Abstract Introduction: We previously reported that serum cardiac biomarkers are among the most powerful predictors of overall survival. This observation was based on outcomes of more than 300 patients with primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) receiving either low dose chemotherapy or high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplant (PBSCT). Not all institutions use the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) assay, but rather the B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) assay. We therefore determined the relative utility of BNP in patients with AL undergoing PBSCT and up-dated our results using our NTproBNP-troponin T staging system. Methods: Between 4/10/96 and 2/24/05, 164 patients with AL undergoing PBSCT had measurements of serum cardiac biomarkers. All BNP measurements were done on fresh serum (Biosite Inc., San Diego). The NTproBNP (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) and troponin T (TnT) (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) measurements were done on either stored serum or on fresh samples as previously reported. Follow-up for patients was through March 2005. Results: Between 5/1/03 and 2/15/05, 72 patients had BNP measurements pre-transplant. The median value was 167 pg/ml (range 5 to 7739). Forty-two of these patients also had an NTproBNP measured. There was good agreement between the two tests in the 42 patients that had both measurements (rho 0.823, p<0.0001). To further test the relationship between the two tests, we evaluated the correlation between BNP and NTproBNP using 204 simultaneous measurements from 106 patients (rho=0.89, p<0.0001). Next, we tested the prognostic utility of BNP. Using a cut-off point of 120 pg/L (the upper limit of normal for women over the age of 70 and the 50th percentile of all measurements in our data set), we found that BNP was prognostic for survival post-transplant. It was independent of TnT values, and patients could be divided into 3 risk categories using these two measurements (low risk if both values were low, high-risk if both were high, and intermediate if either was high). This system was highly predictive of overall survival (Figure A). We next compared the BNP-TnT staging system to our previously reported NTproBNP-TnT staging system in the 42 patients that had all 3 values pre-transplant. The correlation between the two staging systems was excellent (rho=0.91, p<0.0001). Follow-up for the 100 patients who had been reported previously is now 26.9 months. As shown in Figure B, the NTproBNP-TnT system predicts for overall survival post transplant. Conclusions: Serum levels of cardiac biomarkers are invaluable prognostic markers in patients with AL. Preliminary data would suggest that a BNP-TnT system is as useful as the NTproBNP-TnT system. Risk thresholds: BNP <120 pg/ml; TnT <0.035 ng/ml; NT-proBNP < 332 pg/ml BNP-TnT statisfaction: low risk, both low; high risk, both high; intermediate, either high. NT-proBNP-TnT satisfaction: low risk, both low; high risk, both high; intermediate, either high. Risk thresholds: BNP <120 pg/ml; TnT <0.035 ng/ml; NT-proBNP < 332 pg/ml BNP-TnT statisfaction: low risk, both low; high risk, both high; intermediate, either high. NT-proBNP-TnT satisfaction: low risk, both low; high risk, both high; intermediate, either high.
