Gloviczki, Péter

Objective: Endoleaks are critical complications of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study sought to determine the frequency and nature of intraoperative endoleaks and their impact on postoperative endoleak-related events. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who underwent EVAR at our institution. The impact of intraoperative endoleaks on postoperative endoleak rates and endoleak-related reintervention rates were assessed. Results: From December 18, 1996, to May 21, 2003, 241 patients underwent EVAR. An endoleak was observed during 126 (52.3%) procedures. Type I endoleaks were observed in 63 (26.1%) cases: 35 proximal and 31 distal endoleaks (3 cases at both attachments). Angioplasty, additional cuff placement, or stenting corrected 59 (89.4%) of these endoleaks. A total of 71 type II intraoperative endoleaks (29.5%) and 8 type IV endoleaks (3.3%) were observed without any attempted corrective maneuvers. Ten type III endoleaks (4.2%) occurred but all resolved with angioplasty or additional cuff placement. In all, 86 (35.7%) endoleaks persisted on completion angiogram. Patients with a type I or type II intraoperative endoleak were more likely to have an endoleak at 1.5 years (31.4% vs. 21.6%, P = .018). Reinterventions were required more often after an intraoperative type I endoleak (10% vs. 4%, P = .003). Patients with intraoperative endoleaks demonstrated a trend toward less postoperative aneurysm diameter reduction at 2 years (43.8% vs. 74.5%, P = .104). Conclusion: The presence of a type I or a type II endoleak during EVAR significantly increases the likelihood of a postoperative endoleak and should prompt a high degree of suspicion during follow-up.

Background Paraplegia is a devastating complication for patients undergoing repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. A monitor to detect spinal cord ischemia is necessary if anesthesiologists are to intervene to protect the spinal cord during aortic aneurysm clamping. Methods The medical records of 60 patients who underwent thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair with regional lumbar epidural cooling with evoked potential monitoring were reviewed. The authors analyzed latency and amplitude of motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, and H reflexes before cooling and clamping, after cooling and before clamping, during clamping, and after release of aortic cross clamp. Results Twenty minutes after the aortic cross clamp was placed, motor evoked potentials had 88% sensitivity and 65% specificity in predicting spinal cord ischemia. The negative predictive value of motor evoked potentials at 20 min after aortic cross clamping was 96%. Conclusions Rapid loss of motor evoked potentials or H reflexes after application of the aortic cross clamp identifies a subgroup of patients who are at high risk of developing spinal cord ischemia and in whom aggressive anesthetic and surgical interventions may be justified.

Between 1986 and 2005, 22 patients (mean age, 14.7 years; range, 3-21) with renal hypertension underwent renal artery revascularization for 28 lesions, 23 with open repair (OR) and 5 with percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA). Thirty-day morbidity was 17% (4/23). Hypertension was cured in 13 (57%), improved in 8 (38%), and unchanged in 1 (5%). Renal function worsened in 1. At a mean follow-up of 4.9 years, 1-year patency rate was 94% and maintained for 5 years. Hypertension at 1 year was cured in 6 of 14 patients (43%; OR, 4; PTRA, 2) and improved in 8 (57%; OR, 7; PTRA, 1); hypertension at 5 years was cured in 50% and improved in 50%. Renal function remained unchanged in all patients who were followed. The authors conclude that both OR and PTRA benefit pediatric patients. PTRA for selected patients may be promising as a first line treatment or as a bridge to definitive OR in children with small arteries.

Medical and surgical emergencies occasionally present as ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAA). To assess benefits of laparotomies and adverse effects of unnecessary operations, the authors reviewed their experience. Thirteen patients, 9 women, 4 men (mean age: 72 years, range: 41-85) underwent emergency laparotomy between 1988 and 1996 for presumed RAAA and were found to have other surgical or medical emergencies. All the patients presented with hypotension, 12 had abdominal or back pain, four had pulsatile abdominal mass. Rupture was not excluded by computed tomography scan in three or by ultrasonography in two patients. Laparotomy disclosed intact abdominal aorta in all, but seven patients had abdominal aortic aneurysm. Of five surgical emergencies, laparotomy was indicated in four: three for ruptured visceral artery aneurysms, one for perforated duodenal ulcer. The fifth patient required thoracotomy for ruptured thoracic aneurysm. Four of eight medical emergencies were myocardial infarctions. One iatro genic complication required reoperation for bleeding. Mean hospital stay was 18 days; mean hospital charges were $40,771. Seven (54%) early deaths occurred; none were caused directly by the operation. Laparotomy was indicated in one third of deceptive emergencies that present as RAAA. Although mortality, morbidity, and costs were high, iatrogenic surgical complica tions were rare and deaths were not caused by unnecessary operations.

