difference did not reach the pre-determined threshold for significance (HR: 0.679; 95% CI: 0.459, 1.005; 2-sided p-value: 0.0518). However, in the secondary analysis, the 50.6% of pts who had MRD detectable pre- or post-HCT had significantly higher RFS with gilteritinib (HR of relapse or death=0.515, 95% CI: 0.316, 0.838, p = 0.0065). In this post-hoc analysis, we examined 1) the impact on RFS of different levels of FLT3-ITD variant allele frequency (VAF) pre-randomization (immediately before or after HCT but prior to randomization to gilteritinib or placebo); 2) the impact of the presence of multiple mutations detected as MRD pre-HCT; and 3) the eradication of FLT3-ITD clones detected post-HCT during follow up on gilteritinib or placebo. Methods: First-pull marrow aspirates were collected from pts at two time points pre-randomization (pre-HCT and between 30-90 days post-HCT), as well as at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-randomization. For MRD detection (performed at Invivoscribe; San Diego, CA), 700 ng input DNA was amplified by polymerase chain-reaction (PCR) using 25 cycles and primers flanking exons 14 and 15 of FLT3, followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of the amplicons. Variant allele frequency (VAF) was calculated as FLT3 mutant reads/total FLT3 reads. For pts with multiple FLT3-ITD mutations, the VAF used in analysis was the sum of the VAFs for each FLT3-ITD variant. The lower limit of blank (LOB) of the assay is estimated to be 1 x 10 -6 VAF. For terminology, VAF &gt; 1 x 10 -6 and &lt; 1 x 10 -5 is referred to as MRD6, VAF &gt; 1 x 10 -5 and &lt; 1 x 10 -4 is MRD5, VAF &gt; 1 x 10 -4 or greater is MRD4, and MRD0 equals no detectable MRD. Results: MRD was evaluated in 350/356 (98.3%) pts pre-HCT and 347/356 (97.5%) pts post-HCT. MRD was detected in 46% of pts pre-HCT and 19.9% prior to randomization, including 4.5% who did not have detectable MRD pre-HCT. The variant allele frequency (VAF) of detectable MRD ranged from a low of 1.09 x 10 -6 to a high of 3.0 x 10 -1. More than a single mutation was detected in 51 pts pre-HCT. Most of these 51 pts had 2 clones, but the total ranged from 2-9. The presence of more than one mutation detected as MRD immediately pre-HCT was associated with worse RFS compared with all other pts (MRD-positive with only one clone and MRD-negative), irrespective of treatment arm (Figure 1A; HR=2.428, 95% CI: 1.555, 3.792, P &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference in age, mutation length, VAF, or karyotype between pts with more than one mutation and those with single mutations. However, if the VAFs of pts with multiple FLT3-ITD mutations were summed and treated as a single value, then the median VAF for pts with multiple mutations was higher than for those with single mutations (2.14 x 10 -4 vs. 3.12 x 10 -5). The VAF (including the summed VAFs of pts with multiple mutations) at multiple levels correlated very closely with RFS after HCT. To illustrate this quantitative effect of peri-HCT FLT3-ITD VAF on RFS, Kaplan-Meier analysis of pts on the placebo arm grouped by MRD level is displayed in Figure 1B. In the 71 pts with MRD detectable post-HCT, the MRD was eradicated in 69% of pts on gilteritinib versus 44% of pts on placebo. Conclusions Pts with multiple FLT3-ITD mutations have a worse prognosis, which may simply be a reflection of increased disease burden (VAF). The quantity of FLT3-ITD MRD appears to highly correlate with outcome. Gilteritinib appears to augment the effect of HCT, as evidenced by increased eradication of MRD post-HCT. These data illustrate the potential utility of the PCR-NGS FLT3-ITD MRD assay in the management of pts with FLT3-ITD AML.