Clinical Outcome of Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis Affecting the Kidney
Abstract Introduction: The kidney is affected by immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) in more than 50% of patients who present with the disease, but long-term predictors for and outcomes after renal replacement therapy have not been well described in this patient group Patients: 145 patients with AL who participated in Mayo Clinic treatment trials and were monitored for at least 11 years. No patient was lost to follow-up Results: Among patients presenting with renal AL, 42% ultimately received renal replacement therapy compared with 5% of patients who did not have an initial presentation involving the kidney. Table 1. Monoclonal Protein Studies in 145 Patients With Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosisa Patients, No. (%) Monoclonal Protein Renal Amyloid at Presentation (n=84) Nonrenal Amyloid at Presentation (n=61) a P=.02 l more likely to cause renal presentation None 7 (8) 2 (3) k 6 (7) 12 (20) l 71 (85) 47 (77) Table 2. Characteristics of All 145 Patients With Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis Amyloid Renal (n=84) Nonrenal (n=61) P Value Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; NA, not applicable. a included in the definition of renal amyloidosis Patients with l immunoglobulin light chain amyloid were significantly more likely to have renal involvement and had significantly greater urinary protein loss than patients with κ or no monoclonal light chain amyloid Age, median (IQR), y 61 (52–67) 62 (55–68) .47 Sex, male/female 52/32 40/21 .72 24-hr urine protein loss, median (IQR), g/d 7.0 (4.4–11.7) 0.3 (0.1–6.4) NAa Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.1 (0.9–2.2) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) .22 Cardiac involvement (yes/no) 35/48 48/16 .0001 Table 3 Distribution of Urinary Protein and Creatinine Based on Monoclonal Protein Monoclonal Protein Test k (n=18) l (n=118) None (n=9) P Value Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. Patients with renal amyloid who ultimately received dialysis support had significantly higher serum creatinine and 24-hour urine protein levels at presentation. Absence of cardiac involvement at diagnosis predicted an increased likelihood of dialysis All patients (N=145) 24-hr urine protein loss, median (IQR), g/d 0.73 (0.16–2.37) 3.61 (0.35–7.8) 5.68 (0.3–12.2) .001 Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 1.1 (0.9–1.3) 1.5 (1.2–1.6) NS Patients with renal amyloid at presentation (n=84) 24-hr urine protein loss, median (IQR), g/d 2.93 (1.1–5.0) 7.2 (4.8–11.8) 7.8 (3.8–12.6) .04 Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.0 (0.8–2.6) 1.1 (0.9–2.2) 1.5 (1.1–1.6) NS Table 4 Characteristics of 84 Patients Presenting With Renal Amyloidosis Dialysis Subsequently Not Required Characteristic Required (n=35) (n=49) P Value Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. The median time from diagnosis to dialysis was 29.5 months for those that went into renal failure.). However, the actuarial risk reached 50% at 12 years Kaplan-Meier failure curve demonstrating the actuarial time from diagnosis to the start of dialysis therapy N=145 For 38 patients who received dialysis, median survival from day 1 of dialysis was 10.4 months Kaplan-Meier survival of 38 patients from the start of dialysis therapy Age, median (IQR), y 60 (52–67) 62 (52–67) .90 Sex, male/female 21/14 31/18 .76 24-hr urine protein loss, median (IQR), g/d 7.4 (5.0–14.8) 5.9 (3.7–9.1) .03 Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.4 (0.9–2.8) 1.1 (0.9–1.5) .01 Cardiac involvement (yes/no) 9/26 26/23 .01 Conclusion: In our study, 26% of all patients with AL ultimately received renal replacement therapy compared with 42% of patients who presented with renal AL specifically. The presenting 24-hour urine protein loss and creatinine values predict which patients will require dialysis. Median survival for patients starting dialysis is less than 1 year. Presence of l light chain amyloid predicts an increased likelihood of renal involvement and, when the kidney is affected, increased proteinuria.