The coexistence of urologic malignancy (UM) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is rare. Simultaneous treatment may increase morbidity, whereas staged operations delay necessary treatment. We reviewed our experience to develop guidelines for evaluation and management. Clinical data of all patients diagnosed between 1980 and 1998 with both AAA and UM, who also had staged or simultaneous surgical treatment were reviewed. Four thousand forty-seven patients underwent AAA repair during the study period at our institution. Of these, 18 (0.44%) patients, 16 men and two women (mean age: 74 years, range: 61 to 92) had UM. UM was discovered incidentally in nine patients with AAA with computed tomography (CT) scan (7) and ultrasonography (2). In one patient with AAA, hematuria raised the suspicion of UM. Eight patients were diagnosed with AAA during evaluation of UM by CT scan or ultrasound (7) or during laparotomy (1). Initial signs and symptoms included abdominal pain (33%), gross hematuria (33%), and urinary tract infections (17%), although 33% were asymptomatic. The AAA was symptomatic at first examination in three (17%) patients, 14 (78%) patients had hypertension, and two (11%) had renal insufficiency (overall mean serum creatinine: 1.6, range: 0.8 to 3.7). Mean AAA diameter was 5.8 cm (range: 3.8 to 8 cm). Aortography documented significant contralateral renal artery disease in two patients. Twelve patients underwent simultaneous AAA repair and resection of UM; the operations were staged in six (AAA repair first in 2, nephrectomy first in 4). One patient required emergent repair of a ruptured AAA three days after nephrectomy. UM was treated with nephrectomy in 17 patients, and with bilateral ureterectomy and cystectomy in one. A straight aortic graft was implanted in seven patients, a bifurcated graft in ten, and one had extra-anatomic reconstruction. Two patients required reconstruction of the contralateral renal artery. The 30-day mortality rate was 0% after staged and 6% after simultaneous repair (p= >0.1). Major perioperative complications occurred more frequently after simultaneous (42%) than after staged repair (33%), although the difference was not significant (p= >0.1). Two patients developed postoperative renal failure. Seventeen patients were followed for an average of 3.9 years (14 days to 10.8 years). Three (17%) patients died of recurrent cancer at 1, 10.7, and 10.8 years after surgery. Patients with resectable UM have satisfactory long-term survival, which justifies aggressive treatment of concomitant AAA. Aortography in these patients is suggested to exclude contralateral renal artery disease. Complications were frequent, but simultaneous repair did not increase morbidity or mortality significantly. The risk of AAA rupture after nephrectomy, need to correct contralateral renal artery disease at the time of nephrectomy, and disadvantage of delaying treatment of UM are compelling reasons to favor simultaneous treatment of AAA and UM.

Successful replacements of the superior vena cava (SVC) using autogenous saphenous or superficial femoral vein or prosthetic grafts have been previously performed, but the use of allograft for treatment of SVC syndrome has not been reported. The patient treated by the authors was a forty-one-year-old woman who presented with severe venous congestion of the head and neck caused by fibrosing mediastinitis. In addition, she had sclerosing cholangitis and chronic liver failure. To treat her SVC syndrome and provide access for fluid and blood transfusion and for possible venovenous bypass, SVC reconstruction was performed concomitant to orthotopic liver transplantation. A left innominate vein-right atrial bypass was inserted using an iliocaval allograft. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery, and at six months after surgery her SVC allograft is widely patent and her transplanted liver is functioning well. The venous allograft is an excellent conduit for those patients who are receiving immunosuppression therapy to avoid rejection of a transplanted organ.