A Multidisciplinary Quality Initiative for Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Outpatient Transplant with Low Therapy Related Mortality
Abstract Introduction: The Bone Marrow Transplant Program at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) developed a multidisciplinary approach (involving physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dietitians, and financial specialists) for outpatient management of patients undergoing stem cell transplantation. This approach uses an electronic ordering system for diagnostic tests and chemotherapy to minimize medical errors. Table. Patient Characteristics (N=716) Characteristic Value Male, no. of patients (%) 426 (59) Age, median (IQR), y 59 (53–65) Creatinine, median (IQR), mg/dL 1.0 (0.9–1.2) b2-Microglobulin, median (IQR), mcg/mL 2.5 (1.9–3.7) Gammopathies, no. of patients (%) Measured by serum immunofixation or immunoelectrophoresis IgA 148 (21) IgG 414 (58) IgM 6 (1) IgD 12 (2) Light chain 83 (12) Biclonal 6 (1) None 47 (7) Measured by urine immunofixation or immunoelectrophoresis k light chain 402 (56) l light chain 226 (32) Biclonal 1 (0) None 79 (11) Not performed (anuric) 8 (1) Status at stem cell transplant, no. of patients (%) Untreated 4 (1) Plateau 436 (61) Primary refractory 113 (16) Relapse after therapy 93 (13) Relapse during therapy 70 (10) Characteristic Value CD34+ cells, median (IQR), ×106/kg Collected, no. 10.0 (7.6–12.6) Infused, no. 4.7 (3.9–6.2) Sessions of apheresis, median (IQR) 3 (2–5) Engraftment, median (IQR), days after transplantation Neutrophils, 0.5×109/L 13 (12–15) Platelets, 50×109/L 16 (14–22) Duration of hospitalization, median (IQR), d 4 (0–10) Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range. Results: During a 45-month period after implementation of the program (2005-Sept 2007), the day-100 survival rate was 99.5% for low-risk myeloma patients (transplantation during first plateau; n=202) and 97% for high-risk myeloma patients (refractory, relapsing or second or greater plateau; n=71). The overall day-100 survival rate was 99%(270/273). Analysis of hospitalization trends since inception of the program showed that 39% of patients completed the transplant procedure as outpatients. The median duration of hospitalization for all patients was 4 days; age and serum creatinine levels were predictive of the need for and duration of hospitalization Conclusion: Outpatient stem cell transplantation is feasible for patients with multiple myeloma with a therapy mortality of 1%. Nearly 40% of our patients completed the procedure without hospitalization. Age and serum creatinine levels predicted a higher likelihood of hospitalization. Implementation of out patient transplant requires affordable housing in the community since many third party payers do not support hotel costs despite the reduction of hospital days. The hospital physical plant and patient registration process has to support use of designated hospital rooms for purely out patient practice. The transplant team must have process owners to standardize across all disease categories collection protocols, conditioning regimens, infusion SOP’s and post infusion supportive care guidelines for standard antibiotics, narcotics, laboratory work and transfusion thresholds. A care team meeting between physicians, nursing, dietary, pharmacy, business office, data base and appointment coordinators is essential to coordinate all the multidisciplinary efforts. Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of age greater than or less than or equal to 65 years Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of age greater than or less than or equal to 65 years Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of creatinine greater than or equal to or less than 1.5mg/dL Kaplan-Meier curve shows the percentage of patients remaining in the hospital through time t, stratified on the basis of creatinine greater than or equal to or less than 1.5mg/dL
Melphalan and Dexamethasone Is Less Effective for Patients with Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis (AL) with High Bone Marrow Plasmacytosis.
Abstract Introduction: Currently, the most extensively tested treatments for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) are high dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and melphalan and dexamethasone (MDex). A recent randomized controlled trial comparing the two regimens showed MDex is at least equivalent if not superior to ASCT. Most patients with symptomatic systemic AL have a low plasma cell load; however, approximately 30% have bone marrow plasmacytosis greater than 20% but do not meet criteria for multiple myeloma with significant anemia or lytic bone disease. This leads to the speculation that the plasma cell biology (and therefore outcomes) might differ between low and high plasma cell burden AL. We undertook this study to address whether these two standard regimens are equally effective in AL patients with low and high plasma cell burden. Methods: Patients with confirmed AL treated with MDex were recruited for this study. Some of the patients treated were not ASCT candidates while others were eligible but favored MDex. Hematologic response was defined as 50% reduction in serum M-protein or 90% reduction in urine M-protein if one was present, otherwise a 50% reduction in serum free light chain levels was used. Organ involvement was defined according to the Consensus Opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis. Patients were separated into a high and a low marrow plasma cells (PC) group based on their percentage of bone marrow plasma cells. Cutoff for the bone marrow plasmacytosis was calculated using receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier method. OS was also calculated for 342 AL patients treated with ASCT for comparison. Results: Seventy-three patients with AL received MDex between 05/01 and 05/07. Median follow-up was 16.8 months. At the time of the study, 42.5% had died. Calculating for OS and PFS, the best cutoff for bone marrow plasmacytosis was found to be 20%. In our cohort, 28.8% had >20% bone marrow plasmacytosis. Age (64.8 yr vs 61.0 yr, p = 0.61) and sex (81% male vs 63.4% male, p = 0.13) were similarly distributed between patients with high and low PC. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) was also comparable between the 2 groups (0.03 ng/ml (high) vs 0.06 ng/ml (low), p = 0.41). Cardiac involvement were similar between high and low PC groups (78.9% vs 85.7% respectively, p = 0.49) but renal involvement was less common in the high PC group (70.6% vs 38.1%, p = 0.01). No differences were noted in the gastrointestinal and neurological involvement. Patients with high PC received a median of 4 cycles of MDex vs 5 in the low PC group (p = 0.68). Hematologic response was achieved in 75% of patients with high PC and 54.9% of the low’s (p = 0.11). A significant difference was noted in the PFS and OS between the 2 groups. The PFS and OS were 13.5m and 15.3m, respectively for patients with high PC but neither was reached in those with < 20% plasmacytosis (p=0.02 and p = 0.03 respectively). In the multivariate analysis, hematologic response, cardiac involvement and plasmacytosis >20% were independent predictors of PFS and OS. To determine if plasmacytosis had the same affect on survival of ASCT treated patients, 342 patients were analyzed. No relationship between OS and % of plasmacytosis was found. Conclusion: Our study suggests that ASCT and MDex may not be equivalent for all AL patients. Even though hematologic response rates were similar, patients with plasmacytosis >20% had a worse OS and PFS when treated with MDex. This disparity in survival was not evident in patients treated with ASCT. This effect was independent of cardiac involvement. If confirmed, this could have a significant impact on the choice of therapy for AL patients. The best therapy may be determined by the extent of marrow plasmacytosis, with higher plasma cells favoring high dose therapy.
Perioperative Outcome of Patients with Acquired Factor X Deficiency Associated with AL Amyloidosis: The Mayo Clinic Experience.
Abstract Background AL amyloidosis can be associated with coagulopathy due to acquired factor X (FX) deficiency. Published experience, limited to case reports, suggests that infusion of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), platelets, plasma exchange, and vitamin K are of limited hemostatic efficacy for periprocedural management of coagulopathy. Therefore, we reviewed our cumulative experience of managing patients (pt) with FX deficiency due to AL amyloidosis who underwent an invasive procedure. Methods Pt with AL amyloidosis and isolated FX deficiency (≤ 50%), who underwent an invasive procedure between January 1975 and May 2007, were retrospectively identified from institutional databases. We excluded bone marrow biopsies as well as procedures >3 months prior to the diagnosis of FX deficiency. Endpoints of the study were bleeding, thrombosis, and death. Results Sixty-one pt fit the study criteria. They were arbitrarily classified as having severe (<10%; n=6), moderate (10–25%; n=16), or mild (26–50%; n=39) FX deficiency. The pt underwent a total of 115 procedures, 13 (11.3%) of which were considered major procedures and 102 (88.7%) were minor procedures. Major Procedures 13 pt underwent a major procedure; 4 had severe FX deficiency, 2 moderate, and 7 mild. Procedures included splenectomy, colon resection, renal transplant, and others. All 4 of the pt with severe deficiency were treated with hemostatic agents (FFP, plasma exchange, tranexamic acid, danazol, aminocaproic acid, and rFVIIa) in the perioperative period. Two (50%) of these patients had complications: intraabdominal hematoma and death. The death occurred in a patient with splenic rupture and uncontrolled hemorrhage refractory to rFVIIa and FFP. None of the pt with moderate deficiency experienced complications, despite not receiving hemostatic agents. Similarly, 0/7 patients with mild deficiency developed complications (2 received hemostatic agents FFP, platelets, vitamin K, and DDAVP). Minor Procedures All 61 pt underwent a minor procedure; central venous catheter placement was the most common (n=26), followed by EGD with biopsy (n=16) and renal biopsy (n=10). Six pt with severe deficiency underwent 7 minor procedures, 2 (29%) of which were associated with excess bleeding, despite rFVIIa treatment in both cases. An additional 3 procedures were performed with hemostatic agents and were uncomplicated. 2/16 (13%) pt with moderate deficiency had excess bleeding, 1 of whom was treated with rFVIIa and the other was not treated. Two others received perioperative treatment and did not have a complication. There were 7 complications in the 39 patients with mild deficiency (18%), including 1 AV fistula thrombosis after rFVIIa. Five of the patients with a bleeding complication did not receive treatment. One patient with mild deficiency received procoagulants and did not have excess bleeding. Conclusions -This is the largest series examining the perioperative management of pt with FX deficiency due to AL amyloidosis -Complications occurred in 11.3% of procedures, including one death -In this series, there were no clear predictors of bleeding -FX deficiency did not contribute to mortality, with the exception of 1 case -Bleeding risk is relatively infrequent in pt with mild or moderate FX deficiency, particularly with non-vascular procedures -Although optimal management of pt with severe FX deficiency is unclear, options include rhFVIIa +/− FFP and aminocaproic acid in those requiring procoagulant therapy.
The Prevalence of Abnormal Coagulation Parameters in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Primary Systemic Amyloidosis and Its Impact on Outcome
Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder associated with varying degree of organ infiltration with light chain derived amyloid protein and consequent organ dysfunction. Various acquired coagulopathies, predominantly Factor X (FX) deficiency have been previously described in AL. The factor deficiencies are thought to be due to the direct binding of blood coagulation proteins to amyloid fibrils. Little is known regarding the prognostic significance of abnormal coagulation parameters in AL patients (pts). Methods: After Institutional Review Board approval, we performed a retrospective review of the medical records of 625 consecutive pts who had presented within 3 months of a diagnosis of AL to be evaluated at Mayo Clinic from June 2001 to June 2006. 540 pts had coagulation studies performed within 2 months of presentation. 51 of those pts were on oral anticoagulation and were excluded from the analysis. Results: Of the 489 pts included in the analysis, the median age was 62 years and 61% were male. The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 26.8 months. Table 1 lists the prevalence of abnormal coagulation tests in the remaining 489 patients. Prothrombin time (PT) was available in the majority of pts. 61 pts (12.6%) had elevated PT, and 63 pts (20.4%) had a decreased FX. 37 of the 61 pts with elevated PT had available FX levels, of which 31 (84%) of those had a decreased FX, suggesting that the cause of elevated PT was mostly due to a low FX. Indicators of hepatic involvement such as alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels were higher among the patients with prolonged PT and low FX. An elevated PT (more than 12.4 seconds) was strongly predictive of an adverse outcome, with a median OS of 8.7 months compared to a median OS of 29 months (p<0.0001) in pts with normal PT (Figure 1). Similarly, pts with decreased FX (less than 60% activity), was associated with significantly worse outcomes with a median OS of 14.9 months versus a median OS of 33 months (p<0.0001) in pts with normal FX (Figure 2). In a Cox proportional hazards model containing cardiac troponin (cTnT), NT-Pro BNP, serum alkaline phosphatase, and free light chain difference (involved minus uninvolved), prolonged PT or FX deficiency were independently prognostic for overall survival. Conclusion: Abnormalities of PT and FX are seen in a sizable proportion of pts with newly diagnosed AL. An elevated PT and or FX deficiency appear to adversely affect the outcome of these patients. It is likely that the elevated PT in these patients relate to FX deficiency in the majority which in turn may reflect the amyloid ‘burden’. The effect of other organ involvement like the hepatic involvement may also have an impact on FX and PT. Table 1. Prevalence of abnormal coagulation testing in patients with newly diagnosed primary systemic amyloidosis. Coagulation study N (Test results available) N of abnormal results (%) Elevated prothrombin time 486 61 12.6 Elevated activated partial thromboplastin time 312 48 15.4 Elevated thrombin time 315 84 26.7 Elevated fibrinogen 140 118 84.3 Decreased Factor II activity 62 26 41.9 Decreased Factor V activity 63 9 14.3 Decreased Factor VII activity 63 17 27 Decreased Factor X activity 309 63 20.4 Elevated D-dimer 130 72 55.4 Figure 1. Survival grouped by normal versus elevated Prothrombin time. Figure 1. Survival grouped by normal versus elevated Prothrombin time. Figure 2. Survival grouped by normal versus low Factor X levels. Figure 2. Survival grouped by normal versus low Factor X levels.
Phase II Study of Melphalan, Prednisone and Lenalidomide Combination for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients Who Are Not Candidates for Stem Cell Transplantation
Abstract Melphalan (M), Prednisone (P) and Lenalidomide (R) are active in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of MPR in a phase I/II trial. Results of phase I part were previously reported (Blood2006, 108(11) abst 3558). M 5 mg/m2 on days (d) 1–4, 60 mg/m2 d 1–4 and R 10 mg d 1–21 of a 28 day cycle was determined as MTD for the phase II study. Methods: Patients with previously untreated MM who were not candidates for stem cell transplantation, age ≥18 yr, ECOG PS 0–3, evaluable or measurable disease, ANC >1500, platelets > 100,000 and creatinine ≤ 3.0 mg/dL were eligible. All patients received aspirin 325 mg/d as DVT prophylaxis. Routine antibacterial prophylaxis was not used. G/GM-CSF was used at the discretion of the treating physician for neutropenia. Response rate (RR), confirmed on two consecutive determinations was the primary end-point. The study had 90% power to detect a RR of at least 45%. Results: Twenty-six patients were accrued between July ’06 and Feb ’08. The median age was 74 y (64 – 87y), 17 (65%) were men. Six, 13, 6, 1 (23%, 50%, 23%, and 4%) patients had ECOG PS 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Three (12%), 11 (42%) and 10 (38%) patients were ISS stage 1, 2 and 3. A total of 106 cycles were administered; median 4.5 (1–13). Seventy-seven % patients experienced at least 1 grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Neutropenia (42%/8%) and thrombocytopenia (20%/8%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events followed by anemia (16%/0%), fatigue (8%/4%), rash (11%/0%), and hyperglycemia (4%/0%). There were 20 treatment delays in 9 patients, and 18 dose reductions (9 in R, 11 in M and 1 P) occurred in 7 patients, most commonly because of neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Eleven patients (42%) required G-CSF treatment. Eleven patients are currently receiving treatment; 15 have gone off study (4 completed per protocol, 3 refused, 3 adverse effects, 3 unrelated illnesses, 2 other). Median follow up of survivors is 8 m (0 – 22m). Eighteen (69 %; 95%CI 48–86) patients had a PR or better according to International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria; 3 (12 %) CR, 5 (19 %) VGPR and 10 (38%) PR. Median number of cycles before achieving a response was 2 (1 – 11). Median Progression Free and Overall Survival is 16.7m (95% CI 11.2–23.0), and 23 m (95% CI: 22 – 23), respectively. Conclusions: MPR combination is feasible with a manageable toxicity profile and has significant activity in the treatment of patients with MM who are not candidates for stem cell transplant, with an overall response rate of 69%, and a CR plus VGPR rate of 31%. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was the most common toxicity, seen in up to 50% of patients in this cohort of predominantly elderly patients. Dose reduction in R and/or M was required in 27% patients. No patient developed neuropathy or thromboembolic complications.
Long Term Follow-up of Patients with Immunoglobulin Light Chain Amyloidosis Treated with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone.
Abstract Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder. Lenalidomide, especially in conjunction with dexamethasone, has been shown to be highly active in patients with multiple myeloma. We previously reported a hematologic response rate of 41% and an organ response rate of 23% among 22 AL patients treated with lenalidomide and on-demand dexamethasone (Dispenzieri et al, Blood 2007). Long term outcomes of AL patients treated with lenalidomide have not yet been described. Methods: Thirty-seven patients were treated on an IRB approved treatment trial with single agent lenalidomide, starting doses of 25 mg in 22 and reduced dose of 15 mg in the last 15. If progression within or no evidence of hematologic response after 3 cycles, dexamethasone was added. Patients were classified according to cardiac biomarker stage (cut-offs for serum troponin T <0.035 ng/ml and NT-proBNP <332 pg/ml--Stage I neither above cutoff; Stage III, both above cut-off; and Stage II, any one above cut-off). Survival estimates were done according to the methods of Kaplan and Meier. Results: Median age was 64 years (range 44–88), with 70% male. Sixty-five percent of patients were previously treated, and the median time from diagnosis to study entry was 8.9 months (range 0.4–237). The biomarker staging breakdown was: I, 16%; II, 43%; and III, 41%. As of 7/11/08, 5 patients remain on active therapy. The overall hematologic response rate was 43% (1 CR and 15 PR), with only one patient responding to single agent lenalidomide, and the overall organ response rate was 20%. If one excludes the 13 patients who did not complete 3 months of therapy and have the opportunity of having dexamethasone added to their program, the respective hematologic and organ response rates were 62% and 32%. With a median follow-up of 33.6 months (range 14.4–42), twenty-two patients (59%) have died, but only 2 had deaths possibly related to treatment. Median duration of response, progression free survival and overall survival were 31 months, 14.8 months (95%CI: 5.7–28.1), and 18.8 months (95%CI: 11.7-not reached), respectively. Overall survival from diagnosis was 48 months (95%CI: 21.6–153.6). As shown in Table below, outcomes were dependent on underlying risk stratification and ability to stay on therapy. High risk patients were more likely to drop out early and less likely to respond. High risk patients had shorter OS All Patients Outcome Stage I Stage II Stage III p N 6 16 15 Survival from enrollment, mo NR 18.8 (11.7–33.6) 5.7 (3.2–18.3) 0.01 Survival from Diagnosis, mo NR 48.4 (20.4–62) 21.1 (11.2–31.7) 0.005 Progression Free Survival, mo 34.7 (33.7–NR) 18.3 (6.2–28.1) 4.4 (3–8.6) NS Drop out by cycle 4, % 17 31 60 NS Median # of cycles administered 31 6 3 0.04 Time to response, mo 6.2 (3.6–9.3) 6.4 (5.2–NR) 4.7 (3.8–NR) NS Hematologic response rate, % 83 38 27 0.05 Organ response rate, % 40 20 13 NS Duration of Response, mo NR 27.2 (13.6–NR) NR NS Subgroup analysis of patients receiving >3 cycles of therapy (i.e getting Len and Dex) N 5 12 7 Time on therapy, mo 35.2 8 10.5 Hematologic Response Rate, % 100 50 56 Organ response rate, % 50 27 25 Conclusions: Based on these data, single agent lenalidomide is not recommended for patients with AL; however, lenalidomide in combination with dexamethasone can be associated with good progression free and overall survival rates, even among patients with relapsed or refractory disease.
Immunoglobulin Variable Light Chain Restriction, Cytokine Expression and Plasma Cell-Stromal Cell Interactions in POEMS Syndrome Patients
Abstract POEMS syndrome is defined by the presence of peripheral neuropathy (P), organomegaly (O), endocrinopathy (E), monoclonal protein expression (M), and skin changes (S). In addition, patients also have sclerotic bone lesions, papilledema, extravascular volume overload, thrombocytosis, and restrictive lung disease/pulmonary hypertension. A striking but inexplicable feature of the clonal plasma cells in patients with POEMS is that they are virtually always lambda restricted. More surprising is that of the 81 functional immunoglobulin light-chain variable-region genes (IgVL) available in the plasma cell/B cell repertoire, among the 13 cases in which variable gene light chain usage has been reported, all have been either IgVL1-40 or IgVL1-44. The molecular mechanisms triggering the initiation and the progression of POEMS syndrome or the clonal expansion of plasma cells marking this condition remain unclear. We have analyzed the immunoglobulin heavy and light chains sequences in the plasma cells of POEMS patients at the Mayo Clinic Rochester. We found that in 8 out of the 9 patients tested, we could document heavy chain clonality in any given patient; however, no restriction of gene usage among patients was observed in the variable regions of these chains. In the case of light chains, in 14 out of 17 patients we could document not only clonality but also restriction of light chain variable gene usage to IgVL1-40 or IgVL1-44. Our goal is to understand the relevance of this restricted expression of light chain variable region, and its effect on the communication between plasma cells and the neighboring stromal cells that might provide more insight into the disease pathology. To this end, we are generating viral vector constructs that will harbor the germline or mutant versions of IgVλ1-40 and IgVλ1-44 genes and introduced into pre-established malignant plasma cell lines (i.e. myeloma cell lines). We will assay the effects of this over expression in terms of alterations in the expression of cytokines such as VEGF and TNF, and on plasma cell-stromal cell interaction (in a co-culture system). Results from these assays will be discussed.
Post Autologous Transplantation Consolidation of Multiple Myeloma with Idiotype-Pulsed Antigen Presenting (Dendritic) Cells (APC8020) Is Associated with Prolonged Survival.
Abstract Introduction: Immunotherapy is most likely to work in a setting of low tumor burden, making vaccine strategies attractive as maintenance therapy post autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). However, it is difficult to ascertain the effects of the vaccines from delayed responses to the transplant. A novel immunotherapeutic, APC8020 (Mylovenge), was studied as consolidation therapy after for MM post PBSCT (Mayo vaccine trial). Mylovenge is prepared from autologous antigen presenting cells, including dendritic cells, partially purified from an unmobilized leukapheresis product by gradient density isolation and then incubated for two days with autologous serum containing M protein obtained pretransplant. We report long term results of the Mayo vaccine trial compared retrospectively to a consecutive cohort of MM patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplant at Mayo Clinic during the same time period. Methods: The Mayo vaccine trial patients had transplants between July of 1998 and May of 2001. Using these cutoff dates we analyzed 151 total MM patients, 27 from the vaccine trial (9 newly diagnosed and 18 relapsed) and 124 from database (DB) (50 newly diagnosed patients and 74 relapsed). The median (range) of follow-up for alive patients in vaccine trial is 6.5 years (2.9 – 8), and in the DB is 7.1 years (6 – 8). Two-sided Fisher’s exact tests and stratified log rank tests (with newly diagnosed or relapsed as the stratum) were used to compare baseline patient characteristics and time to event distributions (overall survival – OS, progression free survival – PFS, and time to progression – TTP) between the two groups. Results: The median (range) of age in vaccine trial and DB was 56 (30–69) and 57 (36–71) years respectively. There were no significant differences in the known prognostic factors including PCLI, B2M, and CRP. The median (95% confidence interval - CI) TTP for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 1.5 years (1.3 – 2.4) and 1.6 years (1.3 – 1.8); stratified log rank p value = 0.46. The median (95% CI) PFS for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 1.5 years (1.3 – 2.4) and 1.5 years (1.1 – 1.8), stratified logrank p value = 0.30. The median (95% CI) OS for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 5.3 years (4.0 -N/A), and 3.4 years (2.7 – 4.6); stratified logrank p value = 0.02. Conclusions: Despite the fact that no difference was seen in TTP or PFS, post-transplant vaccine therapy was associated with prolonged survival. This is similar to what has been reported in other tumor systems including prostate cancer and glioblastoma multiforme. This approach warrants further investigation, including preclinical studies aimed at optimizing the immune response and randomized trials to define the role of vaccine therapy in myeloma. Figure Figure